Microsoft Intune Reviews

I'm using all the services that Intune provides, including managing Windows 10 devices and mobile devices, with both the mobile application management and without enrolling the devices. I use it for deploying configuration profiles, compliance and app protection policies, as well as onboarding Windows 10 devices to the Defender portal.

I haven't used other mobile device management solutions, but compared to SCCM, we eliminate a lot of on-premises infrastructure and maintenance by using Intune.

For mobile device management, especially for the Windows operating system, it's quite impressive. But it would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure.

Another area for improvement is the reporting structure. For example, currently, when deploying Windows 10 or Windows 11 updates, I don't get any detail or structured reports showing which updates are installed on the devices. It only gives me information on whether the update policy has been successfully deployed on the device or not. That type of installed-updates detail would be helpful.

I've been working with Intune for more than four years. I'm part of a support operations team managing clients' infrastructures on Intune.

The product is very stable. If you have to think about managing devices securely, go with Intune. Although I have not used any other mobile device management solutions, Intune is very reliable and it's hardly out of service at all.

From the start of my career, I have been managing clients in Europe but Microsoft has no boundaries when it comes to using Intune. There are certain services that are restricted to specific regions, but that is not the case with Intune. It can be used in any region and with any number of users. I have managed environments with 5,000 to 10,000 devices enrolled in Intune.

If there is a service outage, that is made very clear on Microsoft's service portal in the admin center. But if an issue comes up where, for example, a policy deployed from Intune has not been received on a device, it is very difficult to evaluate whether the issue is with Intune or the device. In that scenario, Microsoft itself is confused about whether the situation has to be escalated to the desktop support team or the Intune team.

Other than that, everything is good.

The initial deployment process is very straightforward. It's software as a service. You just buy the subscription and start using it. It's not the case that there are very complex configurations or prerequisites to start off.

It does not require any maintenance on the customer's side. Microsoft takes care of all the maintenance.

Having devices managed at scale and maintaining security posture are, of course, value-adds, in comparison with the cost our clients pay to purchase the service. It is worth it.

Microsoft offers different licensing structures. It offers standalone licensing for Intune, but Intune is also included in other licenses, such as for Microsoft 365, E3, and E5, Business Premium, and Business Standard.

There are other MDM solutions, like Workspace One from VMware, which has support for server operating systems as well. I've never used it but I did a quick comparison of the supported operating systems.

The primary use case is to safeguard the company's data. My management wanted to categorize the applications and ensure privacy and security in terms of corporate applications versus personal applications on corporate devices. We began to prioritize B objectives in 2013 and 2014, which is why it is essential for the organization to prioritize its categorization. To accomplish all of these objectives, we embarked on a successful journey.

Since Microsoft Intune has provisioned data, application, and device security, it helped us significantly increase our security posture.

We restricted certain geographical locations with which we are not doing business, which minimized risk, and Microsoft Intune's conditional access feature helped secure our environment from a recent hacking attack originating from a specific country.

The conditional access feature in conjunction with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is a fantastic combination.

The device profiling which uses the official Outlook email enabled us to control the screenshot feature and prevent copying outside of the organization's application. This is really helpful in controlling data breaches.

Microsoft needs to enhance device-level security, as sometimes when using Microsoft Intune, the device's operating system becomes stuck and requires a full uninstall to remove the Intune bug.

The price of the solution has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for almost ten years.

The solution is extremely stable.

The solution is scalable. We have 300 end users in our organization.

Prior to the COVID pandemic, the technical support was excellent, but since then there has been a marked decline in the quality of support.

Neutral

We previously used VMware Workspace ONE which is a very good solution and in some areas better than Intune, and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager. We switched to Microsoft Intune because of the better integration with Microsoft products.

The initial setup is a bit complex. Initially, we deployed for the executives of the organization. We deployed Microsoft Intune for one hundred users in the first year. After receiving positive feedback, we expanded our model and provided security for all the major executive users of our organization, protecting their data, devices, and applications. We had two administrators and six service desk screen engineers deploy the solution. In addition, our two administrators were verifying the policies and implemented the solutions on end users' devices.

The implementation was completed in-house.

Microsoft Intune is a very good solution and in time I am sure we will see a good return on investment.

Microsoft Intune is expensive.

I give the solution a seven out of ten.

