PRTG Network Monitor Reviews

Je l’utilise pour surveiller le système de défense, les différents commutateurs et les connexions entre les différents bureaux de vente. De plus, je l’utilise pour surveiller mes différents environnements virtuels.

Surveillance et prise de décision proactive

L’aspect le plus précieux est la gamme variée de fonctionnalités qu’il offre. Le tableau de bord est exceptionnel, offrant une vue d’ensemble complète.

J’y travaille depuis deux ans.

Il offre une excellente stabilité.

L’évolutivité est incroyablement simple et sans effort. Mille cinquante utilisateurs ont été intégrés.

En ce qui concerne les différentes questions que j’ai posées au support technique, le temps de réponse est impressionnant. Je reçois généralement des réponses dans l’heure. Je donnerais une note de neuf sur dix.

Positive

J’ai déjà utilisé Nagios, mais il était dépassé. PRTG, en revanche, est incroyablement facile à gérer, à développer, à promouvoir et à maintenir. Nagios, étant très âgé, est difficile à entretenir.

La configuration initiale était simple.

Le processus de déploiement consiste à prendre de la capacité, à l’installer sur un serveur, à appliquer les licences, puis à lancer une découverte de différentes catégories. Ensuite, il s’agit de surveiller les différents aspects du réseau. Il s’agit d’un processus relativement simple, en particulier pour surveiller les dossiers de défense et de paie sur des réseaux simples. Il a été achevé en deux jours. Le maintien de la configuration actuelle n’est pas du tout difficile.

Je vois un retour sur investissement significatif grâce à la simplification de la supervision avec PRTG. Les problèmes sont identifiés et résolus rapidement. Avant PRTG, il était difficile de détecter et de résoudre rapidement les problèmes.

Le prix est raisonnable pour les fonctionnalités fournies.

Difficile de concevoir des tableaux de bord

Dans l’ensemble, je lui donnerais une note de huit sur dix.

We're using PRTG Network Monitor for server-level monitoring and network-level monitoring, and in our network, we have switches and firewalls.

We're also using the solution for bandwidth monitoring and internet link monitoring.

We're also planning to use PRTG Network Monitor to monitor CCTV and other IoT devices.

I like that PRTG Network Monitor is evolving as a product. For example, it's releasing new sensors on the OT, Modbus, and MQTT side, but its most valuable feature is the remote probe.

Other OEMs in the market will charge you after some time if you have multiple sites distributed within a particular region. Suppose you have four or five locations and deployed the agent; other solutions will charge you extra or add commercial charges to your invoice. Still, PRTG Network Monitor allows up to sixty or eighty remote probes for one server, particularly when you buy the PRTG main server license. I find this pricing model helpful, mainly because my company has multiple sites here in India, between thirty to forty sites. The company doesn't need to buy an additional license or commercial license.

The remote probe will be deployed at the site remotely, and PRTG Network Monitor will monitor the site and feed all monitoring data to the central server. It is beneficial because it ultimately gives you visibility from the central server. The remote probe feature in the tool helps you monitor remote systems or your network, so it's an outstanding feature available in PRTG Network Monitor compared to other OEMs in the market. Some OEMs may have the feature, but the charges would be huge for such a feature.

Here's an area for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor: my company needs to perform SNMPv3 monitoring, and by default, SNMPv2 is there. From a security point of view, SNMPv3 monitoring needs to be stronger. Otherwise, it'll reduce performance when you need to monitor it at the server level. It'll impact performance, including the PRTG Network Monitor performance.

If my company does a large number of SNMPv3 queries, that will reduce server performance, so PRTG recommends not scanning or monitoring a massive amount of SNMPv3. If PRTG Network Monitor can evolve into agent-level configurations rather than server-level configurations, where you can install the agent on the server and the agent provides the necessary feedback, that would improve the tool.

Performance-wise, PRTG Network Monitor still needs improvement because a large number of SNMPv3 queries reduces tool performance. It could also impact the server level. If the monitoring method for PRTG Network Monitor could be similar to other OEMs, such as SolarWinds, where the agent is on the server and provides server performance information to the main console server, that would be great.

Another area for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor is reporting. For example, if you want the report or the dashboard in a particular format, you'd need to exert some effort. You cannot do it without the support of the vendor or an expert. As a customer, you cannot configure PRTG Network Monitor reports independently because reporting is difficult.

I've been working with PRTG Network Monitor for three years.

I didn't see many stability issues in PRTG Network Monitor, so it's a nine out of ten. Most of the time, the tool works fine.

PRTG Network Monitor is a scalable tool, and I'd give it a rating of nine out of ten.

