Microsoft Intune Reviews

We usually use Microsoft Intune to manage our devices and add security layers to protect access to all company resources.

The main benefit for us with Microsoft Intune is centralized management of all devices, allowing us to apply one policy across the company from one location.

What I like the most about Microsoft Intune is its ability to manage mobile devices. Through integration with System Center, it can also manage desktops and laptops. We also appreciate how easy it is to manage everything from the console.

The enterprise application management feature lets you manage, deploy, or uninstall applications from Intune. It also enables us to automate updates. The Cloud PKI feature helps us manage security keys on all company devices. 

Intune should improve the management of non-Microsoft devices. It would be better to manage Mac, Android, and other non-Microsoft operating system devices within the same Intune interface.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for almost five years now.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of 10 for stability.

We are not a huge company to check the scalability part. However, when discussing with our customers across the region, it seems fine, especially with the integration with System Center.

I rate Microsoft support nine out of 10. We have not used customer support, but it seems okay. If something happens, we open a case and receive assistance.

While I didn't perform the initial deployment, I know it's easy to roll out Intune across all devices. 

From the device perspective, particularly for desktops, it automates application deployment and secures all the devices. Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices. Onboarding and offboarding users is a great asset in terms of ROI.

We are partners, so we receive some discount. However, from the customer's perspective, Microsoft Intune's pricing is competitive with non-Microsoft technology, and the price is good compared to other market competitors.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of 10.

We use Microsoft Intune to manage mobile devices for our parent company and our independent subsidiaries. These devices are not directly corporate-owned but belong to individuals or subsidiaries with whom we work. We enroll both their and our corporate devices in Intune to manage policies, ensure optimal security settings through compliance reviews, and deploy a VPN client for secure access to our internal network resources.

Microsoft Intune has provided valuable insight into the status of our independent computers, which previously lacked a management agent and had no standardized security policies. We could not enforce password expiration policies, hardened passwords, or even minimum password requirements, with some users relying on six-character passwords. By enrolling these devices in Intune, we have enforced more robust security measures, such as a minimum eight-character password length, and gained visibility into device compliance to ensure adherence to best security practices for data protection.

The Intune user experience is good, especially with the many improvements made to the web interface over the years. It has always been designed as a simpler interface than Configuration Manager, and Microsoft has done a good job in achieving this goal.

Dynamic groups are more efficient than static groups, which require manually adding members. This was cumbersome, especially when onboarding new people, as it necessitated manually adding them to the appropriate groups. Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.

Microsoft Intune's app deployment presents challenges for non-MSI and non-store apps, particularly EXEs, requiring the use of a Win32 wrapper tool and adding overhead to the process. Additionally, deploying device-specific installers, such as VPN clients, is complicated by the inability to target users directly, necessitating knowledge of device names that may not be readily available. Furthermore, the web interface lacks detailed information for MDM-enrolled devices, such as the user's UPN, requiring the use of Graph Explorer API and necessitating Global Admin consent to access device properties. Enhancing app deployment, enabling user-targeted device application deployment, and improving the web interface, particularly for MDM-enrolled devices, by providing comprehensive device information and customizable columns, would significantly streamline Intune's usability.

Microsoft Intune should enhance flexibility and features to better match the granularity available in systems like SCCM.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for over five years.

Microsoft Intune has been stable, and I have not noticed any specific stability issues. While we've encountered problems with other services like Exchange, Intune has remained unaffected.

Scaling Intune is challenging due to the various device types we manage. Our parent company's mobile devices were already enrolled, and we've added our independent Windows devices, with plans to include corporate devices soon. A key hurdle is the lack of visibility into user attributes in Intune, hindering our ability to create dynamic groups effectively. Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties. This forces manual group assignment after user enrollment, which is inefficient and reliant on user notification. Improved dynamic group functionality, particularly the ability to leverage user attributes, would significantly streamline device management.

Customer support has been reasonable overall. However, there have been cases, such as issues with BitLocker recovery keys, where support was less effective, leading to multiple hand-offs and delays.

Neutral

Before Intune, the independent devices were unmanaged without any agent. For corporate devices, we previously used SCCM.

The initial deployment of Microsoft Intune was fairly straightforward, despite a few challenges due to our unusual configuration of two on-premise domains syncing to our Azure tenant. This dual user sync caused issues because some users remained on the older domain, leading to conflicts when automated systems modified on-premise account attributes. These modifications triggered Azure to switch the sync to the other account, resulting in login failures for users with cached credentials from the old account. While we've mostly identified the cause and the fix, we still encounter this issue occasionally.