There is no external maintenance, but at the device level, we must adhere to Microsoft's patches and policies and keep our devices up-to-date with the latest patches. The company portal may not allow for older versions, so we must ensure that the solution is kept up-to-date.

Microsoft Intune is a very good solution and when compared to VMware Workspace ONE, it is a strong competitor. I would not call it the topmost or leading product in this domain, however, with Microsoft's progress, I'm sure it will be a leader in a few years. On the Microsoft side, they may need to improve their support system and build releases of the solution.

It's usually used for managing mobile devices, such as Android and iOS, for application deployment, for securing the device landscape, and for making sure all devices are compliant.

Help Desk engineers don't need to spend a lot of time enrolling new devices. In the past, you had to do that by using a complete infrastructure on-premise, or if you wanted to do it by hand, you had to go through every device. You had to install Windows, configure it to set security, etc. Intune does that automatically for you. It saves a lot of time.

There are so many features, but Windows Autopilot is one of the features that are very valuable for most customers. Personally, I like most of the aspects of Intune. I've been working with it for about 10 years. I'm a Microsoft MPP for the Modern Workplace. I like a lot of features. There's no one particular part of Intune that is the best for me. It has developed into a very mature product. About 10 years ago, it wasn't a very good product, but now, Intune is a very good mobile device management platform.

There should be more support for macOS. Even though macOS is supported by Intune and Microsoft is working very hard to get more features into Intune to manage macOS, that's one thing they can give a lot more attention to.

I've been using Microsoft Intune for about 10 years.

It's stable. There are issues once in a while, but they are not worth mentioning.

It's very scalable. It's deployed across multiple endpoints. My customers vary, but there are between 50 and 15,000 endpoints.

I do have experience with Microsoft technical support, and I'm happy with it. I'd rate their support an eight out of ten.

Positive

I've migrated from other platforms to Microsoft Intune, but I've not used any other similar solution.

It's a cloud solution. The cloud depends on the customer, but Microsoft Intune is a cloud solution serviced by Microsoft. My customers have various cloud environments. It could be a hybrid, public cloud, or private cloud. It depends on the customer.

It's quite straightforward to deploy it, but configuring it and doing it right is something else. The deployment duration varies. Some customers have 100 devices and others have 10,000. It depends on the landscape of a customer. Even though nothing changes technically, it's more difficult to move large enterprise organizations to a mobile device management platform.

The number of people required depends on the qualifications of the person who is deploying Intune. Intune can be deployed by one person. 

Its maintenance depends on the company. If you have a very big landscape with tens of thousands of devices, you want to have more engineers monitoring Intune and configuring. If it's a smaller environment, you can manage it with one or two people.

The ROI has been in terms of time savings.

It's affordable. In comparison to the competitors, the price depends on what features you need from Intune, but it's affordable. There are no hidden costs, but there are some features that go for a premium price. Those are the add-ons for which you have to pay extra.

I did have a look at other options, but I'm a Microsoft specialist, so it's a Microsoft-first sort of policy. If Microsoft can do it, I'll do it with a Microsoft product.

Get yourself well-informed. Talk to a specialist who can help you out with deploying Microsoft Intune.

I'd rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten.

We are going to use Intune for registration and then we're going to use some kind of condition policies for resource access for unmanaged devices. With on-prem AD-based access, when the users are working from home or somewhere else, they need to connect to the VPN or something to access the corporate network, whereas, with Azure and Intune, we are going to provide the resources for application access. We can directly provide them access by using conditional policies.

It has been only three months since we took the Azure subscription and migrated all the users to it. We are running it in the production environment. We are not running it in the testing environment. We are not implementing everything in one go because if any issues happen, it's not easy to roll everything back in minutes. For this reason, we're implementing them one by one.

With on-premises Active Directory, the main challenge was that we had no control when a user was working from home. We didn't know what exactly a user was doing and whether the AV was up to date or not. Intune provides better control of their machines.

A few of the options are a bit hard to understand. As compared to on-prem services such as AD, it's a bit different. For example, group policy objects have different names. It takes some time to find out where various options are available.

