We use the product as a network monitoring system. We have ten people who are using the system from the admin and end-user level. The platform is used daily and we are looking at extending it to other areas of the business to do different types of monitoring. We have dashboards that we put up that we leverage off and we want to get more systems incorporated.
IT Support Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The ability to better customize the views helps us target exactly what information gets to the people who need to know it
Pros and Cons
- "Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
- "The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
OpManager allows us to customize the views better than previous solutions that we were using. This helps us target exactly what information gets to the people who need to know it.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature so far is the net-flow analyzer, which works exceptionally well. We have only just started playing around with the apps monitoring portion, but this seems like it will provide value as well. Beyond that, the ops manager portion, the monitoring in general, and the dashboards are all really excellent. The entire solution is very user-friendly. As the IT Manager, I don't have too much time to go investigate how things are running on the system. This is a solution to that problem.
What needs improvement?
The for the areas that can use improvement, I would say furthering the abilities of dashboard customization and enabling workflows into other systems. I think we could get much more out of the solution with greater flexibility. If we could customize access further and allow people to enhance role-based access, it would keep people focused on their tasks and the specific things they need to know. I think that is the only other thing I would like to see in the system. Now there are only two views: an admin role or a view role. Roles are fixed in the extremes and there is a middle ground that isn't served by either.
When you look at the price of the system, it is exceptional and a real value for money. However, it lacks strong local support. I can't blame the company because it is a new product, but that is one addition that would be very useful.
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine OpManager
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about ManageEngine OpManager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the product for a year and a half now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The system is quite stable. Since we have had it implemented, I have not had a single day of downtime on the system. Even when it comes to upgrades there was no downtime. These guys do an excellent job of testing enhancements and upgrades, so it is seamless to deploy new versions.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think the product is extremely scalable. We have actually gone from two thousand nodes up to five thousand nodes and there was no issue in scaling up. We were simultaneously looking at the HA solution at the time and even when upgrading two things at the same time, there was no downtime for the system.
How are customer service and support?
In South Africa, the OpManager system is fairly new. With the current support structures in place, the support team is exceptionally helpful and they try to go the extra mile. However, I don't think they are as experienced with all the components of the system as the users would hope, so it makes installations a little bit difficult. They do escalate to external teams when it is necessary and warranted and we do get assistance when the local team cannot handle a problem. So from that perspective, I think they do an extremely good job in making sure that we are functional and that we have the contracted level of support. I do not think it is an entirely personal preference to assume that the local vendors would have a bit more knowledge about the products in order to support us properly and efficiently.
Regardless of any and all issues, support normally responds promptly (within a couple of hours). It is simply not desirable that the actual issues can take a few days to get resolved.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used the Microsoft SCOM platform. The product was not very easy to configure. It is tedious and you need a lot of experience to get it done. That difficulty was the reason we moved away from it as a solution.
How was the initial setup?
Installation was pretty straightforward. We did get assistance from the team locally assigned to assist us, but the majority of the work was done within our internal IT team.
What about the implementation team?
We did initiate the implementation ourselves but we were, at times, assisted by our assigned team.
What was our ROI?
We had a return on investment almost immediately in that a consistent up-time has been easier to achieve. Alerts come through faster. Our staff has the ability to look at the dashboards and put things in place to make sure we don't have outages of the same sort. Previously on SCOM, it wasn't easy to manage and monitor the system. If you had to understand what an alert meant, it was very difficult. Now, the operator can click on the alert and immediately get details of the problem. Then they can drill down to get a solution very quickly.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance. If there is any additional development required, then that comes at an additional cost. We have not really customized too much. The one change we requested was added to the subsequent release. They built the resolution specifically for us and it didn't cost us anything and went out to all users who may have been experiencing similar issues.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the product an eight out of ten. The reason for that is that it is an exceptional value for the money. It may not be the absolute best, but it is certainly better than most solutions and the price differential is significant.
It is a good idea to get both the application monitoring package and the Ops Manager. They compliment each other, so I would suggest buying both.
With regards to the implementation, I would suggest making use of an implementer even though it is an easy system to implement. An implementer will have the experience to do the implementation according to standards and proper architecture. This will save you from errors, speed the implementation, and keep you from wasting time doing things over again. We did the original implementation ourselves and then we had to re-build and do things all over again because we didn't have the knowledge of the package. It did work eventually, but it would have worked much more efficiently if done correctly the first time.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network Security Architect at DXC Technology
Device backups are smooth and managed centrally with a nice dashboard
Pros and Cons
- "Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."
- "Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."
- "Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."
What is our primary use case?
For enterprise clients:
- Platform monitoring
- Network device monitoring
- Fault monitoring
- Alerting
- Device configuration backups.
How has it helped my organization?
