ServiceNow Reviews

I am currently working in a previous organization as a second line support engineer, and while I am working there, I update my regular activities and support details in ServiceNow, so you can ask me regarding that without any problems.

My relationship with ServiceNow is as a user who creates requests regarding issues such as machines not properly connected to the internet or printers not working, and I have access based on the support profile.

I use ServiceNow to investigate issues, update my findings, and fix the issue directly, or if any on-site intervention is required, I forward it to my next level or escalation. For day-to-day activities, such as rebooting servers, we want to get a change request approved before proceeding after business hours or on holidays, and we keep the ServiceNow ticket in my queue, updating our findings with screenshots and details before closing the tickets.

The features of ServiceNow that I find most valuable include its ability to easily access ticket details if you know the ticket number, monitor the timeline of when the ticket was created, and see the current status, which makes ServiceNow the best tool I have ever used.

The integration capabilities of ServiceNow allow us to enhance our existing environment easily, so I rate it as a nine.

The return on investment from ServiceNow may be around 8.5, indicating time-saving benefits or fewer people needed to operate with this solution.

While ServiceNow has many options, the number of options can sometimes be confusing regarding where to click or how things work, as it is based on configuration provided by the administrator.

The initial setup of ServiceNow was easy for me, and I can easily access the knowledge base, pass tickets to another team through internal notes, and each individual will get a personal email when a ticket is placed into their queue, although sometimes the numerous options can be confusing.

My experience of working with ServiceNow is approximately one year.

I rate the stability of ServiceNow as a nine on a scale of one to ten.

I rate the scalability of ServiceNow as an eight on a scale of one to ten.

I might be unsure about how many users are using ServiceNow in my organization, but it could be around 500.

I rate the technical support of ServiceNow as a nine on a scale of one to ten.

I have experience with other solutions, such as Freshdesk, ServiceNow, Zendesk, ConnectWise, Azure platform, and Ivanti.

The initial setup of ServiceNow was easy for me.

The return on investment from ServiceNow may be around 8.5, indicating time-saving benefits or fewer people needed to operate with this solution.

Regarding the price of ServiceNow, I am not certain because our management team takes care of all pricing details, but I know it is quite high in the market.

Based on my experience, I would recommend ServiceNow to other people. I give ServiceNow an overall rating of nine out of ten.

I use ServiceNow for everything from ticket management to demand and more in my daily work.

As I manage the automation COE team, I've found that getting incident reports and handling demands from different markets is quite useful with ServiceNow. The dashboard helps us track data effectively and see the outcomes, making it very valuable. Although I'm not a heavy user of ServiceNow, I find the delivery for the COE team to be really good compared to previous tools I've experienced.

The features of ServiceNow that I find the most useful include the impressive handling of incident reporting requests, which go into the cab with types, priority types, and the SLA that we can set. The mobile client is also really good, allowing everyone to view demands, requests, and incidents through the mobile app, which has a great UI and user experience.

Overall, apart from not using it extensively in terms of API, as an end user, the demands, requests, service catalog, and incident reporting are much better compared to what we were using earlier.

I haven't thought deeply about improvements for ServiceNow or what might be missing right now.

There are so many modules and features in ServiceNow that I haven't explored them all, so it's hard to say what might be missing or should be improved.

I suggest making the cost more affordable for smaller companies.

I have been working with ServiceNow for about the last three or four years.

I haven't faced any issues with stability; I've rarely seen any downtime.

Downtime is something I've experienced very little.

I haven't faced many problems or challenges with ServiceNow; I haven't seen any downtime, except for scheduled maintenance.

Scaling ServiceNow is easy since it's on cloud, so there are no issues.

I have not contacted ServiceNow support personally, but my team has a dedicated team that reaches out when necessary.

Positive

Earlier we were using Cherwell for IT service management, and now we use ServiceNow.

It's easy to set up ServiceNow; they have guides and everything.

It's a great tool that I've recommended to startups here in Malaysia. It may be expensive for small companies, but for big companies, I think it's good. If there's a lighter version of ServiceNow that could be more affordable for smaller companies, that would be beneficial.

