Salesforce Sales Cloud Reviews

I primarily use the solution for persuing sales. You can follow up on opportunities very easily when you use it. I also use it for case tracking.

The product offers sales best practices. If I establish a funnel and I've got four salespeople, and the average conversion rate of new leads is 18% and one person's at 30%, I could ask them what they're doing and I could get them to show me their pitch. Then I could teach the other salespeople to imitate them. I could quickly look at that in the forecast year and go, okay, I don't know what that person's doing, however, they're converting to the stages at a higher rate so let's ask them what they're doing and then orient all the other salespeople to follow that best practice. That way, all numbers could go up as well.

The aspect I found most valuable was the conversion rates. As a new business, we figured out by filling out the funnel that we can convert 18% of stage one. Therefore, if you could use that math, you can say "if I want to make a million dollars in sales this year, and I make $20,000 a sale, I will need X number of people." You can work backward and project, for example, this is how many people you better have on the file. It's helpful sales forecasting.

While they've done a really good job of being a CRM tool and being, in my case, a sales forecasting tool, if they could integrate with other enterprises' IT aspects - like SAP and ERP - it would be great. A little bit of integration across the corporation would be helpful. If they could have convenient APIs into the other parts of the corporation that I wish to share data with, that would be helpful.

I've used the solution for around ten years or so. 

The stability is very, very good. There are no bugs or glitches. The performance is great.

The solution can scale massively. I've been quite impressed.

In my one organization, we went from ten to 40 people with no issues. 

The solution is being extensively used. I haven't looked back at the competition and had to make a new purchase evaluation, however, my perception is Salesforce took over the space.

It's one of those solutions where you can just start using the product immediately. You don't really need to do any setup or any thinking. You just start using it. After using it for three months, you probably will never go back.

I did use technical support in the past. They walked the talk on CRM. They're one of the companies that eats their own dog food. They're super knowledgeable with the support that was clearly ahead of the game. Whoever I called could quickly pull up my account and know who I was and what my company was. They were using a lot of their own business intelligence and things in the back end.

Overall, I was impressed with the level of support.

I mostly use Excel, however, for clients, I tend to use Salesforce and ZenDesk as well.

The move to Salesforce was mostly due to the fact that it was super easy to use. The best sales guys also recommended it. They liked it as they were always selling and always making money and always on the road. The sales team hated the idea of coming back into the office and doing their stats. The fact that they could update it on the road, and I could just go in and look at it every week and talk to everybody from their phones and say, here's the story was ideal for their sales process. They hated pushing their money to this big enterprise product that seemed not to create any great insight and forced them to have a meeting on site. Everyone preferred Salesforce's ease of use and remote updates.

The initial setup is very simple and straightforward. 

I'm not sure of the exact pricing. My understanding is that it was super cheap on RAM - a lot like Jira. If you're at a really small startup and you have 10 people, the licenses are practically free. Their theory is, as you grow, you're going to scale and hit 50 pretty soon and then they'll start charging more.

I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. It's mostly set up by the client.

I'm familiar with the cloud and on-premises deployment models. Most clients are on the cloud now. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. They have an excellent reputation and live up to it. 

The solution is for companies to manage the sales part. With the tool, companies can create context, needs, opportunities, and whatever they are gathering. Companies can collect whatever information they want and they can manage their space, keep proper tracking reports, and everything in Salesforce Sales Cloud.

In terms of the best features offered by the product and depending on what our company's customers feel about the solution, I can say that the tool is very easy to use and user-friendly. The tool has wide community support. Salesforce has its own courses and everything to make one learn about their products.

There is nothing that comes to my mind when I think about what needs improvement in the product since it does everything perfectly.

The product lacks to offer some AI capabilities. With a lot of AI capabilities that are available nowadays, I would want some of them to be added to the product since it can make the lives of its users easy by allowing them to use the features they want.

I have experience with Salesforce Sales Cloud. My company has a partnership with Salesforce.

It is a very stable solution. Salesforce has its own team to test its products. The tool is very good in terms of stability, support, and features. I have never had any complaints about the product.

It is a very scalable solution.

My company deals with Salesforce's automation products, and everyone uses Salesforce Sales Cloud.

