Oracle HCM Cloud Reviews

For me personally, the most valuable is the account management suite. They're constantly developing it.

Oracle moved the solution to the cloud from on-site. This is more cost-effective for us as a subscription service rather than as a licence-based solution.

The mobile capabilities need to be improved. It would be good for our workforce to be able to access the information from mobile devices and respond to requests. The product is still in development, but the mobile capabilities are still better than their eBusiness suite, and we are happy with it for now.

We're still finding some issues, and third-party apps that need using with our systems. There's still a lot of development to be done, but they are constantly adding new features and modules. Currently, if Oracle doesn't have a solution, we can find a vendor who does.

I've used it for about three years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered yet.

We're scaling up on the cloud, and it's getting there.

They're fairly quick with their responses, 8/10. Every time we need a modification done, we need to speak to them.

They're on top of things, 8/10 as there's always room for improvement.

We previously used several different Oracle solutions, mainly converged systems. We wanted to have everything in one system, and are currently planning on importing our accounting into it.

It was complex because we have several systems that needed integrating into the cloud system. With the API we use, this was done and it works well. There was also a lot of process change, because instead of tailoring the system to fit the process, we had to tailor the processes to the system.

Most of the development was controlled by Oracle. The implementation itself though was done in-house with help here and there from a consultant.

Work the best price you can, and tailor the product for your company to get the best price.

We didn't as we already had experience with Oracle, and wanted to move to their subscription service.

Now there's a couple of other companies have it, as well as some consulting companies that do, so get advice from them.

I use the solution for goal management, performance management, recruitment, and other core HR management processes.

I found all of the features to be valuable. Since it is an integrated solution, it brings speed and efficiency to the business process.

Each business has its own unique process for performance evaluation. We work with templates, but the templates in Oracle HCM Cloud are a bit rigid. Once we are done working on a template, we can't change it unless we create a new one.

Creating a new template is feasible. We can create a duplicate template and edit it. However, our clients consider creating new templates to make updates as a challenge.

Some of the functionalities are cast in stone. When businesses have a unique way of doing something, and we tell them that they have to do it in a certain way in Oracle, it gives rise to arguments since they want enough room to accommodate their old processes.

I have been using the solution for the past four years.

The solution is stable. Most of the instability is due to our network connectivity.

The solution is scalable. We had an engagement session with Oracle support, where they explained that they could add some patches to accommodate huge numbers of users. If the number of users increases, we can contact Oracle, and they will do some modifications for us.

Sometimes they provide the solution. Sometimes, the individuals who respond to the SRs do not have the knowledge to help us with our request. It leads to more communication back and forth and causes delays. We could tell they were trying to get their heads around our request. Other times, you get lucky and get people who understand your issues and give you a straight-up solution.

From a functional perspective, the initial setup wasn't a difficult task. However, from a technical perspective, there is a bit of integration involved. I would rate the setup difficulty a seven out of ten.

If we want to learn to implement the solution, we should acquire knowledge about both the technical and functional aspects of the solution. Some of the functionalities or tasks we need to perform are intertwined.

We may do something on the functional side, but then we might realize that we also need to do some technical work. So, it is good to know both aspects, which takes time and effort.

The deployment took us six months. A third-party team did the deployment.

The solution’s pricing is high.

I specialize in HCM. The solution is cloud-based. It gives us a heads-up about interruptions. We cannot just be functional consultants. We must know the technical aspects. From an implementer’s point of view, some businesses want the solution but don't have their processes streamlined. So it becomes a problem, and we end up spending a lot of time on the project. Before choosing a solution, it would be good to do the groundwork by testing the client’s business process and streamlining it as much as possible.

Apart from my reservations about the performance module, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

• Business intelligence is integrated with the product.
• Gives real time information about employees and processes for managers.
• A self-service BI to key business users.
• Managers can have their analysis delivered in any way: Dashboard, table reports, analysis, charts, etc. with no development cost.

• Talent review (Nine Box) online: An HR specialist can manage their talent review meetings entirely within the system. This includes meeting planning, execution to management of action plans post-meeting.
• It is possible to change a person, add comments, add developments or performance goals, tasks, do a promotion, transfer, manage a salary or even perform termination. All this is done with no extra documents, Excel spreadsheets, or reports.
• All information is on one screen, available to the HR specialist or managers at the meeting to review and take the necessary action.