Within my company, I haven't seen AI functionality being used, but there's knowledge sharing happening and it's in process for assessment. We will get those AI capabilities into ServiceNow in the near future, but currently, it's not enabled.

I'm just using ServiceNow as an end user, and I have not utilized API for integration or anything.

The performance and customization areas are quite good; I have no issues there.

I would rate ServiceNow nine out of ten.

I worked for four to six months with ServiceNow, and then I left it and am generally using more GenAI open-source platforms now.

It was just for one or a few projects that I implemented ServiceNow.

I mainly used it for the development of some no-code platform, but it was very limited usage, after which I moved on.

I didn't do any sort of incident management.

I used it for some sort of analytics to help overcome challenges and check what was wrong if something was wrong.

It did help me see some benefits from using it.

In terms of time, it helped me save time.

It would be more than 30% in time savings.

There were less man-hours in terms of automation capabilities. It helped me with faster service delivery times.

It was faster to develop with ServiceNow.

ServiceNow's customization is not too agile in those cases; it takes a little bit of time.

They should integrate open-source LLM tools and make it a further low-code, no-code build with GenAI. I'm not sure if it is there, but if they can make it a no-code, low-code with GenAI, that would be much better.

I worked for four to six months with ServiceNow, and then I left it and am generally using more GenAI open-source platforms now.

It was easy for me to initially set up this tool.

It took approximately a couple of days to set up ServiceNow.

There were no downtimes, and I never had any sort of technical errors or stability falls.

Regarding scalability, I didn't feel that at any point this tool was not scalable enough or that I had to increase my usage.

I didn't need to contact the technical support of ServiceNow.

Neutral

I didn't actually choose ServiceNow over something else on the market because this came recommended heavily by our CTO.

It was easy for me to initially set up this tool.

It took approximately a couple of days to set up ServiceNow.

I am using some of the no-code, low-code platforms which are more GenAI, such as L-Leverage and others when comparing ServiceNow to something else that I'm working with.

I can't remember any noticeable difference in features or performance when comparing those tools to ServiceNow.

ServiceNow was really good back then, but now there are many other tools which are working better if it was my choice.

I already gave feedback about ServiceNow some time back.

It was more Orchestration, but it was two or three years back.

On a scale from one to ten, I rate ServiceNow a six out of ten.

We mainly use ServiceNow for workflow definition, primarily for ITSM purposes. It is utilized across the whole organization for functions, from employee onboarding to various operational activities. We leverage different use cases for HR functionalities, IT applications, IT operations, IT support, finance activities, and project submissions.

The workflow management in ServiceNow is amazing. The integration with third-party business applications is extraordinary, providing compatibility with major vendors like Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, as well as with custom-built applications. Automation capabilities are impressive, bolstered by a vast repository of out-of-the-box connectors and plugins that facilitate integration with various applications worldwide.

The main area for improvement in ServiceNow is its support. Their customer support could make it a great solution, not just product support but also their relationship with partners and training initiatives in different regions. The official support is often distant, and many partners are not up to standard, which harms the product's reputation.

I have been working with ServiceNow for approximately six years now.

From a stability perspective, ServiceNow has almost no issues.

ServiceNow is a very scalable solution. I would rate it 10 out of 10 for scalability.

Direct support from ServiceNow is not very good. Most of the support comes from partners, and customers heavily rely on them. I would rate it 6 out of 10.

Neutral

We evaluated other options, like ManageEngine, and performed POC for multiple environments. We chose ServiceNow because of the wide range of use cases it offers. It is a one-time investment that takes substantial time and resources.

Setting up ServiceNow involves unique system requirements, and compared to other ITSM solutions, it's more challenging to implement effectively. The standard deployment takes at least two weeks if everything goes smoothly.

Professional resources are essential for setting up ServiceNow because the environment is substantial, and you need competent personnel to implement the numerous components efficiently.

We can easily quantify the return on investment during the six years with ServiceNow.

ServiceNow is expensive for all regions. The licensing cost per year per user is not precisely known but is considered high.

We evaluated other solutions like ManageEngine before selecting ServiceNow.

