Trello Reviews

We migrated data from a NetApp storage system to a Nasuni cloud storage solution.

While we primarily used AWS for our Nasuni storage, we migrated a portion of it to GCP due to cost concerns.

Nasuni eliminates the need for multiple data silos and toolsets by providing a single, unified global file system. This is particularly beneficial for us as the Global File System allows seamless access for our numerous global customers.

With Nasuni, we can dynamically provision file storage capacity wherever needed, eliminating the need to predict future project requirements. This on-demand scalability is invaluable for managing unpredictable storage demands.

Nasuni Access Anywhere worked well.

Nasuni helped minimize our on-premises infrastructure.

We encountered difficulties establishing a stable connection between Nasuni and our network. Additionally, we experienced a lack of adequate communication and support from the Nasuni storage team.

The documentation is not readily accessible.

It is difficult to connect with technical support. Additionally, their knowledge base seems limited.

Managing Nasuni can be challenging due to the lack of comprehensive training and support compared to other solutions available.

The implementation of Nasuni increased our workload, as we assumed responsibility for its administration and maintenance.

My experience with the cloud migration was positive. It helped to improve my work by making it more efficient and accessible, which has increased its usefulness for me.

I would like to integrate directly with AWS, eliminating the need for multiple Nasuni boxes.

I have been using Nasuni for one year.

I would rate the stability of Nasuni a five out of ten.

We experienced significant difficulty contacting Nasuni's technical support team. Availability was limited, and when we did reach them, escalation of the issue was consistently required. This process was frustrating and time-consuming.

In the past, we used NetApp and Doubletake for various migration projects. Their support was much better than Nasuni's.

Initially, the implementation was complex due to limited support, our unfamiliarity with Nasuni, and the migration to AWS. As we gained experience, the process became smoother. The deployment took one year to complete and involved 18 people migrating 28 terabytes of data.

The implementation was completed in-house.

I would rate Nasuni a five out of ten.

We had 18 people using Nasuni.

While Nasuni has a learning curve, it becomes user-friendly once mastered.

To gain the most from Nasuni, I learned the importance of utilizing the knowledge transfer resources and familiarizing myself with the system through the initial prechecks before contacting their support team.

The tool is used to organize projects.

The product helps with the management of projects.

The product is not easy to use. Initially, it seemed easy to use, but it was not.

I have been using the solution for a couple of weeks.

I rate the tool’s stability a six out of ten. The stability could be better.

Around 15 people were using the product in our organization.

Earlier, we used Microsoft Excel for project management.

The initial setup was quite easy. The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I am an end user, and I am also providing the solution to my customers. It's a good tool. I would recommend it, but it depends on the IT projects of a company. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

I use Trello regularly to manage my tasks and track my progress. I use it to keep track of both personal and professional tasks. Additionally, the internship organizers at our company use it as a communication channel. At work, use it to leave comments and discuss how the projects are going.

What I like the most about Trello is how engaging and efficient it is. I like that it allows me to monitor which tasks have been completed and which ones haven't by removing a particular card away from the board, stating that the task has been done.

Although it has many useful features, the one thing I don't like about Trello is that it constantly sends out unimportant notifications. For example, I get an email notification from every card I comment on, which can be tedious at times. They should prioritize sending out only important notifications that are significant to me. I would like to only receive important emails to avoid spending time on irrelevant things. 

I can’t think of anything now but there is room for improvement. There’s definitely room for added features.

I've been using Trello for a little over a year.

I would give it a ten out of ten.

It's a very scalable solution. I believe there is definitely room for improvement but I enjoy the flexibility that comes with it. So in terms of scalability, it's very good, very efficient.

I've never even had any need to contact technical support. I think Trello is very easy to use. I understand that not everybody is tech-savvy like me, but I don't know if there's even a need to have customer support.

I was searching for solutions for productivity's sake and so far I have only explored Notion before I started using Trello. Notion is good in its own way. You can type anything you want and it kind of gives you a Microfosft 365 feeling while using it. You can do anything, convert to devices, convert to the database, convert it back to the table, etc. It gives room for a scale of features like structure, query, language, and other things. It's a very wonderful tool, but for me, in order to keep up with my productivity rate each week, I prefer Trello. I am the kind of person that when I fall in love with something, there's no going back. So I chose Trello. 

For a tech-savvy person like me, the initial setup of Trello was quite simple. There was nothing particularly difficult about it.

I think that the pricing is fair, although I haven't checked it out completely. I'm still making use of the free features on Trello. I'm still enjoying the free version and have not upgraded my plan yet to the most recent one. 

We use the product for meetings and timelines. We use it to share the status of some projects with the team.

Kanban is the best feature of the tool. It is very clear and very good. The desktop solution is good.

