SAP SuccessFactors Reviews

We primarily use the solution for many things including performance management, Goal Management, Employee Central, Compensation Management, and SAP Jam, Recruitment, Onboarding.

SuccessFactors has a really solid process for talent management, starting with Goal Management which helps managers and employees build smart goals aligned with business goals. Unique Continues performance management provides another tool for managers to facilitate communication between employees and managers and ensure having high alignment between employees and managers. This helps to have effective performance and better optimize performance process. CPM helps managers to have an accurate picture of their employee's performance to evaluate employee performance all year daily.

From the moment you are evaluating the candidate through recruitment, the process related to review employee performance using Job profile builder will help to have a connecting process between Recruitment and performance.

Having an LMS and Compensation module helps you to have the complete process, where you can use LMS learning to improve weaknesses and reward top performers using compensation.

The performance management and learning management solutions are the product's most valuable features.

There are updates and new tools for measuring employees all the time. There's also a mobile application that can be used by anyone within the process.

Analytic reports are also provided, so you don't need another tool to handle reporting. It has its own dashboard and reporting tools that give you a good overview of everything.

The solution is losing a lot of utilization capabilities because most companies don't function in just one country; they operate in many around the world. It seems to have issues with handling the master data. One module is not the same across all countries. For example, in one case you will see the coverage of all of the localization processes related to the USA, but when it comes to the UK, it's covering maybe 50%. It's worse in other countries. In the Middle East, you might only get 10% coverage, for example. We were surprised at the level of variance from country to country.

The solution needs more localization, especially for the Middle East and Russia and Germany. 

There needs to be more end-user training.

I've been using the solution since 2012.

The stability of the solution is good, but I would not say it's perfect. Sometimes it's not 100%. There are occasions when you want to do some technical updates and it will shut down the server for eight to ten hours. Usually, there will be an agreement between SAP and the customer and we try to shut down the server during off-hours. This means, however, that the availability is not 100%. Still, it is, on average, quite stable.  

The scalability of the solution is good but not perfect. In our company, we have around 200 users and we use it for 16,000 employees. We plan to increase usage to cover 20,000 employees and have plans to roll out the solution to some of our countries in Europe.

The solution's technical support is weak. 

They have not taken care to put in place any certified consultants that understand the system very well to support you when there are incidents. They seem to just add people that are new, fresh, and don't have a lot of information about the system. They don't have the real capability to solve technical issues. It makes the customers suffer.

We previously used Microsoft Dynamics.

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment times will vary from country to country according to the numbers, but most companies can implement it within three to six months.

You need to have some technical people on your team with you. You need one or two just to hand you each module and to help you understand the standard process so you can deploy and not forget any important features. From the business side, you also need from one to two people to be available during the implementation just to ensure that the user acceptance testing is done very well. It's a good idea to have a consultant visit with your team during implementation to check what was implemented inside of the business processes. They will help you understand the limitation of the space.

You need to have a consultant for deployment. Maybe later on in the process, if you are expanding, you don't need help, but you certainly need a consultant at the beginning.

Without having consultants and partners you will not be able to implement it. There is special access required to get to the backend of the system. We call it the low vision indexes. It's only provided to select consultants. Some features that you want to update also may require access to the provisioning. 

You will probably see an ROI after a year or two. It's great for auditing and there's a lot of reporting built-in so that you can really focus on processes. It will help you reduce manpower which saves money. And, because it can cover and support many companies and countries, it's perfect for multinationals that can now have one overarching system that covers basically everything.

The solution is subscription-based but companies do need to consider other ancillary costs, including upgrades, training, and general implementation costs.

We evaluated Origin and Workday before ultimately choosing this solution. In 2012, Origin was more on the cloud and Workday mostly just covered America rather than the rest of the world. They also didn't have any classes at the time.

We use the public cloud deployment model with SAP as the provider.

I'd advise others to schedule training for the team that will be handling implementation. It's important to have a reference case and go to other companies familiar with your business to check how it was implemented for them and to see how successful they have been overall. They may have good best practices you can learn from. 

Look for a good implementation partner who can take the time to work with you and choose wisely. Some may charge a lot of money and provide low-quality assistance.

You have to know the process before implementation. 

