Salesforce Sales Cloud Reviews

We are primarily using it for tracking sales opportunities. Our company has done some things where we've plugged in some resources that it taps into, such as some databases of install base and LinkedIn information about different influential executives that we might reach out to. Those are probably the three primary things that I use.

I assume I am using the latest version.

It helps the company, or at least executives, with forecasting.

It is nice to have the install base information at your fingertips when you look up a company.

We have a very broad set of products at our company. The process to get that information accurately into the Sales Cloud system could use improvement. It shouldn't take weeks of time. The process of identifying products that are being sold for forecasting purposes and sales tracking purposes is too hard.

We're starting to prepackage new product builds that address replacing the install base. If we can get that to be really smooth, it would be great. If a storage array is going to end of service/life, I am looking at something that not only tells me that but also says, "You should replace it with this, and here's the build for it." This way, you don't have to go through the process of throwing up what the new array would look like to get it over to the customer.

I have been using this solution for two years.

I don't really have problems with it. It seems to work when I access it.

I don't perceive any problem from where I sit. 

We probably have 5,000 people who are using this solution. They range from salespeople to management. It is being used extensively. I don't know what the corporate plans are to expand its usage.

I did not contact their support.

I would rate it a five out of 10. The reason is that I'm not using it for myself. I'm using it for other people to get information because I have to do it for my job. It helps me with that, but it is not particularly useful for me in my sales tracking.

I use Sales Cloud quite often through an apprenticeship I am doing at a non-profit organization. I do utilize Sales Cloud often, and practice using Trailhead. I also use Sales Cloud with the Nonprofit Success Pack, or anything pertaining to that. We also make use of the Education Data Architecture. I have used Sales Cloud in the past as an administrator.

Sales Cloud really helps to point out different numbers for our company in terms of what converts or what doesn't. Different leads and fields can be utilized inside of Salesforce, using Sales Path to follow those specific leads, and it demonstrates what leads convert over into opportunities. The leveraging of fields help to track progress on the user interface. I think that's fundamental, especially for users or individuals that don't know how to use Salesforce. It's easier to track. The page layouts are pretty good for users as well, to track those numbers.

I would say Sales Path is something that I do like to use to track leads and opportunities. It's a pretty cool feature to use inside of Sales Cloud. Different fields inside of Sales Cloud have pretty cool features in Salesforce too.

There are different applications that can definitely help leverage Salesforce when it comes to data management. Importing and exporting different applications can be used to help that process. 

In addition, applications that can help with migrating data over from the sandbox to production would make it easier because sometimes changesets can be bulky and they're not always as effective. This can be frustrating when you make a lot of changes and try to put those changes into production.

Sometimes uploading and making changes to processes can be a little slow.

The implementation of automated processes could be a little bit better understood.

It is a scalable solution. 

We previously used a Microsoft platform. 

It wasn't easy. The difficulty was in tracking the changes that were made inside of the Sandbox, and then trying to put all the changes into a changeset into production. There were certain fields that you needed to have inside the changeset that wasn't there, so it made it a hassle to deploy.

It took a couple of days to deploy. 

It was implemented in-house. There were about three people that were involved with deployment.

We track changes inside of the platform and they are major programs that help the non-profit to run and complete their mission and vision. 

Salesforce Sales Cloud is reasonably priced. 

I would recommend getting assistance from people that know what they're doing in Salesforce. They should get a good idea of what the client wants and take it from there. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. The implementation of automated processes could be a little bit and better understood.

We use Salesforce Sales Cloud for keeping track of both clients and employees on different levels, whether they're client-facing or they're more behind the scenes, such as myself.

Salesforce Sales Cloud has helped our organization by giving it the flexibility to customize our products to fit tiers of products. There are many timing and automation features that have given us control over some of the very unique business processes.

Salesforce is such a widespread software in terms of what it can do and its scope. Theoretically, you can run a whole company off of it. There are many valuable features, such as reporting and analytics. You can customize almost the whole environment is what appeals to so many companies the most.

I would love Salesforce to keep on committing and building out what they call flows. It's their point-and-click version of coding. You don't have to be a coder to create essentially what a developer would have to normally, which is a great feature, but it could still be improved upon.

I have used Salesforce Sales Cloud within the past 12 months.

Salesforce Sales Cloud is reliable.

The scalability of Salesforce Sales Cloud is one of their biggest advantages.

We have a little over 150 employees using it Salesforce Sales Cloud. There are probably 10 of us that use the backend. We have five of us that are dedicated Salesforce developers and administrators and an additional five that you would call super users, who have a lot of permissions because they were very close with us, and we trust them. The rest of the workforce is more client-facing in different parts of the organization. We are the development team, they are part of who we support.

The leadership team is very dedicated to increasing the use of Salesforce, whether it's adding another cloud or adding more people to my team. Recently we added approximately 30 brand new users. this can happen again at any time.

