Webex Reviews

We use the solution for voice calls, desktop sharing, and sharing drawings or texts for presentations.

The solution is useful for communication. It provides the basic features available in other products.

The solution is heavy and slow. It takes too much time to open. It is a bit old. I do not feel comfortable using it.

I have been using the solution for six years, but not frequently.

I rate the stability a five out of ten.

The initial setup was easy.

Microsoft Teams and Zoom are better than Webex. Webex is pretty slow compared to Microsoft Teams and Zoom. Microsoft Teams is also a bit heavy and slow. I like Zoom. I feel more comfortable using Teams and Zoom. I have been using them for a long time.

We use the solution rarely. I use Webex only when our partners ask us to join meetings through Webex. I might not be comfortable using Webex because I do not use it frequently. Our organization takes care of our security needs. Overall, I rate the product a four out of ten.

We use the product for attending training webinars, meetings, and team collaboration.

The product's most valuable flexibility of features is particularly in terms of the user experience, from joining meetings to the controls available during the meetings. We can easily manage the audio-visual aspects as well.

There could be a feature available to record the meetings.

I have been using Webex for half a year. At present, I use the latest version.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

The number of times we use the platform depends on a particular virtual event. It varies from every day to once in a week or month. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

We use different webinar platforms, including Webex, Teams, and GoToWebinar, depending on the organization's needs.

Compared to Teams, I rate Webex's initial setup process a ten.

Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings. The whole platform works well in terms of productivity. Its integration with other tools has improved workflow efficiency.

It is an easy-to-use tool with lots of reliability. It should be considered by every potential user looking for a meeting platform.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

I like Webex because it is easy to work with.

In terms of improvement, every time I want to join a meeting on the web, I have to download an extension or the desktop app. It would be better if I could just join meetings directly on the web without extra downloads and steps. Simplifying this process would make things more straightforward and convenient for users like me.

I have been working with Webex for almost four years.

I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten. It is most suitable for small to medium businesses.

I have used Microsoft Teams along with other solutions like Webex, and in comparison, Teams stands out for its seamless integration with Office 365. The compatibility with business needs makes Teams a preferred choice. While both Teams and Webex serve their purposes, the ease of use and integration with Microsoft's suite of tools make Teams a more convenient option for me.

The initial setup was not overly difficult, but it was time-consuming.

For those considering using Webex, my advice would be to explore automation options, especially if there is an outside team involved. Automating certain tasks can streamline processes and make using Webex more efficient. Overall, I would rate Webex as an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for virtual meetings including video conferences. I'm an IT programmer. 

The stability of the solution is the most important thing. I've used Teams previously and we had a lot of issues with stability. 

I'd like to see a modernized user interface, something a bit more colorful. In that sense, a solution like Teams is much better, it has a modern UI.  

I've been using this solution for two years. 

It's quite scalable, we've had large numbers on WebEx conferences.

We previously used MyMeeting which is more of a boardroom hosted environment where you can connect boardroom Polycom devices to a virtual cloud meeting room. 

I recommend this product and rate it eight out of 10. 

I use Webex for virtual meetings.

Webex could improve the performance.

I have been using Webex for approximately one year.

Webex could be more stable.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution in my organization.

We have not contacted technical support.

I have used Skype for Business previously.

The implmentation of Webex is simple. It does not a lot of time.

We no longer use Webex because we found Microsoft Teams to be more stable.

I rate Webex a six out of ten.

We are using Webex for meetings.

The most valuable feature of Webex is ease to use.

The GUI of Webex should be improved. The connectivity for putting people inside the meetings or entering meetings is to be improved. 

When you mute or unmute someone in Webex it causes a tone or a sound that can be distracting. For example, in Microsoft Teams when someone is muted or unmuted it is silent. When we have a meeting with 100 people the noises are too much. Webex needs to reduce the number of noises activated by using the solution.

I have been using Webex for approximately two years.

We have approximately 100 people in m organization using this solution.

I have not contacted the support from Webex.

I have previously used Microsoft Teams and Zoom. 

Microsoft Teams and Zoom are better than Webex, I have not seen anything special features in Webex.

The setup of Webex is simple.

I have seen Webex improve over the past year. My most recent meeting using Webex was good. Before Webex was the worst meeting platform I used. Every time I went into a meeting, I hang up there for approximately 10 minutes sometimes till I was inside the meeting. Zoom or Microsoft Teams did not have this issue, I was quickly inside the meeting.

We mostly use Microsoft Teams in my organization. 

I rate Webex a seven out of ten.

I am a reseller and use Webex to host calls with my clients and other associates within my enterprise.

I enjoy being able to make video calls.

I would like the next release to be more user-friendly. 

I have been using Webex for about six years.

The solution is stable.

I do not consider Webex to be too scalable.

The initial setup was easy but it was difficult to integrate it within my environment.

I had a hard time integrating this solution within my environment. I prefer Microsoft Teams over Webex.

Webex is used mainly for virtual meetings.

The most valuable features of Webex are the depth of the tone and the quality of the picture. I find them better than Teams or Zoom.

Webex could improve the sharing features.

Everybody these days uses virtual meeting solutions because we're all remote working. It would be a benefit if there were permanent collaboration spaces for projects. For example, the way Teams has its teams folders and shared locations.  Webex is missing that feature, or maybe it has it and I'm not aware of it. However, it needs a permanent sharing location for when projects can get stored and can be a collaboration space as opposed to only a meeting space.

I have been using Webex since it was released, approximately 20 years ago.

The stability of Webex is good. I have a very good home bandwidth, the stability isn't an issue.

The biggest Webexsession I have ever done was with approximately 120 people, but typically the sessions are between 15 and 20 people.

I have used other similar solutions, such as Teams and Zoom.

I did not do the implementation of Webex. However, it took one or two minutes to be installed.

I rate Webex an eight out of ten.