ServiceNow IT Operations Management Reviews

The auto remediation feature has been most valuable. They have also introduced an AOP feature of ServiceNow that we are keen to explore. They have also come up with a lot of anomaly detection and self healing through orchestration.

Even though they call it low code there are a lot of customizations needed, especially from an ITOM standpoint. We have the opportunity to pick elementary data but there is a lot of scope when it comes to training bots and the ML capability. I think this solution still needs to mature, especially from an ITOM perspective. It is still very difficult to train the bots to to detect anomalies.

The ML capability also needs improvement. 

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution. I would rate it seven out of ten for stability. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The availability of the contact center for high priority tickets is really good. If you are an ITOM user and you depend on a particular vendor to get a response, especially when it comes to new product features, there is a lag. 

Positive

For us, the initial setup was straightforward but this does depend on your organization. If you don't have a proper CMDB set up, whether it is internal or outside ServiceNow, the ITOM implementation may not be very easy. 

This solution offers good value but comes at a very high premium. Pricing could be reduced by 10 to 20%.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

My company implements the solution both on-premises and in the cloud for clients. 

The solution is used to discover assets, their dependencies , service mapping and implement all required ITSM modules including CMDB and Asset Management on a single platform.

The solution allows you to subscribe to the all required ITSM modules , asset discovery and service mapping on a single platform, its guided setup provides easy implementation process and I found these features most valuable.

The out-of-the-box reporting feature has room for the improvement, it can be make more user friendly as other tools. 

Troubleshooting can be confusing if you are not well versed in scripting.

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable and new versions are released twice per year. 

I found the solution scalable, it is now highly recognized in the industry and there are many compatible products available. 

For example, CyberArk and SCCM provides out-of-the-box integration with the solution. 

For one client, we wanted to clean the CMDB excluding few records so we contacted technical support. Rather than assist us with the task, they provided written steps for completing the task without losing data. We would have preferred a higher level of assistance. 

For some errors I face, I have not found proper resolution in the available documents or through the community. 

Neutral

Few of our clients previously used BMC Remedy and BMC Discovery but moved to ServiceNow for it's one plateform solution feature.

The initial setup is easy once you get used to it. 

Initially, I found the solution's setup to be a bit more complicated than BMC Remedy and BMC Discovery. 

As I learned more of the solution's features, I became confident with installation and deployment. ServiceNow is a cloud based solution and you need to install a MidServer application to interact it with clients environment and data centers in cloud and on-premise. You can install more than one MidServers for an environment to cover all the assets and DMZ's as per the requirement. It's guided setup for step by step installation instructions gives an easy approach to implement it.

I implement the solution for clients. 

The solution offers yearly licenses and a subscription model for add-on features. 

I recommend any solution only after proper assessment of clients environment and requirements and if you are looking for implementing asset discovery, service mapping, CMDB and most of ITSM module on a single place then ServiceNow is good to choose for. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for our customers, which are based in Orlando, Quebec, and Paris.

The solution has six different modules: Discovery, Service Mapping, Event Management, Operational Intelligence, Cloud Service Provisioning, and Cloud Insights.

They have a very good Health Solutions Suite.

Their Event Management is very good. So are Log Analytics and Event Management.

These three valuable features - Event Management, Log Analytics, and Operational Intelligence - all within their artificial intelligence solution, AIOps. It's very effective.

Log Analytics is very new. It is released in Quebec only. We are yet to implement it, however, in theory, it looks very efficient solution. Even Management we have implemented for around 20 plus customers and it is very effective. It's one of the best solutions in the market.

We also use Discovery and Service Mapping, which are both quite good.

With Cloud Discovery, we can discover cloud assets. It is very useful. 

The solution is quite scalable.

The solution has very good stability overall.

Technical support has been helpful.

Service Mapping is a time-consuming process. The time and effort versus the benefits are very difficult to articulate to customers. That is one challenge we see.

If Discovery, for example, could be extended to other cloud areas it could be very helpful. Currently, it has popular cloud service providers like AWS, Azure, GCP, Google. If they can extend it to all cloud service providers and containers such as Kubernetes, it would be better. 

In the implementation, we have encountered problems with the Ansible integration and Kubernetes. That is one area they can definitely improve. 

Another area of improvement is ACC. They are launching something called ACC, Agent Client Collector. It is more or less their version of monitoring. That is not yet fully realized. It is not a complete solution. It is in its primitive stages. We would really love to see that improving and covering all applications in order for it to be a really comprehensive monitoring solution. 

At this moment, we are not able to use it as a standalone monitoring solution. We still have to use other monitoring tools like SolarWinds, or AppDynamics, or something like that. If ACC is improved, then it will be an end-to-end solution.

The pricing could be lower.

We've been using the solution for about two years now. It hasn't been very long.

We've found the solution to be stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

O one of the benefits of ServiceNow is scalability. If a company needs to scale, it can do so.

Technical support is quite good. We're satisfied with their level of service. They are knowledgeable and responsive. 

I previously worked with Remedy Orchestrator. In comparison, ServiceNow is easier to implement.

For a typical Event Management and OI, or Discovery, it will take from four to six weeks to implement. 

Service Mapping is a long project. It depends on the number of maps the customer has, so it is long-term. If they have to cover all priority applications, it will be anywhere from six to eight months. That is a long process, and are no longer doing it as an implementation. We are doing it as regular day-to-day work, due to the length of time it takes. It requires a lot of inputs from the application support teams and infrastructure support teams, and a lot of coordination is involved. That is why it takes time. However, for any other product, whether it is Cloud or Event Management or Discovery, you are looking at four to six weeks depending on the customer size and customer environment.