I wanted to check if there is any provision at the Intune level to restrict certain things, such as a website, but unfortunately, that feature is available only in Microsoft Defender. Intune has web filtering capabilities, but they are only useful for protection from malicious websites, whereas we would like to be able to restrict a website. For example, YouTube is a clean website. No one would identify it as a malicious website, but if we want to stop the end-users from going to that website, we have to go for another product, such as Microsoft Defender or another third-party proxy solution. It would be great if this capability is included in Intune.

We started using it three months ago. 

Over the past three months, I haven't seen any instability from the Intune point of view.

We have approximately 220 users. We don't have any immediate plans to increase its usage, but by the middle of next year, we might increase the usage of the product to another 70 or 80 people. We would be able to scale it based on our needs.

I haven't raised any case with Microsoft support, but I believe Microsoft has different types of service agreements based upon which they provide support for different applications. 

I have gone through multiple Microsoft articles, and they have sufficient to-the-point information there. 

We were using on-premises Active Directory, and we were restricting certain things through GPO, but there were a lot of challenges when the users started to work from home. 

Its initial setup is fine. I haven't seen any issues. I have worked as a technical lead at the architect level on different products. For that reason, I haven't had many challenges.

Its implementation was a bit longer because we took our time in testing on multiple machines and multiple users. We wanted to ensure that we are able to achieve what we wanted. We completed all the use case scenarios and what we were expecting from the security point of view.

We implemented it in-house. We had two people for the setup, which included a junior person and me. 

We also take care of its maintenance. We are managing approximately 220 people. I take care of all the cybersecurity and software-related work at the corporate level. Most of the people are now coming to the office. So, we have prepared a simple document for them to follow. 

We don't have just the Intune license. We have the Enterprise Mobility + Security E3 license, but I don't have the exact figures. Someone else was involved in the initial discussions and purchase, and the entire environment was handed over to me.

Any bundle package, such as Security E3, covers multiple things, such as AAP, BitLocker, etc. If you go for them individually, they would be more expensive. Bundling makes the price more attractive and competitive.

It is suitable for small, medium, and large companies, but it also depends on your requirements, budget, and the things you want to restrict. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We use it for the rollout of Windows and Apple devices to our users.

Its direct integration with all the other products that we have from Microsoft is valuable. We're using the E5 license, and we have a whole wealth of different products available. It just makes it easier to have everything from one provider. 

One big problem with Microsoft is that they're changing the names of the products quite often, or they're quite consistently doing so. Intune is now Endpoint administration. Constantly switching the user interface or the administrative interface makes it quite hard to keep pace. If you are on a two-week holiday and you come back and look at the same screen you have looked at for the last couple of months, it looks different, which is annoying. Changing things around all the time doesn't make it easy.

There are some elements where the integration isn't finalized. So, for some of the things, you use the user interface, meaning the administrative website, and for some of the things, you have to use PowerShell to make changes, and it's not quite clear why you have to do things at one point this way and at the other point that way. If they could improve that a little bit more, it would be a good thing.

Other than that, functionality-wise, it, more or less, serves our purpose. I'm not really sure what I would wish more at the moment.

I have been using this solution for over a year.

It is stable 99% of the time. There are some problems with Microsoft in terms of outages, but overall, the solution is very stable.

It is very easy to scale. It is basically adding additional licenses. It requires adding additional domain names and things like that and maybe adjusting a couple of security groups, but other than that, it's really easy to scale up or down.

We have only 120 users in 44 companies. A few of them have financial, accounting, or legal backgrounds. We are not an engineering company; we are a service company. We are a shared service center catering to the needs of more than 44 other companies. That's our business. We are a managed service provider to all these companies.

Its documentation is quite okay, and if not, if you Google things, you would find almost everything. 

We had four, five issues over the last year, and we had to contact them. They were actually quite swift at solving problems. So, overall, we are happy.

It was easier than expected. We did the full deployment for 44 companies and about 120 users in about three months.

ROI is very high at the end. We were using a full data center before with three racks built up with about 30 host systems and 220 virtual servers that we operate in, and by just switching to Microsoft 365, we could get rid of all of them. It made our life easier in terms of support and maintenance. We have saved the costs for all the hardware that we had and all the hassle that we had when parts were broken.

If you ask the accountant or the finance department, they'll tell you that it is way too expensive, but when I look at the cost and compare it with the value you actually get, it's more than fair.

