We are using the solution internally for policy purposes in our data center. We use the firewall for certain routes for client connectivity.
Information Technology Support Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
An inexpensive and stable solution with good functionality and user interface, but should offer an antivirus feature
Pros and Cons
- "I like the functionality and the user interface."
- "I wish to see an antivirus feature added to the solution."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I like the functionality and the user interface. The solution has a better graphic interface than that of Cisco.
What needs improvement?
I wish to see an antivirus feature added to the solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I believe we have been using Sophos XG for more than three years.
Buyer's Guide
Sophos XG
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about Sophos XG. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has better stability than Cisco, which is why I prefer it over other firewalls.
How are customer service and support?
I have not had need for technical support. Mostly, I find what I am looking for on the internet.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy.
What about the implementation team?
I handled the implementation by myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is not expensive since one pays as he goes. He pays just for the functionality he requires, meaning there is no need to pay for all that Sophos offers. If a person needs email protection, he will pay just for this. The same holds true if he needs web filtering.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The solution is more stable than Cisco, which is why I like it better than the other firewalls.
What other advice do I have?
The firewall does not connect to the internet. It is not firewall edge. We use the solution as a data center firewall.
I would recommend the solution because it provides the greatest firewall protection.
I rate Sophos XG as a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner

Head of ICT Infrastructure and Security at City of Harare
Easy to set up with great protection features and excellent documentation
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is very straightforward and the solution is extremely user-friendly."
- "I'd like the dashboard to be improved. It could be a bit more customizable."
What is our primary use case?
We use Sophos Firewall for our environment.
The Sophos Firewall, from our interaction and the way we are using it, is a very effective network security solution that basically protects our infrastructure, identifies any infections or any network security threats that actually may happen within our environment. We also are able to manage our users in terms of bandwidth usage and the allocation of bandwidth, whereby we give our users restricted access for use during working hours and they are supposed to utilize the bandwidth and make sure that we optimize and prioritize the applications able to get the necessary bandwidth. We do use it to manage our bandwidth. We do use it as well to make sure that our environment is secure against any possible threats.
What is most valuable?
In terms of the Sophos XG Firewall, what really excites us is basically the issue of intrusion detection and the intrusion prevention features. Those are both very, very good.
The issue of sandboxing as well is something that is very useful. It's able to protect our environment quite well.
Email protection is something that we are basically using all the time and it protects our environment which has more than 2000 users.
All of the protection features are great in terms of securing our environment.
Sophos is way ahead of a number of other products in terms of the enhancements and upgrades they offer.
Sophos offers a great centralized dashboard that makes it easy to see what's happening on your network.
The initial setup is very straightforward and the solution is extremely user-friendly.
The documentation is very, very good.
What needs improvement?
In terms of the product, from the way that we have been utilizing it, we have noticed that the vendor has been able to continuously upgrade and upgrade and update the product with new features. You'd find that all the time a new release has come out, and we're actually happy with that. We don't find it inconvenient that we are constantly upgrading.
I can't think of any downsides in terms of the features on offer.
I'd like the dashboard to be improved. It could be a bit more customizable.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have about five years of experience with the product.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We are very satisfied with the functionality. We are very satisfied with the way that it is securing our environment. The stability has been excellent.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 2,000 users on the solution currently.
The solution is very scalable. We basically started with about 900 users. We went up to about 1,300. As we went up, as our users increased, we also scaled it up in terms of protection. Sophos was able to scale up easily and protect all our end users as well as our environment. It's been great overall.
We do plan to increase usage. Our employee base is about 10,000. We have 2,000 networked employees and we are planning to add another 1,000 users by the end of the year.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support has been great. All of our technical staff have been certified as Sophos administrators. They were able to offer us the training to make sure that all of the support staff are familiar with the functionality of the product. Then, in terms of technical support that we may need, when we call the Sophos team, they are usually very available and they are even able to support us remotely if there is a need to do that. We are extremely satisfied overall.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I also often work with Cisco's ASA Firewall as well as Nagios. We bought Sophos to complement the ASA firewall.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very, very straightforward. You find that we did not even require a lot of external help from the vendor. It's so straightforward. The documentation is quite comprehensive and it takes the user through a step-by-step process, It's very user-friendly.