It's important to not purchase the license until you decide what you will use the system for and when you will implement it. It will help you avoid paying for a subscription without yet being able to use it or purchasing too large of a license.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

The performance of the solution is very good.

The solution has a mobile application and is on the cloud so we have the capability to use it anywhere, not just on location.

The user interface could be improved.

The pricing model should be adjusted.

It takes a long time to deploy the solution, and it should allow for faster implementation.

I've been using the solution for about a year.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

The solution's technical support is good.

I'm a consultant and work primarily with hybrid deployment models.

I'd advise others to look at the methodology before implementing it. 

Although customers don't like the cloud, it is the future and it shouldn't be feared. You don't need a lot of IT specialists to handle the solution.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I haven't worked on the solution for too long and haven't used a lot of features, but so far it's good. I need to look at workforce analytics a bit more to see if it's a plus for the future.

I am a consultant, and this is one of the solutions that my company is currently implementing for one of our clients.

This solution is used for performance management. It can also be used for forms that people have to sign, and it does the validation. You can print documents that have all of the information populated from different business applications. It allows you to manage all of the people without a headache.

This solution contains several features related to performance management. It allows you to record achievements and feedback, and create monthly reports. 

This is a public cloud deployment model.

The most valuable feature of this solution is the performance management module.

The reporting is very good.

The GUI needs to be enhanced to be in line with the latest and complete version of the solution.

We would like to have more information on integrating this solution with other systems, such as financial solutions.

The predictive analysis functionality should be expanded to offer more recommendations.

This is a stable solution.

This solution is more scalable than other solutions because of the features that it offers.

This solution has very good technical support. They are very professional, and we have a good relationship with them.

The initial setup of this solution is not complex at all. It is very easy. If we have any issues then we can ask technical support for an answer.

The length of time for deployment depends on the customer and their environment, but I expect that it takes four months at the maximum. For our client, the deployment took approximately three months, and four people were involved. One or two people are sufficient for maintenance.

We are implementing this solution for our client.

The licensing fees are based on the number of modules that are being used, and the number of users. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Many features and improvements have been announced for the next release of this solution. For example, there are many new integrations, including the ability to work with Excel files.

My advice for anybody implementing this solution is to plan ahead based on the organizational structure, and implement it one or two modules at a time.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

HR Master Data core system. Connected to SAP HCM System for Payroll and Time Management Process.

This solution support our HR Transformation strategy. Provide ESS and MSS functionalities to employees. Employees has digital access to their data and can start processes that before required paper handling as for example the change of personal data.

Reduce HR works and let the HR organization to focus on strategy instead of repetitive work.

ESS and MSS is a powerful functionality of EC. Easy and intuitive use of all the modules is one big attraction. Using EC as HR Core System facilitates the integration of other modules as Talent and Learning, which allow to have a common data framework and facilitates the Reporting. 

Related to Employee Central, the administration of Global Assignments have room for improvement. It is not so simple to manage the effect of global assignments in the Talent and Learning modules once this is activated in EC. EC Payroll and Time Management should provide more functionalities and flexibility, there is still a big gap between the SAP HCM On Premise System and Employee Central.

Is quite stable. However we have had some performance issues during the year.

It is scalable. We don't have any issues adding more and more people. 

Their technical support is okay. Sometimes it can take some time to get a response and it takes some time to resolve some issues. The service is good.

We are still using our SAP HCM systems to process time management and payroll. We decided to move to EC because it supports our HR Transformation strategy and provide digital access to our employees. Our core data is managed by EC as leading system, as a Cloud solution help us to move to the future related to HR data administration.

The initial setup is somewhat complex. We get the software and it's in the cloud and they still said we'd have to do a lot of integration with our recorded on-premise systems for it. It's not that simple, it's quite complex. There is a lot of coordination involved in order to make it happen.

Consider cost of subscriptions and costs for implementation partners.

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

I use the cloud deployment model. Our primary use cases of this solution is for making a fall schedule, human resources services. We're starting with the objectives, monitoring performance, efficiency, planning, and then management. 

The most important feature is the ability to follow up on the yearly performance of the team. It's very good for management to understand how people are performing.

LMS, Learning Management Systems, needs improvement because there were some stability problems.