We looked at the Sophos solution as well. We are a Sophos partner, but it was easier to deal directly with the Microsoft solution primarily because of the rules management and the Microsoft groups and the security groups that we use. We use rule-based access, and we have access packages so that users can elevate their rights with an approval process in the back.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

The solution is deployed on cloud. I'm part of the support team. There's another server team that works closely with Microsoft. They purchased an old 365 license, and Intune was one of the included features. We wanted to take advantage of the feature because it was part of the package. That's why our top management decided to save some costs by making use of Intune and not using AirWatch anymore.

We are enrolling through the Intune company portal, and then we are using the Outlook app to configure the email addresses of the company.

We are using the mobile feature, and we are also using MDM to lock the devices, to push restrictions, et cetera. Compared with AirWatch, I think it's easier to manage the devices and the profiles in AirWatch. Intune has a lot of options, but I've only been playing around with it for a few months.

In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune. It can take a long time for these features to appear, or maybe they will just never happen.

There are certain things that I'm trying to replicate from AirWatch, and it's not possible.

In AirWatch, we have a launcher, which is like a container. You can choose single-app mode or multi-app mode. But in Intune, for example, you need to factory reset the device and then apply the MDM. If we choose multi-app mode, which is the kiosk multi-app mode in Intune, I cannot lock the application on the screen. For example, in the set mode, you have the option to set the leave Kiosk password. You can exit the kiosk. But if you choose Intune multi-app mode, you don't have this leave kiosk option. For us, it's very useful.

If you have this leave kiosk option in the multi-app, you should also have it in the single-app mode. We need this because we have an application that you run on a tablet in hotel rooms, and we want to lock the application in a single-app mode, but besides the application, we also need to have some background applications running, like we need to do some configurations in Knox from Samsung, and eFolder. 

We have three applications that we need to push, but the guests will only be able to see one. Because I don't have the option to leave the kiosk in the single-app mode, I cannot do any configuration in the background apps. We have one app we cannot migrate to Intune from AirWatch because of this issue. This applies to more than 2,000 devices.

I think we need the leave Kiosk option available for the Kiosk single-app mode, because we are stuck with at least 2,000 devices or more because we want to completely retire AirWatch, but we cannot until this feature is available. The applications that we are using in our hotel rooms are not compatible with Intune. My bosses are not really satisfied because we still have expenses with purchasing a license with AirWatch because Intune cannot really fulfill our requirements.

This option is already available in the multi-app mode. It should not be a new feature. This feature already exists. They just need to apply the single-app mode the same way they're applying the multi-app mode.

Compared with AirWatch, Intune is not very stable because I haven't had to deal with these issues. With AirWatch, I would try to fix something and I would need to fine tune the settings, et cetera. But once I fine-tune and push everything, it will run and be stable. With Intune, we are new with this product, but it took some time for me to create a profile and test the devices. It has been working for a few months, but then suddenly this weird issue happened. It affected all devices at once.

In the Outlook application, the scalability is good so far. But there are some differences between on-premises mailbox users and cloud users. For example, let's say I'm my boss's assistant and I'm able to view my boss's calendar on my Outlook desktop. Let's say I want to view a shared calendar on my Outlook app. For the cloud-use mailbox, I'm able to do this, but if I'm an on-premises mailbox user, this option is not available. Usually the cloud mailbox users have more options than on-premise users.

We have around 2,000 users enrolled in Intune so far, not counting the MDM device. That includes just email, the one that I have enrolled in the Outlook email app.

Our plan is to keep the solution because our primary solution for email mobile is now Intune because we are retiring AirWatch. We have already retired the email for AirWatch, and we are just using AirWatch for MDM devices. Of course, the plan is to keep increasing usage. If more users request email on their mobile, we are going to offer Intune.

Technical support is very responsive and helpful. There's another issue that I raised related to Adobe Acrobat. I'm not sure if it's a region issue, but I'm in Macau, and we also have some users in Manila, Hong Kong, and Cyprus. All of us are using the same profile. I make the Adobe Reader application available on the manage app store, but somehow the users in Macau, when they go to the manage play store, are not able to see Adobe Reader on the list. It's only happening in Macau.

I raised this issue. Support dragged the issue on for two months. Support said, "Because all the applications go through the Play store, maybe you need to reach out to Google." The issue was not really resolved because the issue might not be related to Microsoft but Google, et cetera. I just gave up.

