Veeam Data Platform Reviews

Replicate several sites using VMware, centralise backup, and 10 agencies with Hyper-V and SQL databases.

Get only one interface to manage all backup sites, secure them with replication, and manage outside LTO media.

Replication and restore object in Exchange boxes with possibility to select part of Microsoft directory.

Support others operation systems, e.g., AIX. 

Add an archive option to support legal obligations.

• Instant Recovery
• ReFS support
• SureBackup

Faster and safer backups and restores means less time worrying.

• ReFS works
• Evacuation of backups
• Merge

For five years.

No issues.

No issues.

It provides the maximum level of support.

I have used all flavors of backup solutions since early 1990s, this is by far the most advanced yet and easiest product to use.

It was straightforward. Basically, it was start, next, then finish.

It can be costly if the wrong license type is chosen. It is important to know what is needed before ordering.

I have used all flavors of backup solutions since early 1990s, this is by far the most advanced yet and easiest product to use.

Use a skilled consultant for the initial setup, then let him/her teach you for a day and you are set.

Being agentless minimized the install process for new servers. If you are using folder on your backup configuration, all the new servers has been backuped without any intervention on the backup server.

It provides more efficiency to restore lost files that were deleted by users. It provides a restoring process for a complete server and replications on another site for the DRP servers.

Client/agent for non-virtualized servers: This can be improved by integrating them in the same way as the virtual servers and integrating them into the same backup jobs. Actually, the Veeam team recommends making separate jobs for these servers. The options of the job are not the same if it’s a VM or a physical server.

The best solution is to have the same functionality for a virtual or a physical server.

I have already discussed this point with a member of the Veeam development and he replied to me that it will be improved in Version10. We are waiting ;-)

More than 5 years

Nothing, the only problem encounter during installation is a Windows firewall problem but not linked directly to Veeam.

We have not had stability issues.

We have not had scalability issues.

Customer service is very reactive, you can open a call and be sure that's solved or helped on a 24h max.

I would give technical support a rating of 10/10 for fast replies and solutions.

We were using Symantec Backup Exec. We switched for the simplicity of management with Veeam.

The initial setup was straightforward, but now our infrastructure is more complex. We started with five servers and now we have more than 150 servers protected by the Veeam solution.

The pricing and licensing are reasonable.

We looked at Acronis, NetBackup, and Backup Exec.

No special advice, other than just follow the wizard and you can start faster than another solution.

Replication (fast recovery for replicated servers).

It has decreased downtime issues. By using replication, we decreased our downtime for crashed servers and having other service/system issues.

It is very simple and fast to power-on a replicated server, making it come online again.

I'm not sure if this option is available in new versions. But different types of licenses could not be used on the same Veeam server in the past, it would be good to be able to use mixed types of licenses in the same server.

About four years.

No, it is working nice and smooth.

No, because we are using this product in a small environment.

We do not encounter many problems with the product, but we do get an instant response when needed.

We are still using a different product for backup. Veeam is being used for replication only.

Since it was a single server setup, it was easy to install and configure.

It is acceptable for us because we having been using it for approximately four years. However, I think for new buyers/customers it may be cheaper than other products.

Another product is being used for backup. We did a PoC with Veeam, then bought it.

It is easy, with many features, (I think) it is cheaper. Very useful for virtual environments.

It is very easy to recover from crashes or create testing environments.

By using the “Instant VM Recovery”, we test new patches or features on a VM, which is the same as our production environment.

Our VMware License is the Enterprise Plus with Operations Management. For this reason, we only rely on Veeam for backups and a few tests.

Most of our activities are done using VMware itself.

Veeam has more features than we actually use, for example, the virtual labs.

They could integrate Veeam with the storage centers, in order not to use the Veeam Backup Repository Servers anymore.

I have used the solution for three years.

Our organization has always used the latest stable version of the Enterprise Edition.

No.

No. If we need to scale, we just create more proxy VMs to help with the extra load.

We rarely use Veeam's tech support. When we needed it, they were very helpful.

We had other backup solutions, but Veeam has proved to be better than VMware.

The initial setup was made by a consultant from Veeam. It took less than one week to have everything configured and ready for production.

The price for Veeam is better than other backup solutions that we have found out there.

Yes. We also use Bacula, but Veeam proved to be faster and more reliable.

First of all, find out what your backup needs are. After that, try an evaluation (or free) version.

Veeam's virtual lab is very useful for making use of existing backups for other purposes.

We use Veeam to protect our production environment without the need to install clients on every VM for every different MSFT applications that we have in production.

Veeam's been doing a good job in terms of delivering new features.

We have used this solution for more than 5 years.

The deployment was easy as pie.

There were no stability issues.

Our production environment is small but growing. So far, there have been no issues in terms of scalability for our use.

Customer service is pretty good. I would give them a rating of 7/10.

I never had to use technical support. The tool is pretty intuitive and we can solve most of the issues on our own.

It all comes down to cost.

The initial setup it was straightforward.

We did an in-house implementation.

Talk to your Veeam rep.

The solution scales in an easy and intuitive way.

Instant Recovery is an amazing feature which reduces the recovery time from hours or sometimes from days to minutes. It enhances the business continuity results.

With the Instant Recovery, you can run the virtual machine from the backup repository at any disaster time. The users can access data and applications within a maximum of two minutes.

I have used this solution for three years.

There were no stability issues.

There were no scalability issues.

I would rate the technical support a a seven out of 10.

We still use other solutions to back up the physical environment, since Veeam only supports virtual machines.

The setup was very easy and straightforward, i.e., without any problems.

I always recommend using all the Veeam features, not only to just create backup jobs.

Veeam is not only a backup software, it helps your organization for business continuity and disaster recovery as well.

Before Veeam our customer used to backup data with obsolete tools and had no central console management, so every site had single task to be checked everyday. Now, he receives the full backup report as an email attachment everyday.

The WAN accelerator feature has been the most valuable for me. My customer was in trouble because he found a huge quantity of data to be moved from foreign countries sites to the HQ in Milan. That feature reduced the time needed to complete the task from 25 days to less than a week! This is compared with the original tools used: ntbackup, robocopy and Windows Server Backup.

I think user support can be more analytic. Some support replies for a broken backup task have been "rebuild the job from scratch" and this is a bad thing to do if you have many VMs and repositories.

During a WAN copy we found an issue that if the connection drops and the program reaches the retry limit, sometimes this damages of the backup chain. Strangely, the program runs the day after but it looses the retention points number. For instance, if I set up a 30 day retention point, instead of deleting the oldest file and merging the new one, it keeps going on till the repository is full.

I did not encounter any issue with scalability.

I would rate support 7/10.

I used many other tools: Acronis, vSphere Data Protection, Symantec BES. I moved to Veeam because I initially found many high level features missing in the other tools. Now the gap is thinned, but I feel more confident with Veeam.

The initial setup has not been simple due to the complexity of the customer's infrastructure and the number of features to be aware of. Veeam initially can be complex. If you want to enable all the modules, you must know how Veeam organizes its console and where to find a feature.

I think the price is good when you choose the Essentials Suite, but when you buy a full featured version (for instance the Enterprise Plus) the price is a little bit expensive. This is typical when a company becomes an industry leader.

We evaluated Veritas Backup Exec, Acronis and many others, but Veeam was clearly better. That is the reason why we switched.

If you have a complex environment, first study well how Veeam works. Having some days of training before is better than loosing some weeks after to rebuild the logical structure and jobs many times.