SAP Business One Reviews

The solution is very useful for manufacturing companies. 

The most important features are the accounting and finance features. Everything leads to finance. 

The initial setup is not too complex.

It's stable.

You can scale the solution well. 

The pricing is good.

We have some problems around here, in Business One. It's hard to have separate models. We have to make multiple forms and have problems doing that. In manufacturing, we do not have things like the actual cost of the fabric, loss of material, the various costs of raw materials, et cetera.

Some features are missing.

We'd like to see the solution support barcode features.

I've used the solution for around five years. 

The product is stable and reliable.

The solution is scalable. 

We have 125 licenses.

There are some problems in technical support in Pakistan.

I have a big license for SAP Business One, one of the 20 licenses. And S4HANA's support in Python is not ideal. Our control team many times has complained due to the slow, slow response for Business One. If you upgrade the hardware, you should get more services.

We want to move to S4HANA as it has a better design.

The product does not require a complex setup.

The pricing is pretty good. We did not find it to be too expensive.

We are consultants and have customers in Pakistan using it. 

I'd rate the solution six out of ten.

We are a beverage manufacturer in the fast-moving consumer goods sector that uses Business One throughout our whole supply chain. We start with forecasting, which is not calibrated well currently, and then we download the sales plan into SAP. Based on the sales plan, we provide plans for production via MRP algorithms. The primary function of Business One is to handle all this data we are getting about purchase orders, raw materials, packaging, etc. We also plan to acquire a production module for MRP II functionality, but we haven't acquired it yet and have not decided on the production model. Right now, upwards of 230 people using it, including salespeople, accountants, warehouse workers, production workers, purchase servers, and people who handle procurement. At the moment, it's all.

For us, the most useful feature of Business One is Material Requirements Planning (MRP). 

First of all, Business One doesn't have a proper master data management function. So, with any implementation, we had to select the work provider and determine who is responsible for which category of data. We also have to set the data format of the master data, especially an SKU, which should be formatted as an SKU. This is a vast amount of work that involves all departments. Second, I would consider the supply chain. Each function is highly dependent on another function. We still have a 1C:Accounting system, but it's not a system at all. With Business One, you have too much spare functionality. It doesn't create value for the business, but it creates a higher workload for employees in terms of payer processes, administration, development, etc. It's not easy. Because of how mature the organization is, there is less readiness for change. I would not consider this satisfactory. 

After working with Business One for a while, we are becoming more effective. However, we still have some issues involving business experts and even having a category of users like business process owners. We use almost all of Business One's functionality except maybe CRM. We don't yet use CRM. Also, we don't use forecasting because forecasting is internal in B1 forecasting. It only has two algorithms, which might not be enough for us. But it would be great to have more advanced forecasting functionality.

I've been using Business One for maybe two years.

The stability of Business One is pretty nice. 

Scalability has been pretty good so far. We haven't had any serious mishaps yet. If you satisfy the hardware requirements, it's completely okay.

I have not had any direct contact with SAP technical support. Our support is provided by the partners. 

We used a partner to set Business One up and we still use one. We are just customers. As far as maintenance goes, we have 10 people maintaining the solution counting only key users. There are about 10 more consultants and developers on top of that. We are still in the implementation phase. 

We bought all licenses for the whole package in the very beginning, and now we're just paying for 404 licensed maintenance. It's a standard fee. Of course, we still pay partners for implementation.

We also considered Microsoft Dynamics 365 as well as 1C, which is a domestic solution. It's an accounting system. 1C is a little bit different. It's a four-on-two for forecasting. The 1C accounting system is widely used in Ukraine and Russia. If you compare Business One to, for example, S/4HANA, the price is much, much better. And the consultants are not so specialized if you compare it with S/4HANA, for example.

So in the case of S/4HANA, you should have a team of maybe at least five or six consultants dedicated to particular modules. In the case of Business One, you only need one or two — perhaps one is enough. It has competence in the whole chain, starting from procurement, production, and sales.