Compared to AirWatch, I can upload APKs or I can just redirect the Play store link to push the apps. But in Intune for example, I'm forced to upload all the applications through the managed app store. To make it available is a different process, basically. There are some things that don't really stretch forward. 

If I upload a custom APK in the manage Play store and then I want to remove it, I cannot remove it myself. I need to send an email to Google and ask them to remove it. Then they will ask me to unpublish the app for 24 hours first. These are very simple things that I should be able to control myself, and it wastes a lot of time.

I think if you have the money and want something more stable, you should go for AirWatch. I don't think Microsoft is offering the same stability as VMware at this point. On other hand, I think the support from Microsoft is better, particularly the support in Asia. In VMware, all the support is from India, and sometimes I have a hard time with them.

Now that I'm starting to be familiar with the profiles, it's starting to get easier. A few weeks ago, there was a very odd issue that happened also related to MDM devices where we were using the manage home screen application to lock down the apps that we wanted to allow only the users to use, like the kiosk application.

We have configured the profile and have deployed to 200 or 300 devices. Some of our users called and said suddenly all the mobile devices were flashing. I don't know what happened, but it happened at the same time. The workaround that I had to do was to remove the manage home screen from the profile. Then all of the devices were kicked out and went back to the home screen of the devices. That was the only way they could resume the mobile devices. I don't know what happened, but something was wrong with the manage home screen app on that day because a few days after, I pushed back and everything resumed.

We have ROI because we are retiring AirWatch, so we're spending less and making the most of the free stuff.

The licensing is on a yearly basis.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.

We use it to a small extent for approximately 1,100 devices. The biggest portion of it is used in the Aviation department, which is one of our departments. They have invested heavily in some customized software that they've developed in-house. It is put on the devices, and the devices are primarily used by field staff. It's basically a mixture of work order assignment and work order management, as well as record keeping. For example, I could have a technician who is assigned to go and do a preventive maintenance inspection on an HVAC component in one of the terminals. That request or work order is submitted to his device. When he gets there, he scans barcodes for the room he is in and for the piece of equipment that he is working on. So, they track their actual work order, work order status, workloads, and equipment life cycle, and that's all done through Intune.

It helps us in securing devices. It has eliminated a lot of paperwork. It has simplified record-keeping and maintenance of equipment, life cycle management, staff workload, work hours, et cetera. That's the biggest impact on us, and that's also where most of the devices are used.

Its security is most valuable. It gives us a way to secure devices, not only those that are steady. We do have a few tablets and other devices, and it is a way for us to secure these devices and manage them. We know they're out there and what's their status. We can manage their life cycle and verify that they're updated properly.

It doesn't economize when you scale up. We have over 14,000 employees, and we have between 7,500 and 8,000 city-owned or personal devices being used to conduct city business. Its price can be improved. It is not a cheap solution.

It has been years since it was implemented.

Its stability has been fine. We've had no issues at all.

I don't see any issues with it. We currently have only about 1,100 users and licenses for the Intune product. The largest portion or over 50% of usage is by our Aviation department for tracking and managing their work order, workload,  equipment life cycle, etc. Other users are scattered in small numbers throughout a number of departments. 

Our Parts department also uses it. One thing that's a little bit unique is that they also have these assigned to temporary workers. So, we provide the licenses for a number of temporary workers for the summer or for the winter, and then we take them back and reassign them to somebody else. 

The other departments mostly use it for educational or small use cases where they think this will be a good fit, and it is the product that is available to them. I've heard nothing bad about it, and I have no problem at all with Intune.

In terms of future growth, we're currently looking at another product, but that doesn't mean we're going to go with that other product. We're working with a vendor on another solution, and that vendor also has a mobile device management product, but we're not yet ready to go there.

I've no direct input on it. Right now, we're on unified support, but we've always had their premier support. If we ever have a problem with any of our Microsoft products, including Intune, we do have a way to reach out and get additional assistance.

I'm not aware of any other solution being used. I know there were one or possibly two failed mobile device management project implementations. I was not a member of the department then, so I don't know the details. I only know that both of the deployments failed. In other words, either the vendor promises were not met, or we found a function that was supposed to exist but did not exist. 

It was pretty straightforward. It was not a very long, complex, and involved process. It was fairly easy to set up.