The deployment was handled in-house. Our organization benefited from having skilled personnel and guidance from our parent company.

The return on investment includes successfully distributing applications like a VPN client and Office 365. As a result, independent devices now have better application access, encouraging even non-enrolled entities to request Intune enrollment.

We considered Tanium for managing independent devices, but it's a comprehensive endpoint management tool with more functionality than we needed. Management felt it would introduce unnecessary overhead. Since all our corporate devices are currently managed with Intune, adding independent devices would require segregation. Ultimately, we opted for Intune due to its ease of use, allowing us to create targeted policies from scratch.

I would rate Microsoft Intune a seven out of ten.

We use Microsoft Intune to manage mobile phone devices and laptops to ensure they are synchronized with the company. They are not used for tracking or third-party software, and they comply with company regulations. If devices get tampered with, lost, or stolen, we can track them. The devices are registered to our systems, so if anyone forgets their user IDs or passwords, we can resolve that using the authenticator. We use the Cloud PKI, which is straightforward and easy to learn. Everything is documented, and a self-starter can learn it. It is not highly technical. It requires being comfortable with Microsoft Windows knowledge and knowing how to use a desktop and commands. Someone with basic knowledge can pick it up easily.

We use the Copilot integration in Microsoft Intune which helps protect our environment. We are using the Enterprise Application Management features of Microsoft Intune. These features have improved our abilities in app discovery, deployment, and automatic updating. The Advanced Endpoint Analytics in Microsoft Intune has improved and helps us proactively detect and remediate anomalies in endpoints.

Everything about Microsoft Intune is something that I value the most. It is something that I use for employees, whether for new starters or anyone who makes a request. It is a requirement and a need, and it works great. So far, there have not been any issues. It performs very well.

The documentation and authentication could be improved. Sometimes, there can be issues where you have to restart multiple times. There have been instances where enrolling devices should take 10 minutes but ends up taking an hour due to various issues. Performance is something that needs to be worked on.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for around a year in my career, not necessarily in this job, but overall.

Sometimes there has been instability such as crashing and downtime. This happens as part of business operations.

The scalability of Microsoft Intune can be good at times and off at others, so it falls somewhere in between.

I have not had to contact their support.

Neutral

My initial introduction to Microsoft Intune was straightforward because everything was written and documented, so it was simply a matter of following their instructions.

We have used an application called Pyrus as an alternative. That is software our company purchased, and it actually helps.

I followed the documentation from my colleagues and have used some documentation from Microsoft. The Microsoft documentation is adequate. I do not know the pricing of Microsoft Intune, as that is not something I manage. When I joined my current company, Microsoft Intune was already in place, so my role was to enroll new devices and distribute them to new people.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Microsoft Intune a 7.

We use Microsoft Intune for our mobile devices, including tablets and mobiles, across both iOS and Android. Our intention is to eventually use Intune to manage our laptop estate as well.

The integration into Azure stack and M365 stack is highly powerful. Additionally, no longer having to pay for a third-party MDM solution is a significant benefit. We also appreciate the conditional access rules and the basic Azure/M365 security scoring, which offer centralized control and the ability to manage policies from one point.

I would like more clarity on how Intune is migrating control from Active Directory group policies, especially as we move over to Windows 11. It seems inefficient to manage some settings in Active Directory and others in Intune.

I have used the solution for approximately just under two years.

I would rate the stability of Intune as a 10. We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches. The only issues we encountered were during the initial setup.

I would rate the scalability of Intune as a 10. You can scale as much as needed based on the size of your tenants.

We use a third party for support instead of Microsoft directly. Our value-added reseller, who specializes in Intune, is excellent, and I rate them as a 10.

Positive

We previously used BlackBerry UEM. We switched to Microsoft Intune to bring our system under Microsoft and achieve more seamless integration. The cost is included in our licensing, eliminating the need for separate servers and complex configurations.

I have been in the IT field for 30 years, and the initial setup made me scratch my head, so we brought in a third party to help. The deployment stretched over several weeks.

We engaged a third party to help with the implementation.

Financially, we saved four to £5,000 a year on MDM licensing after switching from BlackBerry. The one-touch commissioning has also saved significant time by simplifying device configuration and maintenance.

We saved on licensing costs as Microsoft Intune is included in our existing licensing deal.

BlackBerry UEM

I recommend Intune but only once your M365 configuration is established to support it and after completing your Exchange Online migration. I rate the overall solution as a 10.