If someone decides to implement ServiceNow, they are taking on a significant responsibility. The success or failure relies on the time and effort planned. For a mature implementation, it may take two to three years, and investing in quality resources and understanding business requirements in advance is crucial. Overall, I rate ServiceNow 10 out of 10.

I use ServiceNow to log tickets, raise incidents, and handle change requests for different environments by utilizing various categories, situations, and service assignment groups. I track all tickets related to issues or enhancements.

ServiceNow helps us track tickets related to issues or enhancements efficiently.

The most valuable features of ServiceNow for me are its ticketing and reporting capabilities. Additionally, its integration is great; I have integrated several C# applications to track or update the ServiceNow situations, reference columns, or tagging, which is also very easy. Once I understand the process, customization and exploration become possible using my personal code, which is a significant advantage.

There is a need for bug or error tracking in ServiceNow. Although there are child incidents or tickets, tracking primary issues or bugs within enhancements is not present. The reporting features in the new portal could be more user-friendly. While it provides options to minimize chart and image sizes, actual implementation doesn't always reflect these changes.

I have been working with ServiceNow for four to five years.

ServiceNow is already a stable tool. There is no doubt about its stability, and no additional measures are needed.

ServiceNow is quite scalable within my company. My account fully utilizes ServiceNow, with no other tool in use. It is capable of vertical scaling with no issues.

I have contacted ServiceNow support multiple times and their response is very quick. The support is exemplary and deserves a perfect rating.

Positive

Before ServiceNow, I was using HP ALM, GitHub, and ADO. Reporting in ServiceNow is easier compared to these other tools. However, HP ALM and ADO have capabilities to create bug tickets, something ServiceNow lacks.

The initial setup is very easy due to its user-friendly interface. New users can understand it quickly without any problems.

Before using ServiceNow, I evaluated HP ALM, GitHub, and ADO.

I recommend ServiceNow due to its stability and good security. It integrates well with Active Directory, making it easy to manage users without separate licenses or access controls. 

The overall rating for ServiceNow would be ten out of ten.

I primarily use ServiceNow for client development. We have specific clients, and we offer consultation for them. Our tool also handles project management.

For our work, ServiceNow's service catalogs and SDK integrations are the most valuable features. It offers integrations like the mid server integration and others. ServiceNow provides a wide range of functionality, covering all the necessary modules, unlike Jira which is primarily for IT.

There are sometimes challenges with the portal being a bit confusing for new users. The implementation of the portal and workspaces is quite different, and improvements in this area would be beneficial.

I have been using ServiceNow for around two and a half years.

ServiceNow is stable enough. They provide good solutions if there are any issues.

We haven't faced any scalability issues. ServiceNow is scalable and meets our needs.

The tech support is good. I have contacted them four to five times over the past two years, and they have been quite helpful.

Neutral

I have only used ServiceNow solutions. I did not evaluate any other solutions before using ServiceNow.

The initial setup depends on the complexity of the project. It can take two to three months or even up to two years, based on the project's requirements. I would rate it seven point five out of ten for ease of setup.

The return on investment is good when implementing for ourselves and for other clients. The ROI for projects is favorable.

The pricing depends on the complexity. If only using modules like in Jira, ServiceNow can be more expensive, but it offers more functionality. ServiceNow's pricing can be justified if more functionality is required.

I recommend considering the functionality and user-friendliness before deciding on its implementation. 

I rate ServiceNow eight out of ten.

We use it for IT Service Automation, specifically for managing requests, network management, knowledge base management, problem resolution, and change control processes.

ServiceNow has enhanced the efficiency of our IT service management procedures. Currently, we utilize it to streamline request handling and centralize all requests within the ServiceNow platform. Additionally, we're exploring integration with Microsoft's pilot program, which will soon feature bots seamlessly linked with ServiceNow. We aim to consolidate all channels onto one platform, ensuring a streamlined process for all involved.

ServiceNow facilitates our incident response and resolution workflows, meeting nearly all of our requirements and KPIs.

We use ServiceNow's integration with the MDB, linking it with the MC for discovery decisions. Our database management is handled within ServiceNow.

