Microsoft Azure Room for Improvement
Principal Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
There are some small things that could be done to improve Azure. I think they should actually do more to implement function as a service. It is a completely separate capability that they currently do not address. Function as a service can be a completely different scheme altogether than PaaS or IaaS which it does quite well.
For an example of a FaaS, I think the Azure product can be stronger in terms of storage. I would like to see it have better management systems as a service specifically for managing documents. Right now they are handled as a more generalized object.
Say Azure came out with Microsoft Document Management and it was very strong as a service. It would not have to be deployed as a complete infrastructure. I would be able to use that as a service inside my organization and it is a product that any organization can use.
The question is what is the separate USP (Unique Selling Point) that Microsoft will provide to the user that would fit a unique need when making FaaS solutions available. Document management systems have already been proven to be very popular by Google. Microsoft Office uses OneDrive storage. There may be a better way to promote document management in a more general PaaS. Sometimes it is very useful to virtualize a platform or an infrastructure, but in the same way, it is sometimes valuable to virtualize a function. Applications may be a collection of functions.
It is this type of branching out of services that Azure can do within the structure they already have.
They are targeting Azure into specific domains and not working as much with open-source as they could. That would be helpful. I think eventually this approach will just drive the competition away. If I have a product that is very good for manufacturing as a function — something like is being done with Edge — it might be beneficial for Azure to be able to tie in this FaaS and let manufacturing clients start working with the solution without having to reach outside of Azure. Right now that I do not see that happening and it is an opportunity that Microsoft is missing with Azure.
In terms of what could be improved with Azure, I would like to see something like what Google has created with their cross-platform solution, Anthos. I would like to see some features like Anthos has. Secondly, there are multiple DevOps solutions and tools available in Microsoft Azure, but most of the time they are either in the build mode, meaning you don't get complete support for them because they are either making changes, or changing the names of the particular services. Sometimes, services vanish from the portal. We are not able to see that. I think they actually change the names of the services.
For example, they had advanced data analytics in Office 365. They actually removed it and they now include all those features in Windows Defender.
One more thing that I would like to say is that AWS works on availability zones. You have multiple availability zones in a particular region, which means that in that particular region you have more than one data center. If any of their single data centers fail, they can do a failover to the next immediate data center, which is in the same region. But in the case of Azure, if the data center fails for one particular region, they need to do a failover to different region altogether, which is separated by a geographical distance. That will be a kind of DR scenario.
Microsoft should focus on the higher availability of data centers where they can have more than one data center in a single region. I think they have implemented that kind of solution in the USA. They are going to do it soon in Europe and other countries as well, but it still is an upcoming feature. It's not completely built. They need to build that.
The second thing which I feel regarding Microsoft Azure in India, is that they have less case studies when we talk about SAP on Azure as compared to SAP on AWS. There are fewer numbers of case studies on the portal. You can't find any. Whereas when you go into the India section for AWS, you will find plenty in terms of SAP and cloud.
Case studies are not there. If you have case studies, good case studies of large banks or any kind of government sectors, those case studies would definitely help to build customer trust on that particular platform.
There is one more thing which I would like to talk about in terms of costing. When you talk about AWS, they have three different types of costing models - partial upfront, no upfront, and all upfront. Azure has two models, all up front and no upfront. But also in these costing models, AWS has multiple other payment modes in terms of one-year or three-year. Azure does not have that. It lacks that particular costing mechanism, which it needs so there are more costing models. There is a lack of pricing flexibility, and I would like to see more costing models and licensing.
The third thing I would like to say, is that Azure was pretty bad in terms of the recent service off-time for Microsoft Azure and AWS. They didn't complete 99.99% of service they provide to the customers as compared to AWS. AWS data centers have also gone out recently, I think, four or five service interruptions, but definitely Azure should be keeping that in mind. I think with the help of clustering data centers in a single region, they can achieve that.
I do not want to take any credit away from Azure or AWS, but definitely Anthos is a big plus point for DCP. Azure should also build that kind of platform. Secondly, they can work on creating more data centers to build the regional availability, which AWS already has across geography. The third thing they can work on is their costing models and the RI models - make them a bit more flexible for the client.
Business Development Executive, Managing Partner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Microsoft Azure is so complicated inside. If you should do something internally, if you have to configure something, the opinion about Azure is that it is a little complicated inside. That's why the end users and clients are looking for help and why we help them configure and do anything inside of Azure. That is why we offer other tools to optimize the Azure environment.
Microsoft makes the space for such tools because it is a little complicated and end users know it. That's why we sell these tools to optimize the Azure. I think the Microsoft team knows this and they create the space for other third party partners.
I know all the points about how the Cloud is so beautiful but if somebody starts to do something inside the Azure, it is a little hard to understand. Many services are so complicated to configure out. That's why sometimes clients are obviously confused inside the Azure. That's why they are looking for help with it and why they are looking for a Microsoft partner with the knowledge of how to connect this software into one solution. From my perspective, I like Azure because it makes me money from the end user clients. But for the customers, their opinion is, "Oh, my god. The AWS is easy."
It is well-known that Microsoft is not so easy for the end users. Maybe it's because there is a note of everything changing. They add new features and new functionalities. Azure is growing. From my point of view it's okay. From the customers, it's also ok, but they are looking for someone who understands how to configure it.
From the beginning, the first move to Azure as a solution, it's a long journey with many, many services to find the final configuration for the customer. But it's okay for me.View full review »
There are preview features we are waiting on. When I contact Microsoft support, there is no timeline given or clear information about when those preview features are going to be on GA, general availability. It would be ideal if they could finally give us at least an estimation of how much longer we have to wait.
