We belong to the hotel industry. In the hotel itself, we have deployed WIFI fully throughout the establishment. So far, it is working perfectly.
Network Design Engineer at Comstar - Information Systems Associates Ltd.
Good customization capabilities with easy scalability and a straightforward setup
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is very user friendly."
- "They should work to make their licensing more affordable."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The solution offers a lot of great features to its users.
The multiple FSIVs is great.
The meshing is very effective.
The solution has a very high bandwidth.
We've found the initial setup to be straightforward.
The solution is very user friendly.
It offers good customization capabilities.
We have found the dashboards to be quite good.
What needs improvement?
Occasionally, we have found some controllers malfunctioning. However, that is rare, and largely the solution works perfectly.
They should work to make their licensing more affordable.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for five to six years at this point. It's been a while for sure.
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about Ruckus Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. I've found it to be extremely reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution scales quite easily when you need it to. We use and mix and match the old and new versions as we change rapidly. We have our older equipment that hits its end of life, and we deploy new ones to cover the old. We are able to do this pretty seamlessly, and, if we need to, we can just continuously add on based on our requirements.
Everyone who works in our organization uses the solution.
How are customer service and support?
We've been in touch with technical support multiple times. When we create a ticket, they are quite responsive. We're satisfied with their level of service.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not complex. It's pretty straightforward. A company shouldn't have any issues with the implementation.
We deployed almost 420 pieces and in total it only took us about a month and a half.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is paid on a yearly basis. We are working with three yearly licenses.
The pricing is okay, however, it could be more affordable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have looked at Aruba and Cisco as well as ExtremeWireless and compared them all to Ruckus.
What other advice do I have?
We are a large partner.
We don't use the latest version of the solution every single time. Often we mix and match versions.
I would recommend the solution to other organizations. We've been largely very happy with the product overall.
I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner

Integration Manager at Newcom
Requires less equipment, offers good pricing and is very stable
Pros and Cons
- "The product has good technical support and offers excellent documentation."
- "The solution needs to have some sort of security offering, like a firewall, for example."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for internal use for deployments.
How has it helped my organization?
I don't have specific metrics that could describe who this solution has improved how the company operates. It just offers better connections for the users.
What is most valuable?
The product does a very good job of covering specific areas using less equipment than other providers.
The solution offers better coverage. It offers a better footprint in order to connect with the user.
The possibility to deploy the solution and the configuration of all the equipment through the console makes everything very easy.
The product has good technical support and offers excellent documentation.
What needs improvement?
In both cases in terms of the latest deployments we initiated, we implemented a new version, which means that in both cases the client deployed a new Wi-Fi infrastructure. As we deployed the solution, it meant that the users had to connect to the network via a patch cord.
The solution needs to have some sort of security offering, like a firewall, for example. Fortinet offers access to security via Wi-Fi controls and a management console. Ruckus does not do this.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 20 years. It's been a good two decades of usage. In just the last six months, we've implemented it for two clients.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution is excellent. There aren't issues with glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs. It's completely reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is very, very good. We have no issues expanding as we need to. It's excellent.
We typically work with medium-sized Argentinian companies. In one of the implementations we handled in the past year, the client already wants to increase the coverage of the Wi-Fi network for the next year.
How are customer service and technical support?
In general, we get good technical support from Ruckus. It's excellent service. In all the cases where we have reported some problems, we receive the answer about how to resolve the problem very quickly. They are extremely responsive and very knowledgeable. We've very happy with their services.
How was the initial setup?
The initial implementation was easy. We had already deployed Ruckus for the client previously, and we were just doing another new deployment. It was very straightforward.
The deployment took about a month due to the fact that we needed the client to deploy the cable network. They had to finish the network before we could really finish our portion of the implementation. In another deployment, for a different client, it only took us two weeks.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is less expensive than, for example, Fortinet, and requires less equipment.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
In the first implementation, we did recently, the client decided to implement the Ruckus without any comparison with other solutions.
In the second implementation, we had an evaluation done and we looked at Fortinet. The client decided to implement Ruckus over Fortinet. The decision was mainly based on the different pricing between the two options and the need for access points with Ruckus. With Ruckus, we needed fewer appliances in order to bring the same coverage that Fortinet offered, for example.
What other advice do I have?
We're a partner with Ruckus.
In both of the most recent deployments, we have used the Access Point R320.
