SAP ERP Reviews

Our primary use case for the product is managing financial operations, expense control, asset management, and HR operations. We leverage various modules, including the travel management system, to streamline these processes across our institution.

One of the platform's most beneficial features is the holiday request system accessible through the SAP portal. It offers an intuitive and efficient way to handle administrative tasks like budget checks and other requests.

The product is less intuitive and cumbersome for certain tasks. Additionally, integrating with other systems has been challenging due to customization needs, which may not entirely be the system's fault but rather our internal processes and integrator choices.

I have been using SAP ERP for ten years. 

The product is stable, with minimal instances of glitches or performance issues. The system's reliability has supported our day-to-day operations effectively without significant interruptions.

The product has been highly scalable for our organization. We've expanded its usage seamlessly by adding additional nodes and have encountered no significant issues regarding system speed or responsiveness.

Deploying the product in our institution was a complex process that spanned several years due to our large organizational size and intricate business processes. Each customization and deployment phase required careful planning and execution to ensure compatibility with our specific requirements.

The vendor team demonstrated high expertise and provided valuable insights during the deployment process.

Implementing SAP ERP has significantly enhanced efficiency by automating administrative tasks such as holiday requests and monthly reporting. This has freed up resources and streamlined processes, leading to tangible time and cost savings across various departments.

For other organizations considering SAP ERP, it's essential to be aware of the setup costs, which can be substantial. Licensing can vary, but for educational institutions, there are often favorable conditions. It's important to thoroughly evaluate the total cost of ownership, including future licensing fees.

We evaluated other options such as Oracle ERP and Microsoft Dynamics. However, SAP ERP was selected for its robust functionality and ability to meet our specific needs.

I recommend SAP ERP, particularly for large organizations with standardized processes. Its robust customization capabilities and comprehensive feature set make it suitable for managing complex business operations effectively.

I rate it a seven out of ten. 

We use SAP ERP mainly for CRM.

I like the solution's ability to close plans and resource requirements in deals.

When I entered or itemized closing plans step by step on how to close deals, the solution helped me to materialize how I wanted to close the deal. It forced me to think about how to do it. If you have a vague idea of how to do it, different ways appear when you put it on paper or type it on a keyboard. The solution also monitors if I'm executing all the steps that I define necessary to closing a deal.

SAP ERP was not very user-friendly. Some features and functions are quite obsolete. For example, we had some scoring where the total had to be 100%. I could only enter figures from 100 to 150 or just only 90. There was a lot of manual work.

I have worked with SAP ERP for nine years.

Companies in certain segments find the solution scalable. For companies that require SAP, where employees are required to have high flexibility in changing processes, SAP ERP is not the right software. However, the solution is very scalable for large companies with 1,000 employees and more.

When I was using SAP, there were 80,000 users.

The first line of support has low-skilled people who just resolve some problems. They hand the problem over to the second level if it is more sophisticated. Unfortunately, as a customer, you often have to describe your issue or problem again to those on the second level.

Likewise, if support is 24/7, there could be different support centers, and you might have to describe your problems to different support centers across the globe again and again.

Neutral

From the user's point of view, the solution is easy to set up. You don't need to modify anything while setting up the solution. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten.

The time taken to deploy the solution depends upon many factors, such as the number of modifications, change requests, and the complexity of data migration. It also matters if it is for one or a few small countries. Setting up SAP ERP can take half a year or several years.

I rate SAP ERP's pricing a six or seven out of ten.

I recommend SAP ERP, but it depends on where you are. I'm from the Czech Republic, and SAP dominates the local market. But that's not because of the product but because of the number of available consultants and their experience. By comparison, Oracle has a great solution, but no one has experience with implementation. We didn't know about all the functions and features. Likewise, if you don't have a critical mass of customers, you cannot get experience from implementation.

There are about 700 certified consultants in the Czech Republic for SAP ERP.

I rate SAP ERP an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for logistics, finance, asset management, and accounting.

I like that it is applicable to so many use cases. 

It has been quite stable so far. 

Technical support is helpful and responsive. 

It's very scalable. 

The product is easy to use. 

I don't see room for improvement; we use a lot of specifics in our version.

The only feature that is not available in our current version is web access.

We'd like to have mobile access. 

The solution isn't great for smaller companies since it does cost quite a bit for licensing. The price could be lower.

I've used the solution since 2006.

The stability is great. I'd rate it nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

It offers good scalability. I'd rate the ability to expand eight out of ten. You can grow out f you need to. 

We do not have plans to change solutions. While we're planning to switch to the new version of SAP S/4, we will stay with our ERP.

Technical support has been good. They are always available to us if we need them. We are satisfied with the level of support we get. 

We did not previously use a different solution before jumping into this product. This was our first ERP. 

