Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user519387 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Implementation is modular. It suits a step-by-step approach.

What is most valuable?

It covers the entire employee lifecycle with a simple-to-use UI. It is modular in terms of implementing it and fits into the roadmap of any organization that wants to take a step-by-step approach. Constant innovation, integration and reporting & analytical capability adds lot to the value proposition.

How has it helped my organization?

We have implemented this for our customers and the areas where they have realized the values are employee engagement and satisfaction, better ROI, better visibility and predictability, faster and accurate decision making and lower overall total cost of operation.

What needs improvement?

SAP needs to add more power to its built-in analytics capability as part of the product. Faster time to market for multiple clients’ requests would help with adaption and benefit realization.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it for two years.

Buyer's Guide
SAP SuccessFactors
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about SAP SuccessFactors. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

SAP SuccessFactors is a very, very stable product and has evolved over the years. An implementation partner plays a very critical role that impacts the overall success.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Being a cloud-based solution and regular enhancements every quarter, SAP has handled scalability beautifully. Apart from that, SAP engagement with AWS gives clients more flexibility and access to the latest, state-of-the-art technologies from both software and hardware perspective; it’s a big advantage for any client.

How are customer service and support?

A dedicated support team has the right expertise and has been able to resolve most of the issues on time. No major escalation in this aspect has been experienced so far.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our clients have been using multiple systems, which caused issues such as the time and cost for managing multiple systems, retaining in-house capabilities, issues with scalability & constant upgrades and many more.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup is very smooth; all processes are very well defined and documented.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing and subscriptions are very competitive and at the same time give clients a lot of flexibility to make their own decisions based on their roadmap and the budget in hand.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Our clients evaluate multiple products from vendors such as Oracle and Workday.

What other advice do I have?

  1. Have very clear objectives linked and aligned with your business goal.
  2. Have all stakeholders aligned and on-boarded.
  3. Make a roadmap and start small with clear scope and timelines.
  4. Evaluate an appropriate implementation partner.
  5. Follow the implementation methodology.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. My company is a SAP partner. We do sales and implementation services for our own clients, as well as for SAP clients.
PeerSpot user
it_user326337 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user326337Customer Success Manager at PeerSpot
Real User

Bhupesh, until you see the needed improvements in the solution's built-in analytics, how have you been compensating for the need to market for multiple clients' requests?

PeerSpot user
SuccessFactors Solutions Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
How to Train a Global Workforce Without Breaking the Law

“How am I going to find a system to deploy to 12-20 countries around the world?” Each one has it’s own regulations and requirements for training…”

“I work for a pharmaceutical company? Is there a Learning Management System (LMS) that meets the very requirements of the FDA?"

--

The SuccessFactors LMS answers these common questions by providing features that support US, French, and German requirements. At this point you may also be asking: Does it completely meet the requirements? Does it do everything I ever hoped and dreamed it could do?

Perhaps - I’ll leave that up to you and your legal department.

Let’s go in to a little more detail about how the system supports regulations in the following industries and countries:

  • FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (medical and pharmaceutical companies)
    • E-Signatures
    • Audit Tables
  • French Government and French Work Councils
    • 2483 Reporting
    • DIF Tracking
    • Training Planner
  • German Privacy
    • Deletion of User Data
  • US Federal Government Agencies
    • EHRI
    • SF-182 External Requests
  • Manufacturing and other industries requiring worker qualifications
    • Curricula

US FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Intended to protect the public against manufacturing defects and anomalies in production of medical goods and pharmaceutical products, 21 CFR Part 11 includes regulations that govern the use of electronic signatures in food and drug related industries.

The SuccessFactors LMS implemented two major features to support the regulated medical industry:

1. Electronic Signatures

21 CFR Part 11 requires an additional password when recording learning events. When E-Signatures are activated in the SuccessFactors LMS, users must enter an additional password. This password is used only when recording learning. This comes into play in two situations:

  • Learning is recorded manually - Admins and Supervisors record learning for others and are prompted for the secondary password before learning is recorded.
  • Users complete online training. Typically online learning is recorded automatically. When E-Signatures are active Users must enter the secondary password before learning is recorded.

2. Audit Trails

Companies are audited regularly to ensure compliance, and must produce reports demonstrating that e-signatures are properly recorded. The LMS maintains audit tables on important data including changes to learning history, user, items (courses) and curricula. If an Admin has modified a learning history record, a report will show this change. The following reports are available on audit tables:

  • Curriculum Summary Data Audit Report
  • Item Summary Data Audit Report
  • User Custom Field Data Audit Report
  • User Summary Data Audit Report
  • User Learning Plan Audit Report

French Work Council

The French government as well as work councils in France impose certain training requirements on employers operating in France. Employees must be given the opportunity to complete a certain amount of training each year and the time spent in training must be accounted for. When training takes place outside of normal work hours employers may be required to compensate employees for that time. The French government requires 2483 Reporting, which details the dollars spent on training and the amount of training delivered to employees. A percentage of revenues is collected and applied towards training some of which helps train people who are out of work.