I have only evaluated OpManager in a lab. I have not implemented it in a real environment.
The product was fairly straightforward as far as setup is concerned. Although, the evaluation software provided did not include ISOs or OVAs. I am not certain whether this is just for the evaluation. This made it slightly more difficult to build a virtualized instance.
Device onboarding is easy, and there is pretty broad support for network and network security devices.
What is most valuable?
- Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment.
- Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status.
What needs improvement?
Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available.
For how long have I used the solution?
Trial/evaluations only.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine OpManager
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about ManageEngine OpManager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Product Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Alerts, reports, and automation together enable us to quickly troubleshoot
Pros and Cons
- "It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."
What is our primary use case?
We are using it for network monitoring. We monitor customer networks with it and the performance is extremely good. The distributed network has a lot of features that our customers really appreciate.
How has it helped my organization?
It provides us a way to quickly check any issue that could affect one of our network devices. We have alerts, we have reports, and we have automation. Everything together gives us an extremely fast way to troubleshoot issues that arise.
What is most valuable?
- All the automation capabilities
- Reporting
What needs improvement?
It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has very good scalability. We can go from 250 devices up to 50,000 or more devices.
How are customer service and technical support?
We use technical support at times, especially when there is a new release. Sometimes we need remote support from the manufacturer, and it is fine.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used a freeware tool but it lacked reports and automation. Once we knew OpManager had these features we went for it.
Our most important criteria when selecting a vendor are that have a tool or program that is mature and stable, with automation and reporting features.
How was the initial setup?
We did the full initial set up and it was very straightforward, there was no specific issue.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The other two vendors on our short list were Nagios, which is a great tool, and SolarWinds. The way that SolarWinds does licensing is very confusing and we didn't like it.
What other advice do I have?
It would be a 10 out of 10 if they had artificial intelligence features such that, besides monitoring and sending alerts, it would solve the problems in specific nodes that are causing issues. It would be great if we had that.
Download a testing license and try it for 30 days. It's worthwhile to have the tool in your local environment. Also, try to find a local partner that can help you with the initial set up.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Sr. Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Support needs improvement, though it has a rich GUI for infrastructure monitoring
What is most valuable?
- Rich GUI tool to monitor infrastructure.
- Provides all types of monitoring in a single product.
What needs improvement?
Support is very bad. They should improve support and customer relationship.
For how long have I used the solution?
Two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yes.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues in tools.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
It depends on cost, the customer and architect.
How was the initial setup?
It is straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is fully depend on customer, on what he wants.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, before choosing a product I evaluate it against all requirements.
What other advice do I have?
Before implementation, it is best to clarify all the customer requirements and then choose products accordingly.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Technical Sales Consultant at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Enables the defining of thresholds, monitor, and alarm with multiple severities per monitor
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of this product would be the ability to define thresholds, monitor, and alarm. Having the ability to set multiple severities per monitor allows for a proactive environment.
How has it helped my organization?
OpManager was able to provide graphs associating trending for disk growth and other hardware/network utilization.
What needs improvement?
The new user interface of 12.x is a major change from the legacy UI of 11.x and Fluid UI. The UI changes look nice and 12.x is geared towards mobility, but finding its settings can be challenging. I have found many inconsistencies between switching back and forth between the the legacy UI and Fluid UI as far as settings changing.
Also, every time I perform a version upgrade, something breaks.
I have also stumbled across many bugs, leading me to think that the quality control is lacking.
There is a big lack of documentation and feature requests rarely happen.
The OpManager community is very sparse on the ME forums as well.
A simpler backup solution would be nice. Especially one that doesn't require downtime. I had to script my own daily scheduled task which would run the backup script and rename the file by date and dump it into a folder that is backed up to tape. Their ADSelfService Plus product is great with backups and there is obviously a disconnect between teams if they can't share code to make backups easier.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used this solution for approximately five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability issues were rare, but did happen. They were usually remediated quickly by ME OpManager support.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
My experience with scaling OpManager is minimal. However, when scaling out a VM environment, I have experienced issues requiring the VM hosts to be rediscovered, VMs removed from OpManager and re-discovered, and in some cases an entire VM host removed and re-added.
How are customer service and technical support?
Tech support was good, however with their California time zone, not having 24/7 coverage is very disappointing, especially since any major changes were outside of normal business hours.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Nagios, Cacti, Zabbix, OpenNMS, and PRTG. I worked for a company which had an instance of OpManager (9.x). It just worked and I fell in love with the workflow. Adding devices was a breeze and the trend data was simple to pull up and analyze, not to mention reporting features.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of OpManager is very easy and straightforward. Unlike some competitors, especially on the Linux side, the wizard will guide you through your install and you'll be up and running in minutes. OpManager has a self-contained web server and SQL server that make life easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing can be a bit high, but if you take advantage of the expertise of the developers and support like I did, it'll pay for itself. Also, if you have other ManageEngine products, they will provide additional discounts.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did evaluate Nagios and Cacti (the combination), but being the only Linux guru at the time, no one was really on board with the maintenance and support for the Open Source solutions.