Salesforce is such a large company, they have three feature releases a year. They're constantly addressing issues. However, their responsiveness could be better at times. I do not have many complaints and they have very good customer service when we developers need it.

Overall the support is very good. The responsiveness can vary, but nothing that has displeased me and they will always see the job through. They're very dedicated to filling those types of quotas. They can be very responsive when a case has been open for a while.

The delays we faced are more of a corporate issue, but if you contact them individually, you receive much better service.

I have always used Salesforce, I am a Salesforce specialist. However, the company I work for might have used something else previously but I am not sure about that.

The implementation of Salesforce Sales Cloud is straightforward because it does not matter who you trained with to receive your Salesforce certifications and work in the industry, you know the deployment process. Everyone tends to know that it can be clunky, it can be frustrating, but at the same time, it's not exactly a broken system by any means.

The time it takes for the deployment depends on the size. We work in sprint cycles, we do it every two to three weeks. It depends on the size of that particular sprint. When it comes to deploying and then testing to make sure it's already it will never be more than an hour and a half.

The deployment tool could use a lot of work. However, when compared to everything else they're doing, it feels it's more left on the side, they prioritize the newer features.

My whole team and I, do deployments together or at least after we finish our assignments. There are about five of us at the moment. We have both developers and administrators, who all come together, and we complete whatever needs to be deployed all at the same time.

We always need someone dedicated to regular maintenance. I would imagine it's no different than any kind of another software environment of the size of Salesforce. You always want to have someone dedicated purely to making sure everything is working all right.

When it comes to dollars and cents, I couldn't tell you what that return on investment is. What I can say is that as we've grown out and increased automation, and over the past six months we have seen a very noticeable improvement.

I've seen the prices for Salesforce Sales Cloud, but I haven't been the one to handle the money. As someone who's only visually looked at the price, I would imagine it's on the pricier side, but they do have a ton of leverage, and seeing that everyone I've worked for has always been dedicated to continuing Salesforce. I've never worked for anyone who has threatened to leave. Everyone has accepted the pricing for what they offer.

There are additional feature costs but licenses are definitely the most expensive, but once you add or talk to your account representative about more individual features. We're talking about Salescloud, and if we wanted to add Servicecloud, that would be much more reasonably priced than us asking for 50 new licenses. Licensing is where they make most of their money.

The three companies I've worked for who have all used Salesforce, they've never by any means brought up the idea of moving to a competitor. Everyone's been happy on a macro scale of what the product has brought to their firms.

I rate Salesforce Sales Cloud an eight out of ten.

They can always improve and, if 10 other people in my position were asked about features they could improve they would bring up different answers. They do release a lot of features three times a year, every year. They're listening to customers, but sometimes you have to be more persistent than you'd hoped for them to listen.

• Quick go-to-market with a sales process
• Utilization of the "platform as a service" features of Salesforce
• Appexchange packages help to quickly hit requirements
• Robust feature set when considering all the Salesforce packages - Sales Cloud, communities, Service Cloud etc.

I've implemented a Saleforce solution at a hedge fund where we were immediately able to connect the marketing and customer relations department for tracking up-selling opportunities.

By building on the Salesforce platform, we were able to work through potential data problems such as tagging financial advisor owned accounts separately from individual investor accounts, bringing much needed granular tracking of the new money subscription opportunities.

The reporting functionality of Salesforce is much more a query engine than a true reporting module.

Salesforce have made some great strides towards addressing this deficiency with the advent of the analytics cloud, but it still needs improvement for customers not paying for the additional service.

I've been consulting on the platform for five years. I have implemented it at Rhymeo as a customer and currently utilize the platform at another client.

Being forced to run through all test classes to deploy to production has always been a concern for organizations that are apex heavy and need the ability for quick, impromptu deployments. Some “quick deploy” features are incredibly helpful for organizations trying to meet this requirement.

One look at their website will show you the incredible stability of this product.

Scaleability has never been in doubt.

Premier support has always been incredibly helpful when solving problems.

However, the true benefit of the salesforce community comes from the helpful users that are constantly contributing to the Salesforce support forums.

You’re usually always a quick Google search away from advice to solving a problem.

While consulting for the platform, we were always brought in to assist with implementation after vendor analysis.

Good consulting on the platform is the key to a straightforward vs. complex implementation.

Users are always reluctant to change so managing expectations and involving business users very early in development is the key to success. The robust configurability vs. code allows implementers the ability to demo early and often to business users. Lightning and process builder are taking this to a welcome new level.

Always via a vendor team. Speaking to experienced implementers when planning the release schedule for Salesforce manages the risk that integration inevitably always brings forth.

Spend as much time with Salesforce customer success managers as possible. The wealth of Salesforce accelerators and their solution engineers have built help show the potential features of Salesforce early in the planning stage and go a long ways to a smoothful project planning and execution

Salesforce Sales Cloud is used for many things, such as opportunity, pipeline, and code hub management.

The most valuable features of Salesforce Sales Cloud are code hub management and sale opportunity management.