For the firewall as well as deployment of the end-user, the email protection as well as the sandbox, and the like, it took us approximately three days to finalize everything for our entire environment. We had over a hundred network sites, which are dotted through the city of Harare, therefore, we knew that we had to make sure that deployment was done fully throughout the entire environment.
What about the implementation team?
There was very minimal, minimal assistance from the vendor. The vendor, here and there, would assist if we requested their help. However, you'd find that in most of the installations we did in-house, we didn't need the vendor to do anything. We knew that the installation process was very user-friendly.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of procuring this product is very reasonable and it's very affordable for most organizations.
What other advice do I have?
We're a customer and an end-user.
We use the latest version of the product.
I'd advise those considering the solution that Sophos' security solution is highly synchronized, very secure, and provides comprehensive security. I'd like them to know that it has enhanced and very detailed and sophisticated functionality, which is really easy to use, easy to deploy, and very user-friendly. It is a product that I would highly recommend for any organization that needs to comprehensively secure its infrastructure.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Sophos XG
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about Sophos XG. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Manager at Thyme IT
A rock-solid and sensible product that works very well, comes at a fair price, and requires minimal handling
Pros and Cons
- "There are many features. VPN, firewalling, and intrusion detection are the main features that are most useful for us at this time."
- "Their support is fairly good, and they come back to me. I've had an issue once or twice where I couldn't understand what the support person was saying because those calls were probably routed to India. They were a bit difficult to understand, but it is generally not an issue."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for firewalling. Lately, we are also using it for remote access or VPN access for the users to the firewall and then onto the local network for people working from home. We've seen a huge jump in work from home. Everybody is working from home, so we need a secure connection to the office.
I am not using its latest version. I normally wait for a couple of months before upgrading the unit to make sure there are no bugs or issues. I check on the forums to see what other people are saying and whether there are any issues.
What is most valuable?
There are many features. VPN, firewalling, and intrusion detection are the main features that are most useful for us at this time.
What needs improvement?
Their support is fairly good, and they come back to me. I've had an issue once or twice where I couldn't understand what the support person was saying because those calls were probably routed to India. They were a bit difficult to understand, but it is generally not an issue.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. We've been dealing with it for such a long time. We know exactly how to set it up. Sometimes, clients have got funny ideas, and I just say to them, "You tell me what you need, and I'll do the config and set it up." I've got two clients who have got technical skills. One of them is fairly proficient on Sophos, so he does the work as well, but for most of our other clients, we set it up, and there are no issues. It just works.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable provided you purchase the correct product. We do a bit of homework. We don't just sell you the first device on the list because that's not always suitable. We do a scope of the client's business. They may be a startup with just five users, but they might have a plan to have 100 or 200 users. We need to just size according to what they anticipate to be. It is no good if we sell them an entry-level device now, and two months later, it is too small. We purchase according to a client's requirements.
We've got clients with four users, and the number can go up to hundreds. I'm currently busy setting one up for 150 users, and obviously, there is much more work involved in doing the remote VPN setups.
How are customer service and technical support?
I use the local support in South Africa. If they can't help me, then I log a case with their international support. They're fairly good, and they come back to me.
I've had an issue once or twice where I couldn't understand what the support person was saying because those calls were probably routed to India. They were a bit difficult to understand. They spoke so fast, and I could not hear what they were saying, but it is generally not an issue. It is not a showstopper, and we manage to work. If I don't understand, I say to them, "Can we rather chat by email?", which makes it a lot easier.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
There some other firewalls that my company is using, but they're way below in terms of specs and what they can do. Sophos XG is a layer 7 firewall, and most of the others are only layer 2 firewalls. Sophos is far superior.
I do not have any knowledge about Cisco, Juniper, or other firewalls. I don't really use them. I use some open-source firewalls, but they're also a lot lighter. I've got one or two very small clients or non-profits where we run an open-source firewall, but the feature set is way limited compared to Sophos.
