Jamf Pro Reviews

We use Jamf Pro for Mac and Desktop central for ManageEngine for Windows. It allows us to set up and configure hardware remotely. We also use this solution to release patches, configurations, applications, installations, and any restrictions when required. 

One of the most valuable features is the ability to apply apply granular level restrictions to our machines, making them easy to manage remotely from the backend.

The upgrade process of these solutions could be improved. It is not possible to use Jamf Pro to upgrade devices. This has to be done via the Apple site. In comparison, in Windows, it is possible to download patches and everything you need is readily available on the console of ManageEngine. However, using Jamf Pro and Mac, these packages need to be created and pushed out and sometimes fail due to the network or connectivity. 

There is no solution in Jamf Pro to remotely manage Mac machines if they are not on your network.

Patching packages aren't readily available. We have to create those packages and that is time-consuming.

We have used this solution for more than one year. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. We have more than 2000 users.

The technical support for this solution is not that good. 

I would rate their support team a five out of ten. 

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward. 

We used a vendor team who completed the POC and assisted with the installation.

The licensing costs for this solution are high. 

Jamf Pro gives you control at a granular level such as blocking specific USB devices being used with hardware. This solution has great compatibility with the latest MacBook including offering a PPPC utility and a wide variety of scripts. 

The limitations of Jamf Pro are due to Apple restrictions and not the tool itself. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

My team use this solution to provide end-to-end support on our managed Mac fleet. This includes doing OS updates and upgrades, application deployments, configuration settings and outlining.

Jamf Pro has been the best solution in the market to manage Mac fleets for our organization.

This is an advanced solution which is ahead than any other vendor. There are no particular areas for improvement.

We have used this solution for one year.

This is a stable solution. 

We opted for the cloud version of this solution as it is scalable. We are currently supporting 1000 to 1500 devices and we will be scaling this to 6000 Mac devices.

When we have needed assistance, the technical support has been good.

We have previously used open source solutions to manage Mac fleets but they became outdated and support was limited. We did a product evaluation for three or four different products, and found Jamf Pro the best in the market. Previously we were using Puppet and Monkey. 

It was combination of being straightforward and complex. It took some time to set up the environment because we had to migrate the configurations and applications to Jamf. This took three months. 

We had a trusted partner to do this migration, but our team worked with them for three months.

We have signed a licensing contract for three years. There is an option to buy an annual license subscription, but we opted for three years as it came with a 25% or 30% discount.

Jamf Pro are the trusted partners for Apple. So they are the first one who implement any technical changes that Apple is making. Jamf is the first product to ensure those changes are getting replicated or getting affected and getting implemented actually in their product.

We use the solution for MacOS device management in an environment of over 2500 devices that are found around the globe.   

It has completely enabled us to have a remote deployment solution for our users across the globe, as well as full management of the devices like we've never had before. It's also given us the power to let the users service their own devices via the Self-Service portal, extremely minimizing the amount of service calls our support teams to get now. 

Its also given us insight into how the devices are used on a day-to-day basis, allowing us to trim our available catalog and tailor the devices we deploy to their actual needs.

The self-service portal to share scripts and other tasks that have extremely minimized the need for calls to our support teams, or even sharing the applications we package and allowing users to pick and choose what apps they need or want, instead of just blanket installing everything from our old environment. 

Also, the DEP enrollment process is great. Account creation and management of the SSO extensions have made it so the devices no longer require to be AD Bound, giving us the flexibility to have local accounts and really utilize the full extent of MacOS.

Inventory reporting could be better, however, that is already slated to improve with some of the new features Apple has announced in WWDC 2022. 

Managing the devices and getting their details is too much work to accomplish, but by using the API and some externally available and free tools, we've been able to get the data we need whenever we need it in a way that is more presentable to management and upper leadership. With the improvements coming down the road from Apple though, a lot of it will be much more seamless.

I've used the solution for over three years in my current role, however, I've worked inside of the product elsewhere since 2011.

I manage 1000+ Macs and 200+ iPads from Jamf. I am able to manage software and application updates, pull reports, and scope out certain policies and configuration profiles to a specific set of computers or mobile devices, all from a single pane of glass. I can also leverage a seamless enrollment for our computers when we onboard new employees within our company. 

I can leverage smart groups and API calls for certain automation workflows that help the overall goal of managing and maintaining our computers. 

