Bizagi Reviews, Competitors and Pricing

Business Analyst at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Jul 28, 2013

Not only for documenting processes, it's a real BPMS

Bizagi is not only for documenting processes, it's a real BPMS, so you can make integrations via web-services. I prefer IBM because the most customers I work for use IBM Websphere, so integration is best done with IBM.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user2652Project Manager at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Report as inappropriate

Dec 14, 2013

What features of Bizagi looks interesting to you? Would you recommend Bizagi for middle-sized organizations?

it_user8157

IT Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Jul 28, 2013

No Mac OS or Linux version

It is a very good product. The only drawback is that, only, can be installed on Windows. There is not a Mac OS X nor a Linux version.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user2652Project Manager at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Report as inappropriate

Dec 14, 2013

Does installation of Bizagi on Windows cause high cpu or memory usage? I heard that most of the applications work fine on Linux and Mac, but they cause high cpu or memory usage when installed on windows.

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

April 2024

Free Report: Bizagi Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Bizagi. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.

it_user8154

Business Analyst at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Jul 28, 2013

For me, this is what bpm is all about

Been using different bpm solutions for real life processes for over 10 years and I think bizagi is the ONE that allows the business control over their own processes rather than IT telling the business. For me, this is what bpm is all about- clue is in the title... 'Business'

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user2652Project Manager at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Report as inappropriate

Dec 14, 2013

Do you think Bizagi is user friendly and any new company can easily adapt it? There are multiple applications which are useful but every user can't become familiar with it so easily.

it_user704541

Co-Founder, Enterprise Architect at a tech services company

Aug 13, 2017

Download

Good Product For Modelling And Simulation But Needs Better Technical Support

Pros and Cons

"Business process modelling and simulation."

"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."

What is most valuable?

Business process modelling and simulation.

How has it helped my organization?

Modelling integrated business processes for the whole enterprise.

What needs improvement?

It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine.

For how long have I used the solution?

Since 2015.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

Good.

Technical Support:

Low.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Yes, Bizagi has the capability to import-export with various modelling notations.

What about the implementation team?

We are a consultant.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, Bonita BPM.

What other advice do I have?

It's a good product for modelling and simulation.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

it_user99381

BPM/SOA Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Apr 9, 2014

Try Bizagi first, it’s fast process-making capabilities makes it an excellent option

I’ve been using Bizagi for two years now, and find that the most valuable feature is its dynamic and quick ability to create processes. I used to use Oracle Business Process Management, but switched to Bizagi because Oracle was too complex to use due to its large amount and mix of plug-ins. (I also considered using Intalio, but ultimately chose Bizagi instead.)

Bizagi does have some room for improvement, specifically in the creation of components and its documentation. For example, if you need a text box to receive only numbers, and a regular expression is used, the input is validated just until the activity is sent or saved.

We didn’t encounter any issues with deployment, stability or scalability, and found setup simple. We are implementing Bizagi with a team of three developers who are very experienced with Bizagi. I’d give customer/technical support an 8 out of 10 rating.

In terms of ROI, we’re still evaluating our costs, so don’t yet have specific numbers.

I’d advice others to try Bizagi before trying other, similar BPM tools – Bizagi’s approach to create and execute processes faster makes it an excellent option.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

it_user104598Data Scientist, Team Lead at a marketing services firm

Report as inappropriate

Apr 11, 2014

It goes without saying that each BPM has its pros and cons, and different BPMs are suited to different companies. I’ve heard great things about Bizagi, but I couldn’t help noticing your second paragraph about the text fields…

As a user of AuraPortal BPM, I just wanted to share my experience with you. When including a text field in a form in AuraPortal, it can be set at Open or Limited. If it is Limited, AuraPortal offers many different options to condition how the text can be introduced in execution. It is possible the determine how the text must start or finish, whether it must contain uppercase, lowercase, HTML characters (useful for preventing users from introducing malicious code which could affect the execution of the form), numbers, minimum or maximum characters, whether it should (or not) contain specific text, etc. It is also possible to set the field to hide the text (behind asterisks) and specify whether it will only accept text in email address or URL format. It is even possible to personalize the warning message that appears when the text introduced in the field is not within the established limits and therefore not accepted. And this is not just the case with text fields… the configuration options really are endless.

AuraPortal amicably leads the user designing the process form through the different options for them to select the way they want the fields to behave, and at the end of the configuration, it allows them to test the behavior to check what will happen in execution.

But apart from this general configuration, the behavior of each field can be modified and adapted depending on where it is used. For example, it can be set as editable or read-only, its appearance can be conditioned, its value calculated, etc.

And all this is possible without requiring any programming whatsoever. The system internally generates the code while the modeler diagrams and configures to process.