UiPath Reviews

• Automating web applications is the primary use for my organisation.
• Also, data scrapping is another main usage.

• Improvement in the way of quick and fast automation development.
• Functional testers have changed as an automation test engineer.

• Web automation is the most valuable.
• Locating an element and adding the conditions are very easy compared to other tools.

• Everything is awesome; no improvement is needed at this stage.
• One word to say about UiPath is, it is simply great.

Excellent.

Excellent.

It has the best service.

Earlier we were using Selenium for test automation in our organisation.

The setup is simple, nothing complex to understand.

I didn't implement it through vendor teams.

Good.

Reasonable pricing. If there can be a decrease for individual learners/developers.

Before taking part in UiPath, I have used the trial version of Automation Anywhere.

If mobile automation is included in UiPath, it would be great.

Data transfer between different apps is the main use case for us.

We've been using UiPath in plenty of business processes with great results. It's made our lives easier by automating data entry between different applications, reducing to a minimum repetitive work that everybody hates doing. Our teams have won a lot of time they now use in more interesting tasks where they can really make a difference.

• Great UX and very intuitive UI
• Fast and easy to learn
• Simple to configure with Orchestrator
• Works with most web apps and desktop apps, including Citrix
• UiExplorer is a fantastic help
• Can be used in attended or unattended modes.

• Debugging mode has room for improvement
• Sluggish to develop when several XAML files are open
• Price for large projects.

The most relevant use cases are business processes that include repetitive human tasks that make use of different apps in a common workflow.

There are lots of opportunities to improve these business processes in terms of efficiency, time taken, and error rates.

• Good workflow capabilities
• E-learning and training academy
• Fully robotized and human-assisted automation
• A broad set of applications supported
• VB.NET and C# for developers make it easy to get started.

• Price could be an issue for large projects, but that's where you'll get a high ROI too.
• The collection of applications supported can grow, but we've seen it's happening in the last versions.

Automating various processes in systems such as SAP, Windows automation, and Excel. By making generic components, we are able to reuse them for various projects and clients.

This solution has enabled us to automate repetitive processes in an easy manner which has improved our KPIs. It's not that time-consuming to automate processes.

UiPath has a very easy drag-and-drop interface, which makes automating processes a breeze. The activities make you do most things, and if not, you have the option to custom-code them in .NET.

• Some features feel a bit buggy, and older versions are prone to crash. 
• Double screen support would be nice. 
• More AI and ML support.

It is extremely helpful with our invoicing process. 

The key benefits are the reduction of the non-litigated tasks for our clients. It reduces time and staff needed to deal with these tasks. 

The automation process is helpful. 

I would like UIPath to improve the OCR visuals. Also, I wonder if one day the automation tools will be able to make simple decisions by themselves. 

It scales up easily. 

The initial setup was not complex. 

The pricing is reasonable.

I use it professionally to build software robots for an international company.

My organization is spanning across multiple countries so it's hard for me to see UiPath's influence. However, in my office, we are yet to implement the first solutions.

The most valuable features of this solution are:

• Custom components that can be found on UiPath Go!
  
• Debugger with variable watch capability.
• The UI Explorer can examine the underlying structure of the application's user interface.

I would like to see the replacement of VB.NET with some more popular programming language as the program's backbone.

I've been using UiPath for around one year.

We started with UiPath to automate activities that required gathering data from different applications and posting the data to another app.

Reduced FTE and a significant reduction in errors. Also, the processes can now be scheduled using Orchestrator and can be scheduled 24x7.

• Tool has a macro recording feature that can generate the code for you automatically.
• The recent computer vision AI feature. This feature helps recording for remote desktop and citrix environment and enables recording by converting images to textboxes and other window controls. As a result, recording feature for remote environment is now like recording for local environment

Improvement in the parsing of PDF files.

Stability is a risk with automation tools. Any change in GUI can break the recording. Hoping for more features in the tool to support it

With option to buy multiple licenses and use of orchestrator that can run across multiple servers, UIPath seems scalable

no

I am using Community Edition which is free

no

I am working in a virtual desktop client machine. I have been working as a .NET and RPA UiPath developer. I have an overall of three years of experience in UiPath. I have automated individually, or with a team, and I have successfully completed more projects and also got rewarded.

It reduces human work and is time-saving. I am automating the insurance based project. All insurance claims are automatically validated and verified, and it sends the mail to the user automatically without human help and without any error. In RPA, UiPath is awesome.

Overall, it's good. The selector and keyboard CTRL clicks are very useful to handle the difficult scenarios. Basically, the UI is dynamically changed. The dynamic selector is very useful to select the controls.

Debugging and intelligence window. Sometimes it's difficult to debug the code. It gets stuck and closes automatically, or the VDX stops. Might be better if you improve the debugging it has to advantage.