Ruckus as a brand is pretty new to the Argentinian market, and therefore, we need to introduce our clients to their offering. We really need to show off the benefits of going with Ruckus over, for example, Fortinet, which is more well known.
Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Buyer's Guide
Ruckus Wireless
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about Ruckus Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
865,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Vice President at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Good performance, easy to deploy, and the support is responsive
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the performance. It works great."
- "I would like to see this product made a little more economical because it's very expensive."
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and Ruckus is one of the wireless networking products that we implement for our customers. In this context, we are a managed service provider because after well sell the package, then deploy it, we manage it for them.
This is a full solution including Rucks Access Points, Rucks Switching, Ruckes Cloud Controller, and we have a point-to-point set up in these installations. It's multiple locations, but they're all pretty similar to each other.
As a managed service provider, we are a little different than a reseller. Our relationships are not with the companies that are selling us the equipment, it's more with our customers. So, we're trying to put ourselves in a position that we're making those decisions not based on a relationship with a vendor because those can change as technology changes. Today it might be Ruckus, tomorrow it could be Cisco Meraki. It's all based on customer needs and what they're looking for. Though, the vendor relationship is also important because, obviously, we need to support all of this stuff
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the performance. It works great.
The second most important feature is that it is super easy to deploy. As an example, we deployed this without having any of our physical techs on site. We basically used a contractor to put stuff where we asked for it to be put, but there were no real technical people on site, due to COVID. It is a very large processing plant, so they have maintenance people that we were able to ask to plug things in and place hardware. Pretty simple stuff. After that, we were able to remotely configure and optimize the setup remotely. Again, we didn't buy it because of that, but that turned out to be a huge benefit to going with this product.
What needs improvement?
The management software is cloud-based and they're constantly revising their cloud software, so there's always room for improvement.
I would like to see this product made a little more economical because it's very expensive. If I look at the percentage of my customers that I can sell it to, it's under 5%.
For how long have I used the solution?
Our deployment for Ruckus Wireless started several months ago, at the beginning of this year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Ruckus Wireless is extremely stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This product is very easy to scale and I have a couple of pretty decently-sized Ruckus deployments.
The one that we are currently working on is a very physically large deployment and it's a mix of indoor and outdoor access points. Inside the single physical location, there's a pretty large distance between the location itself and an offsite, which is the reason we have a point-to-point.
There is the main physical location and then there is an offsite a couple of miles away, which is part of the deployment. The offsite doesn't really have any physical structures, though it does need the ability to have wireless. So, we're using a point-to-point to connect the two.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is tiered. Their first level of support is very responsive, maybe not super technical. But again, depending on the size of the problem, they are pretty quick to offer more advanced, technical support or escalate technical support pretty quickly.
We ran into a few issues during this deployment, where stuff wasn't working the way we thought it should be, or we were having some difficulties configuring things, and they were very, very responsive to get involved in it. It seemed like that response was also pretty much on demand. So, even if we would call late in the day or at night, they were able to get someone on support. We rarely had to wait until the next day to get anything resolved.
How was the initial setup?
It is set up as a public cloud, with the vendor's controller on its cloud. All of the equipment is on-premises but managed remotely through the cloud.
What about the implementation team?
Our in-house team is responsible for deployment and maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This is a very expensive solution.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Ruckus has a very specific niche and is surely not the cheapest solution. You have to have customers that are willing to spend that kind of money. If they are willing, then it's a really good solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Independent Consultant - Wireless
Very fast with good technical support and very good scalability
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is very stable. I've worked with it at a hospital before, where we deployed it all over the hospital. It worked everywhere and continuously worked flawlessly."
- "What would be interesting to see is if they had more of an ability for their customers to capture revenue. They should offer some sort of gateway functionality that you could tie through radius authentication, so you can bill the customers. That way, when you go in, you could just have a device and set up a hotspot, and it's a totally billable tool at that point."
What is our primary use case?
I primarily use the solution for pretty much everything worked-related and for e-commerce and studying.
How has it helped my organization?
It basically allows you to go everywhere in your office or at your house or even outside your house and be connected. If you wanted to go do a Zoom right by the pool, you can go Zoom by the pool. Or in your office. Basically, I live in a house that's got a lot of trees around it and I've got some outdoor APS. I can pretty much conduct business from wherever I want without having to worry about a lost signal or drop-off.
What is most valuable?
I use the Wave 2 platform. It'll get up to close to approximately 800 megabits or something to that extent. It outruns whatever internet connection you have.