Sophos XG comes in at a fair price as compared to some of the other products out there. Its learning curve wasn't that steep. It makes sense, and it is a sensible product. It is not like some of the other products.
How was the initial setup?
It is simple for me. I've done so many setups. I can probably do these things in my sleep. In fact, I have got one in front of me now that I need to configure and install. I'm fairly proficient in the use of these devices. I'm happy with it.
The deployment duration depends on the setup. Some simple setups can be up and running within two hours. Complex ones most probably will take four to six hours. It also depends on the client's needs. Some of them have simple requirements, and they just want firewalling and one or two remote-access VPNs. Others have got a complex setup where we need to set up cameras and VoIP telephone systems. It all depends on a client's requirements.
It doesn't require any maintenance because the definitions are auto-updated. I've got a dashboard where I can manage all of the firewall devices from one dashboard. If I want to upgrade the software on 20 of them, I'll log onto the dashboard and upgrade the software just by selecting it and saying upgrade the software, and it is done. It requires very minimal handling on a day-to-day basis. Antivirus definitions, scanning definitions, and all those things are auto-updated anyway.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It comes at a fair price as compared to some of the other products out there. Its price is in the middle. It is not the cheapest, and it is also not as expensive as Juniper, Check Point, and definitely Cisco. Nowadays, everybody is very cost-sensitive, and people don't want to spend unnecessary money, but even before that, it was a fairly priced product.
You've got your choice of what license you want. There are basically two types of licenses, and it depends on what you need to do, and everything is included in that license. There is no cost for VPN and DMZ. You purchase the license, and you know upfront what you're getting or what you're not getting, and that's it. It is one license fee and done and dusted.
What other advice do I have?
I would definitely recommend this solution to others. I recommend it to all my clients. I'm using it at home as well, and it works great. I'm fairly proficient in it, so I'm very confident. I can recommend it to anybody and everybody. It is a great product, and I've got no issue with it.
I would rate Sophos XG a ten out of ten. It is a rock-solid product that works. We've so many deployments of this solution. I'm just happy with it.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
CEO at MARVIV SRLS
Light and stable with excellent real-time control
Pros and Cons
- "It's a product that is in continuous improvement and is following what the customer is asking for. They are taking inputs and designing new releases specifically according to the client and their needs."
- "The solution could offer a bit more integration with other systems, with other platforms - just to be able to extend the capability and to interface with other kinds of platforms or systems that I can find on the market as it gives the possibility to improve the level of integration."
What is our primary use case?
I'm using the solution mainly for its firewall application and to prevent intrusion in the system. The XG platform is very powerful from the perspective of identification and to prevent potential attacks on the system due to its the capacity to predict and to anticipate the potential damage on the system.
It's integrated inside the system, meaning that it can control all the endpoints in the system and talk with them and identify any potential situation. It can also isolate one area inside the system without compromising the entire system. This allows you to isolate the initial problem without involving the entire infrastructure.
You have real-time control of all your infrastructure. It is integrated with the hardware and offers good performance alongside the hardware and by the firmware, and these work together to control the entire infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
The real-time control on offer is excellent.
We really appreciate that you can segment and quarantine certain sections of your system without having to shut down the entire operation.
The product has artificial intelligence that has the capability to quickly identify which could be the potential risk mainly for intrusions like ransomware or a new kind of typology of attacks that are in place right now.
The idea is to mainly prevent the condition and not to manage the situation, as, if that happens, in many ways, it's already too late. It's to identify the condition that can help the company to prevent or mainly to reduce the risk of an intrusion. In that sense, its performance is excellent.
The product is doing it job without affecting the system with a heavy load. The activity on offer is very light in terms of resources that are required by the system. It does not require a lot of resources in terms of memory, et cetera. There is no performance impact on the system. The customer doesn't detect its presence on the system when it's working, and yet they still get all of the great benefits of protection.
The solution has been quite stable.