What other advice do I have?
Start out with the latest version and keep the product up-to-date. Most of my issues have stemmed from starting as a 10.x install and slowly upgrading to the latest version.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Diretor Sistemas de Informação (CIO/CTO)
Alerting Provides Real-Time Failure Insight And Can Occasionally Predict Failures
What is most valuable?
Device Monitoring, and especially Network Monitoring, Automation, Alerting, and Reporting.
- Device Monitoring gives us an excellent view of servers and workstations, providing tools to leverage capacity management.
- Network Monitoring offers an extensive view of about 5000 network ports from different vendors, ranging from military grade switching to firewalls.
- Automation lets us prepare triggers to fire on met conditions, like restarting failing services.
- Alerting is the biggest asset as we can have real-time failure view and predict failures in some cases.
- Reporting gives us the means to know the state of the art in aggregated views, even providing metrics for our CxOs.
How has it helped my organization?
Reduced, substantially, our MTTR, kept our team small and focused, and led to a more controlled budget.
What needs improvement?
Stability regarding upgrades, sometimes impacting database issues. ManageEngine takes good care of its customers and responds quickly.
For how long have I used the solution?
10+ years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yes.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No.
How are customer service and technical support?
10 out of 10. They are superb technically, and their development listens to customers.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes. Nagios Core. It was more difficult to deploy, needed agents to install on Windows, and lacked a pleasing visual representation of systems and dashboards.
How was the initial setup?
Installation is very easy and has no complexity at all. After installation anyone with IT skills can become an OpManager Admin in just eight days.
What about the implementation team?
I recommend the Essential Edition with the required device packs. The product is free for up to 25 devices and starts at $595.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, Spiceworks. Nice product, but lacked robust features for enterprise.
What other advice do I have?
To have all purchased features available, a Windows base is necessary for product installation. Without that, monitoring and automation thru WMI for Windows will not be available. Works with MySQL or an external MS SQL instance. For performance I recommend an MS SQL instance. Installing a digital certificate is hard (although steps are easy) and doesn't always work first time.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Team Lead at EOH Managed Services Public Sector
Monitor and reporting on device config changes.
What is most valuable?
Network device monitoring
Switch configuration reporting
Router configuration backups
How has it helped my organization?
Monitor and reporting on device config changes.
What needs improvement?
Change control.
For how long have I used the solution?
2 Years
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
None
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
None
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
None
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Excellent
Technical Support:Excellent
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
CA Technologies - Not agentless and required training
How was the initial setup?
Easy and straightforward
What about the implementation team?
Vendor team - Excellent
What was our ROI?
>50%
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Much less compared to other products
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Solarwinds
Netwrix
What other advice do I have?
Easy and agentless to deploy , service and support is excellent.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Deploying agents through the application was problematic but overall deployment was easy.
What is most valuable?
FIM, and SIEM both available in free version (fewer than 10 devices).
For how long have I used the solution?
We’ve been evaluating the free version for about a month.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Deployment was quite easy. We used the PostgreSQL version which comes with the install. Deploying agents through the application was problematic so we installed them manually.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Since we are a small shop, we only needed what was available in the free version.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Excellent. It was on my initial contact that the rep suggested I wait a day to download the product, as more functionality would be added to the free version.
Technical Support:Excellent. I have submitted a few support requests and received prompt, courteous assistance, even though we are using the free version of the software.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have tried a few others but this is the first that offered file and log monitoring.
How was the initial setup?
Very simple setup. Much easier than some of the other big-name monitoring solutions out there.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it in-house.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, we looked at SolarWinds, Splunk, and Spiceworks.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free ManageEngine OpManager Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
Network Monitoring SoftwarePopular Comparisons
SolarWinds NPM
PRTG Network Monitor
ThousandEyes
Nagios XI
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
LogicMonitor
ScienceLogic
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ManageEngine OpManager Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which is better, Huawei eSight or ManageEngine OpManager for managing Huawei equipment?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between CA UIM and Manage Engine?
- When evaluating Network Performance Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
- What Questions Should I Ask Before Buying a Network Monitoring Tool?
- UIM OnPrem - SaaS
- Anyone switching from SolarWinds NPM? What is a good alternative and why?
- What is the best tool for SQL monitoring in a large enterprise?
- What tool do you recommend using for VoIP monitoring for a mid-sized enterprise?
- Should we choose Nagios or PRTG?
Very valuable inputs regarding OP Manager Review Bruce ; Thank you for sharing Ravi Suvvari