We deploy Microsoft Intune for clients and give them support for 

The main use cases for Microsoft Intune among our customers currently include migrating a client that was initially with Dell; they were using a Citrix solution along with other solutions. We migrated all the infrastructure on Azure, and they have almost 400 to 500 users. We have registered users' laptops and desktops with Microsoft Intune. I integrated them with Entra ID and Active Directory authentication. We are providing them support with managing all the devices, including their laptops, mobiles, and PCs with Microsoft Intune, along with all the policies and other configurations.

The most useful features of Microsoft Intune for our customers include centralized management; administrators can access all device reports, which devices are expiring MFA, which are not using MFA, device details, and other important information. All details about users and devices can be accessed through a centralized portal and dashboard. That is the main feature.

Regarding user experience, Microsoft Intune is very user-friendly. We need to register the device with Microsoft Intune through the Company Portal. When it's registered with the email, it comes to the management console on Microsoft Intune. We can manage all the devices from the portal, and users are very satisfied with no issues. They only require assistance with daily routine tasks, but otherwise, everything runs smoothly.

It’s already a strong application and management tool, and the team is continuously improving it. Everything is progressing smoothly, and our policy allows for certain configurations to be made easily.

There could be some improvements regarding additional features and integrations in Microsoft Intune. Microsoft Intune works with Entra ID. If there is an option for a client with 100 PCs or laptops that are not on the Entra ID domain, it would be good. It should work without a domain. Microsoft Intune works with the Entra ID domain, with the domain ID, with the email ID. There could be some kind of feature that supports a workgroup environment or a separate environment without the Entra ID.

I've been working with Microsoft Intune for five years.

Our customers have not faced any issues with the stability of Microsoft Intune; it's very stable. When they change devices such as laptops and mobiles, we need to register again and remove from the portal, their MFA, and other configurations. Otherwise, it is fine with no significant issues. It's very reliable and scalable.

In terms of scalability, Microsoft Intune performs exceptionally well. This solution is scalable. 

As technical professionals, we rarely need support. We handle issues ourselves, but whenever there's a need, we raise a ticket with Microsoft to get issues resolved and convey solutions to the client. If we have solved the issue through the Microsoft portal, we raise a ticket and provide the input from Microsoft to the client regarding what the issue was.

Positive

Our customers evaluated other tools before working with Microsoft Intune, as they migrated from ManageEngine and other management devices to Microsoft Intune. They saw advantages that led them to choose Microsoft Intune and Entra ID, so they migrated all the infrastructure and found it better than other management tools.

For tech-savvy individuals, the process is straightforward. You simply need someone with technical expertise to handle the portal, making device registration easy. There’s nothing complicated about it. 

Microsoft Intune is not too expensive; it is bearable for the clients and fits in their budget.

I would recommend Microsoft Intune to others. It is a very good and scalable solution. Every person, client, or company that has infrastructure with more than 100 or 200 devices will find it very easy to manage all their devices, mobiles, laptops, PCs, and network devices from the same dashboard and panel. All the information in the portal and dashboard makes it good for them.

I would rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

I use Microsoft Intune to Autopilot our devices and manage various configuration policies mainly on Windows PCs. It helps in efficiently deploying company configurations remotely.

Intune has streamlined our onboarding process. Most of our workforce is remote, and there typically isn't an office where they can pick up the devices. It's easy to ship them to any address and configure them remotely. 

The Autopilot feature is the most valuable because it saves significant time on managing devices. We can ship devices globally, and users can set them up on their own. It's convenient.

The user experience is pretty solid. We've gotten great feedback on the onboarding process and replacing devices. Every employee on the Windows PC has gone through Intune's Autopilot process.

Microsoft Intune could improve in reporting data for endpoints and fleets. Enhanced capabilities to run queries and gather specific device data to identify trends or issues would be beneficial. The feature parity for MacOS and handling devices from an MDM perspective is not comprehensive. Consolidation of these functionalities within Intune would simplify processes and finances.

I have used Microsoft Intune for about four years.

Microsoft Intune is very stable. I cannot recall any significant service outages in the last few years.

Microsoft Intune is scalable and handles our workload efficiently. Although our organization is not very large, we foresee continuing with Intune as it supports scalability effectively.

We do not utilize Microsoft customer service and technical support since it is generally a waste of time.

We used SCCM before, and now we are in a hybrid state, co-managing with SCCM and Microsoft Intune. The primary reason for the switch was the convenience of joining devices to our environment over the Internet.