The LMS supports the following regulations applied to companies in France by the French national government and by work councils:

  • DIF Tracking
  • 2483 Reporting
  • Training Planner to forecast training budgets

German Privacy Regulations

The German government requires employee data be deleted from all systems 5 years after the employee has left the company. A process called the “Purge Deleted User Audit History” automatic process deletes user data after X days. The number of days can be set to any numeric value. It is not required to be set to1826 days (5 years), so companies can be stricter than the German government requires. Companies outside of Germany can be less stringent as they are not required to comply with German regulations.

US Federal Government

Support for US government agencies is extensive, as the SuccessFactors LMS is the system of choice for most US federal agencies. Two features in particular were implemented to support the US Federal Government regulations. The requirements were specified originally by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and generalized for companies to use if they wish.

  • External Requests - Originally called SF-182 forms, External Requests provide an alternate way to request and record training by filling out a form that specifies the costs and duration of training - and requires approval from supervisors and other parties before training begins. A verification process is included, which applies an approval process to the verification of training after it has been completed. Typically users in the federal government use this feature to obtain approval for the estimated cost of training and to document the actual costs of training.
  • EHRI - There is an entire set of functionality most people never see called EHRI. EHRI is a specific set of regulations requiring federal agencies report all training data to OPM. The original idea was to provide a single training record for all government employees so that when employees change agencies (very common), the training record remains intact. Two issues were discovered in the implementation:
    • Agencies utilize many different types of systems including major LMS vendors, Access databases, and Excel spreadsheets - integrating this data into one feed with common fields is quite the task and has taken several years (with continuation)
    • Training is not standardized across agencies; while similar training may be offered in multiple agencies and could be considered the same course for qualification purposes, they often have different names and IDs. In addition, it is not clear from basic data how similar these courses may be. The task of determining what training an employee needs based on his/her past records can be difficult until these courses are standardized.

Given all that, EHRI is supported. The LMS supports loading private data including Social Security Number and Date of Birth through a feed from the HRIS directly into the LMS. PII fields are never displayed to admins and users. It is imported through a system interface, stored in encrypted tables, and exported to a standard reported transmitted through SFTP to OPM.

Employee Qualification

One other area to consider is employee qualifications. These may be strict regulations imposed by a third party or they may be internal training requirements that determine employee eligibility to work. Employees not up to date on training may be prevented from doing their job until required training is complete.

The primary feature that supports employee qualifications is Curricula. Curricula were at one time (very early versions) called Qualifications, and some database fields and code still refer to qualifications. Don’t be surprised to find the phrase QUAL when you dig deep into the underlying properties files of the system.

Employee qualifications follow a general pattern:

  • Read a document and verify that the user "read and understood” - at one time this was accomplished with a handwritten signature. Today it is accomplished by pushing a button in the LMS next to the statement “read and understood”
  • Complete training - this training may be Instructor-Led, Online, or both
  • Demonstrate performance on the job - On the Job is a combination of training and demonstration. In some cases it is a hands-on mentoring process, in others it is similar to an evaluation. The application even supports checking off completion of tasks on the job through the “Tasks” feature. Fun side note - this feature works on iPads, so you can walk around the shop floor checking off tasks as they are completed.
  • Manually Record Authorization (optional) - some companies have an admin or supervisor manually record authorization and may enable these people to rescind that authorization at a later date if the employee demonstrates poor performance.

Final Thoughts…

As you can see the SuccessFactors LMS has extensive support for a wide range of both government and industry regulations across the globe. Companies operating in multiple countries should consider regulations when choosing an LMS, and ensure that whatever the choice the system does in fact support the applicable regulations. You wouldn’t want to find yourself in the middle of legal issues and fees now would you?!

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We're a SAP and SuccessFactors partner.
PeerSpot user
it_user516756 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user516756-- at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User

Latest version is world's above previous versions.

Buyer's Guide
SAP SuccessFactors
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about SAP SuccessFactors. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1753278 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Human Resources Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
A strong HR activities solution with an easy to use interface
Pros and Cons
  • "This solution provides up with an easy way to on/off-board staff, as well as actioning internal transfers."
  • "We would like to see improvement in the initial launch of the product, as it is currently quite slow."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution for all required actions around people-related activities, such as on-boarding new staff and transferring internal position changes.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution provides up with an easy way to on/off-board staff, as well as actioning internal transfers.

What is most valuable?

We find the customization of the database to be very useful for our organization.

What needs improvement?

We would like to see improvement in the initial launch of the product, as it is currently quite slow.

We would like to see the addition of a dashboard feature, to enable faster access to regularly performed tasks.

For how long have I used the solution?

We worked with this solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have found this to be a stable product; we haven't experienced any issues with performance.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a very scalable solution.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for this solution is good. When we submit a request to them, they provide a timeline for the work to be completed and always come back to us.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

What about the implementation team?

The implementation of this solution was carried out in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is a more costly solution than comparable products, and training is not available in the open-market, so this has to be purchased separately from the vendor.

What other advice do I have?

We would advise organizations to look into the full costs of this product, including the cost of training their employees to use its features . They should also ensure that they can meet the bandwidth requirements of the solution before implementation.

We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SAP SuccessFactors Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SAP SuccessFactors Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.