Cisco Umbrella Reviews

We have been working with the administration of the product as well as looking at various features of the product, such as locking of the URL. We have also been checking certain intelligence to see how it helps in maintaining security posture for the organization. In addition, we have also been looking at command and control, communication with other IPs, and early blocking of the DNS requests.

Overall, it is a very good solution. It is a simple solution and very easy to set up.

It should have a real-time malware classification engine. It should check the malware on the website. It would be good if it had a real-time malware check for the websites because currently, it just compares the DNS queries of the blacklist. 

It should also have malware control over file execution and the types of files that the users are allowed to download.

I have been working with this solution for over one and a half years.

Technical support is very good for the existing features, but they must incorporate more features in their solution, such as file execution blocking and real-time malware check.

The initial setup was very simple because it was just the installation of agents on the system, and it can communicate with the cloud easily. It didn't give me any problem.

The price should be slightly lower than the current price because if you look at the whole solution, it is simply a threat intelligence solution to block blacklisted things. The price should be lower looking at the features provided by the solution. The price isn't too high either, but it could be lower.

If you are looking to have a simpler solution that can easily prevent malicious threats, you can go for it. If you want to have a more general solution, for example, with control over file execution or real-time malware engine, you can go for a web security gateway. If you want to have a number of things integrated within a single solution, such as DLP, you should go for Forcepoint Security Gateway. Cisco Umbrella doesn't provide such a feature.

I would rate Cisco Umbrella a seven out of ten.

Generally, we use Cisco Umbrella to prevent DNS attacks within the LAN. As we are a data center, that is our main use case.

Within our organization, there are roughly 500 people using this solution.

It's good for local communication with the data center and LAN.

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for one and a half years.

Stability-wise, it's good. I have never encountered any bugs. 

The technical support is very good.

Actually, we recently switched over to Zscaler because it has more features and it's more scalable than Cisco Umbrella.

I wasn't involved in the initial setup, so I can't comment on that.

I would recommend Cisco Umbrella to other interested companies. It's a very flexible and secure application — it's very good.

Overall, I would give Cisco Umbrella a rating of 10 out of 10.

The solution is mainly used for remote workers, for people that are outside the enterprise premises, in order to have security while they work on the road.

With many of our customer's end-users on the road, it was easy for their machines to get infected or to lose information. After we installed this product, these issues were drastically reduced and the number of infections dropped month over month.

It provides security for the remote workers and it helps to improve enterprise security in a very easy way.

We mainly enjoy web software protection capabilities. It prevents the end-users from getting into bad sites or sites that potentially could have malware or could be phishing. It helps end-users avoid the wrong sites.

The solution works very smoothly.

The user interface is good.

The implementation is pretty easy.

I can't think of a place where there is a gap in features. It seems to cover everything.

The pricing is a bit high. Being outside of the USA, we have issues with the exchange rate.

The solution could use more intelligence.

They likely could combine some of the AMP features that they already have in other AEM's for anti-malware purposes.

I've been using the solution for two years at this point.

The stability of the solution is excellent. It's very reliable.

Cisco technical support is one of the best on the market. We're quite satisfied with their level of support.

That said, as the solution is pretty easy to use and very stable, we haven't really used too much technical support.

The setup is not too complex. It's pretty straightforward. They make configuration and onboarding relatively easy.

Deployment only takes a matter of days. You simply deploy the agent to the active directory, to all the installations and you're done.

I sell it as a managed service provider. Therefore, the solution is installed for our clients. They don't have to worry about that aspect.

I don't know exactly which version of the solution we are using, however, we do use the most advanced license that's available currently.

As a managed service provider, we deal with organizations of all sizes, from small companies to large enterprises. 

Overall, I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It works well, has an easy installation, and offers good protection.

We are a reseller and Cisco Umbrella is one of the products that we sell to our customers. We offer it as a managed service provider. This product provides security for remote workers and it helps to improve enterprise security in a very easy way.

