Fortinet FortiWeb vs KerioControl comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiWeb
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (4th)
KerioControl
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (29th), Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (18th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

AE
Mar 18, 2024
Works fine for classic websites and simple load balancing but lacks specialized protection
I'd like more customization. I'm not sure if everyone would agree, as it might add complexity. But for advanced users, it would be really useful to have access and the ability to manipulate packets. If we can access and manipulate the contents of packets, even encrypted packets... that would be powerful. Since we're looking at packets arriving at our network, we would have the private key to access those packets and their information. For example, I have an encrypted packet, and I have the private key for the certificate provided in that client. If I could tell FortiWeb, "After the packet is decrypted, if you see this thing, do that thing," that would be beneficial for advanced users. It would open up the possibilities for load balancing and specialized protection that we need but might be outside of the standard feature set. Maybe we need to manipulate a variable with a specific name that's only relevant to our security needs. That customization would be very beneficial.
Timur Assembayev - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 2, 2022
Easy to configure, user-friendly, and useful online information
There were some issues with our main firewall and it went down. In a short time, I deployed KerioControl and save our business The most valuable features of KerioControl are ease of configuration, user-friendliness, and comfortable to use. It is an all-in-one solution, it comes with many…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features in Fortinet FortiWeb are sandboxing and threat prevention."
"FortiWeb offers machine learning in the latest product. This fixed many problems. There are no false negatives."
"One main feature we are very happy about is file security and upload functionality."
"This product is very user-friendly."
"The deployment was very easy."
"FortiWeb offers a good price for the marketplace. In the Sri Lankan market, it's hard to find high-end products that can match FortiWeb's pricing. For high-end solutions, the price is always extremely high."
"Technical support is very good."
"SSL Offloading simplifies the public certificate handling and brings additional protection features."
"The solution’s firewall and intrusion detection features are quite good because you can see exactly who is attacking you and who is getting blocked."
"The reporting needs to be improved. It is hard to get a domain."
"The installation is straightforward."
"The top features are ones that we're not using yet but we soon will be because we've just had broadband upgraded in Australia. We've got something called the National Broadband Network, which is forced onto you, so you have to take it when it arrives. We'll be trying the high availability out soon. We tried that with some load balancing, it didn't quite work as we expected, but I think that was more of a configuration thing rather than a product thing."
"The traffic insight page or the administrative portal is really helpful because you can see all the internet usage down to the point where you can see if it's big files or streams. It gives us a good view of what the internet usage is of users who are coupled to an IP address. That way, if there are problems with, for example, a lot of data usage or problems with the connection, we can narrow it down to a single user or server and address the problem. It's really helpful for diagnostic data."
"The ease of use in the GUI itself is the most valuable feature. The GUI is really the best part of it. We like the traffic rules so we can control who can get to what. It's easy to determine the flow of the traffic itself so we aren't having to guess through command lines and reading out basically command-driven output. It's just a very easy-to-use interface. The interface is the best part of the product."
"I have found the most valuable features of Kerio Control to be the IPS and firewall."
"The most valuable features of KerioControl are ease of configuration, user-friendliness, and comfortable to use. It is an all-in-one solution, it comes with many features, such as a firewall, antivirus software, and network protection."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, even if you follow the documentation, it doesn't work as expected."
"A better load balancer is needed when multiple servers are used for the same website."
"The automation piece can be improved. Although they say it can be automated very well, there is still manual work. Its usability should be improved in terms of automation because we want to build an infrastructure with code, but you can't do that easily with this solution. If they can give us APIs in the firewalls that we can tap into, it would be perfect."
"The solution could offer more integration opportunities."
"Fortinet FortiWeb needs to improve the way it's configured. Common services like publishing exchange should be done in one click only."
"Most of the deployment is done by our development team because they have some parameters that match the configuration. However, when we initially did the deployment we used a consultant company."
"Fortinet FortiWeb could improve data integration."
