Microsoft Teams Reviews

The tool is scalable, flexible, and good in all aspects. I am impressed with its meeting schedules, remote support, and chat. 

The solution should improve internal and external data expansion. I am not able to send records to an external member who has been added to the call. I am only able to send the file to the internal member. These features should be enabled in that Teams so that during the call, we can share the document file and discuss at the same time.

I have been working with the solution for six months. 

I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. Sometimes, when you share the screen with a client it goes blank. It becomes clear once you rejoin the meeting. I think this is a bug or a drawback.  

I have used browser-based applications like Zoom but find Teams to be much more flexible. 

I would rate the tool's setup a nine out of ten. You just need to log in and download the file to get started. 

I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I use the Teams for internal communication like to reach my colleague and share information. 

I like the video call and document-sharing features. 

The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month. 

I have been using the product for five to six months. 

The product is stable most of the time and I would rate it around six to seven out of ten. 

The solution is very scalable and my company has 400 users for the product. 

The product's support is good. 

Positive

Teams' setup is easy and I would rate it around eight to nine out of ten. 

I use Teams' free version. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. Teams works very well for a medium to big company. I don't think the tool is the best when you are the only person and want to reach anybody. 

We mainly use Teams for meetings and video chatting.

In general, Teams allows me to connect with anyone in the organization and share files with the team.

The call quality could be better sometimes. Microsoft could improve the quality of the backgrounds. File sharing could also be smoother. It takes a lot of clicks to download and copy the links. It should be only one click. 

It's also problematic to get people outside the organization into the chat or groups. I can define my own team irrespective of the organizational structure. Still, if I need to work with external partners or colleagues at my company and want them on one team, it's relatively complicated to add external people to the team.

I've been using Teams for about four years. 

I can't say that Teams isn't stable. The only issue we have is the call quality. Sometimes it blurs, or the video stops. However, that could be a connectivity issue that isn't directly connected to the tool. 

I rate Microsoft Teams eight out of 10. 

• Collaboration
• Meetings
• Voice, video calls, and chats

It has allowed for collaboration during the COVID-19 situation (work from home).

• Calling
• Setting up teams
• Meetings
• File transfer

Whiteboard should be standard rather than an app.

Six months.

The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to share documents easily.

It is challenging to sign up for a new device for the solution. It could be better.

We have been using the solution for three years. At present, we use the latest version.

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten.

We have more than 2000 solution users in our organization. I rate its scalability a seven out of ten.

The solution's initial setup is easy. I rate the process a nine out of ten.

The solution is very secure. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use Microsoft Teams for studies and official purposes.

Microsoft Teams is a friendly and easy-to-install solution.

I would like to receive fewer updates from Microsoft Teams.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for 10 years.

I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

The solution’s deployment took only a few minutes. Only one administrator is required for the solution’s deployment and maintenance.

We need to pay for Microsoft Teams' licenses on a yearly basis. Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution.

I am using the latest version of Microsoft Teams. Around 50 users are using the solution in our organization, and we have no plans to increase the usage.

I would recommend Microsoft Teams to other users.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams ten out of ten.

We use the product for communication and as a channel for discussion on projects. 

The solution integrates with project management products like Jira. 

The solution should improve its user interface and recording features. 

I have been working with the product for five years. 

I would rate the product's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 6000 employees. 

Our first line of support is within the company. If they cannot resolve it, we open a ticket and get an immediate response from the Microsoft team.

The product is better than Zoom in terms of features and capabilities. 

Our team did the solution's implementation. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

The corporate world widely accepts the solution for virtual meetings. Also, it has good availability.

The solution's login process could be more straightforward. It takes four to five minutes to load. They need to improve their login speed. Also, its UI needs to be easy and accessible. In addition, the name and picture display options once we log into the meeting should be more flexible.

We use the solution to schedule meetings or virtual calls with customers and vendors.

It is a scalable solution.

The solution's initial setup is easy if you have a Microsoft account.

We don't have to pay for the solution.

In comparison, Zoom has a faster login process. Also, it has better UI and security features.

It is a good and trusted tool from a security perspective. Also, it is the best solution for corporate use cases. I rate it a seven out of ten.