Support could be improved. If you pay for a higher plan, it's okay, however, the lower plans don't offer as good of a service experience. It also seems as though each different tier doesn't talk to the other. they should be able to communicate and share details internally with each other so that they are learning from each other instead of staying siloed.View full review »
The solution should improve the shared cache. For the shared cache, Microsoft uses RADIUS third-party services. We have a lot of trouble with RADIUS and I suppose that is due to the fact that is not owned completely by Microsoft.View full review »
Information Technology Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
It's a bit of a mystery how the storage is going to perform. For example, when you've got a storage device like Hitachi or NetApp, you can run reports on that storage and you can do all this good stuff. I'm not sure if that's the case with Azure. A lot of the stuff is kind of proprietary, at the moment.
The cost is quite high.
You can't control the data as much as you would like to. When it's theirs, it's theirs. With Hitachi, Hitachi has its own policies. You can move data around based on how much it's used into lower-cost discs and whatnot. You might be able to do that with Azure. However, I can't verify that.
The initial setup is complex.
They need to make storage easy and offer more interconnectivity between solutions.View full review »
Cloud Architect at a legal firm with 10,001+ employees
The support, the cost, the way they have the tiers, this could all be improved. For example, our company has been purchasing Microsoft Office 365 cloud licensing for approximately five years, and we do not have any production. We have five divisions and these divisions have different classification and levels of data. This company has changed hands over the years. We now lead the was as far as IT, but the corporate office didn't do a top-down infrastructure. It's a long story, but the way that we do things is not the way that everybody else does things. Just because others are moving to XYZ doesn't mean we're going to go there today. We might look and see how everybody else is doing everything, and once we decide we're ready to go, then we'll go. It might be 10 years later. It might be next week, but we don't follow the crowd. We follow the Navy.
Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Talking about improvement is like a double-edged sword. We like that they have the new capabilities, but sometimes they're deprecating capabilities faster than we can handle. If we had to improve it, we would want to stay on some of these older capabilities a bit longer. It's a brilliant platform for our staff to be more agile and more efficient but probably doesn't match with us in terms of maturity.
For example, they offer this tagging capability, but they keep introducing new platforms without it. We've become heavily reliant on tagging, but in the case of NetApp, they introduced it into the environment, and now we're not able to get the showback off of that.
If they introduce new capabilities, they have to have all the features and functions on that new capability. They're not very good at that. If they introduce new capabilities, all the feature sets on these new capabilities should be available immediately. From my perspective, that's where they need to improve.View full review »
Strategic Sourcing Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It can be improved in terms of ease of billing or monitoring of the billing. That gets to be a little difficult.View full review »
Most of the problems that we've had are related to the DNS and the SSL certificate. Those two things have been a real pain. Sometimes, it happens because of GoDaddy and sometimes it happens because of Azure. Either we make a change in GoDaddy and the configuration is lost, or our developers make a change to the website and from there it gets lost.
It would be helpful if Azure provided more information on the various add-ons to give people an understanding of what they are used for, and how they're applied by other companies or businesses. One downside is that I find myself signing up and paying for things that I don't really need, and I have to call them to find out exactly what it is that I'm paying for. For example, I recently added the Azure Data Studio and I don't know what I need it for. I see that it can create a connection and run a query but I don't know if I'm going to be using it. That said, I will probably need it in the future.View full review »
The documentation can be outdated and is not as clear in Microsoft Azure as it is in AWS or Google.View full review »
Owner at a media company with 1-10 employees
I have found that if you not working with Microsoft Azure's GUI every day, it's not very user-friendly. It changes very often and fast. They are implementing new functionality. If you're not working with it every day, it always takes you additional time to get acquainted with the GUI. You always have to know all the tools because it's one software solution where you work with different kinds of tools to achieve results by implementing policies and other parameters. It would be better if they had everything in one place so that it is clear what type of operations we are doing, such as DLP. However, that's is how it is with all of the tools of Microsoft Azure at the moment.
There is a need to be better on-premise solutions that are more helpful. However, I don't think that is the goal of Microsoft Azure. They want the solution to be secure cloud solutions with cloud applications. This is their main goal at the moment.View full review »
Sr Solutions Architect at System Soft Technologies, LLC
This solution is not user friendly to set up and it's difficult to understand, particularly with regard to information protection and the sort of licensing needed to utilize it. Simplification would go a long way.
I'd like to see them improve on the watermarking. There's a feature that allows you to watermark documents that are checked out. Currently it watermarks a document with whoever publishes it. For example, if you wanted to watermark the email address, it doesn't watermark with the person checking out the file, but with the person publishing the document. It would be more valuable if the watermarking was related to the person checking out the document, in case it leaks out.
Information Technology Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It would be nice if there was an on-premises version of the solution, and it wasn't just cloud-based. Oracle, for example, has both capabilities. Some people don't understand the cloud, or are hesitant, and this might prevent them from adopting the product. Also, migrating to the cloud can bring a lot of misunderstanding and a lot of trouble to some companies. Some prefer that their data is not moved from the premises, or have requirements to that effect. If Microsoft could address these concerns, that would be ideal.
The solution has a lot of terms of services. These should be simplified.View full review »
Sr.Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
For deploying multiple resources in a big number, such as in hundreds, we need a streamlined process and more user-friendly scrips. The scripts have to be more user-friendly, and they should also supply some standard templates to deploy multiple resources at a time. Currently, it is very easy to deploy a couple of resources, but if you want to deploy multiple resources, it becomes complex.
The material that they provide for integration with an existing on-prem data center is complex. They have to make them user-friendly. The scripts related to resource management need to be simplified.View full review »
Senior Devops at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I haven't checked the console for some time, however, compared to the AWS console, the interaction console of the web part, the web services, it's not so easy. That will be a good area to improve, which is to make the console for interaction with services a little easier.
Another point to improve could maybe be the pricing model or maybe the interaction with information. When you look for information in AWS, it's more straightforward and clear. It's hard to find that information on Azure.View full review »
There is room for improvement on a couple of Azure services. One that comes to mind is Data Factory. Microsoft has improved a lot of Data Factory's capabilities, so maybe it's now possible to make a green custom database within Azure and Data Factory.