There are mobile apps for the solution. Sometimes the notifications are not updated on iOS. If we have one notification, the iOS app shows seven. It indicates that the notifications are still unread. The notifications on mobile apps must be improved.

I have been using the solution for almost two years.

About ten people use the product in my organization.

The initial setup was very easy.

I sent messages to the support team through the app when the notifications were not updated on iOS. However, they did not reply.

The product is cheap. I think the product is cheaper than Zoho.

I would recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to set up tasks and monitor their status.

We have employees in New York, India, and London. There was a lot of mismanagement of tasks earlier. With the help of the product, everyone knows the status of all the tasks. 

During the production rollout, we can ensure that everything is rolled out in the production at the same time. We can also conduct team meetings with the help of the product to align the team’s efforts.

The demos and POCs in the product are quite good for onboarding. There is a huge community to help us with the issues we face while using the product. The online forums and blogs are fantastic.

The product does not allow the linking of tasks. We cannot link tasks that are dependent on each other. There is no field to indicate the budget allocated and consumed for a particular task. The meeting should have recording facilities.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I rate the stability of the solution a ten out of ten. We did not face any problems in the last two years.

The solution is highly scalable. Around 20 to 22 people use the product in the organization. We might plan to increase the number of users in the future.

We never had to reach out to technical support because we got help from the online community whenever we were stuck.

Previously, we used Microsoft Project. We switched to Trello because Microsoft Project had a lot of rigidity, and we faced a lot of issues related to cost and deployment.

The initial setup is quite easy. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten.

The deployment was done in-house. Most of the people and resources are comfortable with the product. We need two to three people to deploy the product.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The solution should lower its prices. We pay $10 per user per month for the product.

I am using the latest version of the solution. The solution is cloud-based. Trello is used globally. I would strongly recommend Trello to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

The primary use case is to manage tickets. Whenever they create any kind of ticket, they send again our task, I simply resolve them and move it to the resolved section.

I have found the most valuable feature is that it is very simple and clear to use. They can send a video and I can go view the video, check the images and I am ready to manage the ticket with clarity. I really enjoy the drag-and-drop feature.

I would appreciate seeing how much time spend on each specific ticket.

I have been working with Trello for the past ten to eleven months.

Stability is not an issue with Trello and you can have peace of mind when using the solution.

We are currently using the open-source option.

I would say to them to go and just simply use that system. If they have options to use other project management as well, then I recommend them to use Trello because, for the first time, this thing will be very simple and easy to use. If they have any other tool, there will be some difficulties and they may get rid of it and they said there, "Oh, no. We are not doing any kind of project management tools." So if they use Trello, they will be happy with the end result. I would rate Trello a nine on a scale of one to ten.

I use the solution for agile project management. I use Trello to list all the tickets that the development team needs to resolve.

You can list all tickets that the development team needs to develop. Once they finish, they can pass the ticket to the next list for testing. Once the ticket is tested, they can pass it to deployment. Once the item is deployed, they can close this ticket.

It helps to manage the life cycle of a ticket or of the requirements in development. You list it. You capture it. You schedule it. For each requirement, you try to ensure that it passed all stages of development, testing, deployment, and closing.

The solution is great for project management. It helps us track the progress of work and tickets. 

It is very easy to deploy the solution.

I have found the solution to be stable.

In general, it works very well. 

It is not a scalable product.

There are no features that are lacking. We're pretty happy with its functionality.

They could offer more integration with other tools - especially those that test some requirements in tickets.

I've been using the solution for three years. 

It is a stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

The product does not scale. 

We have 15 people in the company that use it right now. We do not plan to increase usage at this point. 

I've never dealt with technical support. I don't know how helpful they are. 

I've used Microsoft Project in the past.

The product is straightforward to implement. It's not complex at all. You can deploy it in less than a day. 

I work for the development team, so I did not deploy it personally. There was another team member that handled the process. I just use it. 

Since it is so easy to deploy, anyone can do it. 

The licensing covers all of the functionalities of the product. It has everything your team needs. 

I'm an end-user.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use it for project management. It is very similar to Wrike, Jira, and other project management solutions.

It works very well, and it makes it easy to keep track of tasks.

It makes the work a lot easier because you can assign tasks. People working on a project can sign up and go there to look at the tasks.

Trello is very easy to install and set up. It is also easy to use. Its interface is excellent.

It is stable and quite secure.

It could have a bit more customization, especially for organizations that may want to integrate it into their own systems.

I have been using this solution for over a year.

It is very stable.

It is scalable. We have seven or eight users who use this solution.

I have not used their support.

I've used Wrike. I found Trello easier than Wrike.

It was not complex. It took less than 30 minutes.

It was implemented in-house.

Its pricing is good. It is about $6 per license for what we use, but then there are other plans as well, such as $12 a month. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of pricing.

Overall, I would rate Trello a nine out of ten.