Microsoft Exchange Reviews

We use Microsoft Exchange primarily for mailing purposes, both internal and external. We integrate it with other Microsoft tools like Outlook, Word document collaboration, Teams, SharePoint, and more.

The integration of Microsoft Exchange with other tools allows for seamless collaboration and increased productivity within teams. The tools integrate with one another easily, allowing for features such as shared mailboxes, message traceability, and enhanced security and compliance features.

Microsoft Exchange offers several valuable features including the feature of shared mailboxes, the ability to integrate with other platforms, security and compliance features like Purview, conditional access, identity and access management, and scalability of mailboxes.

Microsoft Exchange and other Microsoft solutions like Office 365 need to provide more detailed information for customers regarding the features and functionalities included in their plans, as some features are only available at an additional cost.

We have been using Microsoft Exchange for nearly three to four years now.

There were some glitches, though they were minor, occurring in single-digit percentages, such as downtime where the mailbox was not connecting.

The mailbox scalability is one of the strong points of Microsoft Exchange as it is highly scalable from 50 GB to over 100 GB.

If an individual cannot resolve an issue, they can raise a ticket with Microsoft at any time. Microsoft provides a good knowledge base through their TechNet portal.

There are no significant hiccups in the installation of Office 365, which works similarly to a SaaS.

From a productivity point of view, the productivity increased by 30% to 50%.

The licensing and pricing are quite costly, which can demotivate customers from opting for features and upgrades. However, the solution provides value for money if one is well-acquainted with Exchange and Office 365.

Microsoft should focus on improving the clarity of its plans and pricing to avoid customer confusion over what features are included.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

The features I find most beneficial for my work are primarily centered around mail flow management. Mail flow rules, tracing, and the ability to set up rules and generate reports within the Mailflow section are particularly useful. Additionally, the convenience of connectors to other third-party systems and the ability to manage alert policies proves beneficial.

The product or service could be improved in terms of Microsoft Outlook client compatibility. The transition from old versions of Outlook clients to newer ones would enhance administration and maintenance processes, particularly switching to the web version.

We have been using Microsoft Exchange for four and a half years.

I rate the product's stability a nine.

We have 4500 Microsoft Exchange users in our organization. We plan to increase the number of users up to 5000. It is a scalable platform. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

We encountered significant challenges with response times and communication. In one instance, we had to escalate two tickets to the regional manager due to the lack of response from Microsoft engineers. It took two months to receive a resolution.

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward and fast, taking only a few days. This swift migration to the cloud within days was particularly notable for a bank, demonstrating the efficiency and effectiveness of the deployment process.

We recently transitioned from on-premises Exchange servers to cloud Exchange, primarily for enhanced security and ease of management. In the past, we had shared mailboxes with multiple users who were accessing them simultaneously, posing security risks and management challenges. With the switch to cloud Exchange, we adopted shared mailboxes with individual user access, providing better security and accountability. This transition also streamlined our operations and reduced maintenance costs. While we still maintain a hybrid environment with Azure Active Directory, all our mailboxes are now on cloud Exchange.

It has indeed improved our email system. In the past, with on-premises Exchange servers, there was a higher risk associated with granting extensive access to Exchange admins, potentially exposing sensitive data. However, while transitioning to a cloud Exchange admin center may offer less flexibility for admins, it provides a more organized and structured approach. The preset scenarios and settings reduce the likelihood of incidents caused by manual admin actions, thereby lowering the personal impact on the overall system.

The calendar and scheduling functionality of Microsoft Exchange has been essential to my daily workflow. As a user and a manager, I rely heavily on the calendar feature to organize my tasks and appointments. I utilize color-coding for different types of events, set up repeated meetings efficiently, and sync my calendar with other planning tools seamlessly. Overall, it has had a very positive impact on my productivity and activity management. The flexibility and plethora of features, such as customizable settings for meetings and the ability to share calendars, add groups, and specify user permissions, make it an indispensable tool in my work routine.

Compared to other platforms like Google Workspace, it provides seamless connectivity between Teams, Outlook, Exchange, and other Microsoft products. Additionally, recent updates have improved connectivity between tools like Planner and Projects, allowing seamless task management across the platform.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for email, calendar, and integration into Zoom.

The product works very well. Being able to access email outside the organization is a very good feature. It is very easy to set up.

The default storage capacity is too small. Though the mailbox size is one terabyte on the cloud, the default mailbox size can be increased for on-premise products.

I have been using the solution for ten years.