The wireless is just very fast, and it has a frequency set that can work around local interference that houses have even if some of their cheaper routers are broadcasting on a given channel. We can tune our wireless network and open up a lot of channels with DFS and stuff like that.
It's a pretty solid product. Once, at the hospital I worked with, they had a model and they went from a 300 to a 310. The 300 had a certain power output range, and everything was designed perfectly. Then, as it turned out, 310 didn't cover as much. We had to replace it with the next model up which is the 610 to maintain the coverage we expected. They were good about it and didn't charge us for the change.
What needs improvement?
I really don't need anything faster right now. However, if I would like to get a faster speed eventually. I have a gigabit at my townhome. I'd like to be able to get an APX to add a whole gig on.
What would be interesting to see is if they had more of an ability for their customers to capture revenue. They should offer some sort of gateway functionality that you could tie through radius authentication, so you can bill the customers. That way, when you go in, you could just have a device and set up a hotspot, and it's a totally billable tool at that point.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for a couple of years. I pretty much use it all the time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. I've worked with it at a hospital before, where we deployed it all over the hospital. It worked everywhere and continuously worked flawlessly.
Sometimes they have their own glitches when there's a release of new software, like any company. However, once you get them stabilized, they're really good systems.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very easy to scale. That's, what's nice about it. In our office, we only had to have one AP to cover the whole thing. Their whole business strategy is, for every five APs you might install another grid or eight to double. We do it for three, due to the fact that they have such great independent technology.
I have about 20 users at home and maybe ten users in the office.
I just got an internet connection in my house at a 400 megabits download speed. If I max it out on it and I think I did, on my laptop, I'm going to move to the next evolution of the product. I plan to increase usage in the future and I plan on deploying it in the future on other projects I'll be working on.
How are customer service and technical support?
While technical support is very good, I'd advise that you need to make sure that whatever you do, you have a good backup.
Technical support, in general, is not too hard to get to, however, depending on the difficulty of the problem, you need to get advanced level support. If you need them, you just have to ask them for it, beyond talking to the first guy you get on the phone.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've used a variety of different solutions in the past. I've been using Ruckus for quite a bit of time now. However, before that, it would be just a router that I bought. For example, a Linksys or Ubiquiti, or something like that.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not straightforward per se. You really have to know what you're doing. At my house, I use a commercial-grade solution. I loaded this special software onto the product (that they have on their website) to make it like a standalone product with their own small standalone network. I have basically programmed everything myself. You have to really be pretty smart at it, to be honest with you. It's not just something somebody can just pick up. However, I've worked with it for ten years, so I know the equipment inside and out.
In terms of deployment, for what I had to do, at the locations I'm speaking of, it was very simple. The only thing is that the house is that I have a porch on the second floor overlooking the pool, and then it looks into this wooded area behind my house. It's got a pretty good set up. I have an AP sitting on a tree out there and I'm running power to it. It's like filling in that whole area, mesh unit, wireless swings, so I can get power to it from the pool. It's just awesome to have wifi everywhere.
What about the implementation team?
I handled the deployment myself. I also handle the maintenance, if any is needed, on my own. It's not too hard as I have a good background in the technology.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For me, licensing is zero. You don't really need to have any licensing for what I own. The only thing is, unless there's some software update that you need, you don't have the support. If you're stable and it runs, you don't need to do anything. However, if you need those software updates they'll make you pay.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a consultant. I was a partner of Ruckus at another company, however, right now, I am just a customer.
I've got the solution installed in my office and directly connected to an AP. Then, at home, I've got a mesh network. I basically meshed three of these solutions together.
They do a lot of stadiums and outdoor areas and works very well.
I'd advise others considering the solution that, when you're implementing your wireless products or area of coverage, make sure you test it. Also, make sure that you have the proper signaling to the outer edge where you want coverage. That's what I would say, no matter what product you bring in. Just test its capabilities to make sure it does what you need it to do.
Overall, I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Managing Director at Dataway
Easy to manage and deploy and covers many use cases
Pros and Cons
- "The product is extremely easy to manage after it is implemented."
- "The solution isn't the cheapest option. However, you are getting a quality product."
What is our primary use case?
We are a reseller, our clients' use cases are quite broad but mainly focussed on SMB with multiple locations. A main office and satellite branches. This is where the cloud controller comes into its own.
What is most valuable?
The solution is very easy to deploy.
