ServiceNow Reviews

I implement ServiceNow for our customers. I'm a reseller and we are partners of ServiceNow. I'm the company business developer.

From my point of view, it's the best solution in the market. It's so easy to implement, the ratio of days to implement is the lowest in the market; I can respond to all the needs of my clients. Based on my experience with BMC and EasyVista, ServiceNow is the best solution.

The price is a huge barrier in the Portugese market when it comes to implementing ServiceNow.

I've been using this solution for 10 years. 

Technical support is the best because they respond quickly. They have good SLAs to respond to our tickets with the correct priorities, it's very well defined. Compared with other suppliers, it's fantastic.

The initial setup is very easy. Based on my experience with BMC and EasyVista, ServiceNow is the easiest solution to implement.

Licensing costs are the highest in the market. It's difficult to sell in Portugal, but for the rest of Europe, it's easy to sell because we can easily justify the value that the customer will gain from the product.

It's important to understand all the components of the solution. After that, with the base knowledge, it's easy to implement. It also helps to have some knowledge about processes based on the ITIL and ISO 20000. It's most important to become familiar with that to implement the solution.

I rate the solution nine out of 10. 

I use it for incident management. For the part of the business I'm in, it is used for end-user incident management. There are other parts of the business where it is also used for customer data collection or customer engagement data collection.

Remote access is most valuable.

It needs a more intuitive interface for identifying issues. A bit more natural language processing or something like that would be helpful in understanding my queries.

There should be greater integration with other enterprise applications. We're using Microsoft, Oracle, and other applications, and it would be good to have a greater integration on some of the immediate hiccups that you have with these services. It doesn't mean that when we have a problem with using another application, ServiceNow should be able to fix it, but ServiceNow should be able to alert us to things. There should be a bit more automation or integration.

I have been using this solution for at least five years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

We had minimal tech support.

I am using it in a managed IT environment. As far as I know, it was satisfactory, but our department manager would know more.

I would recommend this solution because I make good use of it. I would rate it an eight out of 10.

Right now, the primary use case for this solution within my organization is billing. The proposal is to expand our use of the platform to validate privileged requests. 

The ServiceNow feature I find the most valuable is its cloud-friendliness. You can use it in-between Clouds and the platform.

It's easy and customizable and that is the goal. You can have it installed and up and running within hours if you know what you're doing. Time to market would be one of the main things to consider.

It's a great platform, but there's still room for improvement. As the solutions stands now, you do need a lot of previous experience to use it. It would be great if they could develop some use case templates. This would be beneficial for a small and medium-sized businesses as they rely on their development teams.

It's a multipurpose tool. If it could be further developed and specialized within the brand, different organizations could more easily implement it.

If you implemented ServiceNow properly, scaling up is no big deal.

I have not had to contact technical support while using this platform. 

ServiceNow is a great tool if you know what you're doing. To use it, you have to have some operability and development skills. If you don't have that, ServiceNow won't be easy to use for you. 

You can do many things with it. For example, you can create IT workflows. It can also be integrated with other products.

We mainly use it for requests and tracking incidents. We are onboarding our HR team, and they are going to start using the HR module in it as well. We also use it for asset management and configuration management. 

We are using the Paris release.

I like the incident module, which is useful for tracking your incidents and other things. It is a reliable solution.

We are struggling with the scheduling part, but it doesn't necessarily mean that it is a ServiceNow issue. It could be the way we have configured it. We don't have it configured in a way where you can schedule a support call with our end users.

We are looking for more automation in the box and the chat feature.

We've been on ServiceNow for two years.

It is stable. There are no issues at all.

We have around 60,000 or 70,000 users or maybe more.

I haven't contacted them.

We used an IBM tool. We switched because we were told that we were switching.

I didn't set it up, but it is pretty simple.

It is a great tool. Most companies in my industry use ServiceNow.

I would rate ServiceNow an eight out of ten.

ServiceNow can be used for many different use cases such as:

• IT service management
• Managing Assets
• Development and operations
• Job processes 
• Project portfolio management
• Managing of infrastructures

There are many more modules and HR that I have not yet explored that are available.

What I like the most is that it's a common service data model and the fact that everything is available on one platform.

The user interface could be much improved, and the developer tools and sets can be improved greatly, they are lacking.

I have been using ServiceNow for more than five years.

I am using the latest version.

I can't give you the exact number of users we have but it's thousands.

We plan to increase usage in the future.

For the most part, our experience with technical support has been okay.

Previously, we were using BMC Remedy.

The initial setup is very easy to get started, but it gets very complex as you move along.

There is no installation involved, as it's in the cloud.

There are licensing fees.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate ServiceNow a seven out of ten.

We are using ServiceNow for help desk operations.

In our operation center, we are using ServiceNow for request management, incident management, inventory CMDB, and client information.

What I like the most is the functionality, it's features are rich, and there is a high degree of compliance with IT standards.

I don't like the UI. Compared to other products that I have been using, it is not as user-friendly.

I have been using this solution for one year.

We are a B2B business and we have a large clientele. 

Our clients are large enterprise companies, and with the number of agency items that we have to enter into ServiceNow, it can handle it easily.

In terms of scalability, I am happy with it.

We have not had the need to contact technical support.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward for me.

I was not a part of the deployment process. By the time I started a year ago, the technical team had already deployed this product.

Our in-house team was responsible for deployment and maintenance.

I can recommend ServiceNow to anyone who is interested in using it.

I would rate ServiceNow an eight out of ten.

We use it for incident management.

It has more extensive features as compared to the other competitors.

Currently, we are finding it a bit difficult to monitor the subscriptions that are being used. The reporting feature related to this can be improved. 

Its ITOM functionality can be improved. BMC does a better job than ServiceNow in terms of capturing utilization and other such things.

It is quite stable from the implementation perspective.

It is quite scalable. Scalability is one of its advantages.

Their technical support is not bad. I would rate it a four out of five. It can be improved in terms of being able to understand and help with management.

We have been using both ServiceNow and BMC Helix ITSM for our client. ServiceNow is more scalable, competent, and intuitive than BMC Helix ITSM. It is a little bit more expensive than BMC Helix ITSM.

The initial setup is more or less straightforward. The deployment took around 30 to 40 days.

ServiceNow tends to be a little bit more expensive as compared to BMC Helix ITSM.

I would advise others to make sure what is required. 

I would rate ServiceNow an eight out of ten.

We use ServiceNow for our internal IT and end-users. When I first started with it, I was simply a user. I've now started to manage the functionality, as well.

Very soon, we will be upgrading to the Paris version.

The most valuable features are its ease of use and capabilities.

ServiceNow is a pretty versatile product.

It is robust and very user-friendly.

I would like to see more functionality in terms of custom workflows, not impacting the overall platform health.

I have been using ServiceNow for between four and five years.

This is a really stable solution.

It is possible to scale, as needed.

I have not had direct experience with technical support, but they have been very helpful for us.

The initial setup is quite straightforward. Ours is a pretty large implementation, so it took approximately two weeks. This was due to the complexity.

This is a pretty expensive product, so the licensing could be better.

This is a product that I absolutely recommend. My advice is to use as much of the out-of-the-box functionality as possible.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.