Trello Reviews

We use UiPath to automate bill generation each month for our clients.

While UiPath offers an RF framework, our organization has developed a custom five-stage framework as our internal standard. To utilize this framework, we implemented specific processes to populate the queue with the necessary values. We then process the data sequentially, debugging and finalizing each operation before moving on to the next. Notably, we ensure all transaction features and exceptions are documented beforehand for comprehensive recording.

The UiPath user community is helpful when we are developing any backend operations.

Over the past two years, UiPath has helped us reduce costs by automating previously manual tasks. This has increased our clients' willingness to embrace automation for their standard manual processes. In the event of an automation issue, we can easily raise a ticket through another user interface to have it resolved.

UiPath has helped reduce our on-premises footprint.

UiPath helps speed up digital transformation in the back end.

If the developers write the code correctly, UiPath helps reduce human error by 60 percent.

All the features are valuable but the data extraction is extremely helpful for automation.

Unstructured data cannot be directly used; it needs to be structured first.

The recording session works well, but introducing dynamic control can cause glitches and loss of control. To address this, we need to manually extract elements from all test boxes and ensure the dynamic code is executed within them for proper functionality.

I have been using UiPath for four years.

The versions of UiPath that we have used are stable.

We can scale UiPath to meet our needs.

The technical support is good.

Our previous automation solution proved to be less effective. UiPath, on the other hand, has demonstrated a 95 percent increase in efficiency for our needs.

Initially, the deployment may be complex, but it will become straightforward once we get the hang of it. The deployment doesn't take much time.

Our positive return on investment with UiPath has led us to consolidate all our automation efforts on their platform.

UiPath is cost-efficient.

I would rate UiPath ten out of ten.

Our clients are SMBs.

Maintenance is only required when there are changes or updates made.

I recommend UiPath because it is user-friendly and widely preferred.

I have hardly had the chance to use Trello since I operated as an admin who was mostly engaged with the use cases of people in my company, where it was widely used. Trello was a tool that was mostly used as an ERP system. Trello was generally used for work balancing and creating to-do lists.

The most valuable feature of Trello stems from the fact of how easy it was with it to see large visual aspects, especially when people were getting their workflow in order. Trello is an easy platform to visualize your next tasks and other things.

I am sure that my company's use cases related to Trello were taxing for the system, so it got rather slow in some areas. With too much information on a Trello board, it got very sluggish. I am sure that Trello board got sluggish mostly due to our company's use case and other bad practices. Trello wasn't a tool that offered lightning-fast speed like users wanted it to be for them.

I have experience with Trello. I am an admin-level user of the product.

Other than the times when the tool slowed down, I don't remember witnessing any outages from Trello's end.

A few hundred people were using Trello in my company.

Trello was a tool that already existed in my current company. Trello was there even before I joined my current organization.

Before someone plans to use Trello, I would ask them to go through all of their use cases and think hard before building any infrastructure with Trello. It is also important to have a good plan and architecture planned out before you start with Trello so that you don't end up building a house of cards at the end.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

Trello's most valuable feature is its visuals. You can customize your board with covers and pictures. There are no restrictions in workflow columns as in Jira. It is a powerful solution to organize work. Jira is process-oriented and restrictive. 

Trello has become complex over the years. 

I have been working with the product for five to six years. 

The tool is stable. 

I rate Trello's scalability a six out of ten. My company has 100 users. 

The tool's response is not on time. It is the last resort after the forums and documentation. At times, their reply is something that we already know. 

The tool's deployment is simple. 

I rate Trello an eight out of ten. 

My company uses Trello for project management to create dashboards and workspaces.

The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and flexible while offering the ease of use of drag-and-drop functionality for each task.

The dashboards and flexibility to adjust the timeline view for each task are areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.

I have been using Trello for three months.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten since they need to improve the flexibility to make changes to the timeline view and dashboard.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.

Around 600 to 700 employees in my company use Trello.

I prefer to use Jira instead of Trello. With Trello, our company can't see the plans in the timeline view.

The initial setup of Trello is not complex.