Salesforce Sales Cloud overall is too complex. There is too much functionality, it's hard for the user, at the beginning. It takes a lot of time to update the information.

I have been using Salesforce Sales Cloud for two years.

Salesforce Sales Cloud is a stable solution.

I have not contacted support. Our company has its own support.

My company installed the solution Salesforce Sales Cloud. I was not involved.

I rate Salesforce Sales Cloud an eight out of ten.

Salesforce Sales Cloud is mostly used for partner lead management.

The most beneficial aspect of Salesforce Sales Cloud is my development life cycle will have been shortened.

The solution could improve the partner management and communities. For the enterprise licenses, we have the help, but it should also be extended with the features to the partner community.

I have been using Salesforce Sales Cloud for approximately two years.

Salesforce Sales Cloud is extremely stable.

The scalability of Salesforce Sales Cloud is good, we have not had any issues.

We have a few thousand users using this solution in my organization.

We have premier support and it is very good. Whenever we hit roadblocks, we do reach out to the support and they're very cooperative.

I would rate the technical support of Salesforce Sales Cloud a four out of five.

We previously had an in-house solution. We switched to Salesforce Sales Cloud because it was a good time in the market to do so and the solution as all the latest changes in the industry which we would receive automatically into our organization.

The complexity of the implementation of Salesforce Sales Cloud depends on the business. If your business process is complex, the implementation will turn out to be complex. Our implementation was a complex one because we have different processes we had to configure, it was time-consuming. It took approximately six to eight months to configure everything. 

We used a partner for the implementation of Salesforce Sales Cloud.

The price of Salesforce Sales Cloud could be reduced. It is expensive.

We pay for a standard license and there are not any additional fees other than the premier support.

I would advise others Salesforce Sales Cloud is a good tool. However, the price is high and other solutions in the market should be looked at because of this.

I rate Salesforce Sales Cloud a nine out of ten.

I personally find the Opportunities to be the most valuable aspect of the tool. It helps me keep a close eye on the business' pipeline. We've also developed a native project management solution on the Salesforce platform called Mission Control. We use this to track the scheduling and performance of all implementation projects. This is of great importance to our business in understanding our bandwidth and efficiencies. We also find the Case object to be of great value, including the email to case functionality that helps simplify the process for our clients when submitting support requests.

We run our entire business in the cloud and Salesforce.com sits at the heart of our solution stack. We have a subscription based model for our products, such as Mission Control, Mercury SMS and InteliMail. We've integrated Salesforce.com with eWay, an online payment gateway to automate our monthly billing process.

The main area that I feel could be improved is the performance of the Salesforce1 mobile application. I find it to be too slow to be of any real value whilst out on the road.

I have been using the Salesforce.com CRM system for over 12 years. I first used it as a Marketing Manager for the company I was working for at the time. In the last six years, I've been running Aprika, a Salesforce.com Consulting Partner helping to implement the solution for clients in Australia.

We've implemented Salesforce.com for over 200 clients and we've never come across a requirement that could not be delivered on the platform.

We've implemented Salesforce.com for over 200 clients and we've never come across a requirement that could not be delivered on the platform.

We've implemented Salesforce.com for over 200 clients and we've never come across a requirement that could not be delivered on the platform.

The standard Salesforce.com support process is very good. They also have a premier support option which provides a very quick response time. In addition to this, the community of users are extremely helpful and supportive to one another and using the success.salesforce.com website, you're always guaranteed someone will be able to help you out.

We are a Salesforce.com Consulting Partner, so we're the team helping the client implement their required solution. Salesforce.com conducts regular, independent research which states a client that works with a consulting partner to implement the solution is 65% more likely to be successful.

We have implemented Salesforce.com for over 200 clients, as you can imaging, there's been varying scales of complexity in the requirements ranging from a simple out of the box configuration through to solutions requiring a lot of customisation using Apex and Visualforce as well as integration with third party systems.

I do hear that Salesforce.com licensing is expensive, but once clients start using the system and the light goes on in relation to understanding the power of the platform, they realise it's well worth the investment.

From a personal perspective, one of the key things Salesforce.com provides us is insight into our business that would be difficult to achieve otherwise. We're able to easily track conversion rates, budget performance, staff efficiency rates and many other key metrics that are important to our business.

12 years ago, I initially compared it to a number of other solutions through a tender process. We conducted our due diligence and Salesforce.com came out top by a long way. As a Consulting Partner, we typically see prospects comparing Salesforce.com and MS Dynamics. Generally, we see them evaluate the two products and in most cases, they'll establish Salesforce.com is the more powerful, flexible and scalable solution.

Don't hesitate - if you're looking at using Salesforce.com, you're on the right track. After a few months, you'll wonder how you managed without it. In terms of implementation, I would strongly recommend engaging a consulting partner, it doesn't have to be Aprika. They can bring real value add to the project and ensure the system is set up to support user adoption. Engaging staff from various parts of the business in the initial implementation is also a key ingredient to successful adoption.