I use Provar, which is Salesforce's test automation solution. My job profile involves more testing, and what our company's customers do is that they test Salesforce implementation for their internal implementations or for what they have implemented in Salesforce. In my company, we have a very diverse portfolio in terms of customers, as some use Salesforce Experience Cloud, while others use Salesforce Marketing Cloud or Salesforce Sales Cloud. I have experience with almost every tool from Salesforce since I have dealt with multiple solutions depending on customer's requirements. If you ask me what feature I am using in the tool specifically, I would say that I have touched almost every other feature offered by different tools offered by Salesforce.

As Salesforce offers its tools on the cloud, the product's initial setup phase is very easy because you have to kind of create a user account and get a license according to the features you want to use, which is easy. There is nothing complex with the tool's installation, as everything is on the cloud and is very easy to use.

Learning to use the product is an easy task, especially since Salesforce has a lot of its own learning processes in place, which can make one capable enough to start working on Salesforce.

I don't have experience with the mobile accessibility of Salesforce Sales Cloud since I don't use it.

I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

This is a cloud solution. Within my company, we have around 150 users.

The user interface is pretty simple.

This is definitely a solution for the younger generation because it's working with the web frontend. There's a lot of new stuff where you can scroll down, use via handheld, and so on. As a cloud solution with web browser, it's different than my classical way of thinking. It's modern, but for older people, maybe it's not that understandable. It could be more user-friendly, maybe with an option to switch between interfaces.

I have been using this solution for the past two years.

Within other companies, I have previously used C/4HANA, which is the SAP product for CRM. From my user experience, I prefer SAP.

I think it's complex and simple. Because it's a cloud solution, you can maybe put in a logo or something like that, but the functionality is provided by the manufacturer, by Salesforce itself.

On a scale of 1 to 5, I would rate the difficulty of setup a 3.

I would rate this solution 6 out of 10.

Salesforce started as pure CRM software. For the CRM environment, this might be pretty good, but imagine when you have to interface this. Regarding interfaces, there could be some improvement.

Our use case within the organization covers the entire cycle from lead generation, demand planning, and opportunities to realization and closure. For our clients, Salesforce is used more to plot the cycle from products to cash and lead to revenue. They mostly build offers and pricing quotations in the Salesforce environment through their field marketing agents.

Salesforce could integrate downstream systems by adding Tableau or MuleSoft into the KDDI. But is there a way to figure out industry-specific solutions? From an ERP standpoint, SAP has industry-specific solutions that are a straight fit for separate industry verticals.

I need to do a lot of customization to implement an ERP solution for an energy and utilities client versus a BFS client. Salesforce should look at the common customizations each client wants and see how much of that can be standardized into industry-specific specific solutions. That would speed up implementation, so we don't need to go through the same steps a hundred times. Salesforce could do it once and put it out for the rest of the clients to use it.

I've handled verticals like manufacturing, automobile, telecom, and BFS. The use cases vary from one to the other. There is no standard recommendation per se. I've handled some three or four clients per vertical. Maybe one or two clients in each industry have a Salesforce ecosystem. Let's say I've had two instances of a financial service client asking for a specific level of customization, so why doesn't Salesforce include that in the cost. 

Salesforce could consult with companies in these different industry verticles to determine the level of customization they need and what common tweaks could be included in the out-of-the-box product. That's something I would love. 

It would be great if Salesforce could pitch customers a base product with an estimate of how much time it would take to implement. On top of that, they could offer the client a set of packages consisting of three or four use cases essential to that customer's vertical and give them a standardized time for implementing these add-ons to the core product.

I don't think clients can afford a designated Salesforce consultant, and that's why businesses come to integrators like us. There's a demand for easy deployment maintenance of Salesforce's no-code, low-code platform with automation. It would help the clients deploy an ecosystem within their organization rather than relying on somebody else to do the implementation and jam it together.

At the same time, it might make sense for Salesforce to integrate an RPA provider like Pega did with the Open Spam acquisition. Salesforce should definitely look into out-of-the-box automation.

I've been working with Salesforce for five or six years. It's the solution we use for internal organization and what I propose to my clients based on their needs, as well.

Salesforce runs smoothly. I've never had a client come back and say, "It is the end of this product's life, I want to switch over from Salesforce because the support is ending by this quarter." I've never seen that case ever.