We assist our clients in implementing the solution. 

The cost could be lower.

For those customers who are already using ServiceNow for service management, for example, then it is just the license costs and no other cost is involved. In that way it is good. It is emerging as a holistic solution for enterprise service management. 

The upside to ServiceNow is that everything is in one tool, whereas, with other solutions, you need multiple tools. If you compare that way, then, in the long run, this price is more or less competitive. 

We are managed service providers and resellers of the licenses. On top of that, we provide implementation support and transformation solutions.

For customers considering the solution, the first thing, they need to do is be very sure before implementing ITOM. They need to have a very mature CMDB, as all these modules, whether it is Discovery or Service Mapping or Event Management, all require a very healthy CMDB, with 80% to 85% of maturity. CMDB and CSDM should be added as a prerequisite. If they are, then the implementation of ITOM and the benefit you get from implementing these modules will be quickly realized.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

I usually use two open objects that I need and if any requests come in, I request that the IT guys do it for me.

As my security department colleague is based in Australia, talking can be difficult because of different time zones. The way this solution has helped us is that it improved our communication.

The feature I like the most is the integrations. Whenever I create a new asset team, all the information is filled in automatically and linked with the initial part. In addition, finding all of this information is quite easy.

When it comes to improvements, I think that my colleagues and I often have issues finding the correct screen and the search box does not work as intended.

I have been using this solution for about a year and a half.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the scalability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. I think there are currently around 100,000 users of this solution.

This solution is deployed on the cloud for us.

I would rate this solution as a whole a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

ITOM is a vast solution so primarily we are using cloud management or discovery event management. We also use ITOM for certification management. We're using the enterprise version which includes all modules. I'm a solutions architect. 

The main beauty of the product is that you have everything in one solution. Other products require a variety of solutions and separate installation and configuration, but ITOM offers everything in a single platform. Every six months, they bring out a new release with enhancements to the solution. 

The one drawback is that ITOM isn't able to do its own monitoring of the infrastructure. I believe they are planning to introduce it in an upcoming release, so we are waiting for that.

I've been using this solution for over five years. 

The solution is definitely scalable. One of our customers has around 1200 users.

ServiceNow provides us with product support.

If you fulfill the prerequisites from the infrastructure perspective, the initial setup is straightforward. 

Licensing is a little on the expensive side but we get so much benefit from it, that it's worth the extra cost. 

We evaluated other products before we chose ServiceNow but we found this to be a better solution. ServiceNow offered more features than other solutions. In addition, it was beneficial to us that it was a single platform that didn't require infrastructure. 

I'm waiting for them to add the monitoring and then I can rate this product 10 out of 10. For now, my rating is nine out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution for event consolidation and correlation as well as centralizing disparate managing tools into ServiceNow into our IT Operations Management. It's for infrastructure monitoring and a cloud management kind of tool.

I like the solution due to the fact that it's scalable. I like the fact that it has open APIs and is supported by basically any monitoring tool that can be integrated with ServiceNow.

I find the setup to be relatively easy.

The solution is stable.

It is scalable. 

ServiceNow could be more prescriptive on how customers can leverage some of the benefits. I know there's a lot of capability. However, maybe more prescriptive guidance needs to be provided.

I've been using the solution since 2015. It's been seven years now, so it's been a while. 

It is very stable and reliable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It offers good performance. 

The scalability has been great. It is very scalable. 

I've been satisfied with the technical support. I find them to be helpful and responsive. 

Positive

I'm mostly focused on ServiceNow. I don't use solutions beyond this product.

The initial setup is fairly straightforward for me. I've been working on this solution for so long now that it's relatively easy. It's always hard to get the requirements and the customer to articulate their needs, however. From the perspective of configuring the tool, it's not that difficult.

I'd rate the ease of setup at a four out of five. 

I can implement the solution for clients. I can implement it with a number of tools. 

The price is a controversial question. It was not expensive or cheap. It depends on what the customer needs. Every customer's pricing is customized to their needs. It's not one size fits all pricing.

I'm actually a consultant on it, so I implement ServiceNow. I'm a reseller.

While the solution can be used on-premises. However, I've never used an on-premises deployment. Likely 99% of the customers use it on the cloud.

I'd advise potential new users to go through the education classes and make sure that they are talking to the right consultants.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use ServiceNow IT Operations Management to manage the day-to-day operations of IT, as opposed to the Business Manager, which is responsible for cost management.

The setup and deployment could be simplified, and the pricing could improve.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is a stable product.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is scalable.

Technical support is not great.

I have experience with IT Service Management, IT Business Management, and CMDB.

The initial setup is complicated.

There are additional costs, you have to pay more for everything.

I would suggest being careful when it comes to negotiating the price.

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is best suited for large enterprise companies. It is not suitable for small to medium businesses.

I would rate ServiceNow IT Operations Management a five out of ten.

I like the tool's CMBD connection with Discovery. The solution is also flexible. 

There is a slower learning curve associated with the tool's scripting part. It is also not cheap. 

I have been working with the solution for three to four years. 

The tool never went down for me. However, the solution goes slow in our development environment. 

ServiceNow IT Operations Management is scalable. You need to pay for more licenses if you want to scale up. 

We have a good technical team and we seek support only when there are some strange issues. 

Positive

ServiceNow IT Operations Management's initial setup is easy. You can add a lot of customization but it depends on your knowledge. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. It is a solution for big companies.