The product is extremely easy to manage after it is implemented.
Ruckus is very innovative as a company and they currently drive improvements to the WiFi standards themselves. Their range of products is broad. It covers all the requirements I have, which aren't as broad as the whole market. We don't do many outdoor installations, for example, however, they cover outdoor as well as point to point and they seem to work well.
What needs improvement?
Whilst vendors are always working to improve the features of their products and make them more attractive than the competition, I cannot identify any core features which are missing. Of course, today the product offers all kinds of features, many more than our specific requirements demand.
The solution isn't the cheapest option on the market. However, you are getting a quality product. Cheap is not always best. Cheap can come back and bite you.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have sold Ruckus wireless for the past ten years at this point. It's been quite a while, way before they went public. They have been bought and sold a couple of times in recent years but the quality remains. They have fantastic people and the product is exemplary.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
When the new cloud controller came out it was functional but lacked some of the finesse of other solutions. That did not matter as much as it was an excellent product from an AP perspective. The refinements in the interface have come and Ruckus continue to innovate. I prefer a good AP over a fancy interface any day.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very easy to scale. Once you have the cloud configured and set up, you can post a single access point to remote location. Plug it in and off you go or you can pre-provision hundreds of them in advance for a mass deployment.
How are customer service and technical support?
If there is an issue, the support is very responsive. Very helpful, never failed me in ten years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have used other solutions in the past. Occasionally, we do installations for clients that go against our advice and then often we have issues, however, with Ruckus, this is never the case. Never, in all the years.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup isn't complex. It's pretty straightforward.
Obviously, you have to mount access points and in the right locations. You've got to screw holes in the wall and stick it to the wall or ceiling or whatever. Once the physical installation is done and it's connected to the network/internet, which, again, is part of any kind of hardware deployments. It takes about 20 minutes to deploy a new access point from scratch.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Obviously, there's a cost factor. It's not the lowest cost solution, however, from an engineering standpoint, which is what we're more interested in, you have to ask does it work? Does it work well? The answer is yes and yes.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We continually monitor the competition. In enterprise WiFi there are about 4 or 5 contenders from my point of view. In the past Ruckus did not have a cloud management solution and that was an issue. Now it's not an issue.
What other advice do I have?
We are an authorised reseller of the product.
The reason that we sell Ruckus Wireless is that, in my opinion, it's the best-engineered hardware solution. Ruckus are innovative and define many standards in wireless technology, they apply those standards to their products and their products work very well.
We stripped away all the marketing blurb that various companies do when they're jockeying for position. The proof is in the deployment, how happy the clients are, how easy it is to deploy, and how easy it is to manage afterwards.
This solution has one of the easiest deployments. Obviously, whether I recommend it or not depends on my clients' requirements, however, I would wholeheartedly recommend Ruckus over other solutions. Having had firsthand experience of Ruckus, as well as other solutions, we do prefer it.
Overall, I'd rate the solution nine out of ten... I don't do ten!
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Director of Product Management at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Good RFS characteristics, reliable, and the technical support is good
Pros and Cons
- "The reason we picked Ruckus, in addition to our long-standing relationship with them, is pretty much that the RFS characteristics of it seem to be the best."
- "The price is an area that requires improvement. The pricing could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We are internet service providers.
We use Ruckus in our business hotspot deployment. We sell to a customer who might have a coffee shop for example, and we would install one of the Ruckus access points so that they could deploy Wi-Fi to their patrons.
What is most valuable?
The reason we picked Ruckus, in addition to our long-standing relationship with them, is pretty much that the RFS characteristics of it seem to be the best. That's what we find useful.
Also, we like the more remote deployment aspects of things as well.
What needs improvement?
The price is an area that requires improvement. The pricing could be better.
In the next release, I would like to understand more where presence analytics is going and IoT support. Is it going to be multi-way for IoT support?
I would like to see IoT presence analytics.
For how long have I used the solution?
Our company has been using Ruckus Wireless for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Ruckus Wireless is a scalable solution.
We have deployed 350 indoor access point solutions, and 650 outdoors.
We have 5,000 people in our company, but we are not the ones who are using this product. We sell 50 to 100 per month. We are incorporating it into our solution and selling it.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. They are supportive.
We don't call them often, and we don't really call them for technical support, we call them for integration support.
It's a different organization, we deal more with the enterprise support group.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was complex although it wasn't a problem with Ruckus, it was our problem.