• Best fit analysis feature: Helps you to identify the correct position for the correct employee. You can visualize all gaps that you have in the current position or for the next level in your career. You can also compare two employees to see the difference between them or compare them to a specific position or job.
• If you are planning your succession plan, you can use this feature to check who is the most suitable for the position, comparing requirements for the position or comparing competencies, and skills and qualifications of the current employee in the position. All information that you gather in the sub-processes of HR goals, performance management, and development plan is available.

• Mobile and Social: This solution has a social network for your company where you can manage knowledge sharing and collaboration. Communities, chats, kudos, etc., can all be used to support your HR processes, such as goals and performance management. This can be done on your mobile device.

Before the solution implementation, our bonus compensation policy was based only on profit and loss results.

We believe that this approach is not the best. In the end, you put all your employees at the same level, increasing the difficulty in identifying talents and paying for performance.

We decided to implement a goals and competencies evaluation process. This will adjust bonuses according to performance. We define all relevant organization goals, give them a weight, and then design a process.

The recruiting process needs work. This is the only module that is provided by other applications and it is not integrated. You need to ask Oracle to "integrate" both applications. This is done with no additional cost, but it is still an outside application.

Although you can turn on the integration between them, it is a different application. You lose all the benefits provided by the integrated modules in Oracle HCM Cloud.

The recruiting solution standalone is a great tool for the recruiting processes. However, when you use it with the entire solution, you may experience some problems. This is the case, especially if you have a process that is a little bit more complex than the usual process.

I have been using this solution since Version 5, in 2013.

So far, no stability issues have been experienced.

So far, no scalability issues have been experienced.

I would give technical support a rating of 2/5. Despite having an SLA contract, the technical support is still terrible.

We have experienced some cases when implementing the solution for our customers, where a service request was created with Priority Level 1, Production. The problem took more than a month to be fixed. This is a service that definitely must be improved by Oracle.

Some examples that we experienced with technical support:

• Dumb questions such as "Did you press the button X to confirm?"
• Same requisitions by different people
• "Provide me with the 'how to' for the issue," but the 'how to' was already attached to the SR
• A conference call was scheduled and then cancelled 30 minutes before it was supposed to start.

We didn't use other solutions previously. We went straight to the Oracle HCM Cloud Solution.

The initial setup is pretty easy to do. It takes no more than a day to do it. If you have a simple process that fits with the solution proposition, then you can implement it pretty fast. Almost the whole setup is performed with step-by-step pages, which reduces the complexity. Day-by-day changes can be performed by a key user from the business with minimum training.

Of course, if your process is complex, the setup will be more complex.

Don't forget to include the implementation cost of an Oracle partner, and not only the subscription, in your cost benefits analysis. (Business plan, ROI, payback.)

On the other hand, the cost of maintenance, upgrade, infrastructure, and support is already included in your subscription.

We had the opportunity to work as a project manager of a SAP SuccessFactors projects for one of our customers. This introduced us to more details about the SAP Solution, not only as a competitor, but with customer’s eyes.

Forget about customization. If you are looking for a solution that can be changed and tailored according your company business rules, don't go with this solution. Overall, this solution provides Human Resources sub-processes best practices and a large amount of flexibility to attend to a lot of business process requirements.

It allows us to consolidate all of our HR functions onto one platform. That's really the big selling point and value proposition for us -- the consolidation.

We have just one platform from which to work instead of multiple vendors for HCR. This increases the overall ease of maintaining the HCR system.

One of the challenges that we've discovered is that for some things like report modifications, whenever Oracle provides a new release, they will overlay certain customizations that you have. And then it becomes a real hassle to re-customize for our needs. There's got to be a better way.

We've been using Golds and just started using Compensation. We're about to roll into a project to implement HCM. So we've used it for about a year now.

We've had no issues with deployment.

In terms of instability, we've had issues with the application being unavailable a few times, especially during our end-of-year cycle.

We haven't had to scale it yet, but it sounds like it would be easy.

It seems to me that Oracle prefers to deal with clients completely through their SR management system and sometimes avoid personal contact. Sometimes you need a phone call. As a customer, you need to know that you can get a phone call if you need a phone call.

We use SuccessFactor's product for goals, succession, and performance, so we're coming off of those products. We wanted to consolidate everything into one.

I was involved with some of the initial requirements, but I don't have much to do with the modules that we're currently using in production.

Think long and hard about it, and consider a product that will integrate with payroll easily. I think the advantages are the consolidation of the HCM and functionality. So far the challenges have been more along the lines of support.

The best feature of the product is the middleware where it allows you to create a project and all the required and the optional tasks come pre-configured. So, you don't have to look for, "What do I need to do?" You can follow a step by step from the bottom up or top down approach. You will know that you have done the tasks that you need to do before the whole configuration or the testing process happens.

