Webex Reviews

We have online meetings using Webex, which include sharing our screens and running different kinds of scenarios.

The most valuable option is screen sharing.

Webex offers dial-in numbers for participants to join the conference, which makes it easier when we deal with international participants.

This solution is easy to deploy and integrates well.

The recording of sessions works well.

I would like to see the addition of new features that will add value to the product. These include things including a faster save or download time for conferences.

I have been using Webex for two years.

We haven't had any problems with stability.

This is a scalable solution. We have about 400,000 employees who can each use Webex.

We have an internal team and haven't had any problems that required contacting technical support.

it is very easy to install and we didn't have any challenges with it.

As an end-consumer, I think that the product is fine. I am happy with all of the features and happy with the product overall. It is one that I recommend. Any new features coming in at the point are just going to add value.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

I use Webex Meeting daily to make all kinds of virtual meetings with my clients, colleagues, and suppliers. It helps me to carry out surveys on needs or help clients create smart accounts or review problems on their platform, all without moving from the office or my house, even from the cell phone.

Webex has helped me to give my customers a much faster response without the need to mobilize, so it avoids transport costs and times. It allows us to improve the SLA contracted by customers, so we can improve our contracts. This ultimately translates into greater profit.

The best feature is to be able to share the screen or just some application we want, even a video or audio, then request the remote control of the device with which they have connected. The latter helps solve problems much faster, rather than guiding the customer.

In the latest version, they have greatly improved access to virtual meeting rooms and it is quite intuitive.

I think options during a meeting can be further improved. You should explore a lot to see the information in the room, for example.

The modification of the email template is not very intuitive.

In the last year, only one time have we run out of service. There was an update that meant that for a couple of days, there is no service worldwide. But, it was only a single time and even the president of Cisco came out to apologize.

The solution scales to what one decides. It has practically no limits.

Cisco has a help desk that works twenty-four hours a day. Depending on the service contract, a case can be opened at any time and an engineer will take it to help solve the problem. If this engineer cannot, it will be escalated until it is resolved.

I have used Microsoft's solution with Skype for Business, but it does not integrate as natively with video devices as Webex Meeting does.

The initial setup is really very easy. However, you better not make a mistake in creating the site, because it is not possible to delete it on your own. To delete it, you must open a case with Cisco support.

We ourselves have implemented it.

Just because you don't need a transfer to support customers or get together, it makes the solution pay for itself.

The cost of installation is free and it is not required to install anything since it is a cloud service.

The price of the license depends a lot on the type of service required and whether it is for the entire company or only for a few users. It becomes much cheaper when used by the entire company.

I tried BlueJeans and Zoom before choosing this solution.

The solution really is very good. In the last year, it has improved a lot, including the recording of the meetings has improved and been perfected.

Cisco WebEx solution is used for voice and web conferencing across five domestic manufacturing facilities. The service enables our locations to utilize not only voice conferencing but also web which allows sharing of content.

It allows for collaboration between like teams located in different manufacturing facilities as well as corporate offices, including training.

The call me feature is one of the features our employees seem to love, they hate having to locate a phone number to call in to it. They say it is cumbersome.

In collaborating we sometimes find it difficult to let others "control" your meeting while they speak, users say it is cumbersome to "pass the puck".

We have had some audio quality issues, and troubleshooting can be difficult because of the details you need to provide to Cisco/WebEx, and that the call needs to have taken place very recently. We have users that sometimes don't even report the issue for a day or two.

We have had no issues with any limitations WebEx may have.

We have had some audio quality issues, and troubleshooting can be difficult because of the details you need to provide to Cisco/WebEx and that the call needs to have taken place very recently. We have users that sometimes don't even report the issue for a day or two.

InterCall: not as much collaboration ability.

Straightforward. Rolled out to users without issue.

Both, we had vendor assistance, but communication came from in-house to end users.

Unknown.

Yes, I don't remember.

Be aware of the different costs associated with voice and data (even if you don't use it you may still be charged).

It allows me to conduct meetings, share files, record events, chat, and have presentations with co-workers.

Webinar.

The charges for US and Asia vary greatly.  It costs more to subscribe to WebEx in Asia.

No stability issues.

No scalability issues.

Very good. Phone support is available 24/7 to get technical help.

I have recently switched to a different solution. WebEx is more costly. There are equivalent solutions at a lower cost.

Set up is convenient.

WebEx is cost effective if the company or individual is located in the US.

Zoom is a good equivalent and alternative.

If you are not located in the US, do consider Zoom.

Using it for web conferencing, and for screen and documents sharing between members of geographically distributed teams. 

Team members do not need to use public solutions to collaborate on complex projects, share files and screens.

• Audio and video conferencing
• Screen demonstration and control
• Document sharing

Webex is mostly doing its job without any issues. The only thing it maybe needs is a chat. It is not very comfortable to use. Private and public messages is a good idea, but it is too easy to select the wrong option.

No issues.

No issues.

Using it anywhere on any devices.

Having the quickest meetings ever.

Overall collaborations.

I have used it for one year.

No issues.

No issues.

No issues.

A 10 out of 10.

A 10 out of 10.

Jabber. It was less flexible, which is why we switched.

The initial setup was easy and quick.

It was implemented through a vendor team. I would give them a 10 out of 10.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Improved collaboration.

Cisco Spark has changed the concept of team messaging and communication in a very dramatic way. Messaging, meeting, and delivery calling are now easy from the cloud. This app also ensures security of the users by providing an encrypted and feasible chance for enterprise-wide engagement. The part I like best is that I can communicate with team members easily and also can have private chats outside the main room. Users can share content in a meeting, when in a call, or when messaging anyone, and the app can be accessed on smart phones, browsers, and dedicated downloads on Windows or Mac desktops.

Though it is a nice app to work with, it has downsides, too. It is not very user-friendly. Sometimes users cannot use voice recognition to send a message. Sometimes messages will not send, icons sometimes will not load, and those things disappoint a user. They should work on solving these issues as soon as possible.

One year.

No issues.

No issues.

No issues.

Good.

Awesome.

No.

The possibility to have conferences with several people. The best feature is that you know to whom you are talking. It's not like a phone conference where someone is talking, but if you don't recognize the voice, you don't know who is talking.

Also, I like the ability to integrate video conference into the meeting.

I'm work at Telefonica International. This tool improves our communications with people all around the globe.

Cisco WebEx is always developing more functions and improving on the ones that it already has. So, I think that all areas are improving already.

For three years now.

Yes, but it depends on the customers'/users' networks, not with Cisco WebEx in particular.

No issues.

I would give it a six out of 10.

Not previously. But currently, we also use Lync (Skype for Business), and WebEx is far far better than Skype.

No, it's very easy to implement as long as you have a clear picture of what you want. Also, the tool is very malleable, so you can easily change functionalities.

Cisco is not cheap, and this product is not the exception to the rule, but it is worth all the money paid.

No.

If you have the budget, go for WebEx. You won't find anything more stable, scalable, and with a fair support team.