I think it would be good to keep making progress on giving users the ability to do action calls on Data Factory. Right now, it's mostly local. Perhaps Microsoft could add the ability to put some calls in the workflow. Airflow is a good example. You might say, "Why not just use Airflow?" And maybe you could use that, but I think it would be better if all these things were possible with Data Factory.
Cloud Solution Expert at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I find that in many cases it's more expensive than AWS, and for no good reason. The pricing itself is also quite difficult to comprehend, it's not easy to know the total cost and not worth checking the calculator because the outcome is going to be totally different anyhow. I also find it difficult that they are specific to x86 and x64 machines, I haven't found any ARM-based virtual machine images that I could run in my IP test lab, which would be a great boost for productivity because I could run the internal pipeline in the cloud and would not have to divert to locally installed devices.
If they want to be serious with IT devices then they should find a way of deploying ARM-based devices to Azure, to get more freedom of choice with virtual machines and services. It would be hardware virtual machine image offerings to other platforms, not only PC-based or x86-based. It would make my life much easier.
Software Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Sometimes the Azure Calculator doesn't have a good way to do a higher estimate, because for any organization there are sometimes issues with the application sites, but I know that the logs are not the real time and there are issues with login synchronization. It cam sometimes take more than five minutes for that information to reach the Azure application side. I'd like to see integration with other lifecycle managing rules because with Azure DevOps, it's straightforward, but the system is painful sometimes.
With Microsoft, our only concern is exchange rates because we're paying in dollars. It's very expensive for us because of the exchange rates. It would help if they partnered with someone locally so we can pay in our local currency. That's the only major area that we wanted them to look into. At least for exchange rate purposes, they should try to do something.View full review »
General Manager at a tech company with 11-50 employees
We would like it to be cheaper. As a customer, we always want to pay less.View full review »
Head of Service Delivery at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
There are improvements needed from a roadmap standpoint. Some of the roadmap items that they typically publish don't move at the same pace.
The predominant area in need of improvement is support.
Microsoft needs to continue working on out-of-the-box connectors to contemporary products in the market, specific to different verticals such as finance and HR. Investing in this would be helpful because it means deploying solutions faster. We've had challenges in terms of having to custom-build some of it and at the same time, the roadmap contains more connectors.View full review »
Enterprise Technology Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
In my opinion, what could be improved is making the actual costs more predictable. It is very difficult to estimate the cost or the budget you are going to need to run your environment in Azure Cloud. You have to be a specialist to understand how you will be charged, which constantly changes.
As for additional features, it would be great if the pricing could be cheaper for those trying to study and use the cloud. Having a discounted pricing scheme or even a free usage scheme, like a sandbox that is free to use on a continuous basis, for those who are studying would help them to actually generate more business later on. The more people learn to use the clouds, the more business they will actually attract.
They will start pushing solutions into the cloud, but if they have no time or opportunity to learn to use it, they will not be confident in proposing cloud solutions. So until they have been able to validate it in a test environment or a learning environment, they won't take the risk and propose a cloud solution.View full review »
Cloud Arquitect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Right now, in Azure, with the solution they offer, it's a bit complicated.
The application response time in particular consumes a lot of memory in terms of the CPU and application response time.
The control administration, every single control, every single application or service, has its independent dashboard. It's a bit complex to set up. It's simple to set up, however, when you want a metric for tracking or reporting, it's a bit difficult.
We've had issues with the login feature and have been looking into other solutions due to that ongoing problem.
The solution needs a more integrated password feature.View full review »
Senior Director at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
You don't get support from Microsoft very easily as compared to other solutions. For example, AWS. If I reach out to AWS, their PDM team is very quick to respond. The Microsoft Azure team does not.
The downtime could be a bit better. AWS has less downtime.
The solution needs to scale as well as AWS, which scales much better.View full review »
Head of Department at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
At this point, the latency is too high to use Azure in our production environment.
I would like to see support for data streaming in the future because I understand that currently, data streaming is not there. It would work like Kafka does, in Microsoft Azure. If they can provide the Platform as a Service and Infrastructure as a Service, it will be better.
For example, if want to use Kafka, I should be able to purchase Microsoft Azure and then use my Kafka license. This would also give me support. Right now, using it requires first getting a server through Infrastructure as a Service, then getting a Kafka license, then installing the server in the cloud.View full review »
CTO at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
It could be more open to external solutions.
Integration with other ecosystems would be beneficial. During this transitional period, this is our primary concern. For example, when we offer solutions to our customers, we must connect to their IT ecosystem, which we are unable to do in some cases.
A good strategy would be to include a feature for integrating with external ecosystems.
We would also like to improve the security.
The product can be a bit confusing at times. It's not well laid out. The interface, for example, can be a bit hard to figure out and they seem to be constantly changing things on us.
It's a rather new product and therefore lacks the maturity of other options. There is much they can do to add to it and to improve it. That may likely come with more time.
Up until two or so years ago, they weren't even accepting customer feedback on the solution. They've just started to do so, and they have given users a sense that improvements will be on the way sometime in the future.
Technical support is lacking right now. It needs to be better.View full review »
IT Technical Manager
I'm currently based in the Philippines and the availability of services locally could be improved. Technically speaking, I'd like to see more flexibility in terms of storage or resource allocation. Resourcing is currently quite fixed so that if you want to move between level two and level three resources, or customize resources, you can't do that. The discrepancy in terms of costing is around $200. If they improved flexibility for selecting resources it would be easier for us to get the costing approved.
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Maybe Microsoft could improve its monitoring around the networking.
Clarity on the cost of the things could be better in some cases. For example, it's difficult to do a report with the cost of the things in Azure. Their calculator to estimate the cost needs to improve in terms of the estimation they provide.
The solution could be easier to use. However, when comparing it to AWS it is a bit easier.
In an upcoming release, the interface could improve.View full review »
IT Senior Consultant and trainer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The licensing model is not ideal. It is not very useful in predicting actual costs. Sometimes we found that we could not accurately predict how much specific products will cost the company in the future. Just now, for example, we want to start using Log Analytics for Office 365, however, we don't know the final price. It's inconvenient for us as we cannot predict the budget and it puts off making a decision. For Microsoft, it's very disadvantagous.