I am starting the implementation of benefits today of HCM Cloud. I have done EBS, full scale implementation of eight modules on my own for a smaller organization. Another advanced feature is the user interface, it is so smooth. I always say to people that PeopleSoft, is love at first sight, and Oracle EBS is an arranged marriage, because you will learn to love. Whereas, I think Oracle Cloud is also love at first sight, because it does the screens so smooth, things are very accessible.

I think the customer experience, especially with the process flows at the top, where it takes you through the five steps, it has a nice navigation path at the top. So you know where you are at any point of the configuration.

Oracle should make sure all their partners are well trained, so that they can go to the client site and make themselves truly valuable. Instead of just, "Oh, it works this way," that is not. They need to be trained, and I think Oracle is already going in the direction, I think they are making sure that implementations are done in a certain standard way and so on.

There is always room for improvement, and I met with an Oracle HCM person, and he and I are going to work together. He is going to pick my brain on some future release testing, and my HCM expertise, because I have all the credentials and I have worked with the product for 20 years, and in HR as well.

We've been using it since February, so around three months now, but I am doing a lot of research, a lot of studying and I am working with a client. We have actually already configured the HCM Core and the Talent Management, just the goals and the performance.

It seems like it is stable. Well, it is not EBS because I have been working in EBS for 15 years. This is a new product, I think it has been in the market for a few years I believe, but I am glad that Oracle is going in the right direction of making it more end user friendly, functional friendly and adopting into the new technology. We are not bogged down with DBAs and copies and patches and gruel regression testing. All of those thing we don't need to worry in the cloud is much simpler and much more organized. It makes it easier.

It's been able to scale for our needs.

With regard to EBS payroll, the support is phenomenal. With HCM Cloud, I have only created two or three SRs, and so far, not bad, but I wouldn't go to phenomenal yet. They need to earn my trust and respect. You already have a benchmark with the new organization. If you want to find, Why did I give them exceptional for Oracle payroll? Go find out from them, what they are doing that is so good, because the people who support Oracle EBS payroll, they know what they are doing. They call the client, they don't wait, and they don't say, "Go do this, go do that." A lot of support people think that we have to give more information. Yes, it is true in some cases, because if a weird error happens, which is so peculiar to your that no one has heard of, granted, you need to go dig deeper, but for each and every question, support cannot say, "I have to give like 10 hours worth of information," before they can even figure out what the hell I am asking.

So, that is my feedback to support. You have your own people, go talk to them. Your Oracle Colorado Payroll Support Group. I know all of their names, first name basis.

The payroll module.

Its integrated modules allow for more seamless business processes.

The user interface is not conducive to high volume data entry.

I've been using it for 16 years.

The biggest issue with the latest release is specifically with implementing the payroll module. It has had some issues with local taxes, and it didn’t calculate taxes at all for Pennsylvania or Ohio.

None, as it’s pretty stable. Being hosted by Oracle, the uptime is pretty good.

No issues encountered.

8/10. As an implementer at one of their premier partners, and knowing the people I know at Oracle, I get pretty good customer service. If we need to escalate an issue we can typically go straight to someone in development.

6/10. They sometimes have difficulty accurately troubleshooting issues.

No, I’ve always worked with Oracle.

It’s complex. That’s what keeps me employed – there’s a whole industry of consultants who are implementing Oracle. It is complex to configure.

I am the implementation partner, so I do the implementations.

Here’s the one thing – don’t let Oracle tell you to implement something just because they threw it into the purchase to sweeten the deal. All too often, I see customers where, during the negotiations for the licensing, Oracle will throw in such and such module – like Oracle time and labor – and the customer feels obligated to implement it, when they don’t really need it as maybe they already have a good in-house solution.

Make sure that your systems integrator-partner knows the product

SaaS solution that reduces cost of ownership and maintenance

Offers free upgrades with the latest features and add-on capabilities for modules that we require

Oracle provides two upgrades for their cloud HCM solution each year. These upgrades include enhancements to existing functionality, new functionality, or introducing new modules that can manage business processes more efficiently.

For example, at the initial stage, we got core HCM modules that were helpful in managing employees and organizational details.

With subsequent free upgrades, we got the ability to use social connects like chats, group discussions, and online meetings.

With further upgrades, we kept on getting enhanced user experience with revised UI, mobile applications, and iPad-dedicated applications.

These upgrades are part of our service agreement. As long as we keep paying subscription fees, we keep on getting these upgrades for free.