I wasn't involved in the first deployment as it was in 2006. However, I was involved in the migration from the old version to the current version. That process was quite complex since we use a lot of specifics in our version. That made it difficult. We had to bring all the specific programs to the new version and also test all the specifics.

There is another technical team that is responsible for the licenses and the number of users. I don't directly handle pricing.

We're a customer and end-user. 

I really recommend it to new clients as we have all the modules in one system, and it's scalable and easy to use.

Personally, I'm very satisfied with it. From the technical side to the functional side, we are satisfied. I would rate it nine out of ten.

In the past, it was a pure on-premise solution. As the market has gone on, SAP is all also delivering hybrid or public and private clouds. Because you can configure SAP for huge automotive factories — like Rolls-Royce and Mercedes-Benz, for example — they do have some development inside of these kinds of software. Therefore, it's really difficult to bring everything into the cloud. 

So, although SAP is making a lot of business with the hybrid or private and public cloud solutions, I think there are still others who would like to use solutions other than pure cloud solutions. This is my impression.

I'm an old-fashioned guy, so I feel better when I have GUI. So, not a web browser. This makes me feel better because of security issues.

If big companies are going for SAP and they would like to install it, they should know that it still needs time. Implementation will cost a lot of money. I would really appreciate it if the software tools had something like template solutions where you didn't have to spend too much time and effort to configure. Instead, the process would run in the software with just a click. So, I'd like to see better provision of templates.

I started as a consultant. I have 25 years of end-user experience and experience as an implementation consultant.

Right now, because of all these different deployment methods like cloud, the scalability is very good. There are plenty of options you can select. It's not a pure public cloud solution. You still have the possibility to go for on-premise or to go for hybrid and use these super large services like Amazon Web Services or go with a small private IT provider. Scalability is very high in my opinion.

Their technical support is available 24/7. They provide good support. On a scale of 1 to 5, I would give it a 4.

Initial setup is complex. I would rate the setup a 4 out of 5.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

There are many interfaces, so you really can build satellites around it like with other SAP stuff or even third-party stuff. The entity relationship is the basis for the whole business in the world. For example, the relationships between the customer, vendor, materials, orders, invoices, and so on. For me, this system is very logical. It's complex, but once you understand it, it's perfect.

We use the FI, CO, SD, PP, and MM modules. We also use GTS.

The solution provides a high level of integration. In my previous company, we were working with Oracle, and there were a lot of reconciliation issues. We do not have such issues in SAP because everything is integrated. GTS provides a lot of value.

The production system must be upgraded. The PP and APO modules need improvement. PP has not been upgraded much, and we look forward to a new one. We do not have extended warehouse management. We are in the process of setting up a new site for a new factory, and we need the extended warehouse management functionality.

I have been using the solution since 1985.

We do not have issues with stability.

The tool provides the scalability we need. We have around 250 users.

We use a third-party vendor for technical support. The support is good. It's not always easy to get the right counterparts immediately. Sometimes, there’s a waiting period because people are busy.

Positive

We want to move to S/4HANA to take advantage of the improvements in finance. New GL provides much functionality for profit analysis, P&L, and all kinds of automation. Our S/4HANA conversion plan has a schedule of 15 months from start to finish.

The deployment is quite complex. The preparation, setting up of all the systems, and the tests are complex. We need a lot of involvement from the key users. The maintenance of the product is easy if we have the right people for the modules. We work with third-party providers. The product works fine if they know what they are doing and we have the right links inside and out. We also need knowledgeable key users in the departments.

SAP is quite expensive. It's a premium system. The other ERP systems are either similarly priced or cheaper. We pay a quarterly license fee for the product.

We have a registered number at SAP for our SAP system. We are end users. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

It is easy to use for someone only if they are trained and have the skills to use it. For those having no experience with the solution, it's almost impossible for them to use it. There is a need and requirement for some training to be provided to those planning to use the solution. Presently, the solution's interface is not intuitive.

I have been working with SAP ERP for ten years. I am currently working on SAP ERP EHP 7. I am a customer of the solution.

It is a stable solution.

Around 200 people in my company work with the solution.

The solution's technical support is fine. They do help users to sort out the issues related to the solution. I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

The last time we faced an issue using the solution, it took the technical support team a while to resolve it, but I think it is because it was not on a production system but on a test system to which they give low priority. However, I felt the technical support team should have provided me with the appropriate assistance even though the product was used in a test environment. Also, I always try to avoid seeking help from the technical support team as I prefer looking for documentation, or I seek support from my peers.

Positive

Previously, I worked with a product from Microsoft. I wouldn't say that Microsoft's product was better than SAP ERP. However, I would say that Microsoft's product had more capacity, processes, and functionalities than SAP ERP, which was meant to support small businesses. But, SAP ERP has much more specialized features suitable for bigger industries.