The solution can be deployed in five hours or a day.

I installed the product, so it was an in-house process without any training.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

The tool is used to organize projects.

The product helps with the management of projects.

The product is not easy to use. Initially, it seemed easy to use, but it was not.

I have been using the solution for a couple of weeks.

I rate the tool’s stability a six out of ten. The stability could be better.

Around 15 people were using the product in our organization.

Earlier, we used Microsoft Excel for project management.

The initial setup was quite easy. The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I am an end user, and I am also providing the solution to my customers. It's a good tool. I would recommend it, but it depends on the IT projects of a company. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

I use Trello regularly to manage my tasks and track my progress. I use it to keep track of both personal and professional tasks. Additionally, the internship organizers at our company use it as a communication channel. At work, use it to leave comments and discuss how the projects are going.

What I like the most about Trello is how engaging and efficient it is. I like that it allows me to monitor which tasks have been completed and which ones haven't by removing a particular card away from the board, stating that the task has been done.

Although it has many useful features, the one thing I don't like about Trello is that it constantly sends out unimportant notifications. For example, I get an email notification from every card I comment on, which can be tedious at times. They should prioritize sending out only important notifications that are significant to me. I would like to only receive important emails to avoid spending time on irrelevant things. 

I can’t think of anything now but there is room for improvement. There’s definitely room for added features.

I've been using Trello for a little over a year.

I would give it a ten out of ten.

It's a very scalable solution. I believe there is definitely room for improvement but I enjoy the flexibility that comes with it. So in terms of scalability, it's very good, very efficient.

I've never even had any need to contact technical support. I think Trello is very easy to use. I understand that not everybody is tech-savvy like me, but I don't know if there's even a need to have customer support.

I was searching for solutions for productivity's sake and so far I have only explored Notion before I started using Trello. Notion is good in its own way. You can type anything you want and it kind of gives you a Microfosft 365 feeling while using it. You can do anything, convert to devices, convert to the database, convert it back to the table, etc. It gives room for a scale of features like structure, query, language, and other things. It's a very wonderful tool, but for me, in order to keep up with my productivity rate each week, I prefer Trello. I am the kind of person that when I fall in love with something, there's no going back. So I chose Trello. 

For a tech-savvy person like me, the initial setup of Trello was quite simple. There was nothing particularly difficult about it.

I think that the pricing is fair, although I haven't checked it out completely. I'm still making use of the free features on Trello. I'm still enjoying the free version and have not upgraded my plan yet to the most recent one. 

We have software engineers working in a distributed format, handling outsourcing projects, and we create tasks in Trello. We use Trello to manage projects, though most of our projects are not very big.

I like the user interface's graphics and the general features and functionalities. Similarly, I like the automation side of things because it provides updates and notifications. Trello is a valuable solution.

The solution could be priced cheaper.

I have been using Trello for the past three years, and I'm using the latest version.

I rate the stability as a ten out of ten.

The solution is scalable. We have eight users. We will increase usage if we need to.

The initial setup was straightforward. It took less than ten minutes to deploy the solution. The process is quite simple. It's a straightforward and user-friendly experience. Since most of our project managers and product managers were already familiar with setting up the solution, the initial setup was not a big deal for us.

We implemented it through our in-house team.

The pricing starts from around $6 per license for a subscription, and there might be higher subscriptions available, possibly around $12 per month. Overall, I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

Most of our projects on Trello are not very big, so we are reconsidering it.

When setting up Trello, you need to create an account, and after confirmation, you can start using the free version to explore the features. While the free version may have some limitations, you can easily upgrade to the paid version if you require additional features.

Everyone should get a subscription since it's a good solution. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I use Trello for small teams. It's my day-to-day work, and it's for small teams.

So I have a small team of five members. So we have a backlog for my team. I use it for that. And when I do trainings, I use the training backlog as part of Trello. And when I offer coaching, I use Trello for goal setting and helping them to focus on the goals, and visualize the goals and those scenarios.

One of the most valuable features is visualization. It really helps every one to get transparency in when and what is happening because you see the same lane. It's pretty helpful. 