 Microsoft Intune's initial setup was straightforward. It took some effort to configure it to a finalized version. Like every other piece of technology, it's constantly undergoing configuration changes. From an out-of-the-box perspective, it's super-easy to set up, but, you know, you have to continue iterating on it over time.

The implementation was primarily conducted by my team, especially my endpoint administrator on the Windows side.

Factoring in the setup time, we've saved about 1,000 hours in the last couple of years.

We spend a lot of money on Intune licensing, and some of our users have to be double licensed just because of how our dev and corporate environments are segmented.

I rate Microsoft Intune eight out of 10. Offering the same features for MacOS would make it a 10.

We use Intune for security or endpoint inside the company and especially for many customers we have.

Microsoft Intune has helped us by improving our security posture, leading to fewer security problems, and helping us understand where we have issues. 

Intune's compliance features are valuable because they allow for immediate visibility into ongoing situations. The solution is very easy to use. We haven't implemented Microsoft Copilot but will adopt it next year. It will be interesting to use natural language to interact with Intune.

It would be interesting to integrate the server side of Intune. Some group policy updates we have on the Windows Server side and possibly some on the client side could also be included.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for about two years.

Microsoft Intune is very stable.

The scalability of Microsoft Intune is good. We don't have large customers, so we haven't seen any issues with scalability.

I rate Microsoft support nine out of 10. Customer service and technical support are good. The technical support from Microsoft and Infineon Technologies is also good. The quality and professionalism of the people are really good, although sometimes we need to escalate to get the right content and answers.

Positive

We previously used a solution from an older competitor that is now defunct.

We did not use an integrator, reseller, or consultant for the deployment because we are an integrator.

Our customers have seen a significant return on investment because they now understand and see where the problems are on the endpoints without needing to search the entire company.

We know the pricing is good because customers are not complaining about it.

We directly switched to Microsoft Intune after receiving good feedback from customers.

I would rate Intune eight out of 10. Some features could be added, but it is a rock-solid solution.

We use Microsoft Intune to manage our customers' end-user workstations. Specifically, we use it for mobile application management, managing personal phone devices for iOS and Android without enrollment, and configuring app VPN through the Intune tunnel server. We also manage Microsoft Teams for mobile application management and use it extensively for Windows devices.

Microsoft Intune has helped by making additional access based on corporate owned devices or managed devices, which prevents our IT admins from accessing specific organizational resources unless using these secure devices.

Intune enables us to deploy applications to devices remotely without touching or interacting with the end user. We can also configure some profiles, like Wi-Fi profiles, for specific branches without additional configuration from the end user. It's easy for end-users to adopt changes or merge branches. Also, you can predefine the applications so they automatically download when the user joins that branch.

Microsoft Intune offers features such as mobile application management and always-on VPN for Windows, which are valuable for managing customer devices and ensuring efficiency. It also aids in application deployment and configuration without requiring direct user interaction, simplifying the integration of new devices and systems.

We use endpoint analytics to analyze the user performance on their machines or  app crashes. We can also evaluate Windows startups to detect if there are some user problems or if it's their workstation performance. We can be more proactive about improving our user's work infrastructure. 

We use enterprise application management for app patching, but it needs to include more applications. Some important applications are not part of the enterprise app management, but we hope they will be added soon. We appreciate the automatic updates and discovery of installed applications and older devices. Automatic patching will help us keep the devices and applications up to date to detect newly discovered vulnerabilities. Copilot helps us generate reports about compliant devices and software installed on specific devices. We can also track the device's compliance state. 

Improvements are needed in Microsoft Intune's enterprise app management, including support for more applications in app patching, boot batching, and discovery. I also hope the cost of Remote Help will decrease because it's a much-needed Intune function. Our customers need that capability, or they will buy it from a third party at a premium. 

We have used Microsoft Intune for around three years.

Microsoft Intune is very stable due to its cloud-based infrastructure and its reliability in performance.

Microsoft Intune's cloud-based nature ensures it is highly scalable, supporting a large number of devices without performance issues.

We do not often rely on Microsoft Support. Sometimes response times can be long, but generally, they are helpful in resolving issues.

Neutral

Previously, we used solutions like ManageEngine and Endpoint Central. We switched to Microsoft Intune to better support enterprise customers needing fully managed devices like iPads for secure environments.

The initial setup of Microsoft Intune was straightforward, thanks to its various enrollment methods.

We are a consulting partner, providing implementation services for Microsoft Intune.

We've seen a return on investment through enhanced security, as Intune allows access to critical systems only through corporate-owned devices, integrating well with Microsoft’s ecosystem to protect company assets.