It was done in-house. For its maintenance, we have no one dedicated to it. Our client computing side takes care of that.

I've never tried to quantify an ROI for the program. We have just a small number of devices. At some point, we will look at implementing large-scale mobile device management, and that'll be a different case where we may look at Intune, Workspace ONE, or another product.

It is not a cheap solution. The price for a device when you start using it at a large scale can be improved.

It is covered under our enterprise agreement. We pay once a year. I am not aware of any additional costs.

It meets the basic security needs and management needs for most organizations. It allows you to monitor the security of devices and manage those devices if they're organization-owned. It is fairly easy and straightforward to manage. It is not difficult. Some of the other solutions are a little bit more difficult.

I would rate it an eight out of 10. It meets all the basic needs that most organizations will have for device management and device security. I am not sure if it can provide the required level of security for different business scenarios that require additional security, which means you'd have to run two systems in tandem.

We primarily use the solution for device management. 

There are a lot of use cases, however, the base is the mobile security for our corporate devices and deployment of applications. We are a worldwide organization and in many countries. There are also country-based use cases, or areas that incorporate these use cases for some specific business units such as healthcare and similar SAP solutions. We have a lot of small areas where we use this, however, the main driver is improving the security of the devices and providing some automation configuration for the users including VPN solutions and corporate WiFi connections, applications, et cetera.

If I compared this product to XenMobile, except the conditional access, which was also partially possible to integrate with Citrix XenMobile, then there is not much difference between the two. The functionality s very good. However, the main way this has improved our organization is that there is support for conditional access and native integration with Office 365 services which we migrated to. 

The integration with conditional access is great. That's maybe the most important aspect of the solution.

The pricing is very good.

We already use a lot of Microsoft products in our company, and therefore, it made sense to also use this product.

For the most part, the solution is stable.

As a cloud solution, the scalability on offer is great.

There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations.

We would like, for example, integrated remote control or a remote session tool or something like this. You must have TeamViewer and the integration with this is limited and it's extra money. Nothing is built-in. Some functionalities are really limited to fully managed devices and so on. It took a long time for them to integrate the big ECS infrastructure into the corporate devices. This is now done, however, it took a longer time than expected.

Technical support could be h=better.

We've used the solution for the last three years, starting with the integration. 

The solution is pretty stable. As it is in the cloud, there are not many issues in terms of a service outage or things like this. Maybe when there are new patches integrated every month, which sometimes happens, some functionality may be influenced or affected. It's more or less a small issue, however, issues are possible. I don't recall a situation where downtime happened or users were really affected, however. It's just an occasional issue we may have with a patch that we would need to address.

The solution is quite scalable. As a cloud product, there are no issues surrounding expanding if you need to. 

We have maybe 27,000 people using the solution at this time. There is a plan to have all mobile users in this solution, so we are talking about 70,000 users at some point. However, it's a question also of the licenses, as you have to have a license for that product.

Technical support is hit and miss. Sometimes it's really good and other times it's not so great.

We used Citrix Endpoint Management in the past. We used it about two years ago. It was a good product. They are comparable, really, Citrix and Microsoft. 

I was not involved from the beginning of the project. However, from what I remember, we did the implementation directly with the help of a support engineer from Microsoft. Their involvement ensured the setup was not such a big deal.

Deployment took maybe one year in our environment, however, this was because we had a lot of time to tune it up and to test it, to have a pilot for a few months and then add more people to the pilot before we started migrations for mobile, for example. We took our time to really prepare the product as best as possible and then deployed it to the users and migrated them over.

We have two levels of people at a global level that handle deployment and maintenance. They mostly focus on improving the environment, not troubleshooting WiFi issues. 

We had direct assistance from Microsoft. Their assistance made the process seamless and it was a positive experience.

The solution offers reasonable pricing.

It's my understanding that we have the licensing set up for monthly payments, however, it's not an aspect of the solution I'm directly involved with. I don't know enough about it.

That said, I am aware that, in order to have mobile involved, you need the EMS solution or EMS license, and that's an extra cost to the standard Office license.

We're just a customer and an end-user.

As we are on the cloud version of the solution, we are more or less on the latest version of the solution.

The product was chosen for political reasons, as the company is mostly using Microsoft products and also the prices were maybe better than other options. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. If they are already using Microsoft or 365, it's a good product for companies sot have. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.