It's a product that is in continuous improvement and is following what the customer is asking. They are taking inputs and designing new releases specifically according to the client and their needs.
It's one of the best products on the market as it really understands where the market is moving and iterates based on the future. It's constantly improving. It does a great job at keeping confidentiality while guaranteeing security.
The solution doesn't just offer theoretical security, it really does offer very good, real-time security and delivers on its promise to the client.
What needs improvement?
There is no specific features request right now really. I see that all the features that Sophos is implementing and is proposing on the market follow exactly what the market is asking. It's difficult to identify something that is missing compared with what the market can ask as one of the most important things that Sophos does is have the capability to anticipate in a certain way what the market expects. As a leader on the market, they tend to have the solution just before the market is asking them for it.
The solution could offer a bit more integration with other systems, with other platforms - just to be able to extend the capability and to interface with other kinds of platforms or systems that I can find on the market as it gives the possibility to improve the level of integration.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is quite scalable. You have to consider that all Sophos products are scalable. This is one of the main characteristics of the system. It means that you can start with a base solution that is very simple and improve this step by step without losing what you have done in the past. It's scalable in the sense that you have a different layout that you can cover, however, you don't have to dismiss what you have done in the past. You have just to integrate. In this way, if you consider the cost of implementation for the company, it has the possibility to optimize the cost because the company has the possibility to appreciate the system initially, and then improve the system step by step without losing what has been done in the past.
This means the company has the possibility to distribute the cost if you're in a certain period of growth. Normally some companies start to say, "I want to guarantee to control to the outside with a certificate and give the possibility to access my data in a controlled way. After that, I want to extend the security on the email that is managed by the company. I want to encrypt the data on the server and so on." All these features can be approached in a step-by-step manner instead of all at once, and you can implement them on the system in different ways and at different times.
We normally have about 50 users and around five technicians.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I also currently use Cisco products alongside Sophos.
However, we did not previously use a solution that was different from Sophos.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not so complicated. The system is not complicated to understand and also in can be installed without a very high level of expertise. Of course, if you have this kind of expertise, you can obtain from the system the maximum performance that the system can do, however, it means that you are not obliged to be a guru to be able to use these kinds of products. You can use these kinds of products just as an IT manager inside the company without having or needing special knowledge.
Otherwise, you can leave to Sophos with the capability of doing something like a close box. You are sure that Sophos is able to guarantee the level of security that you are expecting. You can have it be automatic, or you can choose to go more manual in its operations. For example, if you were a professional photographer, you'd probably like a manual experience, as it would allow you more leeway with your craft, and if you were an amateur, you 'ld likely prefer an automatic camera that handles the heavy lifting for you. Sophos, in that sense, is the same. If you want, you can configure single parameters, or you can leave it to Sophos to give you something out-of-the-box.
In any case, if you stay on the automatic configuration, you are guaranteed that the system can provide the correct level of service that you want. It means that it's not required to have an expert. That said, you need of course to have a minimum level of knowledge, as it's clear that you need to know what you are managing. Starting from that, you can obtain what you need without moving into an advanced configuration.
Typically, a configuration takes about half a day or so, if you go that route. It doesn't take long, as those who would handle it would know what they are doing.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation ourselves, in-house. We did not need the assistance of an implementor or consultant. I have enough knowledge on the solution to manage it myself.
What other advice do I have?
I'm mainly a user. Sometimes I handle installations.
I'm using the latest version of the solution. I don't have the version number on-hand.
We do plan on continuing to use the solution. I've been quite please with it overall.
I would recommend the solution to others. It's worked quite well so far and really leads the market.
I would rate the solution at a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Network Architect at Virtua Technologies
Easy to set up, offers central management, the support is good, and it handles endpoint security
Pros and Cons
- "If you want to install antivirus and firewalling on endpoints, then Sophos is the best option."
- "The SD-WAN capability is not as good as it is in FortiGate, and is something that should be improved."
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and this is one of the security solutions that we implement for our clients. The primary use for Sophos XG is to secure the internet for an organization. It does a bit of antivirus scanning, application filtering, web filtering, and normal firewalling. Security, obviously.
