SAP ERP Reviews

I mostly work with SAP implementation projects as a project manager.

Implementation of a new ERP system usually does not give you immediate measurable benefits, but it helps you to evaluate how the company functions and improve internal business processes, this is where most benefits can be seen. Plus long-term effects in data quality and transparency, better-balanced decision making, higher satisfaction and motivation of employees, and internal and external image of the company. 

The most valuable features depend on the company's needs and area of expertise. For example, PP is quite an important module for industrial companies, but FI-CO is the most useful module for any company.

SAP is more reliable in terms of data quality than other systems, but it still has room for improvement. If it is planned well, it can really help users avoid mistakes. However, sometimes the cost is not reasonable, usually, it is the case of smaller companies.

I have been using it for many years, since 2014. We are currently using S/4HANA, which we use on-premises, but we plan to move to the cloud soon.

Stability is quite high. I would give it an eight out of ten. Sometimes the connection depends on the infrastructure and other things that are not exactly SAP's responsibility if we talk about on-premise solutions. Possible issues with stability could be partially resolved when moving to the cloud based solutions.

In terms of scalability, SAP offers quite a high grade for organizational change possibilities. It's manageable to plan organizational changes, and there is a lot of information available and SAP consultants on the market who can help with this.

In general, every SAP project is quite unique. It depends on how well we understand the requirements and what is expected from this implementation. The success of the whole implementation is actually meeting these expectations or maybe lowering expectations somewhere. I have participated in several end-to-end implementations, but the time varied for each deployment process and the processes differ in each company.

The pricing depends on the implementation functions. I work with implementations, and the cost varies depending on whether it's an internal or external team and the contractual basis or employees involved. Typically, it could start from 100,000 EUR and go up to 1 mio EUR and be much higher if we include more SAP solutions, locations, and cycles. The cost would vary greatly based on the specific requirements.

In comparison to others on the market, I would rate SAP ERP a nine out of ten. There is still room for improvement, as nothing is ideal. But it's one of the strongest on the market I have worked with.

It's good to learn from the best in this industry. And keep learning new things because sometimes you could be not aware that there are new solutions available to help you with your everyday tasks. And being in the area of professionals helps a lot.

Within the organization, I use SAP ERP on a daily basis.

The most significant elements of this solution are the ability to create a virtual product, a service product, and delivery.

Data analytics can be improved.

The problem with SAP is that whenever there is a modification, or if a new field needs to be added, they charge tens of thousands, hundreds, or even two hundred thousand dollars. That is not anything in which I am really interested. 

For instance, consider a single-use case. I have to enter the root causes for a certain operation or failure. That option does not exist anywhere in SAP, not in manufacturing, not in logistics, not in anything. It is completely missing.

The root cause analysis is very common across industries, yet SAP does not offer this option.

A line field or a metaparticle, for example, was delayed. If you have the choice to input the warehouse operator or if the person who submitted the document has the opportunity to enter, this has been postponed for N, X, Y, or Z reasons.

That would have been ideal, but sadly, that option is not available in SAP. I checked other modules, but that option does not exist anywhere.

I have been working with SAP ERP, for eight years.

It is a very stable product. I would rate the stability of SAP ERP a nine out of ten.

In terms of scalability, everything is very modular. It would be great if you could combine everything.

I would rate the scalability a five or six out of ten.

Technical support could be improved. It comes with an additional cost.

It was set up for me. I didn't have to do anything.

I am not sure. However, extensions cost approximately $100,000 or$200,000.

SAP ERP is a great product, but its flexibility is limited.

It's a great product, but it has been driven from the top. It has been driven from the top. It is not a customer-based solution. We are offered something as it is and we are expected to use it as it is.

I would rate SAP ERP a nine out of ten. 

The solution is simple to use.

Introducing diversity into this solution could be beneficial for discovering new and improved deployment processes. Once we acquire experience with one, we can then utilize the other as needed. The pricing of the solution could be improved.

I will need to have more experience with the product to comment on this.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The pricing could be improved.

I rate SAP ERP a seven out of ten.

Our company uses the solution within our European branch for ERP functionality such as configurations for sales, purchases, and production. 

