Trello Reviews

I like Trello's speed. It is more user-friendly compared to Jira. Jira is technical, whereas the management can use Trello. 

The tool should be able to predict the task completion dates based on the date assigned and sprint dates. It is also not commercial compared to competitors. 

I have been working with the product for one and a half years. 

The product is stable. 

My company has eight to ten users for the product. 

Trello's installation is easy and fast. 

The tool's pricing is average. 

I work with Trello's integrated version in Microsoft Teams. I rate the product a seven out of ten. 

My organization used the solution for task management.

Trello is a task manager. It is a focused app. It doesn't have lots of bells and whistles, just task management. The product has a lot of integrations.

The product could add more features. It must be more robust and a bit more comprehensive. Improvements also depend on Trello’s goal and business model. Reporting features could be improved.

I used the solution for three months last year.

I had no challenges with the tool’s stability.

The tool is scalable. We could add as many users as we could afford to pay for. We had about 12 people using the product in our organization.

The initial setup is very straightforward. It took three minutes to deploy the solution. The product is deployed on the cloud. The product also provides a mobile app.

The deployment was done in-house. I simply downloaded the app and clicked on the email link that was sent. My organization might have needed a consultant’s help to set it up. However, I just had to download the app.

It's a good task manager. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

The previous company that I was working for was using it for appointments. In this company, we're using it to see specific actions and check their status.

The most valuable feature is the fact that I can see everything on one page, like sticky notes, and everything is set up. It's pretty easy to use.

Having different actions and maybe multiple pages would be helpful, but I don't know if those already exist because I'm only doing one thing on Trello and I've never really gone deep into it. If there was an option for more pages on it we could actually do other things and see other actions without having to have more programs open. 

I've used Trello in different companies for two or three years.

The initial setup was very easy and very straightforward.

It was probably implemented in-house because it's pretty easy. I assume it was in-house.

It's very, very easy to use and very straightforward, so there are no worries, no issues, and no need to be technically advanced.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. It's really simple, which is a good thing, but it only does one thing for us.

We use Trello to manage our company's projects.

We use Trello to update and sync the project status very easily. It is easy for users to start working with Trello because it has a user-friendly interface.

It would be good if we could update the project status by email without logging into Trello. Some other project management tool could read the email and update the content to the correct project.

I have been using Trello for six years.

Sometimes, the solution is out of order, and we cannot access the system.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten for stability.

Around 30 users use Trello in our organization.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s initial setup is simple.

We are using the open-source version of Trello. Trello is trying to push users to get a license. We are looking for a replacement solution because Trello's price is too high for us.

It's a bit complex to integrate Trello with other tools. I am using the web version of the solution. Trello helps us save time and makes our daily work easier. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

We primarily use the solution to organize projects.

Trello is mainly for a Kanban-style of product management. You have a set of tasks and you'll move tasks from one phase to another phase. They won't do anything themselves from the organization's perspective, or from the strategy or the product perspective. A user needs to manipulate the information and set up the processes. If they want to introduce any product, they'll make a different board for that product. Jira, on the other hand, for example, has both a Scrum mode for managing projects and having a toolkit as well as a Kanban-style board.

The solution uses Kanban boards.

The solution is very easy to use.

On the features side, it's very stable.

There aren't as many tracking tools.

If you use Agile as a methodology, Trello doesn't really fit very well. It cannot run at the speed of the team or show pending tasks and backlogs as well. Those types of features aren't really on Trello. Something such as Jira is much more adept at Agile.

The product doesn't handle heavy loads very well. The information does not load quickly once there's a lot of information in the system. IT needs some sort of load balancer to allow it to take on more information and load more quickly.

I used the solution for about three to four years. I used it recently for six months on another project.

While the features side is stable, and there aren't bugs and glitches, the solution can get overwhelmed if there is a lot of information on it. In that case, it stops loading quickly and really slows down. It can only take so much.

I'm not confident we will return to using Trello, and therefore likely won't expand it. We've been more satisfied with Jira, as it is a bigger tool and serves our purposes better.

I've never reached out to technical support. I can't speak to how responsive or supportive they are. It's not something I can talk about.

I previously used a different solution, however, it was difficult to load as you added information, such as images. I then moved to Trello, and now I am on Jira.

Trello isn't as good at tackling Agile development as a solution like Jira would be. It doesn't have the feature sets for that kind of process.

I'm just a customer and end-user.

I use whichever solution the project requires. Sometimes I use Trello, and other times the project calls for something like Jira. I don't use Trello all of the time.

The solution is an online tool.

On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate the product at a seven. The only drawback I see is the loading issues. For a different set of employees, that wouldn't matter much. They can wait five minutes for everything to load and they can do their work quickly, after five minutes of wait time. However, for my role, where I'm directly facing customers, it should be quick to get the information while I'm talking to them to address their inquiries quickly. I cannot say "I don't know." I cannot give such kind of answers to my customer when they're on a call with me. 

For my segment and for the roles I've been in, which are mostly the customer-facing or manager-type roles, it should be quick enough. However, for developers or testers, it need not be.

I use Trello for project management along with my team. 

It is used for managing projects with our clients and updating tasks along with status updates. It helps us manage projects successfully.

It helped us to organize project information and assign tasks to team members properly. Managing several projects together works with Trello.

There are number of features which work great, including some of the following:

1. Drag and drop tasks into boards.
2. Creating multiple boards for new projects.
3. Assigning a team their tasks.
4. Dashboard management.

In terms of time, recording the service can be improved. Users should be able to log their time against the tasks and visual reports should be available in Trello for time spent.

We use it in our company, since it allows for managing projects and keeping the team informed of all the project's progress and its state. It has been fundamental for our company in better managing projects.

Our organization has improved since it allows a better communication between different developers. Now, projects do not take as long and meetings take less time, since you know the status of developments or tests.

• It can be used online or as an application from anywhere. 
• You receive notifications if mentioned on a card.

In the card area, you should not be able to modify so easily what is already written, as this can cause loss of information.