We're not using any of the Ruckus cloud features.
We're completely integrated into our own kind of a management portal and our own management system, so the issues are on our side, not theirs.
What about the implementation team?
We outsourced installation, but we design and support solutions ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We don't pay any licensing fees, we purchase them.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend Ruckus Wireless to others who are interested in using it.
I would rate Ruckus Wireless an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
CIO at Vätterleden Invest AB
Easy to manage, with a portal that makes it easy to find access points and clients
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the portal."
- "It would be helpful to have a wizard when you are setting up a new access point or a wireless guest network."
What is our primary use case?
This product provides wireless access in our warehouse and the Office and for Guest.
How has it helped my organization?
Now ther is no one complaining that have no access ore lost access.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the portal. It's easy to find access points and clients.
This product is easy to manage.
What needs improvement?
It would be helpful if the wizard when you are setting up a new access point or a wireless guest network. Could have more sugestion on default. There are too many checkboxes to get it to work.
There should be some ? you could klick on to get a short explanation what it means.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Ruckus Wireless for approximately six months. In the past two years ago we alos hade a Ruchkus on prem.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's very stable. We have not had any issues at all.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable. We have not had any problems. It's easy to add more users.
We have approximately 90 users in our warehouse.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have not had the need to contact technical support. The solution has been working.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we were working with Cisco. It was more complex to manage the Cisco Network and the setup was more complicated. This was the main reason that we switched.
We decided to go with Ruckus Wireless because it was easier to use and more user-friendly and the price was better.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was quite straightforward. It was quite easy to set it up and get it working.
What about the implementation team?
We use a vendor. It was straight forwrad. It was working dicect when we connected our AP.
What was our ROI?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is reasonable. It's better priced than Cisco.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Cisco Meraki and Cisco.
What other advice do I have?
We are using the latest version and it upgrades automatically.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
High ROI with simple interface and impressive coverage
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless is the simple interface of the SmartZone platform."
- "The cloud solution is not mature enough."
What is our primary use case?
We use Ruckus Wireless for hospitality customers, education customers, healthcare customers, banking customers, and public venues.
How has it helped my organization?
Ruckus Wireless has a high ROI because it needs fewer access points due to BeamFlex technology, which means less civil work, less cabling, and less licensing. This significantly impacts the total cost of ownership of the project, making it very attractive for investors and increasing the ROI.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless is the simple interface of the SmartZone platform. This platform is very effective and easy to manage. It does not require experienced employees or IT managers to handle the system. BeamFlex is a part of every Ruckus AP, making it a leader in coverage area compared to other vendors.
What needs improvement?
The cloud solution is not mature enough.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Ruckus Wireless for more than twelve years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the Ruckus Wireless solution is rated very high.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very scalable. It works well in very dense environments and provides good coverage.
How are customer service and support?
Customer service and support are somewhat lacking. Sometimes the technical support team is not experienced enough to handle cases effectively. They tend to go in loops when fixing problems and often miss asking crucial questions that could make troubleshooting more efficient. It feels like the support is being outsourced to someone else who is not fully aware of the product.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy, rated a nine out of ten.
What was our ROI?
Ruckus Wireless provides a high ROI because fewer access points mean less civil work, less cabling, and less licensing, which lowers the total cost of ownership.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Ruckus Wireless is not cheap, and they have recently increased their prices. However, the product is worth it.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend Ruckus Wireless to others because it provides stable solutions. The wireless access points are very stable, provide good coverage in dense environments, and have many reasons to be recommended.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Ruckus Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Product Categories
Wireless LANPopular Comparisons
Aruba Wireless
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Cisco Wireless
Huawei Wireless
Ubiquiti WLAN
Omada Access Points
Mist AI and Cloud
Fortinet FortiAP
D-Link Wireless
Fortinet FortiWLM
Aruba Instant
ExtremeWireless
NETGEAR Insight Access Points
Aruba Instant On Access Points
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Ruckus Wireless Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the best high-performance Wireless LAN device?
- What is the biggest difference between Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless?
- Which wireless controller has maximum client connectivity and high throughput?
- What is the biggest difference between Aruba Wireless and Ruckus Wireless?
- What is the biggest difference between Cisco Wireless and Ruckus Wireless?
- What are the biggest differences between Ruckus Wireless, Aruba Wireless, and Cisco Wireless?
- Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?
- Aruba Wireless or Ruckus Wireless?
- How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
- When evaluating Wireless LANs, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?