Microsoft Intune Reviews

It is used mainly for application deployment.

We are using it in our company and we also recommend it to our customers.

It has improved our organization a lot, especially because Intune is improving so much. It makes it a lot easier to deploy applications now, and there's less packaging work for us.

Among the most valuable features are the Company Portal that is built into Intune, and the update rings so that we can manage what types of future updates the devices get.

The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately four years. I have built approximately 100 tenants and I manage environments with roughly 20,000 workspaces.

The product is very stable.

It's also really scalable.

At my current job site, we have roughly 8,000 devices, which includes about 2,000 mobile devices, such as phones and tablets. They're used around the whole municipality. At that client, we are not looking to increase usage because they don't have many more workspaces, but our company is looking to get more customers and expand our usage of Intune that way.

The technical support is good, once you get somebody who knows what they're talking about. Reaching the right person is really difficult, but once you have the right person, it goes smoothly. It depends on the agent you get and which area you are connected to. If you're connected to a United States office straightaway, you will probably get better help than if you get connected to one of the locations in India.

We also use Liquid. We are part of their development program and we helped them develop their software. We also have Liquid in the field, but that's mainly for use cases with social internet and launching applications from websites, which is a little bit more difficult using Intune.

In terms of deployment, what is difficult about Microsoft is that you need to have a broad knowledge of Azure and the other components because the endpoint manager is just a small part of your workspace. You need to have that experience and there's a lot of custom work for every single client. There isn't really an automated way, like a template base, within Microsoft, to fully deploy endpoint environments.

I help our customers with the design and deployment. Normally it includes making a list of all the applications they have within the company and seeing how much work it is for us to deploy an environment and how much application work is within it. In that way, we see which strategy fits them the best. Because there are a lot of on-premises applications that are really difficult to fit into a cloud environment, we will look to build more of a hybrid solution than a fully cloud-based solution.

We usually need three or four people for deployment.

Maintenance involves keeping up to date with the application. The only downside is that if you upload an application today, it doesn't download an update that comes out next week. That means you need to package and deploy it again.

We have most definitely seen return on investment in all of our projects. We still get a stable margin, but because of the price increases, it gets more difficult to sell it.

We don't get Intune as a separate module. Most of the time, we use it within an enterprise agreement like E3 or E5. Those licenses are at a good price, but what is annoying is that every single year they go higher. That makes it more difficult to get a company to take a full license. It will be really hard to manage, for us, if the prices keep going up every single year.

Currently, we pay €44 for an enterprise E3 license. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

My advice would be to take your time and test what you deploy, due to the fact that sometimes a policy that you deploy with Intune can come into effect two or three days after a device is installed. Sometimes, testing for one hour is not really accurate. You need to test for a minimum of three days before you can actually see the results.

There are some improvements needed, but overall, it's a very solid product.

We're using Microsoft Intune for MDM (mobile device management).

It's also used for securing devices. This solution also lets you access your corporate data on mobile devices. You can secure and ensure that whatever data you're accessing and using from mobile devices is in a secure channel, that the data is between your end user and your cloud provider.

There are certain policies you can set up, that can go on both the device level and application level.

What I like most about Microsoft Intune is that it's agile and easy to deploy. I also like that it covers the maximum number of policies.

Microsoft Intune is doing well. They're adding endpoints, so it's good that they're covering that, and they're more stable. What I'd like to see in their next upgrade is more in the context of today's security policies and what's needed, for them to keep adding features based on that, e.g. boosting security, so they can keep on adding security features, and that is the best they can do.

We've been deploying Microsoft Intune to customers for four years now.

Microsoft Intune is a stable solution.

I find Microsoft Intune scalable.

The technical support for Microsoft Intune was knowledgeable.

The setup for this solution was straightforward. It was quick and it was easy, but it would still depend on the policies.

You have to pay for a Microsoft Intune license. It's a user-based subscription. You can go for a monthly or a yearly payment. It's up to the customer.

We have the maximum number of clients using Microsoft Intune. For deployment and maintenance, it depends on the customers and the number of devices they have, and the policies, e.g. they can have one, two, or three resources for deploying and maintaining this solution.

I'm recommending Microsoft Intune to people who want to start using it. They can go for it for one reason: the Microsoft ecosystem. My advice to people who are looking into implementing this solution is for them to know first what they want to achieve from it, before they make their decision.

My rating for Microsoft Intune is eight out of ten.

The primary use case is to manage devices that are dedicated to processing as well as managing work stations and sales devices. I'm an Intune engineer and administrator and I implement this solution.  

This is a great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution.

I'd like to see an ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies. 

I've been using this solution for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

The scalability is good. 

The initial setup is very simple. 

Licensing costs are based on the number of devices being used. 

Indeed, it's a correct solution for any client who wants to use this modern endpoint device management solution.

I rate this product nine out of 10. 

We use it for mobile device management. 

Intune is on a public cloud because it works on Office 365.

It provides control over all mobile devices that are being connected to the corporate network.

Data leak prevention can be integrated into it. Currently, it does not have data leak prevention.

We have been dealing with Microsoft for the past three decades, and we have been using Intune from the time it came to the market.

It is stable.

It is absolutely scalable. It is for enterprises.