Some of our clients also have Sophos UAP and access points are also included in Sophos, which is the same with FortiGate.
What is most valuable?
Sophos XG is easy to manage. You've got the cloud logging and you can manage all of your Sophos firewalls from one cloud, the Sophos Central Portal.
The most valuable feature is endpoint security. If you want to install antivirus and firewalling on endpoints, then Sophos is the best option.
What needs improvement?
What I don't like about Sophos is that applying policies can sometimes take longer, and there can even be a bit of a network interruption. With FortiGate, it's just one click and then you go, but with Sophos, sometimes the wheel keeps spinning for several seconds.
The SD-WAN capability is not as good as it is in FortiGate, and is something that should be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Sophos XG for approximately two and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability-wise, it's almost as good as FortiGate.
I've been selling FortiGate for 10 years and Sophos for two and a half years. I think that Sophos is just about on par with FortiGate. We just had a small thing with a client, but I don't know if that's really going to be reason enough. In terms of stability, I think they are quite good. The issue we had was the locks, and it was causing slowness or interruptions, but that was really not an issue. It's a small thing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Sophos XG is very scalable. You can go from small to large-sized use cases.
How are customer service and technical support?
I think that the technical support is very good, and similar to FortiGate,
I actually dealt directly with a Sophos engineer and I must admit, they've been very fortunate that the guy can help even on the weekends and so forth. I'm very impressed with that.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I primarily work with FortiGate, but I am currently dabbling in OPNSense to see if I can learn it. I've also installed Cisco in the past, as well as Sophos.
Although about 80% of our clients ask for FortiGate, some of our clients ask for Sophos instead. For example, there are some banks and commercial institutions that ask for Sophos.
Sophos is better than FortiGate with respect to endpoint protection.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is as easy as it is with FortiGate. These products are definitely easier to install than a solution like OPNsense because it is just a hardware appliance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of this solution is mid-range. Obviously, it will never beat OPNsense because that product is available free of charge. Sophos XG is not expensive for a firewall, especially when you compare it with Check Point. Check Point is a really expensive product.
Sophos XG is a bit more expensive than companies like BitDefender and Kaspersky, but their endpoint software is very good.
What other advice do I have?
The suitability of this product depends on the use case. If somebody wants to have full endpoint protection then Sophos is the best choice. If they just want a normal UTM without endpoint software, then FortiGate is slightly better, but only slightly because of the SD-WAN capabilities.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
Senior IT Consultant - Sophos Architect at ARENTIA S.A.
A powerful and cost-effective web application firewall solution
Pros and Cons
- "The web application firewall reverse proxy is very good."
- "Sophos can improve the debugging of the WAPS function."
What is our primary use case?
We essentially use Sophos XG to protect our customers. Most of our customers use remote VPN connections. They also use the WAF protection for exposed internet WEB servers.
What is most valuable?
The web application firewall or WAF is very useful. Web application firewalls help keep your servers safe from hackers by scanning activity and identifying probes and attacks.
Using the Web Application Firewall (WAF), also known as reverse proxy, Sophos
UTM lets you protect your webservers from attacks and malicious
behavior like cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, directory
traversal, and other potent attacks against your servers.
You can define external addresses (virtual webservers) which should be
translated into the "real" machines in place of using the DNAT rule(s).
From there, servers can be protected using a variety of patterns and
detection methods.
This function has been completely re-developed in XG, relatively of the UTM-9 version, and it works fine. I protect many internet web servers (IIS) for my customers with this function, due to of a lot of attempted attacks. It's a very useful and relatively simple to implement in Sophos XG.
Obviously, like all security systems, it is not a "fire and forget" configuration. It is necessary to properly analyze the system to be protected, create an appropriate policy and monitor its behavior once activated.
What needs improvement?
I think Sophos XG can improve some annex features. Like in DHCP, we can't make IP reservations in the range. We must reserve out of the range, which is not good. It will not be the same as the DHCP function in a Windows Server. We can't make an IP reservation in the range of the DHCP in the Sophos.
