We are a solution provider and one of the Palo Alto products that we implement for our clients is Panorama. This product is a management solution for cloud firewalls.
It is a central management and logging system.
We are a solution provider and one of the Palo Alto products that we implement for our clients is Panorama. This product is a management solution for cloud firewalls.
It is a central management and logging system.
When a customer has many locations and they would like to push policies to all of the firewalls from one central location, Panorama is the product that enables customers to do this. They can configure templates and push them out to all locations. This makes it easy to manage.
All of the reports and events from different locations can be managed centrally.
Aside from pricing, I don't have any issues with Panorama.
We have been dealing with Panorama for more than five years.
The product is stable and I haven't faced many issues with it.
Panorama is a scalable solution.
The technical support is nice.
With respect to deployment, they have both the virtualized product as well as the offline version. The initial configuration might take two to three hours, with an additional hour for configuration. I would budget four hours in total.
The price of Panorama is expensive.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We are dealing with Palo Alto Networks as a firewall.
Panorama provides management functionalities.
Integration between Panorama and the Edge Firewall has a lot of issues, like different configuration assets, configuration object templates, lack of flexibility, and not a good browser. It needs improvement in saving and synchronization.
We have been dealing with Panorama for one year.
There is no issue about performance. However, keeping the communication between Panorama and the Edge Firewall is a big issue if there is a different configuration version between both Panorama and Firewall.
We are not working over a complex network, but Panorama manages about six to eight firewalls. We may face a lot of issues when scaling up.
The first layer of support is not very good. The second layer is better.
Neutral
We switched from a different solution.
Panorama has a lot of issues accessing and configuring the firewall or deploying the firewall from Panorama. I'd rate the solution five out of ten.