Salesforce is as easy to install as any other product in the cloud today. I don't think it's difficult for any engineer. The hard part is integrating Salesforce into your environment, which typically involves deploying with hundreds of other upstream and downstream systems on the data flows.

It depends on the number of use cases and customizations the client wants. This varies from client to client in terms of the standard data flow, the number of reports, level of fields, etc. The initial implementation could be done in weeks or months, but it's not for us to decide whether that is sufficient. The client chooses whether to stick with the base product or customize it.

Salesforce is affordable. I don't think there are any significant issues there. 

There are very few instances where we've engaged in a consultation to figure out the right product like we did with MDM versus MRK. For the most part, I believe the client will have the appetite and the know-how to pick the right product.

As system integrators, we typically implement the entire product on the cloud or provide customizations on top of the base product. That's our main involvement in the clients' environments. Generally speaking, we don't go to our clients and tell them why they should pick Salesforce over Siebel or vice versa. That type of conversation is for salespeople from Salesforce or Oracle who pitch to the client directly. The licensing deal goes through the vendor directly.

I rate Salesforce 10 out of 10 because I've made five or six Salesforce deals with clients. If there were any problems with the solution, I would not have secured those deals as a salesperson. I would never hesitate to give Salesforce a perfect 10 because it has helped me sell more solutions to clients. If the clients are buying, it means the solution is good.

I'm using it for the selection of sale pipelines, project opportunities, and sales analysis.

I'm using its latest version.

It is easy to customize, and it is also easy to view the summary of a project opportunity. 

There is a ton of information on the dashboard. Reports are also there for us. We can analyze information across the team and across a period, such as quarterly or annually.

There are multiple views to display information. You can display information as a table, and you can also split the views.

It is a bit pricey.

I have been using this solution for about a year.

It is stable.

I have not tried to scale it. We have five to seven people in my team who are using this solution.

I'm working in a global company, and in my business unit, for the local region, we have five to seven people using this. We also have a group of people abroad who view this information.

I have not interacted with their technical support.

I used another one about three years ago, but I prefer Salesforce.

It might be a bit complex the first time, but it is not very hard to understand.

It was done inside the organization. We have a team for this.

Its license is expensive. It is probably a lot more than smaller solutions. It is around £500 a month, but I don't know how many licenses we have.

So far, everything has been good. I would advise others to go for it if they can afford it. It is very good.

I would rate it a nine out of 10 because nothing is perfect.

Salesforce Sales Cloud is used because it is requested by our customers and colleagues.

For the moment, I only know one CRM, and it's Salesforce Sales Cloud. 

I don't use it directly, I am a business unit director. For me, Salesforce is used because I need information about the customers and sales.

Salesforce Sales Cloud is used to collect address information and sales revenue about our customers.

We provide this solution to our clients.

Our clients only enter the data to follow the project.

The performance is good, and it is easy to use.

All of the information that we need is stored in Salesforce Sales Cloud. 

We have no issues with this solution.

The user interface is excellent.

The monitoring has improved. The monitoring for the fixed bugs is beneficial for our developers.

Training is available for our clients before they start to use this software, which makes it easy for them to use this CRM. 

We have a team of specialists for training for this CRM.

Maybe a product can always be improved. But, for me and our office, we don't need any more information than what we already have in the system.

Perhaps the MMI or ESM side could be better than what we currently have.

The monitoring is very good, but it could be better.

I use it every week because I need information about my customers. It is a mandatory requirement for me.

As it is a cloud-based solution we are always using the most recent version.

We have a lot of managers who use Salesforce because we use it for our development teams and can use it for requirements, we can use it for customer requests, bugs, and bug fixes, and all managers require customer information.

This solution is used by more than 150 people in our company, and we have 200 customers.

The technical support is fine.

I require solutions other than Salesforce because we have procurement direction, which we use to share other solutions, other software for CRM, and other needs for our company.

I was not involved in the installation of this solution. It was already installed on our PC I just have to open the software and use it.

The installation was completed by our IT team.

We also have an IT team That ensures that there are no issues with the security system.

We pay for the Salesforce Sales Cloud license. 

When this solution is installed on the customer site for our project, there is no licensing cost to the customer.