Our integration of ServiceNow with existing systems and tools is progressing smoothly, primarily facilitated by APIs.

One of the advantages lies in the implementation of the ITIL process, which becomes more scalable and readily integrated within ServiceNow. With predefined processes, the transition is seamless and ensures efficiency moving forward.

It offers ready-built automation and simpler configuration for workflows.

Some features within ServiceNow have negatively impacted productivity, particularly in managing the entire process. Transitioning from Jira to ServiceNow has proven challenging for end users, as requests now involve multiple tasks, IBM numbers, and request numbers, which can be confusing. The ticketing system is also complex, causing confusion among teams and complicating reporting. Regarding incident management, while the process remains similar, end-user feedback indicates an overwhelming amount of unnecessary information, leading to confusion.

There is a need to enhance ticket details visibility on the portal, such as displaying SLA information, which currently requires development effort. Additionally, there's a need for line manager approvals, especially for requests like license procurement, which is currently managed via teammates. Developing a feature specifically for approvals could alleviate the need for additional licenses. There are challenges with SLA reporting due to SLAs being configured as tasks. This leads to difficulties in accurately reporting SLA compliance, as one ticket may have multiple SLAs. Addressing this issue would improve reporting accuracy.

I have been working with it for six months now.

The current setup is stable, yet there's a pressing need for continual enhancement in processes and procedures.

We are currently in the testing phase, so it's premature to conclude within just six or five months. While the capabilities are present, it may take more time to ascertain whether the system is fully functional and reliable. We have approximately seven thousand users, and the deployment spans across seventeen countries.

The technical support team consistently provides accurate responses to my inquiries, whereas the developer sometimes attempts to evade the support team's answers. In certain scenarios, I've received resolutions directly from the support team while the partner tries to manipulate the situation. I've maintained direct contact with the support team, who are proactive in providing solutions. Even when they don't have an immediate answer, they make an effort to provide guidance through articles, videos, and other resources. I would rate them nine out of ten.

Positive

I find little distinction between Jira and ServiceNow in terms of management data, as we initially opted for the standard license, which didn't impose limitations compared to Jira's standard license.

During the initial setup, I faced significant challenges with our partner developers as they struggled to grasp our requirements and insisted on their preferred approach rather than following our needs. Despite encountering difficulties during the development phase, we ultimately achieved our desired outcome. However, I believe that collaborating with different partners may have yielded better results.

The deployment, initially scheduled for six months, ended up taking approximately a year. Around three developers were in charge of it, who also handled maintenance tasks. Despite facing delays, we continued working with the same partner due to our familiarity with the environment.

We haven't seen a return on investment so far. However, there's potential for improved ROI as we develop, enhance, or onboard additional departments, which may lead to better outcomes.

The licensing expenses are excessively high. To illustrate, consider Jira, a platform we've utilized for ten years. Under a standard license model, we have been paying five times the cost compared to Jira, despite having an equivalent number of licenses.

The product itself is satisfactory, offering all the necessary features and functionalities. However, the quality of the outcome heavily relies on the competence and dedication of the developers. Without continuous oversight and intervention, the result may vary from excellent to subpar. Therefore, the success largely hinges on the capabilities and commitment of the developers or partners involved. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

I use the solution to collect data to build KPIs. We promote and foster the usage of workflows in the company.

We use the data to compare and review situations, propose improvements, and promote action items.

SPM and ITSM features are the most helpful.

The product’s standard user experience is not the best. To make it work, we have to do a lot of customization. The UX could be improved.

I have been using the solution for five years.

The tool is pretty much stable. We don’t see many bugs in the tool. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

We have around 1000 users in our organization. The tool is scalable.

The solution is cloud-based. When we have a new release coming up, we have a few weeks of preparation. We don't have a straightforward test campaign.

I have also used BMC Remedy.

As much as possible, we use the out-of-the-box features. We do very few customizations. We follow the schedule to refresh the versions when they come up. As an end-user, I am not happy with the scalability. We have to wait a long time to buy more capacity. It is not an issue with the tool. Our team must manage it better. ServiceNow is a powerful tool. As long as we have enough users, it works. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.