The functionality is much lighter than the big SAP, so you can have just one brain covering the whole process. It's easier to build and implement something as well as to improve it and communicate with different functions.

I rate SAP Business One eight out of 10. If you are considering implementing this solution, I recommend you start with the master data. Pay as much attention as possible to the master data and establish a dedicated function.

It's used for process automation across various business departments. For instance, in manufacturing, it manages tasks such as raw materials and sales orders.

We primarily use it for finance and invoicing. So, it has streamlined our operations.

The reporting is sufficient for our needs, assisting significantly in decision-making.

I like its simplicity and integration capabilities, especially regarding its user interface.

I like its ease of use. Moreover, it is easy to integrate it with other solutions due to available APIs, though challenges may arise if the third-party system lacks them.

It's user-friendly and comes with specific manuals. So, it is easy to learn to use SAP Business One

In its licensing model and the offering of a pure SaaS solution, which would interest many customers today.

Our customers often request concurrent licensing, which is not available with SAP Business One. Adding this option would be beneficial.

In future releases, I'd enhance its capabilities to handle point-of-sale transactions, which is currently not available.

I have been using it for three years now.

It's a stable product, on the market for more than 20 years, continually evolving and supported with upgrades.

In my region, there are around 450 customers.

The installation isn't difficult but requires about three to four months on average as it's not plug-and-play.

It's not cheap but offers good value, particularly for medium-sized enterprises. We suggest a minimum budget of around 30,000 dollars.

My recommendation depends on your current setup. If you're starting from scratch, SAP Business One is highly recommended. If you already have an established system, it would be considered an upgrade.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. In terms of usability and industry fit, I find that a lot of customers are able to get at least 80% of their business needs addressed by the solution.

We are using it for accounts and finance and also for maintaining third-party transactions and non-CRM transactions.

As we have customized the SAP Business One as per our business requirements, we have found that some of the features that we need are not available in the version of SAP Business One that we are currently using. So we have been advised to move to a higher version that can provide us with all the features that we need. So, I would say that there is definitely room for improvement in SAP Business One in terms of providing more features and functionalities that can cater to the specific needs of businesses like ours.

For additional functionality, my suggestion would be to improve the speed of report generation. The reading and retrieving of data are slow in the system, particularly when generating reports. It takes a huge time to fetch the reports. Another area for improvement is the setup and customization process for SAP Business One.

I have been using SAP Business One for four years.

The stability of the solution is great. I would give it an eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten because it is somewhat complex. Our company has seventeen limited and five pro licenses; I’m the only person maintaining the solution. The call team is available, but I’m handling all the IT-related technical parts.

I have not directly interacted with SAP, but our service partner (SAP partner) has been supporting us. However, I’m not happy with the current service partner. Recently, they sent a mail saying that henceforth, we are not going to support SAP Business One. I am looking for a new one as the current service partner has stopped supporting SAP Business One and is now focusing on other business intelligence products. I’m actively working on finding a new partner.

The initial setup is simple if no customization is required, but if customization is needed, it can be quite complicated and time-consuming. Our own customization and implementation project took almost two years for a six-month project. The project is 91% complete, but there are still some hiccups, particularly with the management reports, which represent about 5% of the remaining work. It took a lot of time to test and implement.

An in-house team deployed the solution.

SAP has a high cost of licensing. It is high compared to other licensing options.

Overall, I would rate the product a seven out of ten.

I had been using it for the end-to-end functionality. I had used it for finance, HR, and everything.

There is room for improvement in stability.

I had been working with SAP for ten years.

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. There is room for improvement in stability.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. There are more than 1000 people working with this solution in our company.

The initial setup is easy.

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I was using this solution for small to medium-sized businesses.

The solution has helped customers because it is more user-friendly than the SAP ERP.

The most valuable feature of SAP Business One is its user-friendly and useful business module.

The solution could improve by having better integration with other systems and reporting.

