Elastic Observability vs HPE OneView comparison

Elastic Observability
Read 22 Elastic Observability reviews
  • 5,192 Views
  • 4,376 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
HPE OneView
Read 80 HPE OneView reviews
  • 3,340 Views
  • 2,331 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: June 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Observability vs. HPE OneView
June 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,779 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), Log Management (14th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)
HPE OneView
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 4.0%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.4%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Unique Categories:
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
6.8%
Log Management
0.9%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

SRIDHAR KARRA - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2023
A solution offering stability, good support, and a straightforward setup phase
Right now, I don't have any comments on what needs to be improved because I handle the delivery unit at a CEO's level. So, it's my team who works hands-on and on a day-to-day basis. Hence, they may be the right people to comment on this. The price of the solution can make a 100 percent difference. I think the licensing model may not have major issues because it's only a node-based one or something. However, the customers should first consume the existing features completely because quite a few customers do not use the complete capacity of Elastic's enterprise version. So that's how things are in India right now. The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper.
Read full review
Trevor Watkins - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2023
Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO
I'm using this solution for Windows and Linux servers, backup servers, and Oracle database servers. We're using a mix of two versions. We have version 7 and version 6.60. The solution is deployed on-premises. There are currently six people using this solution in my organization. We currently don't…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."
"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."
"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."
"The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search."
"It has always been a stable solution."
"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."
"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."
"The Elastic User Interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. You need to have some Javascript knowledge. We need that knowledge to develop new custom tests."
More Elastic Observability pros
"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."
"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."
"​It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. ​"
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"Easy to see if all my servers are on correct firmware levels, with SPP packaging."
"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."
More HPE OneView pros
 

Cons

"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."
"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."
"Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."
"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."
"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."
"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."
"There could be more low-code features included in the product."
"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."
More Elastic Observability cons
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"We've had a few issues. We just upgraded to the 3.9.0 version. We think that now that we are on that version, hopefully a lot of those things are going to go away for us."
"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."
"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."
More HPE OneView cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have been using the open-source version."
"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."
"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."
"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."
"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."
"We will buy a premium license after POC."
"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."
More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice
"​I am happy with the price."
"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."
"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."
"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."
"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."
"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."
"​Use it. It is free."
"HPE could lower the price."
More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?
Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?
I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?
The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configurati...
See all answers
What do you like most about HPE OneView?
The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE OneView?
HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy. It would be good if we could incorporate HPE OneView into GreenLake. Instead of having everything go to HPE G...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?
HPE OneView is a management interface to manage hardware in a VMware environment. It is used for managing different servers and pushing out the firmware and operating software. I use HPE OneView fo...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability Logo
Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability
Compared 16% of the time
New Relic vs Elastic Observability Logo
New Relic vs Elastic Observability
Compared 16% of the time
Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability Logo
Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability
Compared 9% of the time
Sentry vs Elastic Observability Logo
Sentry vs Elastic Observability
Compared 9% of the time
AppDynamics vs Elastic Observability Logo
AppDynamics vs Elastic Observability
Compared 9% of the time
More Elastic Observability Competitors
Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView Logo
Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView
Compared 18% of the time
Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView Logo
Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView
Compared 17% of the time
Zabbix vs HPE OneView Logo
Zabbix vs HPE OneView
Compared 14% of the time
Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView Logo
Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs HPE OneView
Compared 10% of the time
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView
Compared 9% of the time
More HPE OneView Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Elastic Observability
June 2024
Elastic Observability reportDownload Elastic Observability product report
Buyer's Guide
HPE OneView
June 2024
HPE OneView reportDownload HPE OneView product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
HP OneView
 

Learn More

Elastic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
 

Overview

To effectively monitor and gain insights across your distributed systems, you need to have all your observability data in one stack. Break down silos by bringing together application, infrastructure, and user data into a unified solution for end-to-end observability and alerting.
Rely on the most widely deployed observability platform available, built on the proven Elastic Stack (also known as the ELK Stack) to converge silos, delivering unified visibility and actionable insights.

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

 

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Observability vs. HPE OneView
June 2024
Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. HPE OneView
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Elastic Observability vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.