We don't have an issue with the price. We don't pay a lot because we have several licenses and any users.

The licensing fees are reasonable.

Yes, I would recommend it for other users.

When you use Salesforce, we have another team that is in charge of developing other CRM module complements. If we require information that is not currently available in this CRM, our development teams can create it.

We have Salesforce, and if we need other information that isn't actually in the CRM tomorrow, we have our IT teams. They have some developers, who can create this module, we can add it, and you will have the information we require.

If we need some dashboards, or if we need more dashboards than we already have, we have some teams that can develop this software. We have a separate module component that can add to our CRM.

I would rate Salesforce Sales Cloud a nine out of ten.

I am a Salesforce consultant for multiple clients, and we have different scenarios wherein the Salesforce Sales Cloud has been used. Use cases include different scenarios and different industries, so from banking to automobile industries, to NGOs, nonprofits too.

One use case is for a client in the automobile industry. There is a sales process, sales funnel, that has been built for the particular company, according to the region. When there is a lead that comes into Salesforce, according to the region, they will be assigned to a particular salesperson. If the lead is converted, then an opportunity has been created and the opportunity is nurtured through Salesforce. There are different tasks that will then be allotted to the particular salesperson in each opportunity stage.

Sales Cloud in particular is a very, very powerful tool, and we can build on top of the existing platform for the requirements each company has. So if there is a particular workflow that we need to build, particular validation, or there is a particular scenario that we need to capture which is not there in Salesforce, or not in the inbuilt system -- then Salesforce is a very powerful tool that helps us to build that through tools like Process Builder or Flows, or even write code to achieve these scenarios. It's a very dynamic system.

One valuable feature with Sales Cloud is the opportunity for nurturing leads, and there are different sales processes that we can establish in Salesforce to do this. Having different sales processes helps us to diversify the whole system for different regions or different products. The same processes will help a lot in managing or helping out the salespersons to nurture those opportunities.

I've been totally into Salesforce, and almost everything can be achieved through either the configuration part or doing customization. One area that needed improvement though was with the record views. The record views were not aligned, and they have no split views. So to see each record, we had to go back and then select another one from the list, but that has been fixed. One current issue is the system requirement for running Salesforce Lightning. For current computers, it works fine, but for people who are using old systems, there is a lag in loading the Lightning pages. Lightning is the new interface that Salesforce has for the records and seeing the whole data. So if there is an old system used, or if the infrastructure is not correct, then customers are having an issue and it's taking a lot of time to load.

An additional feature that could be added is the email templates. At the moment, it is actually still not a feature to set up email templates. There are two views in Salesforce, the Classic and the Lightning. To set email templates and have those processes, we have to go back to Classic and then do the whole process. It would be beneficial if everything was happening in Lightning itself so that people don't have to switch back and forth. But I think that's down the roadmap of Salesforce to have everything in Lightning.

I've been working with Salesforce for the past five to six years.

With the cloud infrastructure, the stability of the solution is pretty good. There has not been much downtime, or I've never seen any downtime happening in my experience with Salesforce at all. They are evolving in performance, too. The transition from Classic to Lightning was a major shift they had, and that has increased a lot of performance. The solution has been more powerful since it was transitioned to Lightning. If you don't have the right infrastructure, then we see performance issues.

Salesforce is super easy to scale. If you want to add users, you just need the licenses. If you want to add additional features, scalability is not an issue with Salesforce.

The solution is suitable for every sized company. It makes things easier, even for small companies. The amount of manual work can be reduced if they have a proper automated system in place.

We've been in contact with technical support multiple times. They're very responsive and it seems we get an immediate response back from the technical team. In the case where the issues has not been resolved from the lower level, they escalate it to the technical team. I would say they say the technical support process is quite good. But for that too, there is a package I think needs to be bought for high-end technical support. For regular users, there is a certain level of technical support that Salesforce offers, and then if you need more, we need to have an engagement for that.

We have some experience with Zoho CRM, but I wouldn't say it is as comparable as Salesforce. It has a different set of Salesforce setups in Zoho.

With adding multiple sales processes or more fields to the layouts, Salesforce is more flexible and bigger than Zoho.