"F5 and some other firewalls are easier to customize. FortiWeb could be more flexible and customizable. The documentation could also be improved because many of the advanced features aren't fully documented."
"The product's technical support is not good as it used to be."
"The comprehensiveness of the security features could be improved upon. However, for the most part, it is pretty good. They could add more logs. I would like to see more detailed reporting, custom reporting from the logs, and more of a streamlined interface for certain aspects."
"I would like it if the interface section had multiple failovers. Although I do have three connections, just in case our physical cables get disconnected, I can only set up one failover as a backup. So, if for some reason our fiber and our AFM went down together, I would have to have it search for our 4G modem. I'd love to have extra backups running."
"The antivirus seemed to be a bit laggy on the connection so I disconnected that. It's definitely good. The only issue we've had with any sort of cyber attack seemed to be coming from a couple of distinct locations, people trying to get into known ports on remote desktops and stuff like that. The fact that we can block all that traffic is just great. It simplifies it."
"After the takeover by GFI, one of the things that Kerio built was MyKerio environment. This has not been very reliable because I get many messages that MyKerio is not functioning. For some reason, there are things that they changed and it is not very reliable at this moment, instead I have to connect to the firewall to see what is happening."
"We'd like to have more integrations Kerio Operator."
"I would like for them to add more security features."
"Kerio Control has just improved on their biggest problem, which was to introduce better support for high-availability requirements in production."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not a cheap product. It is not like a Linux or a Genex that you can deploy. It is a hardware appliance, and it is built for a specific reason and reliability. It is an enterprise-class solution. You wouldn't find an SMB investing in something like this."
"FortiWeb offers these services at a price that SME customers can afford, but it's also suitable for large enterprises. Still, they need to put in more work to gain a greater share of enterprise business because they face stiff competition in this segment from F5, Cloudflare, and some others."
"Previously, for each project, the cost was $800 to $1,000 per application. Now, it's $100 to $120. For some of the applications, there is a 90% reduction, and for some of the applications, there is a 50% reduction. We're paying only $500 to $600."
"The license cost depends on the size of the box or the size of the solution. It can go from €200 Euros to a few hundred thousand Euros a year depending on your size."
"Its subscription prices are cheaper, and it is not very expensive. From a price perspective, Fortinet is a very well-known security vendor. Subscriptions are very simple. They have a couple of licenses on an appliance, and that's it. The cost is not that big. One license is 40K, which they give with all the products. Another one includes the subscriptions for threat prevention, IPS, sandboxing, etc, which is more than enough."
"It is fine now. We had to earlier negotiate the price."
"The pricing is in the middle. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It feels like a justified cost for the features."
"The solution is a bit expensive when compared to other products."
"There is a yearly upkeep fee."
"It's very affordable."
"GFI has made a stupid decision regarding small office licensing. For offices where there are only three to five employees and had five years towards a five user product, they now force these customers to a 10-year user license. I really don't understand it. It's a stupid decision for the small offices who want a good solution for security because they'll probably decide to go to another product. Why should they buy something that they don't use?"
"The price of Kerio Control could be better, it is a bit overpriced compared to other solutions."
"Its price is fair. There are no additional costs."
"Pricing is good, but the licensing took a lot of time."
"I pay approximately $50 for the solution on an annual basis."
"The price is inexpensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiWeb?
The WAF profiles has been effective at mitigating web-based threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiWeb?
The pricing is in the middle. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It feels like a justified cost for the features, but it might get more expensive in the future. Also, keep in mind that Che...
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWeb?
I'd like more customization. I'm not sure if everyone would agree, as it might add complexity. But for advanced users, it would be really useful to have access and the ability to manipulate packets...
What do you like most about KerioControl?
The solution provides feasibility regarding cyber privacy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioControl?
The pricing is reasonable. We have to pay approximately EUR 175 for the product.
What needs improvement with KerioControl?
The pricing of the product can be improved. The trial duration of the product should also be extended.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
Triton Technical, McDonald's
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.