Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Cloud Private comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.3. Microsoft holds a 0.6% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 10 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

510 Views
495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Private

Read 5 IBM Cloud Private reviews

495 Views
490 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

IBM Cloud Private

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Cloud Private and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are major players in the cloud solution market, focusing on enterprise container management and orchestration. Azure Red Hat OpenShift is considered more advanced due to its features and flexible pricing, though it has higher initial costs.

Features: IBM Cloud Private offers robust data integration, extensive middleware support, and secure on-premises deployment. Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides seamless Kubernetes integration, strong DevOps support with CI/CD pipelines, and broad scalability in hybrid environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Private's on-premises deployment allows extensive data control but requires significant resources. Azure Red Hat OpenShift offers cloud integration for easy scaling with efficient customer service, appealing to enterprises seeking quick adoption.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Private presents competitive initial pricing suitable for organizations preferring on-premises control but may incur higher long-term costs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift's higher setup cost is counterbalanced by a pay-as-you-go model and reduced maintenance, yielding better ROI, making it ideal for long-term cloud investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Private Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Private

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Cloud Private

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

20th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Private is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

ArtemiiKropachev

Vice President, Engineering & Principal Architect at Li9 Technology Solutions

A high-performing solution provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand and lot of automation that developers can utilize

Azure Red Hat OpenShift is very valuable because it is a complete application delivery platform with a lot of automation that developers can utilize. It's a complete solution without building your own on top of Kubernetes. As a consulting company, we implement Azure Red Hat OpenShift for our clients, who appreciate its integration capabilities for enhancing cloud operations. While we handle implementation, build processes, and automation, the operational responsibility lies with the customer. The service provides basic processes and support from Red Hat and Microsoft, which benefits clients by allowing them to focus on their business rather than regular operations like cluster upgrades.

Read full review

CristianIriazabal

Architect of solutions at Gire S.A.

A solution that ranks in the top five and integrates well with API Connect

One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect from Argentina to IBM's data centers in Washington and Dallas. It would be a benefit to have a data center in Latin America. The solution does not offer many routes over the cloud that are available with other solutions such as AWS which is a leader in the industry.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped our banking operations. Not all services are microservices; some remain monolithic for simplicity. Containerization is pivotal, with OpenShift (based on Kubernetes and Docker) managing our microservices."

"We have control of the ESXi."

"Excellent technical support."

"The product's framework is good, it integrates well with API Connect, and the private cloud allows for use in any location."

"The most valuable attribute is the platform's ability to consistently deliver high reliability."

Cons

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"Automation could be improved."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is the leader in this area. However, there's no need for service improvement in Azure Red Hat OpenShift as the service is excellent. I don't need additional features because I can customize it according to the customer's needs."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

"The product is expensive."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"Auto-scaling and managing pod scaling in the microservices architecture, a core feature of IBM Cloud Private, can pose challenges, especially when dealing with larger volumes of traffic."

"One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect."

"The support and pricing need to improve."

"I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhancement. Additionally, the DevOps layer could benefit from closer integrations, especially for using external applications like Jenkins."

"lacking in multi-cloud management."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"In general, the cost is on the higher side."

"We pay annual licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Government

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretati...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Private?

Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped ou...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Private?

I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Private?

I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhance...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 47% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 20% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 11% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Cloud Private

Compared 74% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud Private

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon AWS vs IBM Cloud Private

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM Cloud Private Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

August 2025

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

July 2025

Download IBM Cloud Private product report

Also Known As

No data available

ICP

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides highly available, fully managed OpenShift clusters on demand, monitored and operated jointly by Microsoft and Red Hat. Kubernetes is at the core of Red Hat OpenShift. OpenShift brings added-value features to complement Kubernetes, making it a turnkey container platform as a service (PaaS) with a significantly improved developer and operator experience.

Microsoft

IBM Cloud Private is a private cloud platform for developing and running workloads locally. It is an integrated environment that enables you to design, develop, deploy and manage on-premises, containerized cloud applications behind your firewall. It includes the container orchestrator Kubernetes, a private image repository, a management console and monitoring frameworks.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Private

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Private

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Private and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. IBM Cloud Private report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.