I have been using SAP Business One for approximately 10 years.

I rate the stability of SAP Business One an eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability of SAP Business One an eight out of ten.

I rate the support of SAP Business One a seven out of ten.

Neutral

The setup of the solution is straightforward.

We used less than 10 people to deploy the solution.

I have seen a return on investment using SAP Business One.

I rate the price of SAP Business One a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. It is a good solution.

I rate SAP Business One an eight out of ten.

The main use case for SAP Business One is for small and medium-sized enterprises in various industries, such as manufacturing, trading, and services. It can be implemented across various domains.

SAP Business One has valuable and helpful features for standard utilities, such as sales, purchasing, inventory, and finance, including Indian localization. Additionally, it is strong in the area of production. It has enhanced capabilities in advanced production planning, maintenance, and other features as needed through the use of add-ons provided by partners. These add-ons run within the solution and can be provided to customers based on their specific production needs.

The standard SAP Business One is sufficient for the Indian region. There is no need for further enhancement as custom solutions can be designed and developed to meet specific needs. For example, HR and payroll is not a standard feature of the solution, but they can be created as a separate custom solution. However, payroll is not a standard function due to the varying norms and regulations across India's 29 states and union territories. Therefore, a standard payroll solution cannot be provided by SAP to add utility and features. Adding it would lead to different versions of the solution and more complexity in managing them. However, it would be useful to have addons to cover the other states which have different regulations.

I have been using SAP Business One for approximately 12 years.

SAP Business One is highly stable in regions or countries where the taxation norms are simple, such as European and American companies. However, in regions such as India or Asia, where more customizations are required, it may be less stable. In those cases, support would be needed to manage stability.

I rate the stability of SAP Business One an eight out of ten.

The scalability of SAP Business One is great. It is highly scalable and can be designed and developed to add any kind of features and functionalities required. Additionally, it is highly integrable with other third-party applications.

I rate the scalability of SAP Business One a ten out of ten.

The support typically provides query resolution for the customers and customization if it is required.

I rate the support from SAP Business One a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of SAP Business One is straightforward, but it depends on the specific processes and requirements of the organization. It may need to be configured to fit the organization's needs.

The implementation for a trading company will take a minimum of two and a half months. If it is a manufacturing company, the time can be higher, approximately eight to nine months.

I rate the initial setup of SAP Business One an eight out of ten.

We used three to four technical people for the implementation of the solution.

Utilizing SAP Business One can greatly reduce the people needed for management and time efforts for the organization. Additionally, when it comes to managing inventory, using the solution can lead to a significant ROI by reducing leakage and inefficiencies. We estimate that by using this system, inventory management costs can be reduced by five to eight percent.

I rate the ROI from SAP Business One an eight out of ten.

The price of SAP Business One is not comparable to other solutions. SAP is a well-known brand, and its price is on the higher side. However, if the solution offers the right fit for an organization the price is not a major concern for those who choose to use it.

There are two main types of licenses, one for administrative management and the other for users. Users are the ones who input the transactions. In addition, there are other licenses, such as integration licenses that are provided as needed. However, generally, there are two types of licenses.

SAP Business One does require annual maintenance and support from the partner who implemented the solution after implementation. We provide maintenance to our customers the solution.

A dedicated team is responsible for providing support services for SAP Business One, consisting of approximately 32 individuals. This support is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week as customers are located in various time zones, including India, Asia Pacific, the Middle East, and European countries.

I rate SAP Business One a ten out of ten.

Our primary use case for the solution is as implementers for our customers.

The most valuable feature depends on the requirements.

The solution can be improved by allowing customers to move to the cloud. Additionally, more support can be provided on the web client end.

We have been using the solution for a year and are currently using version 10.

The solution is scalable. There are currently six users utilizing the solution.

The initial setup is not difficult for on-premises but difficult for cloud. Implementation took approximately six months.

I rate the solution a six out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by providing options for the solution to be moved to cloud.