- Team collaboration
- Webinars
- Team collaboration
- Webinars
- Relieved some bandwidth
- Freed up budget
- Customer Service/Support
- UX
- 3 years
- No, pretty easy
- No
- No
- Poor
Technical Support:- Average
- Switched from WebEx to another provider
- Straightforward
- In-house
- Annual contracts can be rough
- This is the best everyone knows about, but there are plenty other players.
I just finished one month of repeated emails, phone calls, and online test sessions with Cisco WebEx tech support. We found the answer to the problem I originally reported to them and in an attempt to save others the same frustration I thought I would write it up in this post.
The symptom I observed was that the In-Event Activity Report for one of my WebEx Event Center webinars contained columns showing results for some of the polls we had run, but others were missing.
It turns out that this was because WEBEX ONLY CAPTURES IN-EVENT ACTIVITY INFORMATION WHILE THE RECORDER IS RUNNING.
My first two polls were just audience demographics, asked while giving the live audience their instructions about using the conferencing software. I don't record that, because viewers of the archive have no reason to care and they can't participate. I start the recording after giving instructions and before introducing the content. Turns out this is a very bad idea if you want a report.
If you look hard enough, you can find a WebEx Knowledge Base Article (WBX45170) that tells you "In-Event Activity Reports are only available for events recorded on the server (Network-Based Recording)." But it never mentions the fact that information is only captured while the recorder is on.
I can't think of any way to describe this other than product design insanity. Reports are vital records of what happened during a web session. They should be… must be… divorced from any decisions I make about whether I want to make an archive recording, what portions of the event I elect to record, and whether I store the recording on disk or the network server.
The In-Event Activity Report is very important in WebEx, because it offers the only combined, integrated record of attendee interactions. The only other way to see their chat messages, Q&A questions, or poll responses is to manually save multiple distinct files before you close your meeting session. And all three of those interaction reports are in significantly different formats. Hell, they don't even go to the same default directory on your hard drive.
I expect more from the market share leader in the world of web events. WebEx has a massive customer base, a long product history, and plenty of real world usage experience. We should not have to put up with substandard reporting of our critical event data.
You outlined perfectly some pros and cons that WebEx has. I would like to add features that helped me when using WebEx at my workplace.
Since it is software as a service, the user only needs to subscribe to the service and have Internet access and he is ready to go. With WebEx, no download is necessary, and the audience does not need to be a subscriber to watch and listen. One of the distinct pro of WebEx is that it successfully combines the online viewing portion with the ability to teleconference easily and be connected to the webinar via the access code. This lets the presenters know who is actually there during the presentation, without need for a time consuming roll call.
More features from WebEx include the ability to easily share documents, presentations, or applications. With a simple click, the user can allow someone else on the other side of the world the opportunity to present, either with their computer, or by taking remote control of his computer. Another pro of web conferencing with WebEx is the ability to access a recording of the meeting. Also, WebEx is fully scalable.
We use the product for attending training webinars, meetings, and team collaboration.
The product's most valuable flexibility of features is particularly in terms of the user experience, from joining meetings to the controls available during the meetings. We can easily manage the audio-visual aspects as well.
There could be a feature available to record the meetings.
I have been using Webex for half a year. At present, I use the latest version.
I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.
The number of times we use the platform depends on a particular virtual event. It varies from every day to once in a week or month. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.
We use different webinar platforms, including Webex, Teams, and GoToWebinar, depending on the organization's needs.
Compared to Teams, I rate Webex's initial setup process a ten.
Webex has enhanced the remote team collaboration process regarding time management and cost savings. The whole platform works well in terms of productivity. Its integration with other tools has improved workflow efficiency.
It is an easy-to-use tool with lots of reliability. It should be considered by every potential user looking for a meeting platform.
I rate it a nine out of ten.
I like Webex because it is easy to work with.
In terms of improvement, every time I want to join a meeting on the web, I have to download an extension or the desktop app. It would be better if I could just join meetings directly on the web without extra downloads and steps. Simplifying this process would make things more straightforward and convenient for users like me.
I have been working with Webex for almost four years.
I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten. It is most suitable for small to medium businesses.
I have used Microsoft Teams along with other solutions like Webex, and in comparison, Teams stands out for its seamless integration with Office 365. The compatibility with business needs makes Teams a preferred choice. While both Teams and Webex serve their purposes, the ease of use and integration with Microsoft's suite of tools make Teams a more convenient option for me.
The initial setup was not overly difficult, but it was time-consuming.
For those considering using Webex, my advice would be to explore automation options, especially if there is an outside team involved. Automating certain tasks can streamline processes and make using Webex more efficient. Overall, I would rate Webex as an eight out of ten.
We use the solution for multiple purposes, including collaborative meetings and online education through web events, seminars, practical sessions, and lab sessions.
The solution provides a secure environment for meetings. Along with this, its feature for conducting exams works the best. In addition, it helps the instructor to monitor student engagement during online educational sessions.
They should integrate the solution with multiple hardware vendors.
I have been using the solution for more than ten years.
It is a stable solution. I rate its stability ten out of ten.
It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability ten out of ten.
Technical support is optional for the solution as it is never out of connectivity or has latency issues.
I have used Zoom and Microsoft Teams before. In comparison, Webex provides additional features and a standard license policy.
The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.
The solution is low-cost for a hybrid model.
It is a unique solution. I rate it ten out of ten.
Thanks for adding your comments Alin Radu! You've highlighted more nice features.