At the moment, PRTG Network Monitor support is only email-based, and that has to be improved. You never receive remote session support from PRTG.  If you're facing an issue, you either need to work with the vendor, or if you need OEM support, you must send an email.

The PRTG Network Monitor support team responds to your email, but it usually takes a lot of time. If support can directly join the remote session to brief you on the process, it would be easier than just getting email-based support.

Whenever my team communicates via email, support will provide a reference link or KB article link that tells you how to configure PRTG Network Monitor.

It would be helpful for any customer if PRTG had remote-based support, and it'll be simpler to show customers how to configure the tool.

My company only takes a little support from the PRTG Network Monitor team nowadays, but I'd give support a seven out of ten. The PRTG technical support team usually responds quickly over email, and it's good. The only limitation is the absence of remote support.

Neutral

I didn't use other solutions apart from PRTG Network Monitor. My company had a lot of issues at the time the decision to use the tool was made. My company was blind as it didn't have any monitoring tool, yet it had a lot of sites, internet links, and services. Because I worked on the PRTG Network Monitor in my previous company, I was aware of its performance and that it meets basic requirements and the company budget, versus SolarWinds, which would require a larger budget, so my company went with PRTG Network Monitor. I deployed it within the environment, and the tool works fine so far.

Setting up PRTG Network Monitor was easy, so I'd rate its setup an eight out of ten.

Installing the tool was straightforward, and there wasn't much required to set PRTG Network Monitor up. It's only the dashboard that requires a lot of effort.

Completing the setup for the tool took around two to three weeks, including the onboarding of all devices.

I followed the PRTG Network Monitor installation guide. I ensured all prerequisites by PRTG were ready, including the recommended OS or server, such as Windows OS, and other software prerequisites. I then installed the tool, and it had a GUI-based, intuitive installation, so it was instant.

What took time was onboarding the devices, though I gradually updated and onboarded the devices. I didn't do a bulk update, and onboarding devices into PRTG Network Monitor wasn't that difficult. You can even show how it's done to anybody, even a person with a limited skillset because installing the tool doesn't require much.

I implemented PRTG Network Monitor because, in my previous organization, I also implemented the tool, so I was aware of the process.

PRTG Network Monitor is very easy to use and doesn't require a lot of manpower for deployment and management, so based on this, the features of the product, and the cost, the ROI for PRTG Network Monitor is good.

You can get ROI from the tool quickly within a year. You won't have to wait three or four years to get ROI because PRTG Network Monitor is cheaper than other solutions.

I'd rate ROI from the tool as ten, so it's a hundred percent.

Pricing for PRTG Network Monitor is a nine out of ten. It meets my company's budget and monitoring requirements. My company is on a perpetual license, particularly a basic license that doesn't require purchasing an additional license.

Regarding PRTG Network Monitor support, my company pays for it annually compared to other vendors, and the support cost is lower. You need to renew support annually for the tool. My company has an annual maintenance contract with PRTG.

My company is currently using PRTG Network Monitor.

I'm not using the latest version of the solution, but my company plans to upgrade to the latest one.

One person from the IT department handles the day-to-day maintenance of the PRTG Network Monitor.

Between five to six people from the IT team use the tool. Only a few members log into PRTG Network Monitor to generate a report or do additional monitoring. Usually, a person doesn't use the tool. That person receives an email alert based on his respective device and doesn't need to open the PRTG Network Monitor console because my team enabled email-based alerts. Different groups would receive the alerts, such as the application team, the security team, the frontend team, etc.

My company has plans to extend the license and apply the solution to another environment, an OT environment.

I'd tell anyone looking into implementing PRTG Network Monitor to go for it, especially if you're in a medium-sized organization that doesn't have a massive infrastructure, but it still depends on the customer. It varies from customer to customer. A large organization could still evaluate other solutions in the market, but PRTG Network Monitor is a good tool for small to medium-sized organizations.

My rating for the tool is eight out of ten because it has some areas for improvement, particularly the reporting, which could be more user-friendly, and the support, which is only email-based, with no remote support available. If I see improvement in the two areas I mentioned, I could easily give PRTG Network Monitor a nine or ten, but right now, it's an eight for me.

My company is a customer, not a partner, of PRTG Network Monitor.

If you want to grant access for clients to the MSP service provider, you can use this solution. For example, if the client wants to monitor the net flow and net flow traffic with PRTG, you can analyze this traffic for them.

If you have a problem with your slow network, you can get visibility on the net flow and SNMP protocols in order to review them and then handle troubleshooting specifically about the issue.