The tool is very stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The tool is very scalable. It is easy to add additional servers and users. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very difficult to migrate the server. If a primary Exchange server needs to be moved, it is not very easy. The service has to be shut down completely before it can be moved.

If there were a way to move it in real-time while email is still running, I would give it a ten. However, at the moment, we have to shut down the server and migrate or scale it to bigger capacity servers or the cloud. About 100 people in my organization are using the product. It is extensively used in my organization. As the organization grows, we will increase the usage.

I have used a webmail service that comes with Plesk for Linux servers.

The initial setup is moderately easy. It is neither easy nor difficult. It does require Active Directory to be set up properly. Setting it up is not difficult. It takes two days to set up an Exchange server.

We deployed the solution in-house. We need a manager, a systems engineer, and two developers to deploy the solution.

We have seen very good returns on investment. The solution is almost free. We just worry about Microsoft 365 licenses, and then Microsoft handles the deployment in the cloud. Once we set up the cloud domain, the cost is almost zero.

The licensing is integrated with Microsoft 365. Licensing is becoming easier. We can get Exchange in the cloud along with the Microsoft 365 license. We don't have to worry so much about Exchange licenses in the future. It would be deployed in the cloud.

The tool is very stable and easy to set up. However, we need Microsoft-certified engineers to manage it. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I use Microsoft Exchange as our mail server. Google is free, so I use it for my personal use, and for our office, we have the 365 option.

I use Exchange Server for email. That's why I am using Outlook for Exchange email. 

I do not have any notes for improvement.

I face some issues. No system is perfect, so I do face issues. They fix it and then get going.

With the cloud coming in, scalability is not an issue even for Microsoft. They probably will be able to scale up and scale down as and where it's required. Scalability probably is not proper.

I contact my technical support team, and they probably might be able to troubleshoot it on their own. If not, they'll take a ticket. I have a technical support team, the help desk, who will try to resolve it.

For my personal use, I am using Google Gmail, and I am okay with it.

Overall, I am satisfied with the product. I am used to it, and it's all good. From my experience, I would rate the product stability eight out of ten.

Our company uses the solution as our server. We have 20 to 30 users who collaborate across the solution. We prefer the solution on our web servers for committee users. 

The email management system is very easy to set up, configure, and use. 

The integration and features are very good. 

Creating an email for one user on a different domain takes time. 

The setup is difficult so could be easier. 

Our version of the solution is legacy so is no longer supported. 

I have been using the solution for fifteen years. 

The solution is very stable but you need to keep updating it. 

The solution's old version is discontinued with no support. 

The setup is difficult because it requires specialists to create domains and activities. 

We implemented the solution in-house. It was difficult and might have taken a day or more. 

The solution is expensive to maintain because it requires frequent updates and ongoing server maintenance. 

The 365 email only costs around $8 per month, per user. 

For all 365 applications, the cost is $12 per month, per user. For comparison, Google Workplace costs $8 per month, per user for all applications. 

We are looking to other providers like Google Workspace because the solution is legacy and no longer supported. It is also very expensive to maintain. 

We are deciding if we should upgrade our server and version or move to a different server and product.  

The solution is a very, very stable product so I recommend its use if your budget can handle it. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

I use Microsoft Exchange more for organizing tasks than as an email client. We have integrated Exchange with Teams for organization and communication.

The most used feature of Microsoft Exchange is the email capability, especially since it integrates with the calendar. We integrate Exchange with Teams, and the single sign-on feature is very helpful. I use Exchange to organize tasks with implemented rules, and its integration with Teams enhances our organizational abilities.

The filtering of spam needs significant improvement, as many spam emails are not getting detected. Exchange should provide higher security and better spam filtering.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for more than ten years.

The solution has faced performance issues, especially lagging, in recent updates.

Scalability is not a major issue, as it's easy to scale up and provide Exchange access to new users.

I do not need to contact Microsoft directly as the IT department handles any support interactions for us.

Positive

The initial setup of Microsoft Exchange is straightforward. It requires simply having a user and password to initiate, and a lot of the process is automated.

Microsoft Exchange saves time by allowing users to send emails or set schedules instead of making calls or holding meetings.

I can recommend using Microsoft Exchange as it is a functional product, but users should be aware of cybersecurity issues and potential spam. It is important for users to be cautious when opening or forwarding emails. My total rating for Microsoft Exchange is eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company because it is an email system, and it can be hard to get by without one. I also use the tool for different companies and offer support for it. As a consultant, I support it for many different organizations. I use the tool across a whole bunch of different industries, so there are too many to name.

