Microsoft Exchange Reviews

It is user friendly.

The management of .pst files and archiving need improvement.

Because there are so many threats these days, better encryption and security would be good as well.

I've been working for around nine years with Microsoft Exchange.

Sometimes, it's not that stable, but it is good for the most part.

I would advise you to do the training and then use Microsoft Exchange.

If I had to rate this solution on a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at eight.

Microsoft Exchange is used for emailing groups, subscription-based similar to Online Exchange you can work on emails anywhere at any time. Used for groups, global address books, and global calendars.

Our customers are satisfied with the features included in Microsoft Exchange.

The only and main issue I had was when we had to verify the domain on the tenant.

There are issues when you add your domain to Microsoft Tenant, and you try to create that. Which is a problem for me.

I have been working with Microsoft Exchange for more than ten years.

It is deployed both on-premise and on the cloud.

I have not had any complaints regarding the stability of Microsoft Exchange.

Microsoft Exchange is a scalable solution.

I have 10 clients with approximately 200 licenses.

The Microsoft employees in Mauritius are friends, and they assist us whenever help is required.

The installation is very easy.

I have myself and two others to maintain and deploy this solution.

Licensing fees are paid monthly.

We plan to move everyone to Microsoft Exchange Online.

Everyone, in my opinion, is going for the Online Exchange, and I don't see any other option for myself.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.

Microsoft Exchange can be used as an email service.

We would prefer to be able to manage the solution on the cloud.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately eight years.

I have found Microsoft Exchange to be stable.

Microsoft Exchange is scalable.

We have 600 users using this solution in our organization.

Microsoft has a very good support team.

We did the implementation ourselves.

I rate Microsoft Exchange a six out of ten.

We are using Microsoft Exchange for our email. It is hosted with Zimbra and we use Exchange to interact with it.

The interface is user-friendly.

There is a lot of spam email that comes in, so they should add functionality to help fix this problem.

Better integration with other service providers would be helpful.

I joined the company two months ago and I have been using Microsoft Exchange since then. The company has been using it for much longer.

This is a stable product. With our IT putting a firewall in place, it is robust.

My impression is that it's scalable. We have approximately 1,000 users.

I have not has a reason to contact Microsoft for support.

When I joined the company, my laptop was pre-configured, so everything was already done.

Our in-house IT team is responsible for deployment and maintenance.

In general, this is a good product and I am happy with it. 

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We use Microsoft Exchange for emails.

Microsoft Exchange is comparable to the Outlook client. Both are Microsoft products, and most people are familiar with Outlook. This is why the best feature of Microsoft Exchange is the ease of use. It is more compatible with the client software, especially for Microsoft Outlook. There are a lot of features available that are required for businesses users.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately five years.

Microsoft Exchange is stable. However, there are other solutions that are more stable, such as Zimbra.

The solution is stable, but it could improve. It's crashing if there is a big mail database.  The Zimbra solution is better in this area.

We have approximately 200 people using this solution and we plan to continue to use this solution.

We have contacted support. The support for Microsoft Exchange and Office 365 is widely available and is good.

I have used Zimbra.

The installation is simple for the clients.

We have approximately three engineers that support this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for all communication exchanged with our team, customers, and all other internet exchanges. Additionally, it was used as a formal way of communication.

The backup and archiving features are valuable, it is user friendly too.

They could improve on the search function, it takes too much time.

I have been using the solution for five years.

It is a reliable solution.

We have approximately 20,000 users using the solution.

The installation was straightforward and it was supported by the IT team.

I was satisfied with the usage of Microsoft Exchange, I would recommend the solution.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

I'm the CDO and we are resellers of Microsoft Exchange. 

I like the logistics and Microsoft protocol of reaching Outlook anywhere. It's a user-friendly product.

Load balancing is lacking. If you need to use it, it requires preparation of the Windows IIS services for load balancing. 

I've been working with this solution for close to five years. 

The solution is stable. 

You can add multiple lots and expand the solution so it is very scalable.

It depends on the customer's architecture but in general, the setup is quite straightforward. 

There are multiple competitors in the market and I think the price is a little bit high but it has many benefits. 

We've just stopped providing advice for on-premise products because customers are moving to cloud-based products which saves a lot of preparation time. 

That said, I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

My main use case is corporate messaging.

The most important things are its long reputation of stability and that it has a lot of options for corporate staff.

An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations.

I've been using this solution for at least 15 years.

This is a very stable solution.

Exchange is very scalable, it's one of the most important things about this software.

We've had some issues getting responses from Microsoft support lately, as they seem not to be very interested in the Russian region nowadays.

Exchange isn't a very hard solution to implement, though the infrastructure can require some changes in advance. Deployment can take anywhere from a few months to a few years, depending on the size of the customer and the project.

Exchange is better for medium to large businesses because it can be quite costly for SMB, which may not need all the options the product provides. Customers may also need to buy additional client licenses depending on the options they require.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.