Amazon AWS Reviews

We use Amazon AWS because it has really advanced parameters and suits our business.

I like that it helps us do everything really fast, and its advanced services.

The price could be better.

I've been using Amazon AWS for about four months.

Amazon AWS is stable, and there aren't any issues that I know about.

Amazon AWS is scalable.

I didn't notice any problems or issues related to this area, and everything was fine.

The initial setup wasn't easy because we implemented this process over two months, and it was a complex process.

It's an expensive product.

My company considered not only one provider, and it was really a complicated process to review all the providers. We had our checklist of all necessary requirements, and it was quite complicated. We chose AWS because of its advanced features that let us do everything quickly.

I would recommend this solution to new users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a nine.

We use Amazon AWS for storage, networking, and remote computing.

I like S3, load balancers, and Route 53.

The price could be better.

I have been using Amazon AWS for six years.

Amazon AWS is quite stable.

There are so many references that I can refer to, and their technical support is great.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The price, in general, could be better.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS an eight.

I like the storage, all the codes like Lambda and Amazon EMR.

The price could be better. 

I have been working with Amazon AWS for seven to eight years.

Amazon AWS is a stable solution.

Amazon AWS is scalable. Scalability has been good for us.

I didn't take part in the initial setup on a very hands-on level. However, I hear from my architects and the development team that it's straightforward.

It could be cheaper, and Amazon could also be more transparent with its pricing. I would first expect any product vendor to give me the utmost transparency on pricing information. There shouldn't be any hidden costs.

Their service offerings have a bit of segmentation, and they focus more on SMBs. They brought them onto the cloud and encouraged them to use solutions on the cloud. But strategically, they should probably improve that and offer some credits.

I would advise potential users to use Azure if they want more stability, but I always warn about the costs. That's why I don't bring infrastructure to the business, and I find the customers with their own environment. There are multiple portions, and it's not straightforward for anybody to do. That's the bad side of it, but anybody can prepare.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a seven.

The scalability of the product is excellent. 

The solution is pretty mature.

In general, the cost management in Amazon is complicated. It's not too straightforward. That's a little bit of a problem that they have. 

Sometimes, their interface is kind of old. We see that they're trying to move forward and modernize, however, they've gotten a little bit behind compared to, for example, Azure, which obviously started later, and yet, has a better interface. Not better. I would like it if it was easier to reach certain items.

We have quite a bit of experience with AWS.

We have found scalability to be the most useful aspect of the product so far. it's very easy to expand to whatever size you need. 

We also use Azure and Oracle. 

While AWS is more mature, Azure has updated its user interface and seems more modern in comparison.

We implement the solutions for our clients if they need us to. We deal with AWS, Azure, and Oracle for the most part.

We are an implementor.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been pleased with the solution's capabilities. 

The solution is useful in many ways. If you want to invest in on-prem infrastructure, it is going to be a huge cost. If you could add auto-scaling features and load balancing features on AWS Cloud, the e-commerce site can use the autoscale feature to handle any traffic threshold or additional workloads. I have two, three customers who are using this feature and they are getting benefits out of it.

Amazon, in terms of cloud infrastructure, is really robust.

The product is scalable.

They provide cutting-edge features compared to other cloud vendors. 

They offer many services that are unique to AWS. 

The availability is a good feature. They have certain criteria. For global virtualization, if you want to scale and operate across the world, AWS can provide the infrastructure without limiting the performance. They have those provisions such as availability. 

In terms of latency and other things, AWS is great.

The online knowledge base is very helpful and has a vast amount of information for users.

The solution could always have better performance. 

Some extensions are better than others. 

We'd like it if the solution was more secure. 

I've been dealing with the solution for over three years. It's been a while. 

The solution is robust and stable. The solution is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The solution is highly scalable, especially for the storage part. They have storage called S3 Object Store, which is virtually unlimited. You can scale it to an unlimited amount. It's great.

For AWS, if I compare it to Huawei, Huawei support, Huawei is better compared to AWS, however, AWS is better compared to Google and Oracle or SAP and all of those other clouds. Due to the fact that AWS has a very good knowledge base, you can easily find answers to any issue you might have. 

I've also used similar solutions such as Oracle and Azure. I've also dealt with Huawei.

As a cloud-based solution, there isn't really an installation process. 

While some clients will take a monthly subscription, we tend to do an SLA reseller with them for a one-year or three-year contract.

I'm a reseller.

As a cloud-based solution, we're always on the latest version. We don't have to manually update it. 

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten. Even compared to other solutions, such as Oracle and Azure, it is much better.

I've been a specialist for AWS for installation, however, I recommend solutions based on the company's requirements. However, it will help them in many ways. 

I primarily use it as a cloud-based platform that's easy to scale. 

The solution offers easy provisioning and scaling on the fly.

The performance is great.

Everything is very clear and there are no complex procedures to follow. it's a very easy-to-use solution. 

The integration is very good. Integrating anything with it is easy to do. 

In IBM we have IM, identity access management. For all the solutions in AWS, identity access is not quite so straightforward. Identity and access management on AWS could be made to be much more straightforward. That is something that they could work on. If they could work on that and use it for load balancing, that would be ideal.

I've been using the solution for a year and a half or so.

The solution performance well. The stability is very good. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The scalability is excellent. Whatever your needs are, if you need to grow, Amazon can handle it. 

We have 20 people working with the product currently.

I've never gotten to the point where I needed to reach out to technical support. I cannot speak to how helpful or responsive they would be.

We also use IBM. 

It's a cloud-based service. It's easy to set everything up. 

With the enterprise product, you have to pay for a license, however, if you are using the open-source version, you don't pay to license it.

We did not evaluate any other products before choosing AWS. 

As a cloud-based solution, we're using the latest version at all times. It's consistently updated.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

I would 100% recommend this product to other users and companies. 

Web developers use the solution for application building, modernization, cloud transformation, new development, and budget solutions. It has a wide variety of use cases.

The solution is very easy to use.

The product is nice and stable. Its performance is great.

The technical support has been good.

The solution could offer better integration capabilities.

The pricing is a bit high. It's an aspect they could improve upon.

I don't use it in my current organization. I used to use it in my earlier organization. In fact, I don't really use it, however, we used to consult on it. I've been a consultant for about a year or so.

The product is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. The performance is great.

At my organization, there are around 100 users on the solution.

Technical support has been good. I have not heard of any customer complaints. It's my understanding that they are helpful and responsive and users are satisfied with their level of service.

I was not a part of the installation process. I cannot speak to how easy or difficult the implementation was. I have no visibility on that aspect. I'm not sure what the makeup of the technical team was or how many people were used to deploy it.

The price of the solution can get expensive. They could work to lower it for their clients.

Those that use the licensing do need to pay a fee. It can be paid on a yearly or monthly basis.

I've worked as a consultant. 

We've been quite pleased with its capabilities. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten.

I'd recommend the product to other users or companies. 

It's quite stable and scalable. The price is good as well.

It would be good to see integration with a low code platform. They have one, but it is for intervention. It would be interesting to see it more developed.

I've been using Amazon AWS for a year and a half.

It's quite stable.

It's a scalable solution. It is used by our entire organization.

Our experience with technical support was as expected; they responded fast.

The price is quite good; it is a pay-as-you-go option.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Amazon AWS at eight.