The tool's most valuable feature is associated with the fact that it stands out for being beneficial for managing emails.

At the end of the day, the biggest area for improvement is having better and more knowledgeable support technicians. Anytime I have to call in with issues about Microsoft Exchange, I know more about it than the consultants or some other people to whom Microsoft pays to offer support for the product.

I have experience with Microsoft Exchange since it came into existence. I used to work at Microsoft, so I have been familiar with Microsoft Exchange when it was Microsoft BPOS. My company has a partnership with Microsoft.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I am a small business person, so the tool's scalability is just fine.

The tool is meant for small businesses.

I rate the technical support a zero out of ten.

Negative

I don't see any differences between Microsoft Exchange and some other email applications I have used. Microsoft Exchange is just a tool. The biggest I see in Microsoft Exchange is that it is much easier to access it through multiple platforms.

There is no ROI from the use of the tool in my company. It is a required piece of tool for business. I can have a functionality-related discussion about the tool that I need to run the business. The tool's ROI discussion is kind of moot for me.

The solution's pricing is fine. There are not many options out there, so it is not fair to rate the tool's pricing on a scale of one to ten. I do think the tool offers value for money.

The security and compliance features impacted our organization to a minimal extent because we use third-party products for most of such stuff.

Speaking about the tool's integration capabilities with other software, I would say that they vary a lot, so some things are good, while some areas are challenging.

I utilize the mobile access features of the tool all the time.

Speaking about the tool's productivity, I would say it is the number one email platform in the world. The product works just fine. It does what I need it to do. The only time I get frustrated is when it breaks down or doesn't do things the way it is supposed to and when the support people are unable to assist me.

As I support Microsoft Exchange for many people, I can recommend it to others.

When the tool is working just fine, it is a great product. When it breaks and I cannot get it working the way it is supposed to, it is bad.

I rate the tool a five out of ten.

We use it to share information and collaborate with each other, even when we're working remotely. 

We exchange files and documents, and we also use it to store recordings and other information from meetings with our customers. 

There are some bad days or hard ways when it's tough to connect with people who don't have MS Teams products. But this is only a hard situation when we need to communicate with people outside MS Teams.

So the connectivity could be improved.

Another area of improvement is the sharing of files, the sharing part of Teams. How I can easily share information files or video files with the colleagues I'm working with? So, this is an area for valuable improvement.

Another area of improvement is support. It should be faster and more clear, and more human.

I have been using this solution for the last five years. We use the latest version.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. There are hard days. 

It is very easy to scale. Just add on licensing and keep working the same way.

There are around eight end users in our company. It's suitable for our current level. We're a small company, so it's quite okay.

I don't have the best impression of customer service and support. It should be faster and more clear, and more human. The support team deep dives into thousands of documentation pages, making problem-solving time-consuming without human interaction.

Neutral

The initial setup is very straightforward. It just took a minute. It is very easy. 

The deployment is a plug-and-play process. You simply need to access the administrator platform, set up the configurations easily, and share enrollment links with people. It's a very easy process.

The deployment was done in-house. However, you need an IT-oriented person, an IT manager with knowledge of Microsoft.

The license can be both monthly or yearly. It is not expensive.

It's a useful tool for remote work and communication. Start slow and educate yourself. Learn about the solution and give it a try.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We wanted to centralize email to a specific server. We needed to manage the Exchange from one place and centralized everything. We chose Office 365 for all of our mailboxes, and the emails run through Exchange. With one click, we can access all of Microsoft's products.

Everything is good.

New features come in regularly.

It helps users communicate effectively with outside parties.

The whole Microsoft Team has created a great tool that has helped improve our capabilities and productivity. We use the solution daily.

Technical support is good.

We have witnessed an ROI.

The solution is stable.

It can scale well. 

The solution is serving the purposes we have. 

The cost could be cheaper. 

I've been using the solution for 13 or 14 years. 

The stability is fine. There have only been one or two incidents where Exchange did not work. However, for the most part, it is issue-free. There are no bugs or glitches. 

We currently have 12,000 mailboxes that leverage this solution. 

The solution is scalable. It is very easy to expand usage. 

We do not have plans to increase usage at this time. 

Technical support is fine. We haven't had issues with them. We've found them helpful. 

The initial setup of the solution is okay. It depends on the level of knowledge of the people setting it up. I found it easy since I have past experience. It needs to be implemented with people with past experience. It is easy to upgrade.

The time it takes to deploy depends on the number of mailboxes. 