It is world-class. It is the best.

Its setup is easy. It is a Microsoft solution, and everything is easy with Microsoft.

Its price is in the medium range. It is acceptable because you're paying for the features. I am not aware of any additional costs.

It is a wonderful product. I would advise others to go for it. It is definitely helpful for an enterprise. It has been improving constantly. When they introduced it, it was only for Microsoft, and now, even Apple has been included. They're doing well.

I would rate it a nine out of 10.

We use this for management of all mobile devices.

We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks.

I have been using this solution for about three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution.

I think customer support is quite good, we have enterprise support and premier support agreements.

Initial setup was straightforward.

Potential users should run a proof of concept. This can be done easily because Microsoft is offering a free trial period of one month.

I would rate this an eight out of ten.

The primary use of Microsoft Intune is for device management.

The solution is easy to use and it has good performance.

We can manage all our devices with the policies we want and it is secure. We can apply any policies we want, which gives us more flexibility.

There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good.

I rate Microsoft Intune for approximately two years.

The solution is stable.

Microsoft Intune is scalable, we use it across many groups.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution in my organization.

I have not used the technical support.

We previously used AirWatch.

The installation is simple and it can be done quickly, within minutes.

We have a team that does the implementation of the solution.

There are licenses required for this solution. We enable licenses on the devices we need to manage.

We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft. It is part of our E3 and E5 of our bundle company package. We are happy with the solution.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

The solution is primarily used for people who want to manage their mobile devices.

It's difficult to describe how we've been able to improve our organization specifically with this solution.

The most valuable aspect of the product is that we are able to send application deployments and certifications for conditional access.

The solution is very easy to install.

The stability is good.

You can scale the solution if you need to.

Technical support is helpful. 

The MacBook management could be better. 

They should have better integration with, for example, Apple.

The synchronization could be improved.

They need to work on providing better troubleshooting techniques. 

I've been using the solution for two years. 

It's a very stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We have found the solution to be scalable. 

We have about 20 clients using the product. Typically, the users would be managers or assistant administrators. 

We've used technical support in the past. They are very fast and they know what they are talking about. We're happy with the level of support we get.

The implementation process is simple. It's very straightforward. 

I'd rate the overall initial setup process at a four out of five. 

Deployment times vary. It depends on the product. Our clients, for example, we're deploying it to all of their mobile devices. We use architects and engineers for the deployment process. How many we need depends on the project. We typically need, let's say, one architect and then, depending on the size of the project, one or more engineers.

We can integrate the product for our clients if they need us to.

I can't speak to seeing any specific ROI.

Customers do have to pay a licensing fee. Our clients pay a monthly subscription cost.

I cannot speak to the exact price as the licensing is complex. 

It's decent, however. I would rate it at a four out of five.

We did look at other solutions. The one we did look at closely was more for larger organizations in the manufacturing industry, which wouldn't have fit with our needs. 

We are Microsoft partners.

We are integrating the solution for our clients. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. With Intune, many companies may already have the product if they are also already using Microsoft.

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

We use Microsoft Intune to secure our mobile access when you're assessing your data from your mobile. Additionally, we use the solution to limit people from transferring files to people that are not part of our domain, and secure company data from exposure.

The one feature we find most useful is the Mobile Application Manager. There are two types, we have the complete MDM and the Mobile Application Manager(MAM). We don't give our users phones, it is their own personal phone, and we need to allow them to have access to the company detail on their phone. We need to create a balance between their own personal data and the company data. We deploy the  Mobile Application Manager for them so that we won't be able to interfere with their own personal data.

We are always working with Microsoft on improvements. Improvement is not something that is static, we are always looking for a dynamic way of working with Microsoft. We have a support and enterprise agreement with Microsoft. Every quarter, we review the performance of all our solutions and then we ask for further improvement.

In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately four years.

I have found Microsoft Intune to be stable.

Microsoft Intune is scalable.

The installation is not complex.

I would advise others to ensure that the technical people are well versatile and trained, especially the technical people that will implement Microsoft Intune.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

Being able to use it to control phones is the most valuable feature. 

It's a developing product, so there's lots of room for improvement. There's a lot of stuff we couldn't do because Google and Apple prevent you from doing a lot of the stuff you'd like to do. 

Microsoft documentation is a bit hard to get around, so having more control over devices would be good.

I've been using Intune for about a year or so.

We had no problems with stability.

It's hard to find the information to work out what you need to configure, but it's easy once you get to know how to work it.

The pricing is pretty good.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Endpoint Manager for patch management and software and application deployment. We also use it to engage with the user to be flexible and encourage them to use our organizational tool in their home or country, along with Microsoft 365 features and VDI.

Microsoft Endpoint Manager's patch management has been the most helpful to us. However, Microsoft Endpoint Manager has a lot of features. We could use it for cost management, inventory, and security purposes. But, bottomline, its best feature is patch management.

No tool is 100% perfect. An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it.

I have more than 10 years of experience with Microsoft Endpoint Manager. 

Microsoft Endpoint Manager is scalable. We have not run into any issues. 

The initial setup was not easy for me.

The pricing is reasonable. Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments. But for enterprises with more than 6,000 or 7,000 users, it can start to get a little expensive.