The initial setup of Salesforce is pretty straightforward. The deployment process is quite easy. With that being said, I would say there are a lot of instances where this pretty straightforwardness has been misused. There need to be some guidelines or DevOps processes in place so that people don't just push things to production.

The solution does not require any onsite maintenance; since it's cloud, the maintenance is done automatically. Since the platform is evolving, there are cases where they add in a few security points or depreciate a few old processes. Then we might need some enhancements done to the work that we did.

Just one developer can have test classes built in and then push it over to production. There have been cases where we see that even one admin team in companies just does the whole end-to-end, adding the component, then pushing to production. It is not an extensive, manpower-required process.

Pricing wise, I'm not sure how affordable the solution is, because for each market it's different. For small companies, I don't know how the pricing point works, but feature wise, I would say it is a very useful tool for all sized companies.

My advice to any company implementing any product is to have their processes lined up, at least on paper first, rather than going to a system. I've seen this happen with a few clients. Their structure is not set, but they come into the CRM and then they build on the go, which creates a lot of best practice issues when they do that.

Before implementing any CRM, I would suggest that any company should have a proper sales process or their processes lined up, and have a clear idea of what they want to happen in the system so that that can be translated easily onto the system.

I would rate Sales Cloud a nine out of ten because I'm totally into Salesforce and I appreciate the product a lot.

We use the solution for opportunity identification, pipeline management, and forecasting. Those are primarily the areas.

The solution has provided our company with a common platform, a common process, and has created a common skill set, and institutional awareness of major transactions. It's provided easier audit for opportunities, deal reviews, and automation features for reporting. 

The dashboards and dashboard customization are great.

The solution is stable and reliable.

You can scale the solution easily.

The setup is pretty fast.

Technical support is helpful and knowledgeable. 

The reporting formats could be better. We'd like to be able to graphically, optically, change what the selections are that we can choose to put a report or format in, just in how they appear, the aesthetics. There could be more presentation formats that are incorporated that would make them easier to transfer over to a PowerPoint or something. We should be able to export documentation capabilities that are more presentation-friendly outside of the system.

II want to be specific about what it looks like, what the actual report actually looks like. For example, the optics of the report, the colors that are used, the format that it's in. That's the main comment. The data is fine. It's how the report actually looks that's an issue.

I've been using the solution for more than 12 months at this point.

It's very stable. It's reliable. It's a good solution.

It scales well. A lot of people need to own that the solution will only work as well as its design, and how people apply it. The more information that can be given upfront about what the outcome requirements are, the better.

That's a conditional situation. It really depends on how engaged the client is in providing their requirements and then giving that stuff over so that it can be executed. It's a pretty well-thought-out solution that performs and scales well.

We have more than 5,000 users at this point. That's across departments in the services division. The solution is extensively used. 

I've dealt with technical support. They were good. They were on the better side. Nobody's perfect, however, they were pretty knowledgeable.

I've used multiple CRMs and NetSuite by Oracle in the past. In this organization, we had a homegrown solution that would not have been commercially marketed.

The initial setup was complex, however, it was well planned. There was a good approach. It was very formulaic. It allowed for customer feedback to help customize the solution. I thought it was a very interactive process.

The configuration part was relatively quick. It was the planning that took longer as it required a lot of internal reviews to discern what was important information and what wasn't. It's hard. I would say that the process was six months, however, the actual flipping the switch wasn't that long - maybe a couple of weeks.

That's why it's hard for me to discern where the breakpoint is. It was a lot of reviews, communication, et cetera. However, the enabling of the technology did not take very long. It was more or less deciding on how to enable the technology that took long.

There is a team that handles maintenance for the product. I don't deal with that directly.

I've done it probably two ways. One was an internal engagement. The other one was external. I know that Accenture was involved in that. I myself actually had to go to Chicago to train at one of the Accenture facilities to be a champion for their transition.

I'm an end-user. I'm using the most recent version of the solution.

I'd advise potential new users to make sure you're good by researching what's best for your organization and make sure that once you choose to go down that path, that you've put the right steps in for adoption. This or any other CRM will fail if the organization doesn't agree on the value or use of the tool.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. It is highly available, handles the majority of our business needs, and the consistency of its function is pretty strong. The capacity of capability is good.