We have a team that handles deployment and maintenance. We manage the solution for ourselves and sometimes for our clients. 

We are able to handle the implementation ourselves. I'm quite comfortable with the process and can do it myself. It does take a certain level of knowledge.

I have witnessed ROI while using the solution. It has good value for money. However, it depends on the use case. It's a journey for every organization. Each business might witness a different ROI across a different amount of time. 

The pricing model is a bit costly. They should work to lower the cost for the Indian market.

We pay for the solution yearly.

We're a Microsoft partner. 

We are using the latest version of the solution. I'm not sure which version number we are on. We migrated from on-premises to the cloud three or four years ago. 

We are a telecom service provider and have integrated Microsoft with a variety of products. It also integrates with mobile. It allows us to provide multiple services, including control and command centers. 

Technology is moving fast in this space, and there are more service providers out there. Many people are beginning to look at Google as an alternative. However, I've used Exchange for the last 14 years, and I am very familiar with it. Still, others are coming up fast, and more competition is on the horizon.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

Microsoft Exchange is the main mail server of Microsoft. It's a popular mail server, so a common use case for Microsoft Exchange is for small, medium, and enterprise-scale businesses. It's a mail solution, voicemail solution, live calendar solution, etc.

What I love about Microsoft Exchange is the good integration since 2013, particularly its integration with the calendar and other software such as Zoom, TeamViewer, AnyDesk, etc.

After 2022, users of Microsoft Exchange have to migrate mailboxes to Microsoft Exchange Online, and what I'd like to improve is for Microsoft to publish more on-premise versions for customers using Microsoft Exchange. Having more security is another room for improvement in the solution, particularly for mailboxes that develop the Exchange Edge rule to protect internal mailboxes.

What I'd like to see from Microsoft Exchange in the future is for Microsoft to still update the latest, existing version which is 2022. I'd like Microsoft to still push more cumulative updates for Microsoft Exchange 2022.

I've been using Microsoft Exchange for two years.

I'm impressed with Microsoft Exchange, and I'm rating it five out of five, stability-wise.

Microsoft Exchange is a scalable solution.

Setting up Microsoft Exchange from 2016 to 2022 in an SMB environment is straightforward because Microsoft combined all the cache, hubs, and mailboxes into one server. For large enterprises, the initial setup for Microsoft Exchange isn't as straightforward because large enterprises require more sophisticated setups.

How long it takes to deploy Microsoft Exchange depends on the size of the environment. For example, if I'm going to implement the solution in a small or medium-sized customer environment, then the deployment would take approximately one to two days, but if I'm implementing Microsoft Exchange for a more complex environment that has a minimum of 10 mailboxes and multiple sites, the deployment alone can take up to one week.

My team is responsible for deploying Microsoft Exchange for customers, so the implementation is in-house. I lead the deployment team.

The ROI you get from Microsoft Exchange can be very, very broad in terms of values. The solution, particularly the on-premise version, can save you additional costs compared to deploying it on the cloud, but the downside is the maintenance cost, and during new releases or updates, you may want to schedule the downtime in advance.

I don't have enough information about the licensing costs of Microsoft Exchange, but I do know that you need two types of licenses to run it. You need the product key and the client access key to activate Microsoft Exchange. This means that apart from the standard Microsoft Exchange licensing fees, you have to pay additional costs.

I'm working in a professional service company that's implementing Microsoft Exchange on-premises for customers. I implemented the solution on-premises in 2016, 2019, and 2022. In 2016, I also performed a migration from Microsoft Exchange to Microsoft Exchange Online.

My current company has between fifty to one hundred users of Microsoft Exchange, but in terms of the number of clients my team has implemented the solution for on-premises, it's potentially five thousand.

Deploying Microsoft Exchange for SMB would require just two people, but deploying it for enterprise-scale businesses would require a minimum of three people. Maintaining Microsoft Exchange requires five to seven people for SMBs, and up to twelve in enterprise environments because maintaining the solution isn't as easy.

My advice to anyone looking into implementing or using Microsoft Exchange is the same advice I give to my team every day, which is to be more aware of new information found on the internet in terms of troubleshooting Microsoft Exchange problems. You should also keep on training about sophisticated setups for the solution because you deal with aggressive customers, so I encourage my team to learn about Microsoft Exchange designs, troubleshooting mechanisms, etc.

I'm rating Microsoft Exchange as nine out of ten.

My company is an implementer and consultant for Microsoft Exchange, not a reseller or retailer. The customer is responsible for purchasing the Microsoft Exchange license.