The default capabilities of Microsoft Intune are reasonably priced, but the Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly, leading customers to consider third-party options.

Before switching to Microsoft Intune, we considered ManagerEngine. Eventually, the decision focused on Intune specifically to meet enterprise requirements.

I rate Microsoft Intune eight out of 10. I deduct a couple of points because key features like application patching and Remote Help need to be purchased separately. 

We use Microsoft Intune to enroll devices in our environment, install software, and monitor security patches.

In the past, our cumbersome OSD installation model using images made it difficult for IT to track installations and required users to visit the help desk for reinstallation. However, with Intune, employees can now conveniently manage installations themselves.

I have no complaints about the Intune user experience.

I appreciate Intune's Autopilot feature, which allows us to enroll devices and install applications to meet corporate requirements seamlessly.

I would like to see Intune improve its handling of hybrid domain joins. We continue to experience issues with machines losing their hybrid domain join status.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for several years now.

Intune's stability has been generally good, although recent issues caused devices to stop checking in and become unmanageable. We hope this is resolved before we begin redeployment.

Intune's scalability appears satisfactory, as we have not experienced any scaling issues.

Support has become more challenging to navigate over the past couple of years. It takes some effort to engage the right level of support, but once the right person is contacted, support works well.

Neutral

Before Intune, we used the OSD image approach. We switched to Intune for end-user ease of use and to lessen the burden on support teams.

The initial setup was fairly straightforward.

We did the implementation in-house ourselves.

We did not evaluate other solutions because Intune was included with our Microsoft 365 solution.

Overall, I like Intune as a solution and would rate it nine out of ten. The rating isn't a ten because we haven't enrolled our entire environment in it yet, but so far, it looks promising. It might reach a ten at some point.

We have over 50,000 employees and 75,000 machines.

We operate call centers and provide our agents with laptops that they use from their home environment or home offices. We use Microsoft Intune to manage those laptops remotely. This remote management accounts for 99 percent of our use cases.

Microsoft Intune has effectively managed our patching needs, resulting in very few system-wide issues. While a small number of laptops occasionally fail to receive updates, the vast majority are patched successfully without manual intervention.

Microsoft Intune has enabled us to effectively manage our laptops, which is crucial for our involvement in civilian federal projects. The platform allows us to maintain a necessary security patch level and address any bugs that may arise, ensuring our devices are always secure and functional. Implementing Intune provides a cost-effective solution that would otherwise be prohibitively expensive.

Our Intune users, the IT group and system administrators, are happy with the system and have not reported any complaints.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is patching-related capabilities. This is because patches are constantly being released, and it requires us to stay current with bug-related and security-related patches, which is critical for our day-to-day operations. Intune's support in this area is crucial for us to maintain our laptops at a certain security patch level.

A more incisive reporting tool with automated progress updates and graphical representation would be beneficial, as the current manual method lacks efficiency and visual clarity.

I have been using the solution for about a year.

The stability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten. It has been very stable for us.

The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten. Although we are not the largest company, it has never presented any scalability issues for us.

The customer service is above average. We have an Azure engineer on staff who handles troubleshooting. Although we have not had any major issues.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. We manage everything in-house with just a few commands needed before deploying laptops, never having to reconsider our processes.

We do everything ourselves without using a reseller or consultant.

We have never operated without Microsoft Intune, but it is apparent that it offers significant cost reductions. Operating without it would likely be prohibitively expensive, indicating a ninety-nine percent reduction in cost with Intune.

The alternative to Intune, sending out replacements for every issue, is prohibitively expensive. In contrast, Intune's pricing is reasonable considering its benefits and the high costs it helps avoid.

We evaluated other options that are tool-specific. For instance, our call center platform from NICE's CXone, has built-in Copilot-like capabilities. Nevertheless, Copilot remains our primary focus as it covers our entire spectrum of needs.

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of ten.

We recently started using Copilot and find its support features very attractive. Our call center agents are internal customers who, like any customer, need occasional assistance with various issues. Copilot could benefit both IT and non-IT departments by providing faster service, self-guided troubleshooting, and access to relevant resources. For example, if an agent has an HR question, needs help with benefits, or experiences a technical issue like audio problems with their laptop, Copilot could guide them with self-service options or provide helpful files. This would empower our agents to resolve issues independently and efficiently. Our initial analysis suggests Copilot may have the potential to protect our environment, though our assessment is ongoing and we haven't begun implementation. Preliminary findings indicate it will be a valuable tool.