The solution could use mutual segmentation for servers. It would be ideal if you could constitute something like five or 15 groups among the groups of different computers inside Azure. If you could get something like logical groups of servers outside the mutual servers, it would be an improvement.
Sometimes we want to start and do a penetration test. If, for example, we're planning new security scanning for our customers. You have to inform Microsoft that you want to start a penetration test. If you have regular scans Microsoft should allow regular scanning, without having to plan and to ask for approval from the Microsoft side every time. When it's meant to be a regular occurrence, it's very inconvenient for us.
Microsoft allows you, via Azure, to have different authentication methods. You can use the Microsoft Authenticator app, text or voice, or something called a FIDO, which is like a USB security key. Unfortunately, the authentication method only allows me to have up to 90 users, and there are 2,300 people in the company. When I have to push multifactor authentication, I cannot specify certain users for the authenticator app. It forces me to lock it down and say conditional access only allowed.
Another issue I have is that Microsoft notifies me retroactively about certain things. For example, when a user sends an email with over 200 recipients, it can take half an hour for me to get a notification but sometimes it can take 24 hours. I have the same issue when it comes to things like phishing attempts. It's a problem.
User at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
There aren't really any issues with the product itself. For us, the problems are organizational and the processes inside the company, which uses Azure, aren't as clear. They need to define a good process and a good implementation strategy going forward. We only really have issues with what they want to do, and not the technology itself. Basically, the technology is not the problem. It is just the way we want to use it.
It would always be nice to have even more integration capabilities.
A company needs to have strong finance managers. It could cost a lot if you haven't got a finance function inside each company.
The installation process is complex.
The pricing could always be better and a bit more standardized.View full review »
Systems Administrator Team Leader at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
At times, the support is terrible. It is not bad all of the time, but many times when we have contacted them, there are juniors without refined knowledge. We have had instances where it takes a long time to solve just a single problem.View full review »
Founder and Managing Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Some of the capabilities available in an on-premise SQL Server aren't available in Azure. For instance, we found Azure Managed Instance to be lacking in certain aspects. One of our clients decided to stay on-premise rather than migrate to Azure because of this reason. Maybe Microsoft is working on building these capabilities in the future, and we are unaware.View full review »
IT Systems Administrator at a transportation company with 51-200 employees
The support subscription models need improvement.View full review »
We need more security to be available on our smartphones and mobile devices. They need to improve the protections available in that area in particular. We're actually currently looking for solutions that will protect devices of this nature so that they can safely access the corporate network.
CEO at CLIFURVA
The pricing needs to be a bit lower. It's an expensive solution right now.
In future releases, I would like to see Microsoft offer personal desktop environments in a virtual solution. Citrix, for example, now offers this as an option.View full review »
I think Azure Active Directory and also the backup solutions provided in Azure need to be improved by Microsoft. The backup solution is not a very enterprise solution, and it is very simple. I think in comparison with other backup solutions like Nakivo and Veeam Backup, it can be improved to have a lot of options.
Along with this, one of the lack of options in Azure is managing antiviruses in virtual machines in the Azure environment. For example, if we have a lot of virtual machines on-premises and have to migrate them in Azure, there is no handy tool for the central management of antivirus software in all virtual machines in Azure.
On-premises, we have a lot of options like Kaspersky, Norton, and a lot of others, but in the Azure environment, you are limited to Windows ATP.
Windows ATP solutions are limited and can be improved by Microsoft, specifically the central management of the GUI for configuring agents on virtual machines.
I think Microsoft Azure should provide more innovation and new services to get better performance in the market.
The documentation for how to connect to CLI could also be improved.View full review »
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I believe the cost management and billing section features could be improved because sometimes it may seem somewhat complicated to find certain settings to set up a threshold for resource consumption and track expenses in real-time.View full review »
Market Tech Partner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
The solution should have better interface capabilities.
There should be be better support for microservices and containers.
It's not user-friendly because it is made for developers. A normal user can't use it, but for a developer, it is a very friendly solution.
The initial setup can be improved. It should be simplified and made easier for developers to set it up.
I would like to see the use of Microsoft DevOps simplified. It's automation to develop and deploy software that is very difficult to use. It is so complicated and we need extra time to learn it. It is not easy.View full review »
Management Executive at a security firm with 11-50 employees
The biggest area needing improvement involves the licensing cost. The cost of actually acquiring the solution is of much significance to small to medium enterprises, especially in countries that have a negative currency. The biggest challenge we face in Africa is the lack of awareness among overseas, European and American vendors of the massive impact that the exchange rate has in the South African market. A cost of $20 for you can equal 300 rand for us. This is what most vendors neglect to realize, that a price affixed to something for the European or American market cannot be applied to the rest of the world or to a continent like Africa. The disregarding by vendors of the importance of the exchange rate amounts to ignorance or arrogance.
My issues are not with the product itself, which I think is great, including Microsoft's strategy concerning respecting it and the consolidation. The pricing, in terms of what can be referred to as traditional third world countries, needs to be addressed.
The main takeaway that vendors should leave with is that they should not neglect the market in South Africa or in Africa. It is not enough for them to want to have a presence or sell a license. They should also show a desire to sell a value proposition.View full review »
I think the pricing model could be improved. I have that clarity with AWS but with Azure it's not that easy. If I am building a solution on Azure, the first question that stakeholders will ask me is about the cost. If I'm using multiple services of Azure, then how do I figure that out given that it's all on cloud.
Technically, I would say there could definitely be improvement on the AutoML part, which is the machine learning component of Azure. I made a comparison between AutoML versus DataRobot, another vendor that provides machine learning. DataRobot is definitely ahead of Azure AutoML. Of course that could be because I'm using the licensed version of DataRobot versus the free version of AutoML but there does seem to be a gap.