Our organization covers three states in India and 4 in US. Employees are spread across these regions and need to access HCM system on-the-go. Oracle HCM Cloud offers subscription based services to system that includes web based interface, and mobile and ipad application. A simple net connections and credentials are enough for employees to access system and utilize HCM related services like time sheet, leave or personal information update.

In addition to this, inbuild chat system helps employee keep connected with each other and HR Representatives for day-to-day tasks and follow-ups if required.

Our organization is spread out over a wide geographic region. Using cloud-based technology, we assure that all employees and HR teams have a seamless experience from their desktop, on-the-go mobile application, or iPads. They can utilize functions like absences, timesheets, and expense management with a decent internet connection, anywhere and anytime.

As the product is cloud based, it is a heavily standardized system.

There is little or no option to customize business processes, features, or integrate the few exceptional business processes to work with the existing product.

The majority of HR functions are standardized in terms of transactions in the system. However, each organization has peculiar functions, such as their forms.

As of now, there is no functionality in the system to accommodate such exceptions. They do have functionality to incorporate some in other products. These are excluded, especially for cloud HCM.

I have been using this solution for over three years.

We faced stability issues during the nascent stage of implementation, but none after that.

As a part of our service agreement, we provide services to a number of users over a geographic spread and during peak usage times. This communication helped us manage scalability without any challenges.

Technical support, during some stages, was a bit of hassle. As the product is now stable, we have fewer instances that require support.

We used a customized system provided by a local vendor. As our organization grew, we needed a better solution that would work for us and across various geographies.

The initial setup was a bit of challenge. There were issues to take care of such as new terminology, functionality, and legislative requirements.

From our experience, we would recommend to go for a basic system and functionality at the initial stage. Switch to additional (non-essential) modules if, and when, the organization needs better functionality.

Implementing all modules or features in one go might increase implementation time and complicate the process.

We evaluated three other products. Two of them were from local vendors and the other was Workday. As Workday is officially not supported for India, we had to rule that out.

Owning to our past experience with local products, we chose to go with Oracle. The system is supported in all geographic locations that we operate in and has a good presence with clients to reference.

Definitely use it.

It is designed in such way that end users can do their jobs without knowing much technical details. Most of the functions can be handled by an analyst, which in turn, removes the dependency on the IT department. This makes the user self-driven and ultimately increases user satisfaction and human productivity.

1. Collaboration was never so easy. The collaboration of activities in Fusion HCM are much more instinctive as compared to Oracle EBS (anther ERP from Oracle, on which Oracle HCM Cloud is based).
2. Fusion HCM is synchronous with human behavior.
3. It helps to identify potential talent.
4. Graphical and pictorial presentations of team performance tracking and the employee directory allows goal allocation.

The payroll part of the product requires more changes, which I feel are already in the future release of the product.

I've used it for over three years.

Deployment is awesome.

Scalability is awesome.

Implementation is straightforward, provided the implementor has an HR process and legislation-specific knowledge. There are a few Oracle propriety tools and techniques that one has to learn and apply throughout the implementation.

HCM Cloud is built on the latest robust middleware "Fusion Middleware". It includes all great features that come from PeopleSoft, EBS, JDE, Sibel, Hyperion, Taleo etc.

Easy to learn from technical and functional point of view.

We have done our first ever implementation of Payroll and Absence module with over 10,000 people in North America. My advice is to keep yourself up to date with the product and attend the training that Oracle offers.

Return on investment is always a major consideration when making an investment in your company. Here are some key best practices for HCM solutions that you can utilize to increase your return on investment and lower risks:

• Identify your HR processes, and select a complete HCM solution: You need to determine the HCM capabilities that are required and their interaction with each other to maximize business. The key is to understand the interaction of the related HCM processes in different modules and select an HCM solution that allows you to deliver a complete solution without starting a new process at every turn.
• Identify the integration points with other non-HCM applications and solutions: You need to take into account the standard integration of HCM modules with other applications like, Procure-to-pay, Project Accounting, and Internet Expenses etc. For instance sharing the HR position hierarchies for procure-to-pay workflow processes ensures that the procurement managers making purchases are managers with the appropriate authority to make the types of purchases they are making. Considering the need for these integrations will reduce ongoing technical costs and enable greater automated workflow from the solutions implemented.
• Identify international scalability and data ownership compliances: You need to ensure availability, redundancy and performance at all global locations by taking into account the global scalability feature of the HCM solutions. For instance, Multi language support ensures that the managers don't need to maintain separate systems and will help bring together key processes and data thus maximizing business results. Data privacy norms, which differ by country, needs to be considered and long term control of data should be maintained.