Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use Teams for meetings because it comes with features for collaboration and document management.

The tool makes it easy for us to book meetings. It seamlessly integrates with the Office application which we are using for the last four years. 

The solution needs to be more stable. I have found Zoom to be more stable than Teams. 

My company has six users for Teams. 

Microsoft's support is good enough for me. 

Positive

I use Zoom but find it to be less competitive than Teams. Zoom does not offer integration with documents, calendars, etc. 

Teams' setup is easy and takes less than a day to complete. There isn't much configuration involved since everything is on the cloud. The solution's deployment is not a rocket science. 

The solution's pricing is fair enough and not expensive. Teams' licensing costs are yearly. However, Zoom is less expensive. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. You will get the full benefits of the solution if you use collaboration and document management. 

I used Microsoft Teams for work, and I like the usability of the solution here in Brazil. A lot of my colleagues always complain about Microsoft Teams, saying that the solution wastes a lot of machine capability, but I don't have a problem with that. Microsoft Teams works just fine with Outlook, and I have no problem using the solution. I like how sharing the screen or specific windows with Microsoft Teams is easy. I have no problem with the stability of the solution.

We have an open team; other organizations can find and talk to us on Microsoft Teams. We don't have to talk about work using other solutions like WhatsApp. We choose WhatsApp because it's easier for us. However, when I want to speak about something more confidential, I do it on Microsoft Teams. Whenever I talk to a partner, we talk on Microsoft Teams, as our platforms are open to each other. I utilize Microsoft Teams to discuss confidential matters.

What I use the most is the plugin or the optimization feature. When I want to create a meeting on Outlook, I can automatically share the Microsoft Teams link.

Microsoft Teams should include the possibility of creating questionnaires or polls during webinars, whereby the people watching can answer the questionnaires in real time.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for three years.

I rate Microsoft Teams a seven out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

I am using the latest version of Microsoft Teams.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten.

We run most projects in Teams. We use it for file sharing with customers and internally. We also use To Do on Teams to follow up.

File sharing is the most valuable feature. It is so simple to send a file in chat or a team’s site. It is very useful.

To Do tasks’ ease of use should be improved. It should be simplified. The product should also enable users to mention people on tasks.

I have been using the solution for probably two years.

The solution is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The product pulls some computing power. More than 40 consultants, developers, and customers use the solution in our organization.

Setting up a Teams site and a project in Teams is straightforward and easy. The solution is deployed on the cloud in our organization.

If someone wants to use the product, they could look at the add-ons provided by it. It has quite a few add-ons. Overall, I rate the product an eight or nine out of ten.

Microsoft Teams is a very good collaborative tool. The solution provides instant messenger, collaboration with teams, and you can do calls. You can use Microsoft Teams to share files and store files. You can use the solution to create your own channel from the perspective of topics and share discussions and files.

The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved.

I have worked with Microsoft Teams for eight years.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for scalability.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

Microsoft Teams gives the best return on investment.

Microsoft Teams is the best collaboration tool in the market today.

On average, five people would be required to deploy and maintain Microsoft Teams.

Microsoft Teams is very user-friendly compared to Slack.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten.

For all the meetings and events we are using Microsoft Teams.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the ease of use. It is very good for a small virtual office for meetings and calendars which sync well together.

Microsoft Teams could improve because it is heavy on bandwidth. We have some access points and when we have 30 or 40 users on it with Microsoft Teams calls can drop. WebEx does not use as much bandwidth.

When someone joins a meeting we are not able to kick them out.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for approximately three years.

Microsoft Teams is stable.

The scalability of Microsoft Teams is good and is easy to do.

We have approximately 450 - 500 users using the solution.

I have used Skype for Business and WebEx.

The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is straightforward.

We have a license needed to use Microsoft Teams.

I would advise others to set the parameters correctly for security. You can transfer files between users in the chat window which is helpful.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten.

I primarily use live chat. The chat is used mostly to communicate with all departments in my company.

There is a good option for you to make group chats. Communication is really easy to handle. It’s easy to make groups and intimate chats when you need to.

It is a stable product.

The initial setup is easy.

It's a really good application, a good program. However, maybe the whole UI could change a bit in the future. After a while, it gets to be too much of the same in the eye of the customer. Maybe they need a column, or maybe a background, or something like that to mix things up.

They need to improve the scalability of Teams.

I’ve been using the solution for six months.

Stability is not a problem. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable, and the performance is good.

The solution can scale. However, it could be better.

We have about 200 people using the solution right now at our organization.

I’ve never had to reach out to support as I’ve never had any issues. It works well. I can’t say how the technical support is, however.

The initial implementation was actually not made by me. However, I saw the process and it's pretty straightforward. There was nothing that I saw that would lead me to believe it would be complex.

I’m not sure about the pricing. I’m not sure if we have to pay anything.

I am a customer and an end-user.

I’m not sure which version of the solution I’m using right now.

I’d invite potential new users to use it or try it out. You can have access it from any device, and it’s great if you want to access data or information.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten. It’s great. However, the UI could be better, which is why I didn’t give it perfect marks.

I use Teams for meetings, chats, and outgoing calls.

Teams' most valuable feature is the ability to choose from multiple numbers to show when calling.

Teams doesn't always sync to show as Do Not Disturb during Outlook meetings. In the next release, it would be useful to see other users' availability.

I've been using Teams for a year and a half.

Teams is stable, though there are very occasional problems with flashing when screen sharing.

We previously used Skype, but Teams is more user-friendly and syncs with Outlook.

The initial setup was challenging because Teams was a new platform for us, but it was that hard, and the training provided helped us understand better. Deployment took three months.

Teams is really user-friendly and not that complex. I would give it a rating of nine out of ten.

We use this solution for video conferencing.

I don't like it very much, but I have to use it because it's the standard in the organization for communication. It could be improved if it was easier to use and the interface was revamped. 

We have been using this solution for two years. 

This is a reliable and stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. It integrates with a lot of Microsoft software.

The initial setup was complex. I have the impression that Microsoft software is complex to implement because of the many configurations and parameters that they use.

We used an integrator to complete the installation. 

I would say that it's important to train all the people that are going to use it, because it's not very easy to use. 

I would this rate this solution an eight out of ten.