Executive Officer at UK export finance
As compared to AWS, Azure can improve its functionality. In terms of the feature list, it is still lacking a bit as compared to AWS. AWS supports lots of types of operating systems, which Azure is still catching up with. Azure is mainly focused on the Windows system, and it is not yet there in terms of integration with other operating systems like Linux, Unix. Azure is slowly catching up.View full review »
IT Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
It could be more flexible. If you look at all Mircosoft products, they are not up to the mark. For example, Azure Ready doesn't provide the same kind of access a domain administrator has and the kind of flexibility that they have when using Active Directory.
Microsoft support could be better. Their service could also be better. For example, specific policies for templates suddenly become unavailable. When I checked, they said that certain things might be withdrawn based on customer feedback. This happened once or twice, and it wasn't available at all for five days, it just went down.
Chief Technology Officer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
The interface for configuring the environment is not very intuitive. Certain things are at different places, and it is not easy to navigate.
They should have a more transparent licensing model. Currently, Microsoft's licensing is a bit clunky, and it keeps changing depending on the type of subscription you have. Different features are included, and sometimes, it is very hard to figure out the right licensing. So, the commercial aspect of the licensing can be improved, and they can make it easier to understand all the features that are included.View full review »
Digital Strategy Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Integration with other services could be much better.
Senior System Engineer at a engineering company with 11-50 employees
I can't say that we have any complaints in terms of features or lack of capabilities within the product. Over the last two years, I'd say it's been so far so good.
It would be ideal if they could reduce costs a bit. Right now, we find the product to be expensive.View full review »
GM COE at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
There are worldwide issues on Microsoft Azure, however, it is happening to Google also and as well as AWS. The problems we have are nothing new.
Technical support needs to be better.
Senior Regional IT Infrastructure Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The level of authorization or authorization cascading can be improved. We have the most powerful admins and then we have sub-admins, but the level of authorization is not that easy to handle or manage.View full review »
Manager, Enterprise Infrastructure at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution is less mature than AWS. That said, it is catching up quickly.
The solution could always be cheaper. That way, it would be less expensive than AWS.View full review »
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For some use cases, Microsoft Azure is okay and working, but it is lacking features and we cannot implement it fully.
Talking from a networking perspective, when you create a file or a rule in Azure and you want to view this IP group, sometimes the way it is displayed on the GUI, you don't see the name of the group. At a minimum, I should be able to see the name of the group. They need to improve the GUI with respect to creating files or files. In summary, on that GUI view for firewall rules creation, the IP groups that are chosen in the firewall are not easily seen.
If I want to track, for example, a soft IP group, and mistakingly I click the wrong thing, then it's a problem. They need to improve it so that you can just view it, read-only, and then edit it later if needed.View full review »
User at CGI
The cost is a big issue, it can quickly go up if you don't control things. We've set up a system that shuts down machines regularly so we don't run up costs. Sometimes our development teams start up machines and forget to shut them down, and we see our costs go up quite rapidly with monthly surcharges. It would be helpful if Microsoft didn't change the control panels quite so often. It means we need to retrain personnel whenever things change and that seems to have an impact on our IT teams.View full review »
Managed IT Services Provider at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
We work with Azure, which is okay, but very clunky and complex. It lacks fluidity and is not intuitive. This can be problematic and require one to work with external consultants. Things can depend on the client. Not everything can be known in advance and there may be a need to make changes to the interface. Changes which are made to the functionality are not always intuitive. As such, while the solution offers very good functionality, its intuitiveness, in respect of user experience and configuration, is not the best. I should note that these are minor issues and I do not work with Azure very much, there being only a couple environments in which we employ it.
We see the same issue with Microsoft, which is not an intuitive platform. The ways in which the various components are placed seems to be illogical. There are different screens and end-configurations. In my familiary with Microsoft, a decision was reached to do things this way and there is no way to alter this.
As such, the solution could definitely be more intuitive.View full review »
As for improvement, I think better accelerators and better tools that can be used to migrate and leverage the existing models and data schemas are needed.
Also, on the ETL side, we can convert data pipelines that are already setup on-premises and business tools that already exist. If we can migrate and automate these into Azure faster, it would be great. I think a faster migration path will help. There is a lot of scope for improvement in this area.
Better reporting capabilities would be good also, because as of now, Microsoft Azure has its own path with Power BI. However, better integration with other enterprise reporting platforms would help.View full review »
President at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
The solution needs to be easier to configure in the future. Right now, it's a bit difficult to accomplish.
Technical support could be better. They need to be more responsive.
The documentation should be more accessible. It's hard to find what we need right now.
It would be helpful if there was more data science or AI implemented in future versions.
The product needs to implement more API capabilities.View full review »
Senior Engineer- Hardware at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users. Nowadays, if I want to go and do a cloud management platform across private clouds and public clouds, then I would need something more out of the box and easy to use.
There's a huge need for platforms, like vertical platforms, where you've got to create the platforms out of the box to sell to those with particular domains. For example, aviation. They might be using their own platforms underneath CAPEX and OPEX that are not distributed. So it would be nice to address the security until you can provide a mutualized solution with CAPEX- and OPEX-based cloud platforms.
It would be good to have out-of-the-box modernization capabilities because the industry is always looking for modernization. So, it would be good to have an out-of-the-box AIML-based solution that would reduce the time needed for application modernization.View full review »
Senior Architect, Technology Transformation Group at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
There aren't limitations that come to mind. Whatever they have planned for the solution in the future, I will be happy with it.
The solution could always work to reduce its costs.
It would be ideal if the solution could offer more non-Microsoft-related integration capabilities.View full review »
I would like to see all of the cloud providers be more compatible with each other. All of the big organizations, such as large manufacturing and banking and financials, use Azure, while other places will use Google Cloud to AWS. Compatability between these is important.View full review »
The alerts management should be improved. Alerts management is very complicated to configure. You have to go through a lot of tests and config action groups to set up those things. It is very complicated, and it can be simplified.
