Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user584106 - PeerSpot reviewer
HCM Team Lead at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Offers out-of-box headcount and strategic reporting. The Learning module can be used for compliance training and talent development.

What is most valuable?

SF Learning and Employee Central are the most valuable modules in my experience.

SF Learning is a key element in making SF a tool with added value for the entire organization. All levels (managers, employees, HR, interns, etc.) can be involved in these processes and use SF Learning for compliance training, to improve their own skills, and work on their own talent development.

Employee Central is often the first full personnel backbone for a company. It offers all the possibilities to manage employee data, but even more important, it offers out-of-box headcount and strategic reporting.

For companies who are looking for a solution that supports their time registration and payroll processes, the SF solution will have some functional gaps. However, SF Employee Central is fast evolving and these gaps will be closed soon.

How has it helped my organization?

It enables active talent development by the employees, instead of driven by HR.

What needs improvement?

I would like more functionality in time registration, calculation and payroll.

For how long have I used the solution?

I’ve been using SuccessFactors for three years.

Buyer's Guide
SAP SuccessFactors
May 2025
Learn what your peers think about SAP SuccessFactors. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We had stability issues multiple times; sometimes disturbing and in a few cases, it caused blocks for business.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not had scalability issues.

How are customer service and support?

I give technical support 2.5/5. It takes too long to fix issues and the impact on our business is often underestimated by SF support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using SAP Talent and Taleo. We switched to SF because of the SAP/SF roadmap strategy and insufficient integration options within Taleo.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was straightforward. We aligned business processes, where needed, to the SF solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Don’t go for the traditional implementation approach with remote/offshore consulting. Use an experienced implementation partner who has enough expertise in HR projects.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Taleo. It had insufficient integration options and was not a full-scope product. We also looked at Workday. It was not a full-scope product and was not localized enough for European HR.

What other advice do I have?

Choose an implementation partner wisely for the long term. One who has a proven record in SF implementations and understands your business. Go for phased go-lives and apply a template for rollouts. Use the momentum to optimize business processes and align where possible to the SF solution. Start this before you start the implementation.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user585888 - PeerSpot reviewer
Hr Solution Architect at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
You can use the Compensation and Recruitment modules without additional instructions.

What is most valuable?

Comp and Recruitment: They really bring value for the managers and cost savings to HR. They are the easiest to use without additional instructions. The feedback received from the managers is very positive and they can also understand the benefits to their own organizations. E.g., in Compensation, a manager can manage the whole team at once and ensure they’ll implement the pay policy and guidelines.

How has it helped my organization?

There are top management recruitments where Recruitment has been utilized without using external recruiters.

What needs improvement?

LMS, the admin tool, is quite complex and requires a lot of admin work. The admin tool in LMS is a ‘system inside another system’ as the former Plateau, and the logic is not so self-evident as it is in BizX modules. SuccessFactors has ensured well that the LMS user experience continues but the admin tool is still separate from the BizX admin centre.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it since 2011. We currently use SuccessFactors EC, Comp. PM&GM, Succession, LMS, Recruitment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have only encountered temporary performance issues, lasting a couple of hours. These are very rare anyhow.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Based on my experience, the system can be very flexible and easily configured based on the company requirements.

How are customer service and technical support?

Of course, the level of technical support depends on your support model and whether you are taking the support directly from SuccessFactors or from the partner. However, partners cannot impact the technical settings too much. My experience is that SuccessFactors has done a lot of enhancements to their support during the year.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used SAP HR. The most important reasons for changing the system were user experience, data visibility (portal) and cost savings.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was straightforward, as global and lean master data was maintained in the previous system.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The most important is of course what systems you are able to implement (aggressive or less aggressive implementation) and then consider the implementation and license plan. It is also very important to find and select a partner that understands your company-specific complexity, are experts in implementation and not having extra costs (CRs). I think the partner selection is a key for keeping the costs in plan.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing this product, an evaluation was done.

What other advice do I have?

You don’t need be an expert in this tool area but you should consider carefully, what is your company’s target? Shall managers use the system or only HR? Are you only migrating the old system to the new or are you trying to fully utilize the new system? However, the most important is, of course, your internal resourcing and how ready your company is for the cloud implementation (e.g., global identity management, standardized workstations)? The implementation of SuccessFactors modules is usually very easy and standard, but the complexity comes with the relationships to other topics (e.g., integrations).

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
SAP SuccessFactors
May 2025
Learn what your peers think about SAP SuccessFactors. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Global Hris Leader , Senior Director at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
MSP
Working with different types of forms in one platform is helpful.

What is most valuable?