Better in the next release? I hope...
Sophos can also improve the debugging of the WAF function and provide a better resolution in the log, in the attached WEB log. The initial error doesn't appear. You must tail the console log to find the source pattern, cause of the error.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Sophos XG for about tree years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Sophos XG is stable. I don't encounter problems that are typical with broken systems. But bugs in the system exists. Last example, I discovered a bug is in the asymmetric routing implementation. In a specific network configuration, asymmetric routing, with sub-net 25 doesn't work, but mask 24 and mask 26 works!!
But this is just a bug, and Sophos' support is very good to correct quickly, ASAP.
I only had a break function once because of the appliance BIOS. The Sophos support send me a new BIOS very quickly, and the problem was resolved.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have a lot of issues with Sophos technical support. I still have some pending issues that need to be resolved. It's very odd in the beginning because your first contact is with the sub-part of another sub-part of Sophos based in India or Pakistan. It's very odd to have a quick connection with the second level or third level engineer at Sophos in UK.
I have personal contact with some security managers and the sub-part manager of Sophos support. When they don't resolve a problem quickly, I send an email, or I call my contacts Sophos UK, and it happens! They have good reactivity.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We start with Sophos UTM-9, the old version of Sophos firewalls, and then we switched to the XG.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of the last version of Sophos XG is good. The initialization is very simple, but you must prepare it. You need an Sophos customer account , on the web cell, to declare easy a firewall.
It'll ask for an account, and you can create it in the interface, but it's better to prepare it before in the Sophos site, to have the account ready, for the first initialization of the firewall.
The deployment time depends on the system's complexity, the number of ISPs, the number of sub-nets, WAF functions and VPNs.
It's normally very easy for a little company. A retail company with 20-30 computer-users, and a simple connection to the internet, it'll take about four to six-hours to deploy. If you need to fine-tune it, maybe two hours more. So like eight hours or a day to deploy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Sophos XG isn't expensive compared to Check Point. Sure, Check Point is the Rolls-Royce of firewalls: It's great, it's fun, technically good tunned, but it's very expensive.
But the specs and technical side of Sophos XG are close to Check Point, and the price is lower. It's better for our customers. I can do the same complex configurations with Sophos XG that I used to do on Check Point firewalls.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The main difference between Sophos XG and Check Point is keylogging and working with clouds. Both FortiGate and Watchguard doesn't have in log packet analyzer to do so deeply.
For me personally, Check Point firewall is the best firewall, because the log console is the power key of the firewalls. But Sophos XG is the main challenger of Check Point, I think. You can open the debugging packet analyzer, like a Wireshark, directly in the WEB log console. This function is a powerful tool and must be discovered, because it's very useful for quick debugging.
If I had to rank them, it's Check Point first, second, Sophos XG, and in third with FortiGate and Watchguard. We chose Sophos XG because it's much cheaper than Check Point.
What other advice do I have?
I think it's very important to choose the right appliance first. Implementing a lot of things like VPN, IPS strong protection and WAF functions will stress more the appliance CPU. It depend also with the number of connections and number of users too.
Sophos XG is a lot of fun because you can change the appliance model without changing the configuration. You can back-up the configuration of the old appliance and import into the new appliance without spending hour for migration. It's powerful, and the new system is quickly operational.
Another key is VPN LAN to LAN in SSL, allowing connections to be set up much faster. Is this the end of the old IPSEC protocol? No, but it is a function which increases the versatility of the Sophos XG firewall.
Last, but not least, the virtual appliance works perfectly, in private or public clouds. Very simple to implement, work perfectly.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Sophos XG a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. ARENTIA S.A. - Sophos Gold Partner
Av. Francisco Sá Carneiro 380
2415-376 Leiria - Portugal
CTO at Kingsway Hospitals
A great UI with very intuitive features; comprehensive documentation ensuring issues are easily resolved
Pros and Cons
- "Great interface and in-built help is very intuitive."