We have 15,000 users across various departments including IT, sales, and business development. We are planning to upgrade to the newest version soon. 

The solution can easily be standardized across processes. 

Customizations are a bit expensive. 

I have been using the solution for fourteen years. 

The solution's stability is perfect across our 15,000 users. 

Any stability issues are likely caused by manual configurations that do not have correct master data to run properly. 

Technical support is not very good so I rate it a seven out of ten. 

Neutral

We previously used Infor but switched because we needed a global solution. 

The setup is difficult so implementation consultants are needed. 

We utilized consultants for our first implementation and it took eighteen months. Our internal team included ten IT specialists and ten business development staff.

Typical rollouts include a team of 20-30 people. 

The solution is expensive so I rate cost a five out of ten. 

To save costs, use the standard solution with few customizations and ensure your data is good quality.  

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

One of the most relevant features is that the product connects to every software. Our third parties can integrate through SAP ERP extremely easily, integrate with data transfer and communicate within the solution. The solution is reliable for external connections that other software doesn't provide.

The service could be more user-friendly regarding transition codes. There are more than 65,000 four and six-digit codes from every field and domain. A person like me, or anyone else, can't remember all of them. So something easier to remember or work with would be an improvement for all SAP products, not just ERP.

I started working with S/4HANA three years back. But overall, I've been working in SAP ERP for more than nine years. Right now, most clients are on S/4. If we have the latest version of SAP ERP, we call it S/4. 

The solution is not 100% stable. Working in a 24/7 environment, I face disasters day and night. Every work process operates in the backend. If a process goes down, once we identify the exact issue, we have a disaster center with all the data we copied on our servers. We can recover all the files and data from there. So the solution needs improvement.

I work for a parent company, and they have some other vendors to whom we provide support because we work for tech.

If we're talking only about administration, setting up our landscape is very complex. 

We have a huge number of servers. The SAP software itself is more than 100 gigabytes. It takes two to three days to download SAP software from the SAP service marketplace. And installing the server itself takes months. It's not easy.

Because I was representing third parties as their solution provider. I already knew most features and functions, so I never went to another vendor for support. But in such cases, if I can't resolve an issue, I log a ticket to an SAP technical team like the core SAP team or the SAP Support Portal. 

Overall, I would rate the solution seven out of 10.

Most S/4 ERP solutions are cloud-based. BPC is totally cloud-based. Most of our data servers are cloud-based, and Information Steward is also cloud-based.

All the data and more used to be stored locally. Nowadays, however, all the data, including S/4HANA, is only on the cloud. They're planning to move everything into the cloud, even ACC, because of space and wasted storage issues.

We have 22,263 SAP ERP end users, for which we require a team comprising around 25 technical and as many as 74 functional members.

In the past, it was a pure on-premise solution. As the market has gone on, SAP is all also delivering hybrid or public and private clouds. Because you can configure SAP for huge automotive factories — like Rolls-Royce and Mercedes-Benz, for example — they do have some development inside of these kinds of software. Therefore, it's really difficult to bring everything into the cloud. 

So, although SAP is making a lot of business with the hybrid or private and public cloud solutions, I think there are still others who would like to use solutions other than pure cloud solutions. This is my impression.

I'm an old-fashioned guy, so I feel better when I have GUI. So, not a web browser. This makes me feel better because of security issues.

If big companies are going for SAP and they would like to install it, they should know that it still needs time. Implementation will cost a lot of money. I would really appreciate it if the software tools had something like template solutions where you didn't have to spend too much time and effort to configure. Instead, the process would run in the software with just a click. So, I'd like to see better provision of templates.

I started as a consultant. I have 25 years of end-user experience and experience as an implementation consultant.

Right now, because of all these different deployment methods like cloud, the scalability is very good. There are plenty of options you can select. It's not a pure public cloud solution. You still have the possibility to go for on-premise or to go for hybrid and use these super large services like Amazon Web Services or go with a small private IT provider. Scalability is very high in my opinion.

Their technical support is available 24/7. They provide good support. On a scale of 1 to 5, I would give it a 4.