We can manage software and application updates, pull reports, and scope out certain policies and configuration profiles to a specific set of computers or mobile devices, all from a single pane of glass. There is seamless enrollment for our computers when we onboard new employees within our company.

The features I find most valuable within Jamf Pro are:

- The dashboard. I can add policies, configuration profiles, patch management, and smart group membership to one single view, and this is very helpful at a glance. 

- The policies. I can deploy scripts and packages easily with policy payloads. This can range from applications to specific policies that I need to deploy to our users.

- The smart groups. Based on certain criteria, I can group computers and mobile devices and leverage that to deploy my payloads to those devices

The areas of the product I would like to see improved are:

- The universal searching with filters. It would be nice to be able to search smart groups and/or filter them. We'd like search packages or be able to categorize them a bit better by leveraging tags. Right now, searching is only on certain pages in Jamf and it is inconsistent. 

- Better reporting. It would be nice if Jamf could build out a reporting pane within Jamf to see better data. This can include patch management, smart group criteria, and so on. This would help when reporting to higher-ups. 

I've been using the solution for more than eight years.

We use Jamf Pro to automate device management.

The solution has good integration with Google and has high performance for our Mac fleet of devices.

Jamf Pro currently is only used on Mac computers and could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems. We have to use other tools to manage our Windows and Android devices. There could be other improvements but I am still exploring and learning more about the features.

I have been using Jamf Pro for a couple of months.

The solution is stable.

Jamf Pro is scalable.

The technical support from Jamf Pro is amazing.

We previously used different solutions.

The installation was complex. 

We used the help from an implementation consultant team and we went through Jamf's 200 and 300 courses. The courses took one week to complete and an additional four weeks to complete the communication process.

The price of this solution is a bit high but it is worth the money for the features. 

There is an annual license for the use of this solution.

My advice to those wanting to implement Jamf Pro is the process to implement the solution takes a while. You have to go through Jamf 200 and 300 courses first to be able to understand the solution.

I rate Jamf Pro a ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for MDM management of over 5500 iOS devices and 300 MacOS devices.

The ease of use and access allows us to manage all of our devices collaboratively.

App deployment and smart groups allow for intuitive distribution of content.

I really hate updating certificates and I would love to see more integration with ASM and ABM.

I've used the solution for seven years.

The solution seems to be stable, especially when using it as a cloud-based solution.

The solution is tremendously scalable.

Jamf customer support is always available and prompt. They are very helpful.

Positive

We have always used Jamf.

The setup was as easy as contacting our Jamf team.

The solution was implemented in-house.

I'm not sure what the ROI is for us at this time.

It is realistic in terms of the setup and costs.

We did not evaluate other options first.

We use this solution for device management.

I am very satisfied with Jamf Pro. It's a good solution.

When we are creating or fetching the features, such as creating extension attributes.

We face issues when we do not have a script and have to write a script, we need to create extension attributes. The hardware details and software details should be by default from Jamf. This needs improvement.

We have been using Jamf Pro for almost five years.

We are not using the latest version. We use version 10.26.1.

Jamf Pro is a stable solution.

It's a scalable product.

Jamf enrolled devices are approximately 1,000, for a project that we have started with recently.

The initial setup was straightforward. We didn't experience any gap there. It was good.

My management is trying to set up VMware Workspace ONE. It will take 10 to 12 months to set up the Workspace ONE in the company. Once it is set up then we can do a comparison and a PoC between both.

I would rate Jamf Pro an eight out of ten.

We use the product in a higher education environment that was completely unmanaged before Jamf. We have 8,000 devices in total that are now being gradually enrolled.

It's allowed us to manage our fleet and patch management. It has secured our devices and connected with our Mac users like never before.

The self-service is invaluable to the user. It's somewhere that the user to go and get institutional resources like software, bookmarks, or IT tools to help them.

Jamf needs to get an inbuilt remote support tool to allow the admin to remote into machines. At present, you can use third-party remote apps, however, a Jamf one would be better. Currently, Jamf allowed for TeamViewer integration, however, TeamViewer is very expensive these days and not worth the money they now charge.

I've been using Jamf since August, and I'm hugely impressed by the level of detail you can configure.   

We previously used Intune, which was not good enough for Macs.

Intune was evaluated as we already had it in use. However, we deemed it not suitable for our Mac estate.