Microsoft Exchange Reviews

I'm the CDO and we are resellers of Microsoft Exchange. 

I like the logistics and Microsoft protocol of reaching Outlook anywhere. It's a user-friendly product.

Load balancing is lacking. If you need to use it, it requires preparation of the Windows IIS services for load balancing. 

I've been working with this solution for close to five years. 

The solution is stable. 

You can add multiple lots and expand the solution so it is very scalable.

It depends on the customer's architecture but in general, the setup is quite straightforward. 

There are multiple competitors in the market and I think the price is a little bit high but it has many benefits. 

We've just stopped providing advice for on-premise products because customers are moving to cloud-based products which saves a lot of preparation time. 

That said, I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

Microsoft Exchange is used for emailing groups, subscription-based similar to Online Exchange you can work on emails anywhere at any time. Used for groups, global address books, and global calendars.

Our customers are satisfied with the features included in Microsoft Exchange.

The only and main issue I had was when we had to verify the domain on the tenant.

There are issues when you add your domain to Microsoft Tenant, and you try to create that. Which is a problem for me.

I have been working with Microsoft Exchange for more than ten years.

It is deployed both on-premise and on the cloud.

I have not had any complaints regarding the stability of Microsoft Exchange.

Microsoft Exchange is a scalable solution.

I have 10 clients with approximately 200 licenses.

The Microsoft employees in Mauritius are friends, and they assist us whenever help is required.

The installation is very easy.

I have myself and two others to maintain and deploy this solution.

Licensing fees are paid monthly.

We plan to move everyone to Microsoft Exchange Online.

Everyone, in my opinion, is going for the Online Exchange, and I don't see any other option for myself.

I would rate Microsoft Exchange a ten out of ten.

My main use case is corporate messaging.

The most important things are its long reputation of stability and that it has a lot of options for corporate staff.

An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations.

I've been using this solution for at least 15 years.

This is a very stable solution.

Exchange is very scalable, it's one of the most important things about this software.

We've had some issues getting responses from Microsoft support lately, as they seem not to be very interested in the Russian region nowadays.

Exchange isn't a very hard solution to implement, though the infrastructure can require some changes in advance. Deployment can take anywhere from a few months to a few years, depending on the size of the customer and the project.

Exchange is better for medium to large businesses because it can be quite costly for SMB, which may not need all the options the product provides. Customers may also need to buy additional client licenses depending on the options they require.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

We mainly use Exchange for the email, calendar, and contact management features. 

The functionality on the user side is quite good. Exchange provides an excellent platform for collaboration between users. 

Exchange's management could be improved a bit, and its troubleshooting tools are limited at times. It's not easy sometimes to troubleshoot. That's another area where there's room for improvement.

Microsoft could make it easier to combine comments in the GUI. It isn't easy to do certain things in Exchange, primarily if the administrator isn't used to the command line, so I think the customer interface could be improved.

I've been using Microsoft Exchange for 15 years.

Exchange's application front services are robust and scalable.

I've never had to contact Microsoft support about issues with Exchange. We used to have a support contract with Microsoft, but it was for integration. However, the technology itself is mature though, and we have extensive experience managing Exchange. But if there are matters related to the environment, sometimes it is tricky. You have to build your own capability and rely on it when there is some novel use case.

If you want to run Exchange as an on-premises solution, you have to cover infrastructure costs. If cost is an issue, you can opt for Office 365 instead. But I'm fine with what we're paying because we have no problem budgeting for an Exchange server.

I rate Microsoft Exchange nine out of 10. 

We use Microsoft Exchange for emails.

Microsoft Exchange is comparable to the Outlook client. Both are Microsoft products, and most people are familiar with Outlook. This is why the best feature of Microsoft Exchange is the ease of use. It is more compatible with the client software, especially for Microsoft Outlook. There are a lot of features available that are required for businesses users.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately five years.

Microsoft Exchange is stable. However, there are other solutions that are more stable, such as Zimbra.

The solution is stable, but it could improve. It's crashing if there is a big mail database.  The Zimbra solution is better in this area.

We have approximately 200 people using this solution and we plan to continue to use this solution.

We have contacted support. The support for Microsoft Exchange and Office 365 is widely available and is good.

I have used Zimbra.

The installation is simple for the clients.

We have approximately three engineers that support this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

I believe I had used my previous version in 2010 or 2016. Subsequently, more people switched to Office 365, Exchange Online. 

Microsoft Exchange is exclusively an email solution and this is what we use it for. 

The performance is good.

The solution should be easier to deploy. 

I have used Microsoft Exchange for a couple of years. I'm now using Office 365, Exchange Online.

The solution is stable. 

The solution can scale up to whatever number of users one desires. This depends on one's infrastructure.

The solution is scalable. 

The technical support is fine. 

The deployment could be easier. 

I believe the installation lasted a couple of hours. However, further integration takes time and this can vary with the additional features one wants, customization which is based on the ETA, the rules and one's desire to make the solution visible to others. 

Once the solution is wholly deployed, there is not much need for further intervention. 

We pay for the license annually. We could take advantage of it throughout the course of the year, although it is now online, meaning subscription-based, by which the person can receive all the bookings, save for the mailing system. 

I'm currently using Office 365, Exchange Online.

The solution can scale up to whatever number of users one desires. This is wholly dependent on one's infrastructure.

We have approximately eight to ten thousand users making use of it in our organization. 

I would recommend the solution to others. People are gravitating towards it. 

I rate Microsoft Exchange as a seven out of ten. 

Microsoft Exchange can be used as an email service.

We would prefer to be able to manage the solution on the cloud.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately eight years.

I have found Microsoft Exchange to be stable.

Microsoft Exchange is scalable.

We have 600 users using this solution in our organization.

Microsoft has a very good support team.

We did the implementation ourselves.

I rate Microsoft Exchange a six out of ten.

All of Exchange's features are valuable. For example, we can configure the MAPI profile, IM profile, or mobile profile. 

Microsoft Exchange needs to improve how it handles and assigns policy and security.

I have been working with Exchange for the last 10 years.

The product is absolutely stable.

I think Exchange is somewhat scalable, but not exactly. For example, if we ever need to update our server, we have to create another server and migrate the mailboxes from one server to another. So, it's only somewhat scalable, not fully.

We are getting good technical support. We have an in-house support person, so we don't need any technical support most of the time. 

It's easy. Easy to use. Not complex.

It's reasonable. It's an affordable price.

I rate Microsoft Exchange nine out of 10. It's a good product that you can either implement on-premises or on the cloud.