We like the monitoring with the net flow and net flow protocols and SNMP protocols. 

The health check functionality is currently very good.

Its initial setup process is fast and easy.

It is stable. 

The scalability is pretty good.

The technical support services could be better. The service operation center also needs to be improved.

Users need to buy the more expensive licenses if they expect to be able to scale. 

We would like to see more advanced features. It would be great if they can help us exclude some protocols if you want to configure some scripts. 

I've been using the solution for two to four years. 

This is a stable product. You only need to deploy remote probes around the network and infrastructure, so you need to add enough remote probes to meet your needs, however, if you do that, it remains stable. 

You can scale the solution if you buy the most expensive licenses or limited sensors. 

We have 12 people using the solution within the company.

At this time, we do have plans to increase usage and add clients to the MSP.

Technical support could be better. 

Positive

I've previously used HPE and SolarWinds products in the past. 

The initial setup is really fast. We didn't need to download the setup on the webpage. You just click through. It is traditionally Vista for Windows.

We have ten users that are capable of handling maintenance tasks. 

We had a consultant assist us during the initial setup.

We have seen an ROI as it allows us to avoid downtime. When you have a problem with your network, and it goes down, it's a really big problem.

The solution is very cheap. You can buy 600 sensors for $1000 or a bit more. 

We did not previously evaluate other solutions.

Currently, I have Privileged Access Management solutions, Identity solutions, Privileged Cloud solutions, and Identity solutions. We use both cloud and on-premises deployments. 

I'd advise new users to implement a hybrid architecture. That way, you can get visibility around cloud solutions and on-premise solutions. It's very important to get visibility around these architectures.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. 

The solution's use cases depend on the number of interfaces you want to monitor. You have to calculate the values by referring to the licensing prices publicly published on their portal.

The solution has excellent redundant features. It also allows you to install two systems in one license, which is really good.

When you email the support team, they take three to seven days to respond and resolve simple issues.

The solution’s stability is fantastic.

PRTG Network Monitor is a very scalable solution. If you have good hardware and a good server, you can scale it up as much as you want.

The solution’s initial setup is very straightforward and user-friendly.

The software features, quality, manageability, and SLA system are fantastic. Based on my SLA, I can easily monitor and identify the service provider's bandwidth in real time. PRTG Network Monitor is a user-friendly solution.

The solution's integration is simple. You need to trigger the SNMP. It has two features. One is automatic detection, and the other is where you manually select and trigger your particular interface, and it should work. PRTG Network Monitor has some OID features in addition to network monitoring. If you know how to develop OID, the tool can work with other monitoring solutions.

PRTG Network Monitor is easy to manage, easy to use, and easy to operate.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

My clients primarily use PRTG for monitoring network devices, bandwidth, server status, and security devices like Sophos firewalls, and CCTV systems. It helps ensure efficiency, security, and reliability across their IT infrastructure.

The real-time monitoring feature in PRTG is invaluable to me. It provides immediate insights into network performance, which is crucial for proactive maintenance. Another standout feature is its recommendation system, especially in the enterprise version, which helps optimize operations by automatically managing failovers. Additionally, the flexibility to customize data storage and the option to remove old data after a certain period is also essential for efficient resource management.

Improvements in data storage flexibility, such as allowing customers to specify data retention periods, would enhance PRTG. Additionally, implementing OID panels for wider device support, especially for devices like UPS network equipment lacking standard OID support, would be beneficial.

I have been working with PRTG Network Monitor since 2008.

I would rate the stability of PRTG at a nine out of ten.

PRTG is quite scalable. It is not just about software; scalability extends to hardware with customizable solutions. PRTG is suitable for companies of all sizes, from small to enterprise-level, with support for up to 1,000 devices.

While the tech support offers good remote login assistance, there is room for improvement in response time for critical problems. Overall, I would rate their support nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup was simple.

Pricing for PRTG depends on the number of licenses needed, ranging from as few as two hundred to potentially as many as forty thousand. The pricing model is flexible, making it suitable for a wide range of businesses and budgets.

PRTG and SolarWinds both offer comprehensive solutions, but PRTG's simpler pricing model based on device count makes it more appealing. With PRTG, everything is included in one package, whereas SolarWinds often requires additional monthly payments for various features. This straightforward pricing structure makes PRTG a preferred choice for many.

PRTG helps clients identify and resolve network issues by providing comprehensive monitoring without requiring configuration changes. It collects data from various devices and systems, including Cisco and Juniper, and offers flexibility in monitoring settings to suit different needs, such as traffic analysis or vendor-specific monitoring.