Another important feature is that it is easier to allocate people because we have the labels, and we can assign people. So those are the things that I find interesting. 

n Trello, there's one aspect that could be enhanced. Sometimes, I find it challenging to manage the checklists. Specifically, I'd like to have the ability to track the checklist as a separate entity. Let me explain. When I have a detailed checklist for a task, like organizing an event with items such as "Talk to the hotel" and "Get details," it would be helpful if I could convert this checklist into a new card while retaining all the same content, labels, and other details. Currently, if I convert it into a new card, I have to manually update everything, which can be time-consuming. Improving this aspect of the checklist feature would be beneficial.

There's another thing that comes to mind. Sometimes, I use PowerApp to supplement Trello because I find that some of the basic features in Trello might not fully meet my needs. PowerApp helps me accomplish specific tasks and allows me to do things in a way that I couldn't solely achieve using Trello. 

I have been using Trello for maybe the last five years. I did an upgrade, but I'm not sure if I'm using the latest version.

I haven't found any challenges in that. Trello has been stable in my experience.

I think when you have bigger teams and also, like, a proper backlog, for example, in an infrastructure team, maybe I feel that Jira is better suited. But for a small team, Trello is fair.

The initial setup is easy. There is no maintenance required. 

I have seen the paid version, but currently, I'm not using it. Some time ago, when I wanted to use more power apps, I considered the paid version for a while, but right now, I'm using the free version.

In my experience, coming from software development and event management, I prefer Jira for software development because of its proper use of storage, and Confluence integration adds to its benefits. So for software development, Jira is a better fit. However, in my company's events-based workshops, I find Trello more suitable. I don't need all the extensive features of Jira for that. Simplicity matters for my company. But when it comes to software product development, Jira proves to be more helpful.

I would always recommend Trello when it comes to small team collaboration, especially for those looking for transparency and tracking progress. Trello is a great choice. However, if it's a big team working on software development, I believe Jira would be a better fit. So, it depends on the specific needs of the team.

One is the worst, and ten is the best. I would say it's an eight. Overall, it's been a good experience with Trello.

We use the product for meetings and timelines. We use it to share the status of some projects with the team.

Kanban is the best feature of the tool. It is very clear and very good. The desktop solution is good.

There are mobile apps for the solution. Sometimes the notifications are not updated on iOS. If we have one notification, the iOS app shows seven. It indicates that the notifications are still unread. The notifications on mobile apps must be improved.

I have been using the solution for almost two years.

About ten people use the product in my organization.

The initial setup was very easy.

I sent messages to the support team through the app when the notifications were not updated on iOS. However, they did not reply.

The product is cheap. I think the product is cheaper than Zoho.

I would recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to set up tasks and monitor their status.

We have employees in New York, India, and London. There was a lot of mismanagement of tasks earlier. With the help of the product, everyone knows the status of all the tasks. 

During the production rollout, we can ensure that everything is rolled out in the production at the same time. We can also conduct team meetings with the help of the product to align the team’s efforts.

The demos and POCs in the product are quite good for onboarding. There is a huge community to help us with the issues we face while using the product. The online forums and blogs are fantastic.

The product does not allow the linking of tasks. We cannot link tasks that are dependent on each other. There is no field to indicate the budget allocated and consumed for a particular task. The meeting should have recording facilities.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I rate the stability of the solution a ten out of ten. We did not face any problems in the last two years.

The solution is highly scalable. Around 20 to 22 people use the product in the organization. We might plan to increase the number of users in the future.

We never had to reach out to technical support because we got help from the online community whenever we were stuck.

Previously, we used Microsoft Project. We switched to Trello because Microsoft Project had a lot of rigidity, and we faced a lot of issues related to cost and deployment.

The initial setup is quite easy. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten.

The deployment was done in-house. Most of the people and resources are comfortable with the product. We need two to three people to deploy the product.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The solution should lower its prices. We pay $10 per user per month for the product.

I am using the latest version of the solution. The solution is cloud-based. Trello is used globally. I would strongly recommend Trello to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.