Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use the solution for communication and creating teams or groups to share information quickly within the organization.

The solution helps our organization with faster communication.

The solution's most valuable features are meeting, calling, and activity feed.

The solution consumes a high amount of system memory. It could be improved.

We have been using the solution for more than six years.

It is a stable solution.

The solution's initial setup process is complicated. We implement it on the cloud infrastructure. 

The solution generates a good return on investment.

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it a ten out of ten. It is an essential tool for quick communication and sharing files.

We use the solution as a collaboration platform to do telephone service, chat, and share documents. 

The solution is simple and present in many devices at one time. 

The product's support can be better. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

My company has 2700 users for the product. I use the product every day. 

The solution's support is good sometimes and other times not. 

Neutral

I also use Zoom and Cisco Webex for meetings. However, I have found that Teams is easier to use. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I use the product as a communication channel with my colleagues.

The idea of building teams is valuable to me. We can build a team with a group of people and upload documents. It is like an internal SharePoint.

The product should provide a to-do list feature.

I have been using the solution for five years.

The product is stable. We haven’t faced any major outages.

Over 1,000 people use the solution in my organization.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The product has been working well. I have no complaints. I would recommend the solution to others. The solution performs well, and it satisfies all my needs and expectations. I haven't faced any problems with it and have never missed any service or application. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

I use Microsoft Teams for collaboration like chatting, calling, and grouping. 

The solution is very expensive and I won't be able to afford it personally. 

I have been using the product for three years. 

The tool is stable. 

My company has 150 users for Microsoft Teams. 

Microsoft's support is tricky and hard. 

Neutral

The product's setup is hard. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Compared to other technologies such as the ones from Google, I prefer Microsoft Teams. The tool's user interface is very good. However, I wouldn't recommend this solution for personal use. Companies can use this solution after considering costing factors. You can use the trial or PC version. 

Teams is mostly for internal purposes. We use it to communicate between our company with colleagues. Instead of sending emails all the time, we have Teams just to send documents or communicate for anything, even creating groups.

It’s very easy to set up. It doesn't take that long.

You can either use it on your phone or on your PC.

You can make phone and video calls.

It makes it easy to communicate with colleagues.

One time the product was basically freezing. I couldn't send a message to my colleague for some reason. I had to restart the PC or restart my phone for some reason. I don't know why it was buggy. Maybe it was overloaded or something.

The desktop and mobile apps are quite different. They should work to make both virtually the same.

I have had an issue in the past with it being buggy and freezing. I had to restart my devices to get it going again.

Everybody in our organization uses the solution. It’s on every PC in the company. It’s, give or take, a bit less than 100 people.

Usually, I contact my IT team to share any issues. I haven't used the support from Microsoft Teams. Usually, it doesn't have that many issues. It's just straightforward.

I’ve also used Slack.

Teams can be used as an internal tool, whereas Slack might be considered more public. We are able to share internal documentation more effectively with Teams.

The initial setup is effortless and straightforward. It’s not complex at all.

I don't know how much it costs. That’s not an area I am involved in.

I’m not sure which version of the solution we’re using.

It’s good to use it internally with colleagues. You do not have to share anything with external organizations. It gives you basically the advantage of not having any external partners or anything. It's just for internal purposes with nothing to communicate with other partners. It’s a great internal tool.

I’d rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use Microsoft Teams for training and meetings.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is easy to use.

Microsoft Teams could improve the integration with Outlook because most of us are not using the last version of Outlook and it causes some issues.

In the next release of Microsoft Teams, they should make the mobile application easier to manage. Additionally, they should add more features.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for approximately two years.

Microsoft Teams is a stable solution. However, we have to turn it off and reconnect sometimes.

Microsoft Teams is a scalable solution. We have more than 600 users using this solution, from all levels in my organization. We have no problem with all our users using this solution.

I have not contacted the support from Microsoft. We have our own internal support.

We previously used other solutions, such as Bridge and an internal application. Microsoft Teams is the easiest to use.

The implementation of Microsoft Teams is easy on the laptop but sometimes we are facing some difficulties with the phone.

I rate the initial setup of Microsoft Teams a three out of five.

Microsoft Teams is priced less than other solutions, such as Bridge.

I rate the price of Microsoft Teams a four out of five.

I rate Microsoft Teams a seven out of ten.

We use it for daily or scheduled meetings.

Teams enhances collaboration within our team and with our customers. While we've had positive experiences overall, one issue we've encountered is inconsistent remote access through Teams. However, for field meetings and estimations, it functions effectively.

The video conferencing capability has significantly enhanced our remote meetings, making them more productive. It allows people from different locations to convene at a central point, enabling seamless sharing of views, solutions, and discussions without the need for physical travel. This efficient communication method enables us to address various matters and reach solutions in minimal time.

One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to record sessions on Teams, which is a beneficial feature. It allows for reviewing meetings afterward, ensuring that any missed details can be revisited and understood, contributing to better meeting outcomes.

The most valuable feature for our team's productivity in Teams is remote access, particularly because many of our clients are located remotely. This feature allows us to efficiently address issues without the need to travel to other countries or regions. Instead, we can initiate remote sessions through Teams to troubleshoot and resolve problems promptly, enhancing our ability to provide support regardless of geographical barriers.

At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement. Access to the target server may not always function correctly when accessed remotely.

We have been working with it for last three years.

It provides good stability capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Scalability is contingent upon the projects at hand. As projects expand, so does the team size. This scalability is influenced by the number of global projects and remote sites. Additionally, it correlates with the client base; as clients increase, more personnel are required to support them. We have a team of two to three individuals, but as our business grows and client numbers increase, we will accordingly augment our team size to accommodate the expansion. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Our marketing team frequently utilizes this tool, often engaging with clients on a daily basis through multiple meetings. In contrast, our technical team typically uses it for work approximately three times a week.

We previously utilized Zoom, but frequent interruptions and disconnections prompted us to transition to Teams.

The initial setup process is straightforward, requiring only a few simple steps. Setting up Teams and scheduling meetings can be easily done with minimal effort. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The deployment time may range from one to three months. Our deployment process involves setting up database, application, and web servers. However, we're currently facing a challenge as the Network Access Control service is unavailable on any cloud platform. Our solution relies on NAC for initial authentication, followed by communication with middleware before completing the cycle. Due to the absence of NAC on cloud platforms, we're exploring alternatives. Suggestions have been made to run the NAC function on-premises and then deploy the solution on the cloud. However, management is hesitant until a cloud-based NAC solution is available. This delay has stalled the project's progress despite initial work starting six months ago.

We've deployed the project with our in-house technical team, not relying on third-party assistance. Multiple teams were involved in the deployment process, including the development team and PMO team. Each team member played a crucial role, with approximately five to ten individuals participating in each deployment phase. Two people are sufficient for maintenance.

The ROI we've observed primarily stems from the significant time savings achieved through Teams. I would rate it nine out of ten.

The price is relatively high. I would rate it eight out of ten.

We consistently advise our clients to utilize Teams. Although some clients may request Zoom meetings, we promptly suggest using Teams for its reliability and seamless connectivity. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

I use Microsoft Teams for remote access. I can check the calendar and call my team. I can ask them to share the screen. 

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format. 

The main issue is that the link goes down when there are internet issues. 

I have been using the tool for four years. 

I would rate the product's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate Microsoft Teams' scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 10 users for it. 

The solution is priced high. 

I would rate Microsoft Teams a ten out of ten.