I would recommend PRTG, especially for users with limited budgets who want an effective monitoring solution. Overall, I would rate it as a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for monitoring the bandwidth and reachability of a big network. We rely on reachability to generate an alarm as banks have different branches and routers. We use the PRTG to assess whether there is any fault in any branches or ATM buses. We have been using a site with 5000 sensors in 60-78 sites.

The solution is good, very friendly, and simple to use. I have been taking training. As far as it's not complicated, you can use it.

The automation part can be more flexible. It will be much easier for an administrator to work on. It can discover all the devices in a network and design its network.

I have been using PRTG Network Monitor as a customer for eight years.

We have observed many things when we were analyzing the bandwidth.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

I've used FortiMonitor, Huawei, and SolarWinds before. SolarWinds is complicated. An administrator needs more skills to work with SolarWinds. If you're going for a data center or vendor monitoring, it's good to have PRTG set up because it's very reliable.

The initial setup is easy.

The solution is expensive compared to FortiMonitor. PRTG is costly for small scale, but for large scale, FortiMonitor is more expensive.

The solution is very user-friendly. You get whatever you need, but it has room for improvement too.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is monitoring all our live servers, their resources and networking equipment like firewalls, routers, switches and network switches. Additionally, we have a bandwidth monitoring map deployed in PRTG Network Monitor to monitor our internet bandwidth continuously. The solution is deployed on-premises.

We have found the ESXi feature very valuable. It allows us to directly add individual VMs independently. We can also add the ESXi so each VM is considered a sensor, and each sensor can get all the resource parameters like CPU usage, memory usage and network usage. Everything is combined in one sensor, and we can utilize it. Unlike other competitors, this feature is only available in PRTG Network Monitor. Otherwise, we have to go with multiple sensors and it will be costly.

The product could be improved by being cross-platform friendly. A feature we would like to see in the next release is support for bare-metal servers. For virtual machines, we have many options in PRTG Network Monitor, but adding sensors to the bare metal servers is difficult because it does not support all ranges of servers. It has to have a much better database of custom servers and resources. Some of the new servers are not added in PRTG Network Monitor. They don't have the database now and we would be glad if they added more databases of server templates.

We have been using this solution for four years and are currently using the latest version.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. Currently, we have about 15 people using it in our organization. These 15 people are in charge of deployment and maintenance. We intend to expand the usage to 2,500 licenses.

Our experience with customer service and support has been superb.

The initial setup is straightforward.

Deployment was done in-house and took approximately two hours.

I rate this solution a ten out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by supporting bare metal servers and cross-platform friendly. I recommend this solution to all types of users because it doesn't require prior knowledge of other configuration sets. PRTG Network Monitor is user-friendly and takes just one click to install the solution in Windows. Amateurs with no previous knowledge of networking can use it because it is very user-friendly. SNMP configuration is straightforward, and unlike its competitors, it seems to be a user-friendly tool.

Additionally, it has a free version which can be used for 100 sensors. If it is a small-scale business they can use the free version with 100 sensors and utilize that as well. If it is for a big enterprise, they can have 2,500 to 10,000 sensors. They also have custom modes for payments. It is a superb product.

We use the solution to monitor customer sites.

PRTG Network Monitor helps us quickly and easily discover a large number of sensors, so we can spend minimal time monitoring customer sites. This allows us to focus on other important tasks.

PRTG Network Monitor could develop more tie-up sensors so that we can get more detail on the monitoring system. We have a lot of tie-up devices, and many of them we cannot monitor. However, we have to go to the price of this product to monitor them. I hope that in the future, Paessler could develop more sensors.

Sometimes, our PRTG Network Monitor system crashes and a lot of sensors go down. I have to reboot the prop to get the system back to normal.

I would like PRTG Network Monitor to add backup abilities.

The solution can be more stable.

The technical support needs improvement.

I have been using the solution for ten years.

I give the stability of the solution a seven out of ten. We have faced a lot of crashes in PRTG Network Monitor in the past.

The technical support is not good. I was not happy with some of their responses.

The initial setup of the solution is complex and our environment relies on three PRTG systems to monitor many customers. In the event our PRTG Network Monitor was to go down, we would have a lot of problems as we would have to check the sensors manually.

We used a consultant for the implementation.

PRTG Network Monitor is very expensive. We pay around $100,000 per year for each installation. We have four installations, so our cost is $400,000 per year.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

We haven't used other solutions because we think PRTG is the best monitoring system at this time.

We have 30 people using the solution in our organization, but we monitor around 200 customers.

I recommend the solution but it is very expensive and some organizations don't have the budget.