The solution's deployment process was easy for me since I have experience in deploying it. However, it may not be straightforward for someone else. Since it is not a PnP device and there are so many moving parts, there is a high chance of the person involved in its deployment process making a mistake. But, over time, one gets to know and learn what to do when something happens. Even though issues are there in the solution, I am able to use it after fixing it.

I was not a part of one of the latest instances involving the implementation process of the solution, but I have carried out the implementation process in many other places. So based on my experience, the implementation process takes about six months.

Our company has experienced a return on investment using the solution. Some people in my company look into the areas related to the solution.

The pricing is based on the license per user, which I think makes the solution a bit costly, especially for Africa and Kenya. The price for the solution is the same for everybody, so they are able to generate the same revenue from companies in Europe. Basically, the prices of the solution are high, and we don't have that much revenue. We have to choose a mix of licenses for SAP ERP, so we can't choose just one type of license. Even though the mix of licenses has both expensive and cheap ones, one has to buy the expensive ones since there is a minimum ratio to be considered while purchasing their licenses. Additionally, our company had to pay 22% of the amount for the solution's licenses for maintenance and support.

We decided to move to SAP S/4HANA from SAP ERP since we wanted an upgrade, and it had to be done someday. Also, we felt that SAP ERP will get discontinued at some point.

Since it is a superior product in terms of its functionalities to my company, I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

Our company uses the solution within our European branch for ERP functionality such as configurations for sales, purchases, and production. 

We have 15,000 users across various departments including IT, sales, and business development. We are planning to upgrade to the newest version soon. 

The solution can easily be standardized across processes. 

Customizations are a bit expensive. 

I have been using the solution for fourteen years. 

The solution's stability is perfect across our 15,000 users. 

Any stability issues are likely caused by manual configurations that do not have correct master data to run properly. 

Technical support is not very good so I rate it a seven out of ten. 

Neutral

We previously used Infor but switched because we needed a global solution. 

The setup is difficult so implementation consultants are needed. 

We utilized consultants for our first implementation and it took eighteen months. Our internal team included ten IT specialists and ten business development staff.

Typical rollouts include a team of 20-30 people. 

The solution is expensive so I rate cost a five out of ten. 

To save costs, use the standard solution with few customizations and ensure your data is good quality.  

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We are a consulting company and SAP ERP is one of the products that we implement for our customers. Our primary role is to advise them on tools and strategy, including business use cases that they want to transform.

With ERP, we are working with customers who are looking for S/4HANA transformation, mainly from a greenfield approach. For RPA, we want to add some value in the business case because the business case of the S/4HANA transformation is not so easy to find. So we use some techniques like RPA to find more money around this transformation.

Right now we try to automate some functionality, which is not yet really good, within ERP. We really want to connect via API to the RFP tool to S/4HANA in fact.

We do business consulting or IT consulting, and do not provide support. We do advise them on tools and strategy, including business cases that they have to transform. We work with them up to this point and do not do the implementation.

The most valuable features are the claim management. We also find the automation for the process within the "purchase to pay" can be valuable as well. We know that SAP already has an RPA solution to automate the reconciliation between the invoice and the orders, so we don't think that we can find a lot there. We would like to have some use cases with logistics and so on, but we don't have much right now.

We have a "purchase to pay" process, which is in SAP Ariba but mainly within the ERP. We would like to have more around purchasing because with purchasing we have a lot of money to gain and it could be very good for the business case.

There are a lot of manual tasks that are used by a lot of people, so it is a very good candidate for RPA. SAP says that if you want to extend the solutions, you need to use some solution outside of SAP for RPA, on a platform as a service or whatever. So, if SAP could have some option, but this not the tool or the best platform that is in the market. So we try to find some solutions to better convince our customers.

I began working with SAP in 1992, about 28 years ago.

We have experienced no problems with stability.

Scalability has not been an issue for our customers. Our smaller clients have between 2,000 and 3,000 users, whereas a large company has between 10,000 and 20,000 users.

Normally our customers are in retail, the chemical industry, and energy companies. The setup is usually quite complex. When we want them to transform to S/4HANA it has been mainly customized. There are a lot of specifics because their processes are generally not straightforward.

The deployment will take perhaps two months, on average.

When it comes to financing or accounting, SAP is quite enormous. When a company has to produce on every quarter, the numbers that would be in the SAP report, it is quite good. It has very long, long, long life behind it. Logistics, it's still okay. But for the rest, we just started G-Cloud first with a software as a service application. For HR, you have Workday, for instance.

For key purchasing, maybe go to SAP Ariba. If you are looking for Salesforce automation, for instance CRM, maybe you will go to Salesforce. It really depends on which process you want to clone and you want to target, but for the core finance, S/4HANA is a good solution.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.