Everything in the product is most valuable to us. The flexibility of working with so many types of forms in one platform and also the ability to define different eligible populations for any process are extremely helpful features.

How has it helped my organization?

It is a single platform that the HR team, managers, senior business leaders and employees use to participate in the company's annual processes and that was a great achievement. This also had cost reduction aspects.

What needs improvement?

There should be a single mechanism to manage forms, i.e., to create a template/forms, change/route etc. There is also need for role-based permissions and the ability to add filters in the compensation form.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution's components as listed below:

  • Performance: 5 years
  • Goals: 5 years
  • CDP: 1 year
  • Compensation: 1 year

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I did not encounter any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I did not encounter any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

There is still need for improvement in the technical support; it is not ideal.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we had used Oracle on-premises for compensation purposes. The reasons why we moved to another solution were its high cost and also since it was a highly customized solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You should go for the three-year contract.

What other advice do I have?

You need to spend time learning this product at the SAP SF Support Portal. You should also talk to customers who have implemented it before and learn the best practice approach that has been adopted by them.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user589494 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sap Hcm/Success Factors Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Employee Central has customisation options. Reporting should be reduced to one tool.

What is most valuable?

Employee Central is the core of the product and is the best developed. This module is well worked out and has a lot of customisation options, which makes SuccessFactors an ideal solution for many customers.

How has it helped my organization?

It provides us with a way of visualising all our employees.

What needs improvement?

Reporting is done in several tools and should be reduced to one tool. Time management is currently not sufficiently developed for a Belgian company.

For how long have I used the solution?

I’ve been using SuccessFactors for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We had stability issues very often during the end of the year and after updates.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We did not have any scalability issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is very good for things that are not urgent. When urgent problems occur, they are not handled very well.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I only worked with SuccessFactors.

How was the initial setup?

If you do a good analysis, the setup is never hard. The most difficult thing is the analysis.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I never do sales. I only do implementations.

What other advice do I have?

It’s better to spend more time in the analysis phase than to reanalyse in the implementation phase.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are a reseller.
PeerSpot user
it_user521811 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director IT, Business Intelligence & Data Resources at Norwegian Cruise Line
Vendor
Allows us to consolidate our review processes. Has a complex data integration process.

What is most valuable?

The tool allows us to consolidate many review processes into one process. We had a lot of processes and everybody was doing their own thing. This tool has streamlined that succession management process.

How has it helped my organization?

We have multiple offices in different countries. This solution allowed us to consolidate all that data together without having to send spreadsheets and emails.

What needs improvement?

There are opportunities in every piece of software. It's not 100%. It's hard to find developers. That's the only problem we really have with this solution. It's hard to find people who can manage it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In terms of stability, so far so good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's our first year of implementation and we haven't had any scalability issues yet.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have used technical support. I would rate their support as average. They are not as fast as we want them to be. They help us with backend technical interfacing between other systems. We're taking data from other systems and pushing it in.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn’t have a previous solution. We have lots of employees and we're growing very fast. Selecting this solution was something that needed to happen.

How was the initial setup?

I was not involved in setting it up. I was involved with the data integrations, which were very complex. They have a set of web services and connections to them. The libraries were not up-to-date and this contributed to the complexity.

What other advice do I have?

Start with a small implementation first and then work from there.

When looking for a vendor, the cost is the most important factor. The next factor is scalability. We want to be able to grow with the product.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user521628 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Leader at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User
It is flexible to scale the classroom sessions and has the ability to make real-time availability of all the sessions. It needs to offer more customizations.

What is most valuable?

The flexibility to scale the classroom sessions and its ability to make real-time availability of all the sessions are valuable features of this product.

How has it helped my organization?

It has helped us in saving costs because the guys can see the availability of the classes as to what time it is scheduled or what time it is cancelled; thus there is availability of real-time information.

What needs improvement?

It has offered all the flexibility and customization that we were looking for in a product.

However, a couple of improvements can be carried out to offer more customization of the solution that is limited in the market. We do have a subscription from SuccessFactors that we review from time to time so if something comes up we'll certainly forward the feedback to them.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable product. We have not faced any real challenges so far.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have not really scaled this product with the implementation that we have done. The customer base that we were looking for didn't really need to scale.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have used technical support for probably one or two instances but for nothing major as such. They were quite efficient.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

There was a phase in which the customer had to identify which product suits them the best. There were three to four products that were evaluated after which we finalized SuccessFactors as the final product.

How was the initial setup?

There were a few consultants from SuccessFactors who came in and did the installation. They were helpful in setting up the product and doing the initial customization, after which we took over.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at one or two other solutions. However, based on the customer's environment and applications, SuccessFactors was the most applicable solution.