It is good to start with, but as the complexity increases, the usability needs to improve. We are managing only 40 virtual machines, so we are able to make use of the portal.
The VPN part can also be improved. If you want to set up multi-factor authentication for VPN clients, it is not so easy. The documentation is not so simple for multi-factor authentication.
I would like to see Azure Data Factory simplified. It is very complex. If they can simplify the data integration part inside Azure, it would be great. They should design simpler integration. They can also have a new service and keep Data Factory as it is.View full review »
The pricing could be better.
If you don't understand Microsoft, the initial setup can be a bit difficult. You have to be slightly technical.View full review »
DevOps Lead at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I cannot recall anything really specific that needs to be addressed within the solution. There aren't any features that are missing as far as I can tell.
It would be helpful if it offered more integration with other platforms.View full review »
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
I believe that some of the services need to be available on the on-premises version and not only based on the cloud.
There are some security issues in the cloud that cannot be solved. Some countries will not allow you to store certain types of data on the cloud.View full review »
CISO at a religious institution with 501-1,000 employees
They're already doing quite a bit. I'm not unsatisfied with anything that they're doing right now. They can maybe make the transitions a little smoother and improve its pricing. The pricing for the end-user packages is a bit high.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
I would say an improvement could be allowing for more external, third-party tools. However, I think that's their vision, how they develop the product.View full review »
It's not always simple to manage the team who use it. Sometimes customers abuse the capacity and it's not always easy to bill the department for the usage.
Microsoft Azure is not always a user-friendly solution. There are too many people who develop this solution. For the end-users, sometimes it's not really fun to use or simple to use. It could be improved.
It's difficult to stop the solution when you have started, you need to use it for the long term. You have to make a good choice when you start the project with Microsoft or with Amazon too. You will have the same problem, once you choose one you have to commit.
When a feature doesn't exist in Microsoft Azure, generally we can use other software that does the job very well, such as backups or supervision. Any products to help the customers and engineers to do a good job, such as managing large infrastructure. There is a lot of solution to make it work well.View full review »
Cloud Security Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Data Science Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The design of the platform is not so easy to navigate. It's not very user-friendly.
Some services are more difficult to use in AWS and GCP. I have projects on the three clouds, and some things are easier to do on AWS. On the other hand, using Databricks on Azure is easy, as they are integrated well. However, some products are more difficult to use than other products.
Improvements need to be made with respect to the availability of third-party services.
I would like to see more advanced functionality in terms of information security.View full review »
Solution Architect at a sports company with 201-500 employees
Director of Analytics and Cognitive Computing at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
We work mostly with the data services and the SQL database features. We like the optimisation recommendations we get such as creation of indexes etc. What I would like to see further is some basic data profiling stats or charts representing data stored to be integrated in the SQL database services instead of using other services such as the Azure Data Catalog.
Senior Architect at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Some of the dashboard features can be improved.
Some of the backup solutions for SAP are not compatible. For example, we have a Sybase database running, and Azure does not have an agent tool for connecting with it. This means that we have to use a third-party tool to properly backup our SAP Sybase system.View full review »
The solution could be a bit more intuitive and easier to use.
The documentation could be a bit better. It could be more clear and accessible. It would be good to know if the person answering the questions was a Microsoft employee or just another user.
The pricing in our region can be a bit high.View full review »
Associate Manager at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
When we are doing transfers of records in large amounts, for example, petabytes of data or few long datasets, the performance should not degrade as it does. I am working on big data platforms like Informatica and others and even though there are terabytes of data being transferred it does it immediately. However, in this solution, I would like the performance to be there when building a large dataset to integrate the data.View full review »
Team Manager - Public Cloud & Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
There are always areas for improvement. The integration is good but it can always be better.
The openness and the security policies can be better. It is missing a bit in everything related to the policies.
I would like to see better policy-based management and everything related to security management could have been better integrated.View full review »
It should have a better hybrid-cloud central analysis. Their support service also needs to be improved. Our main concern is support calls. Our issue is basically related to the technical functionality of the services that we use. It doesn't behave as expected, and support often fails to solve the problem.
The management portal can be confusing sometimes. We have difficulty navigating the menus because the terminology is unclear, especially when referring to the content or actionable items.View full review »
The pricing needs to be adjusted so that the strong inflation in Venezuela does not prevent customers from purchasing it.View full review »
Associate Director at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The solution is not particularly user friendly so that could be improved. With Microsoft Azure it's quite difficult to do anything freely or try my hand at something new. I think the solution is also lacking in security. I'd like to see the option of a free account for carrying out a POC and the ability to play around with the solution without any restrictions.
Ease of use could be improved. You wouldn't just be able to use this solution without being trained on it.View full review »
If you compare it with AWS, it is not very friendly to use. I find the UI better to work with on AWS.
They easily provide service with Windows, but not with Linux.View full review »
Associate Vice President at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Microsoft needs to simplify its licensing, which is hard to understand currently.
The security of the solution could always be much better.View full review »
Information Technology Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The cost of the product is too high. It would be ideal if they could lower it a bit for their customers.View full review »
Senior IT Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 501-1,000 employees
It would be advantageous if the dashboard had more clarity, in terms of the visibility that it provides. The challenge that we are facing has to do with resources and the grouping of them. We have different services that we use and we cannot see all of them until we filter the resource group.
Having inbuilt security would be an improvement. As it is now, Microsoft has a sentinel as a security tool, where you need to integrate it.View full review »
Systems Architect at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
Azure could be improved with better security. The world is changing and their security could be better. Compared to five years ago, many of these cloud systems are a lot better, especially since you can set up a private cloud and configure your services to make it more secure.View full review »
Senior Manager Global Database Services at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The cost is something that could be improved. There's not much clarity regarding the price range. We'll create a VM and then at the end of the month, we'll receive a bill with various costs from different locations — it's confusing.
