Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use Microsoft Teams for training and meetings.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is easy to use.

Microsoft Teams could improve the integration with Outlook because most of us are not using the last version of Outlook and it causes some issues.

In the next release of Microsoft Teams, they should make the mobile application easier to manage. Additionally, they should add more features.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for approximately two years.

Microsoft Teams is a stable solution. However, we have to turn it off and reconnect sometimes.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. We have more than 600 users using this solution, from all levels in my organization. We have no problem with all our users using this solution.

I have not contacted the support from Microsoft. We have our own internal support.

We previously used other solutions, such as Bridge and an internal application. Microsoft Teams is the easiest to use.

The implementation of Microsoft Teams is easy on the laptop but sometimes we are facing some difficulties with the phone.

I rate the initial setup of Microsoft Teams a three out of five.

Microsoft Teams is priced less than other solutions, such as Bridge.

I rate the price of Microsoft Teams a four out of five.

I rate Microsoft Teams a seven out of ten.

I use the solution for meetings. 

We can share all files on Microsoft Teams directly. It is integrated with Outlook. 

We cannot change the mic automatically in Microsoft Teams. We have to do it manually. 

I have been using the product for four years. 

I have not contacted Microsoft regarding any issues with the tool. 

The solution's pricing is average. 

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. 

We use it for daily or scheduled meetings.

Teams enhances collaboration within our team and with our customers. While we've had positive experiences overall, one issue we've encountered is inconsistent remote access through Teams. However, for field meetings and estimations, it functions effectively.

The video conferencing capability has significantly enhanced our remote meetings, making them more productive. It allows people from different locations to convene at a central point, enabling seamless sharing of views, solutions, and discussions without the need for physical travel. This efficient communication method enables us to address various matters and reach solutions in minimal time.

One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to record sessions on Teams, which is a beneficial feature. It allows for reviewing meetings afterward, ensuring that any missed details can be revisited and understood, contributing to better meeting outcomes.

The most valuable feature for our team's productivity in Teams is remote access, particularly because many of our clients are located remotely. This feature allows us to efficiently address issues without the need to travel to other countries or regions. Instead, we can initiate remote sessions through Teams to troubleshoot and resolve problems promptly, enhancing our ability to provide support regardless of geographical barriers.

At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement. Access to the target server may not always function correctly when accessed remotely.

We have been working with it for last three years.

It provides good stability capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Scalability is contingent upon the projects at hand. As projects expand, so does the team size. This scalability is influenced by the number of global projects and remote sites. Additionally, it correlates with the client base; as clients increase, more personnel are required to support them. We have a team of two to three individuals, but as our business grows and client numbers increase, we will accordingly augment our team size to accommodate the expansion. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Our marketing team frequently utilizes this tool, often engaging with clients on a daily basis through multiple meetings. In contrast, our technical team typically uses it for work approximately three times a week.

We previously utilized Zoom, but frequent interruptions and disconnections prompted us to transition to Teams.

The initial setup process is straightforward, requiring only a few simple steps. Setting up Teams and scheduling meetings can be easily done with minimal effort. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The deployment time may range from one to three months. Our deployment process involves setting up database, application, and web servers. However, we're currently facing a challenge as the Network Access Control service is unavailable on any cloud platform. Our solution relies on NAC for initial authentication, followed by communication with middleware before completing the cycle. Due to the absence of NAC on cloud platforms, we're exploring alternatives. Suggestions have been made to run the NAC function on-premises and then deploy the solution on the cloud. However, management is hesitant until a cloud-based NAC solution is available. This delay has stalled the project's progress despite initial work starting six months ago.

We've deployed the project with our in-house technical team, not relying on third-party assistance. Multiple teams were involved in the deployment process, including the development team and PMO team. Each team member played a crucial role, with approximately five to ten individuals participating in each deployment phase. Two people are sufficient for maintenance.

The ROI we've observed primarily stems from the significant time savings achieved through Teams. I would rate it nine out of ten.

The price is relatively high. I would rate it eight out of ten.

We consistently advise our clients to utilize Teams. Although some clients may request Zoom meetings, we promptly suggest using Teams for its reliability and seamless connectivity. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

I use the solution for conference and collaboration purposes.

The product helps in saving time in meetings and in sharing documents.

Sharing screens is valuable. Sharing documents and conducting conferences are also valuable.

The interface must be more user-friendly.

I have been using the solution for two years. I am using the latest version of the solution.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The product was easy to set up.

The returns are on the transportation and time consumption we face when we are not using virtual tools like Microsoft Teams.

The more we use and get involved with the product, the more we learn. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for communication and creating teams or groups to share information quickly within the organization.

The solution helps our organization with faster communication.

The solution's most valuable features are meeting, calling, and activity feed.

The solution consumes a high amount of system memory. It could be improved.

We have been using the solution for more than six years.

It is a stable solution.

The solution's initial setup process is complicated. We implement it on the cloud infrastructure. 

The solution generates a good return on investment.

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it a ten out of ten. It is an essential tool for quick communication and sharing files.

We use the solution for communications within the organization.

The solution's stability could be better.

We have been using the solution for five to six years.

The solution's stability is a six or seven out of ten. We encounter critical issues sometimes.

The solution's scalability is a six or seven out of ten. We have 20-25 users in our organization.

It is easy to coordinate with the solution's technical support team in case of queries.

Positive

The solution's initial setup process is easy. The time taken for deployment depends on specific requirements.

It is an excellent solution. I recommend it to others and rate it an eight out of ten.

I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings. 

The solution needs to have subtitles. 

The product is stable. 

The solution is scalable. My company has 1008 users for the product. 

I haven't used any support. 

I have used Google Meet but find the UI and function of Teams to be more simple and unique. 

The product's setup is easy. 

The solution offers high integration and is easy. I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We use Microsoft Teams for team collaboration, exchanging ideas, and talking about project management solutions.

Microsoft Teams has an option for you to create files. The planner and the breakout rooms are good and helpful features in Microsoft Teams.

Microsoft Teams can start being more interactive and intuitive by implementing artificial intelligence and machine learning. The solution could do something better. The solution can explore the world of AI and ML and utilize the virtual environment even better.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for more than seven years.

Microsoft Teams is quite a stable solution. I rate Microsoft Teams a seven out of ten for stability.

More than 7,000 users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization on a daily basis.

The solution's initial setup is very easy. I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

Microsoft Teams is a great collaborative forum for us to work on. Especially after COVID, Microsoft Teams has been very supportive in helping us collaborate between various functions in a remote work environment.

Microsoft Teams is deployed on-cloud in our organization.

Zoom doesn't give you a lot of scalability options and has fewer features than Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams allows you to collaborate, and it's very easy to set up things with Teams.

I would suggest people looking into using Microsoft Teams to explore all the features of Microsoft Teams and be curious about it.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.