The important factors while selecting a vendor are its flexibility to integrate with the application that is with the customer and the adapters that are available so that we don't need to do a lot of customization. These are the main aspects.

What other advice do I have?

SuccessFactors is a great product. It offers a lot of flexibility, customization, integration and disintegration points as well. These are the most preferred requirements in an optimized solution so you should take a look.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user519387 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Implementation is modular. It suits a step-by-step approach.

What is most valuable?

It covers the entire employee lifecycle with a simple-to-use UI. It is modular in terms of implementing it and fits into the roadmap of any organization that wants to take a step-by-step approach. Constant innovation, integration and reporting & analytical capability adds lot to the value proposition.

How has it helped my organization?

We have implemented this for our customers and the areas where they have realized the values are employee engagement and satisfaction, better ROI, better visibility and predictability, faster and accurate decision making and lower overall total cost of operation.

What needs improvement?

SAP needs to add more power to its built-in analytics capability as part of the product. Faster time to market for multiple clients’ requests would help with adaption and benefit realization.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

SAP SuccessFactors is a very, very stable product and has evolved over the years. An implementation partner plays a very critical role that impacts the overall success.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Being a cloud-based solution and regular enhancements every quarter, SAP has handled scalability beautifully. Apart from that, SAP engagement with AWS gives clients more flexibility and access to the latest, state-of-the-art technologies from both software and hardware perspective; it’s a big advantage for any client.

How are customer service and technical support?

A dedicated support team has the right expertise and has been able to resolve most of the issues on time. No major escalation in this aspect has been experienced so far.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our clients have been using multiple systems, which caused issues such as the time and cost for managing multiple systems, retaining in-house capabilities, issues with scalability & constant upgrades and many more.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is very smooth; all processes are very well defined and documented.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing and subscriptions are very competitive and at the same time give clients a lot of flexibility to make their own decisions based on their roadmap and the budget in hand.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Our clients evaluate multiple products from vendors such as Oracle and Workday.

What other advice do I have?

  1. Have very clear objectives linked and aligned with your business goal.
  2. Have all stakeholders aligned and on-boarded.
  3. Make a roadmap and start small with clear scope and timelines.
  4. Evaluate an appropriate implementation partner.
  5. Follow the implementation methodology.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: My company is a SAP partner. We do sales and implementation services for our own clients, as well as for SAP clients.
PeerSpot user
it_user326337 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user326337Customer Success Manager at PeerSpot
Real User

Bhupesh, until you see the needed improvements in the solution's built-in analytics, how have you been compensating for the need to market for multiple clients' requests?

PeerSpot user
SuccessFactors Solutions Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
How to Train a Global Workforce Without Breaking the Law

“How am I going to find a system to deploy to 12-20 countries around the world?” Each one has it’s own regulations and requirements for training…”

“I work for a pharmaceutical company? Is there a Learning Management System (LMS) that meets the very requirements of the FDA?"

--

The SuccessFactors LMS answers these common questions by providing features that support US, French, and German requirements. At this point you may also be asking: Does it completely meet the requirements? Does it do everything I ever hoped and dreamed it could do?

Perhaps - I’ll leave that up to you and your legal department.

Let’s go in to a little more detail about how the system supports regulations in the following industries and countries:

  • FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (medical and pharmaceutical companies)
    • E-Signatures
    • Audit Tables
  • French Government and French Work Councils
    • 2483 Reporting
    • DIF Tracking
    • Training Planner
  • German Privacy
    • Deletion of User Data
  • US Federal Government Agencies
    • EHRI
    • SF-182 External Requests
  • Manufacturing and other industries requiring worker qualifications
    • Curricula

US FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Intended to protect the public against manufacturing defects and anomalies in production of medical goods and pharmaceutical products, 21 CFR Part 11 includes regulations that govern the use of electronic signatures in food and drug related industries.

The SuccessFactors LMS implemented two major features to support the regulated medical industry:

1. Electronic Signatures

21 CFR Part 11 requires an additional password when recording learning events. When E-Signatures are activated in the SuccessFactors LMS, users must enter an additional password. This password is used only when recording learning. This comes into play in two situations:

  • Learning is recorded manually - Admins and Supervisors record learning for others and are prompted for the secondary password before learning is recorded.
  • Users complete online training. Typically online learning is recorded automatically. When E-Signatures are active Users must enter the secondary password before learning is recorded.