Initial setup is complex. I would rate the setup a 4 out of 5.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

There are many interfaces, so you really can build satellites around it like with other SAP stuff or even third-party stuff. The entity relationship is the basis for the whole business in the world. For example, the relationships between the customer, vendor, materials, orders, invoices, and so on. For me, this system is very logical. It's complex, but once you understand it, it's perfect.

We use the product for accounts payable and accounts receivables processes. It helps us analyze the throughput time between goods receipt and the completion of the entire accounts payable process. It identifies any delays or lags in the payment of invoices and ratios.

The product’s most valuable feature is a centralized system integrating different departments within the organization. It works much faster compared to other vendors.

SAP ERP lags a bit compared to Oracle for reporting features. Oracle provides predefined standard reports for vendor and customer-related financial statements. This feature could be included in SAP for creating reports adhering to standardized compliance requirements.

We have been using SAP ERP for three and a half years.

The product is stable. There are a lot of clients that maintain their systems for several years.

The product is scalable and suitable for large enterprises.

The technical support services are good. However, they cannot provide solutions for certain problems.

Positive

The deployment process requires a lot of resources and is expensive. It takes a lot of time to configure and deploy SAP applications. We need around 50 to 60 skilled resources for configuration setup. For finance, we may need another 50 resources. The process involves technical modules. Thus, we need expertise in finance and cost to handle the functional models, including warehouse, production, and plant maintenance. SAP provides good support services to help us set up the application.

The deployment time depends on the size of the data records and their processes. Some implementations might happen for years together.

The number of engineers and architects required depends on the existing data and processes. On average, we need a minimum of 10 executives to work on each module. We have around 20 modules in total. We may need overall at least 100 resources to implement the product.

The product has high pricing. They provide a yearly basis license. The customers have to pay extra costs for support services.

I reviewed some articles and blogs and interacted with IT consultants to learn about Oracle.

SAP ERP provides a lot of features compared to other systems. It is a well-integrated and feasible solution. It is a perfect solution if you can afford to invest in SAP. They are improving themselves rapidly. They provide all the organizational level services, including transaction, dashboarding, reports, automation, etc. They need to improve a few processes, including transformation, intelligence, governance, modeling, etc.

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I use SAP ERP to make our internal processes run smoothly. It helps with finances, accounting, and reporting. I can manage inventory and purchasing efficiently, and the system ensures our production and manufacturing processes work seamlessly.

The most valuable features of SAP ERP are its stability, industry-specific package, and adaptable configuration. It is versatile in communication, making it easy to align with our business processes. 

One challenge we face with SAP ERP is the push to upgrade to S/4HANA, which comes with significant costs. While SAP encourages this transition, we need to carefully evaluate factors like our team's functions, existing customizations, and the overall expense involved in the upgrade process. Cost considerations are a major downside to this potential move. For the next release of SAP ERP, I would like to see enhanced financial planning and analysis features

I have been working with SAP ERP for six years.

SAP ERP is quite stable. Our current instance operates smoothly, and we have only made minor customizations for specific management reporting needs. When it comes to the standard functions and configurations, we haven't encountered the need for significant changes.

It is a scalable product. In our company, we have around 200 licensed users for SAP ERP. When it comes to administration and maintenance, we have only one system administrator for the basic IT needs. Additionally, we have less than ten people handling application-related IT tasks. Overall, the management is straightforward, with a small team handling the responsibilities.

Before SAP ERP, we used Oracle ERP. The decision to switch to SAP ERP was not driven by our IT team but it resulted from business organizational changes that forced us to adopt a different ERP package.

Deploying SAP ERP two years ago was a bit challenging. We moved from an existing instance to a new virtual one, rebuilding everything from scratch and converting Master DataOps. It took some effort, but with external support, we successfully made the transition. Deploying SAP ERP had its challenges because when we started using it six or seven years ago, it wasn't a new setup but a result of a merger. For the first three years, we were more focused on daily operations. When we decided to take full control three years ago, it was our first time setting up our processes. We needed external support to navigate the difficulties, given our limited familiarity with the new package.

It is on the expensive side. 

Overall, I would rate SAP ERP as a nine out of ten.