Webex Reviews

We primarily use WebEx as our internal chat platform, as well as ad hoc meetings and client meetings. 

This solution is cloud-based, so we are always using the latest version. 

One of the most valuable features of WebEx is that it's very quick for ad hoc meetings, and I use it all day, every day, for internal chat with my team. It's just a good platform. 

The performance of WebEx could be improved. If you're using it on a mobile device and on the laptop, you sometimes get glitches, where you've answered the call or joined a meeting on a laptop and your mobile device doesn't quite know what's going on. It may just be technical glitches, but it seems to be a bit shaky sometimes on mobile devices. 

I have been using WebEx for about a year or so. 

The stability seemed fine, for our use. 

The scalability is fine. 

There are probably about 50-60 of us using it internally and, to a degree, with some of our external clients and consultants. 

I have never personally contacted technical support, but my team has. 

We also use Teams and Zoom. WebEx is a bit clunky for lots of external meetings, so we also use Teams because a lot of our clients have it. Teams also has IMing, but WebEx is sort of defaulted as our major platform, internally. 

The installation is very straightforward. I can do it myself, and it took a couple of minutes. You don't need a technical team. 

I implemented this solution myself. 

I rate WebEx a nine out of ten. It's a pretty good platform and it does what you expect from it. 

Webex is very good for webinars and presentations. I used it for attending Cisco webinars and other security training. It's very good.

Overall the quality of the solution is very good.

The solution can improve by adding a smaller version for small business usage or for personal use. The solution is geared towards larger companies and enterprises.

I have been using Webex for approximately one year.

Webex has been scalable.

We plan to increase the usage of Webex.

I have been in contact with the support for Webex and they have always solved our issue in a timely manner.

I have used Zoom previously and if I had to choose which one I prefer, I would pick Webex.

The installation is simple, and it takes approximately one hour.

I am able to do the implementation myself.

There are licenses for business to use the solution but for end-users, there is not.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Webex an eight out of ten.

The WebEx interface is not as user-friendly as Zoom's. There is room for improvement there. I ran into some connectivity issues with WebEx in previous versions but those have been fixed now. 

I do not use it as much as I used to. WebEx seems to be losing ground to competitors like Zoom. At least this is the case in my environment. 

My primary use case of Webex is virtual conferences. 

Webex is cloud-based. 

A valuable feature of Webex is that it's useful for virtual meetings and similar webinars. 

Webex's stability could be improved. 

I have been using Webex for more than six years. 

Webex should be more stable. I have had some problems with connection, and it can be complicated in some areas. 

This solution is scalable. 

The installation is straightforward, but it can be tricky parts when opening a session on your mobile phone or laptop. 

Webex is expensive, especially compared to Zoom or Google. 

Zoom or Google could be good solutions for medium-sized or cost-conscious companies. However, not every country in the world can use all software—in some countries you cannot use Google, in some you cannot use Webex. 

I rate Webex a seven out of ten. Whether I would recommend Webex to others depends on the size and policy of a company. If they decide that they want to have an image or a reputation to show that they are a big corporation, and use a high brand product, they could use Webex. However, if they're just a medium company and very cost-conscious, then there are other options. It really depends on the image of your company, as well as your network condition. 

I used Webex for virtual meetings.

It is a valuable solution for virtual meetings.

The solution could improve by having better integration with other platforms.

I have been using Webex for approximately three years.

Webex is scalable.

We have approximately 200 people in my organization that has been using this solution.

I have used Microsoft Teams and I prefer it Webex.

There is a license needed to use this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Webex a seven out of ten.

This solution is used for virtual meetings.

The solution is user-friendly.

The solution could improve by having more dashboards and enhancing the processing speed.

I have been using Webex for approximately three years.

I have approximately 50 using the solution in my organization. We have plans to increase the usage of the solution.

We have used Microsoft Teams.

The installation is straightforward. 

I am able to do the implementation of Webex.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Webex a seven out of ten.

Our primary use for Webex is for virtual meetings.

The interface of Webex should be improved and it is difficult to find information.

I have been using Webex for six months.

The solution is perfectly stable, it normally performs very well.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 500 people using this solution.

I have not needed to contact support.

I previously used Microsoft Teams and Zoom. I liked Teams more than the others.

Our IT teams do the implementation of the solution.

We paid for our Webex license as a bundle.

I would not recommend this solution to others.

I rate Webex a six out of ten.

We use Webex for virtual meetings.

We have actually shifted from Webex to Teams. It was a company decision made by a few of the managers. To make Webex more competitive, I would suggest lowering the price and providing some of the same features that are in Teams or Zoom.

We have a yearly license. I think the price of Webex could be cheaper. 

I rate Webex seven out of 10.