2. Audit Trails

Companies are audited regularly to ensure compliance, and must produce reports demonstrating that e-signatures are properly recorded. The LMS maintains audit tables on important data including changes to learning history, user, items (courses) and curricula. If an Admin has modified a learning history record, a report will show this change. The following reports are available on audit tables:

  • Curriculum Summary Data Audit Report
  • Item Summary Data Audit Report
  • User Custom Field Data Audit Report
  • User Summary Data Audit Report
  • User Learning Plan Audit Report

French Work Council

The French government as well as work councils in France impose certain training requirements on employers operating in France. Employees must be given the opportunity to complete a certain amount of training each year and the time spent in training must be accounted for. When training takes place outside of normal work hours employers may be required to compensate employees for that time. The French government requires 2483 Reporting, which details the dollars spent on training and the amount of training delivered to employees. A percentage of revenues is collected and applied towards training some of which helps train people who are out of work.

The LMS supports the following regulations applied to companies in France by the French national government and by work councils:

  • DIF Tracking
  • 2483 Reporting
  • Training Planner to forecast training budgets

German Privacy Regulations

The German government requires employee data be deleted from all systems 5 years after the employee has left the company. A process called the “Purge Deleted User Audit History” automatic process deletes user data after X days. The number of days can be set to any numeric value. It is not required to be set to1826 days (5 years), so companies can be stricter than the German government requires. Companies outside of Germany can be less stringent as they are not required to comply with German regulations.

US Federal Government

Support for US government agencies is extensive, as the SuccessFactors LMS is the system of choice for most US federal agencies. Two features in particular were implemented to support the US Federal Government regulations. The requirements were specified originally by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and generalized for companies to use if they wish.

  • External Requests - Originally called SF-182 forms, External Requests provide an alternate way to request and record training by filling out a form that specifies the costs and duration of training - and requires approval from supervisors and other parties before training begins. A verification process is included, which applies an approval process to the verification of training after it has been completed. Typically users in the federal government use this feature to obtain approval for the estimated cost of training and to document the actual costs of training.
  • EHRI - There is an entire set of functionality most people never see called EHRI. EHRI is a specific set of regulations requiring federal agencies report all training data to OPM. The original idea was to provide a single training record for all government employees so that when employees change agencies (very common), the training record remains intact. Two issues were discovered in the implementation:
    • Agencies utilize many different types of systems including major LMS vendors, Access databases, and Excel spreadsheets - integrating this data into one feed with common fields is quite the task and has taken several years (with continuation)
    • Training is not standardized across agencies; while similar training may be offered in multiple agencies and could be considered the same course for qualification purposes, they often have different names and IDs. In addition, it is not clear from basic data how similar these courses may be. The task of determining what training an employee needs based on his/her past records can be difficult until these courses are standardized.

Given all that, EHRI is supported. The LMS supports loading private data including Social Security Number and Date of Birth through a feed from the HRIS directly into the LMS. PII fields are never displayed to admins and users. It is imported through a system interface, stored in encrypted tables, and exported to a standard reported transmitted through SFTP to OPM.

Employee Qualification

One other area to consider is employee qualifications. These may be strict regulations imposed by a third party or they may be internal training requirements that determine employee eligibility to work. Employees not up to date on training may be prevented from doing their job until required training is complete.

The primary feature that supports employee qualifications is Curricula. Curricula were at one time (very early versions) called Qualifications, and some database fields and code still refer to qualifications. Don’t be surprised to find the phrase QUAL when you dig deep into the underlying properties files of the system.

Employee qualifications follow a general pattern:

  • Read a document and verify that the user "read and understood” - at one time this was accomplished with a handwritten signature. Today it is accomplished by pushing a button in the LMS next to the statement “read and understood”
  • Complete training - this training may be Instructor-Led, Online, or both
  • Demonstrate performance on the job - On the Job is a combination of training and demonstration. In some cases it is a hands-on mentoring process, in others it is similar to an evaluation. The application even supports checking off completion of tasks on the job through the “Tasks” feature. Fun side note - this feature works on iPads, so you can walk around the shop floor checking off tasks as they are completed.
  • Manually Record Authorization (optional) - some companies have an admin or supervisor manually record authorization and may enable these people to rescind that authorization at a later date if the employee demonstrates poor performance.

Final Thoughts…

As you can see the SuccessFactors LMS has extensive support for a wide range of both government and industry regulations across the globe. Companies operating in multiple countries should consider regulations when choosing an LMS, and ensure that whatever the choice the system does in fact support the applicable regulations. You wouldn’t want to find yourself in the middle of legal issues and fees now would you?!

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're a SAP and SuccessFactors partner.
PeerSpot user
it_user516756 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user516756-- at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User

Latest version is world's above previous versions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free SAP SuccessFactors Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SAP SuccessFactors Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.