Microsoft Exchange Reviews

Our company uses the solution to manage emails and accounts. 

The solution's speed is good. 

The search tools are good. 

Observations are very user friendly. 

The solution could be more secure. 

I have been using the solution for ten years. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

The setup is easy. 

I rate the solution a ten out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for e-mail. That's pretty much what Exchange is built for, and it's very good at what it's built for. 

If you want to have an email system that works quite well and that allows you to be able to give easy access to everything from emails to checking calendars, that's basically 365.

It is stable. 

It can scale. 

Technical support is largely helpful.

The only thing that could be improved is the pricing. They could make it more competitive. The price is a lot. That said, the product works, which means you're kind of caught between two realities. You want to pay for something that works. You just don't want to pay too much. If they could get it to be more affordable, then they will have a greater uptake in users. All the people that are using G Suite, the free version, would likely actually move over to 365.

I've been using the solution for over 15 years. 

This is a very stable product. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable, and the performance is good.

I'm happy with the scalability. 

We have about ten people using the solution in our company; however, our customers that we support number in the thousands. 

If we do get additional people, we will increase usage. 

I've used Microsoft tech support quite a bit across various applications that they have available. Technical support is not bad. Once or twice you get a unique issue that's going to be difficult until you find someone that knows absolutely everything. However, for the most part, technical support is okay. It could be far worse.

The setups vary in level of difficulty. I've worked with both simple and complex setups. 

I'm not sure exactly how long it takes to deploy. The time would depend on the size of the implementation. 

I can handle the initial setup myself. 

The solution could be less expensive. 

We can do monthly payments if we like; however, usually, we do a yearly subscription. 

We've used on-premises and cloud deployments. In on-premises, we're likely one version behind. On the cloud, we are using the latest version.

I'd recommend the solution to others. Whenever, for example, I find someone using Google, I move them over to Exchange. 

I would rate the product eight out of ten. 

Email exchange is part of our operations. As a customer, I use email for communication.

Integration is crucial for data storing. Web data is handled effectively, and it's quite convenient.

Microsoft Exchange is a little bit difficult. The challenge lies in the cloud implementation.

We have been using this system for almost more than five years.

The system is stable.

We don't currently use a similar service platform as we developed our own system.

When discussing price, we usually inquire about ROI. While Microsoft Exchange is expensive, we see some return on investment.

At this moment, we have not explored additional features. We do not utilize a shared calendar. I focus on scheduling, and we seldom use the shared calendar but share files instead. The system performance is quite satisfactory. I can provide a referral. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Microsoft Exchange a 6.

I use Microsoft Exchange for mailing, managing agendas, sharing contacts, and accessing the company directory. It integrates with Dynamics and project management tools to facilitate sharing information, appointments, and agendas.

The ability to share information, appointments, and agendas easily is the big value of Microsoft Exchange. It facilitates agenda sharing, and integrates very well with Dynamics, allowing seamless sharing of contacts and company directories. 

As a user, I find it easy to use, with digital signature and certificates being straightforward. It also automatically updates, which is very convenient.

Sometimes the client part generates some trouble. It can be very slow, though this might be related to our company's installation and configuration rather than the product itself.

I have been using Exchange for ten years.

From my perspective, as a user, it is stable and reliable.

In the past, when I was a technician, we experienced scalability problems with older products, however, I don't think today's products have that kind of problem.

I don't have direct access to Microsoft support. We have internal IT support that provides assistance.

At my previous company, we used Exchange as well.

I found Exchange already installed on my PC. It's a simple link, and I got access through the web.

We use GitHub and various other tools, however, primarily Exchange.

I'm quite satisfied with the solution and the automation it offers. It is easy for me to understand and is quite stable.

I use the solution in my company because it is an email system, and it can be hard to get by without one. I also use the tool for different companies and offer support for it. As a consultant, I support it for many different organizations. I use the tool across a whole bunch of different industries, so there are too many to name.

The tool's most valuable feature is associated with the fact that it stands out for being beneficial for managing emails.

At the end of the day, the biggest area for improvement is having better and more knowledgeable support technicians. Anytime I have to call in with issues about Microsoft Exchange, I know more about it than the consultants or some other people to whom Microsoft pays to offer support for the product.

I have experience with Microsoft Exchange since it came into existence. I used to work at Microsoft, so I have been familiar with Microsoft Exchange when it was Microsoft BPOS. My company has a partnership with Microsoft.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I am a small business person, so the tool's scalability is just fine.