It's scalable. We are expanding our business now to 500 employees. Scalability is good. We started with 400 users. 

We previously used HCM but I wasn't there when they switched to SuccessFactors. I don't know why they switched. 

SAP implementation is not an easy thing. SAP implementation is an issue.

We used a consultant for the deployment. 

My advice to someone considering this solution is to focus on your business requirements and get yourself a strong, reliable partner. 

I would rate SuccessFactors a nine out of ten. 

We use the private deployment model of this solution. 

It was much easier than the previous system. It made things a lot easier and operations much smoother.

The best models we used were the Goal Management and Performance Management. They were the most useful. We use three modules in our company, the Goal Management and Performance, the Talent Acquisition, and there's the LMS, the training. The best features that were working well for us was the Goal Management and Performance Management. They were the most valuable to our organization.

They should improve the reports. We had a problem with the reporting. If we compare it to Oracle products, Oracle has much more comprehensive and a better reporting system all in all. They really should work on the reports and making it more user-friendly. There's room for more customization in the reporting. This is the feedback I received, that the main edge that all Oracle products have is the reporting system, which is the main reason why I'm using the system in the first place.

In the next release, I would like for them to make the system have a slot for regular, back and forth feedback. It should have a feedback form on the system. 

It is stable. We haven't had any problems. 

Scalability is good. We can easily expand it. We were able to integrate it with a couple of our systems.

We were not happy with their after-sales support. Whenever we had an issue it was really difficult to get in touch with them. There was a problem with asking them about a feature or other things. They weren't as responsive as we would have hoped. During the installation of the system, they replied 24/7. However, after we deployed the system, it was not that easy to get a response.

We previously used Oracle. We switched because SAP is much more user-friendly. We weren't using Taleo or Fusion, we were using Oracle Basic. SAP was user-friendly for our employees.

The initial setup was straightforward. SAP was really supportive during this time.

We used a consultant for the deployment and they were very supportive during the time. 

I would advise someone considering this solution that they need to really look into their requirements and be very specific regarding the requirements when getting their orientation on the system and creating the requirement documents. They really need to to be very specific and very detailed in their requirements. Make sure to understand all the features and capabilities of the system.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

The administration parts and PA modules are on-prem but the talent management recruitment part is on the cloud. We have 22 different companies and we selected this solution so every employee can have a main point of connection. 

The interface is really useful and it's very easy to combine different information. For example, we can easily get reports that we need. It's very easy to create reports. 

Some of the screens aren't that user-friendly, older employees especially have a hard time with it. They have some problems with it. 

Challenge management parts should be improved. Also, the recruitment part module should be improved to help managers to select the right person without an HR. 

It is stable. 

We don't have problems with scalability. 

We haven't needed to use support yet. 

Before using this solution we used Excel.

The initial setup was straightforward. It's very easy on the cloud. 

We used a consultant for the deployment. 

Be sure about your processes. If you know how to plan your processes and needs, it's very easy to deploy it. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

SAP is our ERP. On the cloud we only have SuccessFactors for the recruitment.

We are currently looking for a better solution enabling us to better analytics. So SAP on-premise is pretty old and while it allows a lot of flexibility, it doesn't give us the flexibility to integrate to other modules. We have many interruptions and disconnection points into processes, which is why we are looking to another solution. We are not so happy with the system. We believe we have in the market better solution, so we are looking for alternatives but so far the system has been used a lot. It's brought to our organization a big big improvement. We would give it a good rating. 

The analytics part could be improved. Analytics are pretty poor plus some usability parts need improvement but in the end, the process is covered. In some cases, we don't have the possibilities to reverse the workflow. Overall, the product is a good product, I'm not saying it's bad. We are just looking for an integrated platform and of course, SuccessFactors is one of the possibilities. We are evaluating several alternatives.

In the next release, I would like to have the possibility to reverse workflows. There should be better automation. On the scoring, it's pretty fine. It really depends on the way you manage your recruiting. We are a wide organization so we have these type of issues. But for the normal recruiting process, it's more than enough.

The system is pretty stable. We have not had big issues with that. 

Scalability needs improvement. 

I would definitely recommend SuccessFactors but I think the roadmap for a better product needs to happen. Our overall rating is good but I think there is space for improvement.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.