Amazon AWS Reviews

I am a consultant and Amazon AWS is one of the platforms that I use.

The best features are flexibility and cost.

Scaling is an area that can be improved. For example, I would like to be able to change the amount of memory that is allocated to a server. This would give us better performance. I know that it can be done but it isn't obvious how to do it.

I have been working with Amazon AWS for between two and three years.

The technical support is good. We contacted them when we were working on a project and they were both knowledgeable and helpful.

The initial setup is easy.

There is some design that has to be done, including security and zoning.

The price for AWS is good.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We are using it for File Transfer Protocol (FTP) services. We are using it for file transfers from the US to India via FTP.

It is flexible. It is quite comfortable to use for organizations.

It just needs to be improved from the security perspective.

I have been using this solution for five years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We have 200 to 300 users currently, and we might increase its usage.

We don't have any challenges with technical support. We are fine with it.

There isn't much installation. It is just about hosting things, which doesn't take that much time. It was quite easy configuration-wise and implementation-wise.

We did it ourselves.

We evaluated Azure and other products.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Amazon AWS a ten out of ten.

I am the leader of a team that runs cloud operations for our clients. We work with AWS on a daily basis using it for synthetic and real use monitoring. Our company is partnered with AWS.

Since AWS came a bit later to the market, they are always improving and upgrading their platform.

They do not yet have a complete solution for APM monitoring. But this, along with real user monitoring, is something that they are actively working on improving.

I have been using AWS for about a year. 

The solution is very stable.

The solution is easily scalable.

My team and I have not needed to contact support.

In general, the initial setup was quite easy.

I would rate this product a seven out of ten.

We have just started to use this solution. We are using it for Amazon S3 Bucket.

The storage is most valuable. The gateway and documentation are also quite good.

Its price should be lower. The price for in-house usage should be different from production usage.

I have been using Amazon AWS for around a month.

I didn't use any other solution previously.

It was easy to install.

Its price should be lower. Currently, the price is the same if you are working in-house or in production. If you have to do internal testing or you are checking if things are working in-house, you need to pay for that, and the price is the same. The price for in-house usage should be different from production usage.

It is a good solution. I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

We use Amazon AWS for website hosting, application hosting, and serverless computing.

Everything is good. 

It is easy to use.

The performance is good.

It's also very economical.

The pricing is reasonable but there is always room to be better. 

If it was offered for free, it would be better.

I have been using Amazon AWS for three years.

We are using the latest version.

We have 20 people in our organization who are using Amazon AWS.

Technical support is okay.

I use Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud as well.

It's a cloud-based solution, there is no installation.

The price is quite reasonable.

With Amazon AWS, you pay as you go.

Definitely, I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

The services on offer are good.

I use the RDS a lot.

I've recently implemented more systems on Amazon. They integrate well with various other solutions.

Managing databases, and moving them from on-premises to the cloud is easy.

I need to read a bit more and figure out if the database configuration is off. I'm finding that the solution can sometimes be slow. 

If I have a complex database on the OCI and try to move in AWS, for example, sometimes I can't do it. I'd like it to be easier if possible. 

I'd like to see integration with MySQL.

I've been using the solution for two years. 

I've worked with Azure and Oracle as well. A big part of our database is on Oracle OCI. It might be as much as 70%.

I can handle the implementation process. I've done a few lately.

We're a customer and an end-user.

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

We have been using AWS for our own product. We are not direct users. Rather, our customers are using our product, which is hosted on AWS.

The cost should be reduced.

They should have a better big data stack.

We have been dealing with Amazon AWS for the last six years.

This product is stable and we plan to continue selling it in the future. All of our products are tightly integrated with AWS.

AWS is a scalable platform.

The technical support is good.

There is no installation for AWS, as it is a cloud product.

AWS is expensive and the cost should be reduced.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We mainly use AWS, EC2, and RDS. We also use the BI tools and the data warehouse.

The most important feature is deploying our production in multi-data regions around the world.

I think the price can be improved. The price is high now, and Amazon's web portal can be improved.

We have been using Amazon AWS for about four years.

Amazon AWS is a stable solution.

It's scalable now that EC2 can support scaling.

The initial setup is straightforward, and we deploy our production every week.

The price can be better. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a five.