Integration with other cloud environments can be tricky at times.View full review »
Presales Network & Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
A few different vendors from Fortinet, from Barracuda, from Forcepoint, all use infrastructure from Azure from time to time. A problem with Azure is that the architecture that they have is not really compliant — not really connecting with the endpoint Cloud. It's a different type of architecture, so that's a mistake from Microsoft. Hopefully, they will fix it soon.
It could be more secure actually. Microsoft Defender is not very secure. The platform is also a bit slow, to be honest. It takes a few seconds to load. Although, it does update quickly now. It's one-click — Microsoft takes four seconds and Google takes two and a half. It's minimal.
Better integration with other vendors and third-party systems would be a nice change.View full review »
IT Projects Manager at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
They develop so fast, it's hard to trace the technology. They have a lot of folders, for example, and it's hard to keep up with changes.
The deployment was quite complex. It's not easy to implement.View full review »
In my role as a service provider the vendor appointment may be required from the Microsoft plan. Occasionally, the response time is inadequate. It would be nice to have faster support.
Dashboards and reporting could be improved.View full review »
Junior Mobile Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Security could be better. Once there was an attack, and we couldn't get to the cloud to see the reports for about five hours. If we want to back up the application in storage, we can't have a firewall. For now, it's secure. I think the main problem was the configuration.View full review »
1.One is not able to upload custom images in azure and not able to access windows client images. This can be improved
2. It moves your business’ compute power from your data center or office to the cloud. As with most cloud service providers, Azure needs to be expertly managed and maintained, which includes patching and server monitoring.
Because it has a lot of features, a person just coming into Microsoft Azure might feel that it is a bit complex. Once you are familiarized with it, they will find that it is organized in a structured way.
It's a bit clunky at first.View full review »
It should have cost optimization tools. Customers are required to use third-party applications to avoid usage complications. Also, charging on downloads is not a good option, especially when it moves to a production server.View full review »
Product Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Azure could be made more user-friendly. For example, the configuration wizard should be more intuitive for the users.View full review »
Senior Solutions Specialist (Network & Security) at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
While Microsoft Azure is user-friendly, some of the other cloud products I use are more user-friendly. I use AWS and I like it more than I like Microsoft Azure.
I would like to see the console improved.View full review »
Senior Vice President Information Technology at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The quality of some components of Microsoft Azure is not that great. For example, Microsoft has not fixed issues in Microsoft Teams for many years. There are well-known issues that are submitted by customers two years ago and they still are not fixed.View full review »
Network and systems administrator at a recruiting/HR firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement.View full review »
Technical manager at a non-profit with 201-500 employees
The solution is too expensive.View full review »
SOA & BP Technical Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like to see this solution support integration.View full review »
Digital Architecture Project Leader at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
There should be more language options for the Azure Functions apps. It supports programming languages, but there are only a few options. It could have more programming languages.View full review »
Head of Architecture - Digital at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
They should enable more other products to enable other commercial products as a Pack services, from the database side, more from the security perspective. Some of the databases don't have the features that Azure SQL has. Those parts have to enabled.
There were also a lot of constraints with the serverless parts. They are far behind compared to AWS.View full review »
I honestly can't think of anything that needs to be improved.View full review »
They should include a cybersecurity feature to improve the protection of the systems.
They could do better in terms of the pricing model. Its price keeps on changing. Their technical support can also be better.View full review »
IT Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
There needs to be better data security. There are organizations that do not want their data to be submitted to Microsoft, they should have strong encryption.
In the future, Microsoft should increase its data center percentage in Africa.View full review »
cloud solution architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
No product is perfect, there is always room for improvement.
The solution to the market and the guidance for the customer should be streamlined.
From a customer perspective, it can be complex. It's a bit abstract for the customer.
They need to provide comprehensive and easy-to-understand guidelines for the customers to implement.
The initial setup could be simplified.
The customization could be improved.
I would like things to be easy for the customers and partners.View full review »
Manager at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
When you use one feature in six months or a year, it changes for the others, and it isn't very easy. The filters are too complicated. I'd like to see better integration with S/4HANA integrated and other services, like monitoring, for example.View full review »
Microsoft Azure can be pretty advanced and difficult to understand. I would like it to be simplified. The licensing especially needs to be simplified.View full review »
Principal Enterprise Architect at a construction company with 201-500 employees
They are a bit closed on the customization side. If they open the customization then it will be very good.
It covers pretty much the similar problems that we face in many areas of Azure. If we are planning to use some of the Azure applications within our organization, there are some places that we need to complain about a complaint. Because of the design of Microsoft, we were not able to make this complaint. So, we are not able to use that interface.
Head of Business Security Advisory at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Overall, the solution is good but there are some minor technical issues that can be resolved.View full review »
Senior Solutions Specialist at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The process by which our customers can switch from one subscription to another should be simplified.View full review »
ICT Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.View full review »
Cloud Business Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Onboarding customers is a challenge. Sometimes our customers don't know how to deal with the cloud environment. Maybe the customers are more comfortable with the old-fashioned on-premise environment. So it's challenging to move to a new environment in the cloud. Another area where there is room for improvement is maybe security. Also, the interface could use some work. And maybe Microsoft could add some new features for monitoring the environment.View full review »
User at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
In the next release, I would like to see better security.View full review »
It could be more stable, but we think this is due to Microsoft making changes too often to their setup. We also think the configuration could be easier. Sometimes performance takes a hit on a slow network. Microsoft does not appear to pay enough attention to the platform or the account solution.View full review »
IT Infrastructure Architect at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
It is constantly updating. There are weekly releases, sometimes daily releases, and there should be fewer that are consolidated into one.View full review »
Risk Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Use of the solution could be easier. It is too complex.
The solution is not sufficiently informative and there is a need to wade through much information.
Moreover, we find it lacking when it comes to active dashboards. This is problematic when looking to Teams, as it does not allow one to know what is transpiring in real time, such as when there are concurrent conferences. This information only becomes available the following day.View full review »
Team leader Modern Workplace, Senior Solution Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I would like to see it more easily accessible.View full review »
Architect/ Project Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The technical support could be improved. When we leave tickets, it can take some days before the issue is dealt with.