The tool is meant for small businesses.

I rate the technical support a zero out of ten.

Negative

I don't see any differences between Microsoft Exchange and some other email applications I have used. Microsoft Exchange is just a tool. The biggest I see in Microsoft Exchange is that it is much easier to access it through multiple platforms.

There is no ROI from the use of the tool in my company. It is a required piece of tool for business. I can have a functionality-related discussion about the tool that I need to run the business. The tool's ROI discussion is kind of moot for me.

The solution's pricing is fine. There are not many options out there, so it is not fair to rate the tool's pricing on a scale of one to ten. I do think the tool offers value for money.

The security and compliance features impacted our organization to a minimal extent because we use third-party products for most of such stuff.

Speaking about the tool's integration capabilities with other software, I would say that they vary a lot, so some things are good, while some areas are challenging.

I utilize the mobile access features of the tool all the time.

Speaking about the tool's productivity, I would say it is the number one email platform in the world. The product works just fine. It does what I need it to do. The only time I get frustrated is when it breaks down or doesn't do things the way it is supposed to and when the support people are unable to assist me.

As I support Microsoft Exchange for many people, I can recommend it to others.

When the tool is working just fine, it is a great product. When it breaks and I cannot get it working the way it is supposed to, it is bad.

I rate the tool a five out of ten.

We mainly use the solution for our company email communications.

The platform is easy to use as it is integrated with Microsoft. We can easily share work files with other employees. 

We are not able to use Microsoft Teams due to connection issues. Thus, the product integration with Teams could be improved.

We have been using Microsoft Exchange for about seven months.

The product is stable. 

We have 73 Microsoft Exchange users in our organization. It is scalable. 

We contacted the technical support team for the migration. They responded immediately to our concerns and were knowledgeable.

We used Google Workspace before migrating to Exchange. We switched to Exchange as it was already integrated with Microsoft Office and didn't require paying for a separate license.

The setup was not very complex. It took about one to two weeks to migrate all our end-user accounts.

The platform's calendar-sharing capability is useful. It integrates well with other tools. 

I recommend it to others. It has many security features and is integrated with Microsoft Office, making it cost-effective. I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use the platform to facilitate email traffic, file transfer, security services, and rule policies.

Microsoft Exchange is a user-friendly product with efficient features for mail services and DNS registration.

The platform could be more user-friendly.

We have been using Microsoft Exchange for three years.

The service is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

We have 132 Microsoft Exchange users in our organization. It has a good scalability.

The technical support services are good. The team answers the tickets immediately.

The product is easy to install and deploy. The development steps included creating DNS records, followed by synchronizing with the Active Directory and facilitating user logins.

We implemented the platform with the help of our in-house team.

Microsoft Exchange is an inexpensive application.

The product, Microsoft Exchange, has significantly impacted our team's collaboration by utilizing hybrid directory functionality. We can integrate it with Teams, Calendar, and SharePoint providing simultaneous access for the users. It has effective calendar functionality improving scheduling efficiency. It offers various security-level templates, allowing administrators to tailor security policies based on specific organizational needs.

It is a stable service. It has a knowledgeable technical support team as well. I rate it a nine out of ten.

The main use cases are sending and receiving emails, managing calendars, scheduling meetings, and integrating with Microsoft Teams.

I find the Outlook client very valuable. It allows me to connect to the Exchange Server and send and receive emails easily. The graphical interface is user-friendly and has a good look and feel. 

Additionally, I appreciate its seamless integration with other Microsoft solutions like Teams and To-Do.

I would like to see the search capability of the Outlook client improved. I would like to be able to search emails by date, sender, recipient, or attachment.

I have been using this solution for more the ten years. We use the latest version. It's the cloud version of the Microsoft 365 solution that includes the Exchange Server. So, we use the latest solution provided by Microsoft in their cloud environment.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

It is quite scalable when it comes to Microsoft products. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. 

We all use this solution in our organization. 

We have often contacted customer service and support. It's a widely used product around the world. We often turn to community resources. When we are not able to solve a problem we contact our system integrator.  

We switched to Microsoft because Exchange is the most integrated with other Microsoft products.

If you're using Microsoft 365, it's very easy to setup since Microsoft manages most of it. You simply configure your clients to connect to the Microsoft server using your credentials. 