- "Lacking network access control, user profiling and analytics dashboards."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case of this solution is for protection and to have better governance for our LAN usage. I've got a lot of people working from outside on the corporate infra and all policy based decisions happen there. The solution is basically a firewall that protects us from various internet threats, but other than that provides controlled and properly managed access using various rules of VPN and other fingerprints of people logging in. I'm the CTO of the company and we are customers of Sophos.
What is most valuable?
The interface is great and easy to understand. Any firewall engineer who has medium to moderate experience on bylaws, can easily understand the UI. The language presented on various features and the in-built help, is very intuitive. If you have a problem you can figure it out there and then. As a result, there is less probability that we'll call tech support.
What needs improvement?
The solution really needs some additional features like network access control. If they could incorporate some user profiling and present the analytics of the login user usage patterns, or a typical proper management dashboard to take a decision on the firewall rules, that would be useful. Basically, MI's and the dashboard could be more user friendly. The information is there but the dashboards are not in a graphical format. In short, I'd like to see network access control, user profiling and analytics dashboards. It would make the solution a more competitive product on the market.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for over four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution. I haven't had any firewall crashes or any non-performing rules for over two years. We are a hospital so all the lights of all the devices should be on 24/7, 365 days a year.
We manage and control around 250-300 internal users. There would probably be another 75-100 logging in externally.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is definitely a scalable solution. The way we've configured it, if a device goes down, it can be shut off and removed from the network for repairs or updates and our second firewall automatically takes the load.
How are customer service and technical support?
We only used technical support during our initial deployment. After that, we didn't need support because the product was working perfectly well. We trained ourselves on the newer software and we are capable of managing and maintaining our own firewalls. In addition, Sophos provides online documentation which is very user friendly. If you follow the steps you get the result.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used Cisco's firewall ASA and it was extensively implemented in my earlier role. The main reason to migrate to Sophos was due to their aggressiveness in terms of pricing but also the fact that they had features that Cisco did not have.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took somewhere between six and eight hours.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There's no annual licensing fee. When we purchased the product, it was with a five year agreement bundled in with the product price and the recent rollout is not yet five years old. When we renew, we'll renegotiate. I can't differentiate between the product costs and the licensing costs at this point. We're very lucky that we get one of the best deals in the country in terms of pricing. The Sophos-backed pre-sales and implementation team were very cooperative and collaborative which really helped us make the decision to choose Sophos.
What other advice do I have?
I would definitely recommend this solution but it's only suitable if it fits the needs of the company so I would suggest carrying out some research. Why does the company need a firewall? What rules do they want to deploy on the firewall? Based on the answers to those questions the company can make a call.
I would rate this solution a nine out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Consultant at Hitech Network Solution
Can be deployed easily and quickly, and the antivirus features are valuable
Pros and Cons
- "The antivirus features are valuable."
- "The price should be cheaper."
What is most valuable?
The antivirus features are valuable.
What needs improvement?
The price should be cheaper. Xstream must be included in future releases.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the tool’s stability a seven out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten. Our clients are SMBs.
How was the initial setup?
I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten. The solution is deployed both on-premise and on the cloud. The deployment takes half an hour.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
We are distributors. We sell the solution. We have many customers. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Sophos XG Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
FirewallsPopular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
Netgate pfSense
OPNsense
Cisco Secure Firewall
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
Check Point NGFW
Azure Firewall
WatchGuard Firebox
SonicWall TZ
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
Sophos XGS
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
SonicWall NSa
Untangle NG Firewall
KerioControl
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Sophos XG Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Sophos UTM and Sophos XG?
- What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?
- Which firewall is better and why: Sophos XG 210 or Fortinet FortiGate 100E?
- Which solution do you prefer: Fortinet FortiGate or Sophos XG?
- What are the main differences in features between Sophos XG and FortiGate 80F?
- Fortinet FortiGate or Sophos XG?
- How does Meraki MX compare with Sophos XG?
- Which firewall to choose for an SMB to prevent malware damage: Cisco Firepower or Sophos XG?
- Looking for a technical comparison between Sophos XG550 and Fortinet FortiGate 600E