System Administrator at A&T Systems
The cost of Microsoft Azure could be lowered.
The subscription licensing is very complex and we would like to have it simplified.
The ease of configuration and use should be improved.View full review »
Founder at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
I think the cloud interface could be improved.View full review »
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Maybe Azure could add an address code to create your analysis without SQL or Python because some business users don't want it to code. So it's good to have a service application that connects to the data lake to conduct analysis and simplify the business process.View full review »
Owner and Senior Technical Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
I would like to see improved migration tools. It is improving week by week. They just need to make sure that they keep up with the new functionality provided in other clouds.View full review »
Senior Microsoft Solution Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its costing can be improved. There should be better cost management.View full review »
IT Manager at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
They should optimize their pricing so that we can use more features. I would also like to see more auditing and more security for the Blob storage feature.
From a technical point, it has very good features for Microsoft products, but for non-Microsoft products, it may have some limitations. I have mostly worked with Windows-based integration, and now I am trying to use it for open-source systems. It is good but not as easy as Microsoft products.View full review »
Technical Pre-Sales at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Its pricing should be better. In terms of features, I am yet to explore the whole solution, and the current features seem okay.View full review »
Remote Product Manager
The solution could improve by providing better tutorials and documentation. There was a point when I was trying to understand how the board works and there was not any documentation that could articulate it properly. We had a whole team who had to go online to check other sources in order to understand.View full review »
Customer Success Manager - Architect: Cloud and Data Platform at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The microservices and analytics of Azure are good areas that could be improved.
Microsoft Azure has technology compatible with OpenShift from backtrack, but I would like it if they could evaluate another vendor of technology of microservices like Rancher to integrate with.View full review »
Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There was a time when the solution was updated on their side and all of our functions stopped working. This issue could be worked on to prevent it from happening in the future.
They must give us the information of when they are going to updates on the platform side so that we can take the appropriate measures on our side as well.
We would like to see more enhancements in the Azure Migrate services in the future.View full review »
Head of IT Infrastructure at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees
If you're not aware of how things work with Azure, it's not easy to understand. It's not clear for customers and sometimes even for Microsoft people themselves. The high cost of the solution is linked to that issue.
Information System Auditor (IT Audit) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution could improve by having more security features around my data and the platform.View full review »
We use Microsoft Server 2019 and 2016. And I didn't like the 2019 client, so we had to downgrade back to 2016. The main issue there was its monitoring system. Our client needed an alternative, and if they were using more Windows products, they also needed to make that downgrade.View full review »
We have faced some issues on the pricing side, but it has improved lately. We are trying to adjust to the new pricing methods that they are using now. It should be better from now on.
In terms of features, it is constantly improving. We receive improvements from the site daily.View full review »
Architect at GSPANN Technologies, Inc
We need more customization and support for doing so.
I would like to see more customization on the DevOps side.View full review »
It could be cheaper.View full review »
Senior System Administrator at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
There are so many services available that the interface is a little bit messy, and when you're looking for a specific service, you have to know exactly where to search. Having better visibility in the interface would be an improvement.View full review »
IT Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
The diagnostics should have more logs. We must pay a surcharge for our dependence on the Azure monitor. Each platform comes with its own logs.
Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
I would like to see better integration with other products.View full review »
Chief Financial Officer & Chief Operations Officer at a energy/utilities company with 1-10 employees
Price could always be better. The features come in quickly, so we're comfortable with the feature set that is available to us.View full review »
Business Analyst at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
An issue I encountered was around the integration of Identity. I lost some important information and I would like to see improvements with this.View full review »
Managing Director at D3
Microsoft should have one package for all their solutions in one place to be found.View full review »
Team Lead Information Security Control at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The response time and stability of Microsoft Azure need to be improved.View full review »
IT Project Manager, Senior Java Developer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's possible that the performance could be improved, but it's not a big issue.View full review »
Technical Lead at FD
There could be more documentation and video tutorials to incorporate each and every feature. This way one can easily get the knowledge and implement it.
Personal Banker at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I would like to see support for the applications that are currently in place. Ideally, Microsoft Azure should be compatible with the applications that we are using in my environment.View full review »
Regional Head of IT at a engineering company with 51-200 employees
I would like it if Microsoft communicated better about upcoming changes before they roll them out. Sometimes when Microsoft implements changes, they don't notify the users promptly enough. I would like to know about new features, especially Office 365.View full review »
Cloud Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The price could be improved as well as the interface speed, and technical support.View full review »
The pricing can be reduced.View full review »
Co-Founder and CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Its subscription price could be cheaper.View full review »
Integrate as a service. A lot of Microsoft software licensing options aren’t yet in Azure. Also, the ability to integrate with other technologies, such as other options on the market based on RISC Technologies.View full review »
Architecture and Solutions Director at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The initial setup is quite complex because of the number of options that are available.View full review »
CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I would prefer Microsoft Azure to increase the free trial, then developers can take advantage, and it could increase their sales.View full review »
Assistant Professor at a university with 51-200 employees
Microsoft Azure could improve by being more user-friendly and the interface could be better.View full review »
Project Specialist at integra software
From a security perspective, it could be improved. A little bit of automation would also be nice.View full review »
Senior Software Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is pretty secure, but it can always be more secure.View full review »
The solution could improve by simplifying network management.View full review »
Platform Engineer and Infrastructure Management - OTIC (Contractor) at a government with 201-500 employees
They can add more documentation about the solution.View full review »
Any time you use a cloud service, there are increased security risks. If you want more security, you have to have private hosting.View full review »
Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution could improve by providing a better user interface and more organized workflows.View full review »
I have found Microsoft Azure has many components to use and it's very difficult to understand every component.View full review »
Product Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
They should create integrations with more platforms.View full review »
senior system integrator at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
There are many bugs in the solutions and we already have a ticket to Microsoft. Their content team is working on that.
We don't have the active-active options for Microsoft SQL Server. This is something they can work on.View full review »