For on-premises solutions, it's a bit more complex as you need to set up and configure servers. You also have to manage roles and permissions, which is not required for the cloud solution.

The setup time can vary. For a small environment, it can take a day or less, especially if you're using a cloud solution like Microsoft 365. However, for larger deployments, there's additional work involved in configuring and optimizing the system.

Many users prefer Microsoft 365 as a cloud solution, which is easy to set up. However, there are still users who opt for on-premises solutions, which require more setup and management. Some are transitioning from on-premises to the cloud for better flexibility and management.

We require a few people for the maintenance of the solution. It's easy to manage. We have one dedicated technician.

For the cloud version, we have to pay. On-premises versions include some licensing, like Office 365 packages. There are variations.

The pricing is reasonable. It's not too expensive. It's comparable to Google, but Google offers fewer features.

We considered Linux-based products and Google products. 

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. 

I surely recommend Exchange. The recommendation is to manage the change process correctly, such as the access system, MFA, password change policy, and complex passwords. You should also use Microsoft's email anti-malware solution to resolve issues and avoid phishing campaigns. 

We use the solution in our company for emails, calendars, requests, and tasks.

The exchange of emails is its most valuable feature.

I'm a user for the time being. I'm not an administrator who is managing the server. I was an administrator fifteen years ago. But today, I'm just a simple user using the solution for emails.

We had an antivirus like Sophos to secure our network. In terms of Microsoft Exchange, I think maybe what can be done is to make it more user-friendly. Also, Microsoft should make it more like a web version.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for a very long time. Currently, we are on the cloud version.

It is a very stable tool.

It is a very scalable tool. In my last company, the solution had more than five thousand users. Now, thirty users use the solution. Considering the upcoming year, there are no plans to increase its usage.

I am not seeking any help from technical support because we speak with our own technical staff.

As a user, we don't get involved in the setup process. We need to connect it using the email address. It takes a minute to deploy it. I can do the deployment by myself.

Since my company is on Microsoft Cloud, we pay for the licenses per user. Compared to volume licensing, I would say the present licensing cost is not expensive.

I recommend others planning to use the solution to use it. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.

We wanted to centralize email to a specific server. We needed to manage the Exchange from one place and centralized everything. We chose Office 365 for all of our mailboxes, and the emails run through Exchange. With one click, we can access all of Microsoft's products.

Everything is good.

New features come in regularly.

It helps users communicate effectively with outside parties.

The whole Microsoft Team has created a great tool that has helped improve our capabilities and productivity. We use the solution daily.

Technical support is good.

We have witnessed an ROI.

The solution is stable.

It can scale well. 

The solution is serving the purposes we have. 

The cost could be cheaper. 

I've been using the solution for 13 or 14 years. 

The stability is fine. There have only been one or two incidents where Exchange did not work. However, for the most part, it is issue-free. There are no bugs or glitches. 

We currently have 12,000 mailboxes that leverage this solution. 

The solution is scalable. It is very easy to expand usage. 

We do not have plans to increase usage at this time. 

Technical support is fine. We haven't had issues with them. We've found them helpful. 

The initial setup of the solution is okay. It depends on the level of knowledge of the people setting it up. I found it easy since I have past experience. It needs to be implemented with people with past experience. It is easy to upgrade.

The time it takes to deploy depends on the number of mailboxes. 

We have a team that handles deployment and maintenance. We manage the solution for ourselves and sometimes for our clients. 

We are able to handle the implementation ourselves. I'm quite comfortable with the process and can do it myself. It does take a certain level of knowledge.

I have witnessed ROI while using the solution. It has good value for money. However, it depends on the use case. It's a journey for every organization. Each business might witness a different ROI across a different amount of time. 

The pricing model is a bit costly. They should work to lower the cost for the Indian market.

We pay for the solution yearly.

We're a Microsoft partner. 

We are using the latest version of the solution. I'm not sure which version number we are on. We migrated from on-premises to the cloud three or four years ago. 

We are a telecom service provider and have integrated Microsoft with a variety of products. It also integrates with mobile. It allows us to provide multiple services, including control and command centers. 

Technology is moving fast in this space, and there are more service providers out there. Many people are beginning to look at Google as an alternative. However, I've used Exchange for the last 14 years, and I am very familiar with it. Still, others are coming up fast, and more competition is on the horizon.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.