It is mainly used for remote workers and for people that live outside the enterprise premises. It gives them security while they are on the road.

Because our clients' end-users are mainly on the road, it is very easy for them to get infected and lose information. After we installed the Cisco Umbrella solution, importantly, they have reduced the number of infected cases per month.

The most valuable feature is the website protection capabilities because it prevents end-users from entering bad sites that potentially have malware or could be used for phishing. Ultimately, it helps users avoid the wrong sites.

It is very easy to integrate.

I would like to see more intelligence built into Umbrella.

In the future, they should combine some of the Cisco AMP features that they already have, for anti-malware purposes.

We have been working with Cisco Umbrella for more than two years.

This is a very stable product and helps to improve the security posture of the enterprise.

We have clients that range in size from small to large-sized organizations.

Cisco's support is very good and, in fact, one of the best.

Because the product is very easy to use and very stable, we have not had to rely on support from the documentation or the community.

The initial setup is quite straightforward and easy, and the deployment can be completed in a matter of days. You deploy the agent to Active Directory, for all of the installations, and you're done.

We deploy this solution for our clients because we sell it as a managed service.

Outside of the United States, we have issues with the exchange rate that increases the cost.

Overall, this product works smoothly and perfectly.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

DNS security used to be the main value for us. Looking forward, SASE-style use cases (the ability to connect to any endpoint, be it a corporate-managed device, or a privately managed device, to any SaaS service) seems to be the most important feature for the future, on top of DNS security.

Looking at the full umbrella suite in the light of SASE, Secure Access Service Edge, they are clearly lacking in the inline CASB. Any line cloud access security broker has an API-based cloud access security broker, which is called CloudLock, but they're lacking the inline components, which are able to intercept traffic.

An on-premise DLP solution or integration with an on-premise DLP solution would be a nice addition. Also, more broad operating system support for endpoints would be an advantage.

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for the last three years. 

Cisco Umbrella is absolutely stable. They put a lot of weight on the availability and reliability of the global footprint. So yes, they kind of set the standards for availability. 

Cisco Umbrella Is very easy to scale. 

I haven't been involved in providing support for it; however, I am not aware of any significant issues.

The initial setup was quite straightforward. 

Deployment depends on the number of features and the degree of integration you're looking for. Deployment can take anywhere from 30 seconds, simply to redirect your recursive DNS service, up to several days for a full-blown enterprise setup. So it depends on the use case.

The pricing varies. If you're just after DNS security, it's rather expensive. If you are, however, after replacing parts of your enterprise security infrastructure (by moving from a legacy on-premise, security-based approach, to a more cloud-based approach), then you can replace a whole bunch of classic security devices and solutions. In short, you can basically consolidate your security functions. I think it's worth the money.

I would definitely recommend Cisco Umbrella. Proof of concept is always the second step. The first step is coming up with your use cases. If Umbrella is the answer, what's the question? You should roadmap your immediate and long-term goals in terms of IT security, or information security. You should take into account your operational fitness for tackling the cloud as well, then pick the right features to suit your needs. This is all basically applicable to similar solutions. If you run into this with no plan, you're just shifting your existing problems.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cisco Umbrella a rating of eight.

Our customers used an older version of Cisco, but we proposed Cisco Umbrella for their POC phase.

The user interface is great. It's very easy to tailor to our client's environment and needs.

There should be some programs for the POC phase.

I would like to see more integration between Cisco Umbrella and Cisco DNA center

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for one and a half years.

Cisco Umbrella is very stable.

The support is very good.

The price of Cisco Umbrella is a little higher than similar solutions; however, I am not exactly sure what the price difference is.

We compared Cisco Umbrella to other solutions including Zscaler and Palo Alto.

Integration is better with Cisco. Cisco Umbrella performed very well compared to Zscaler and other solutions.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.

We primarily use the solution as cloud security for our branches. It protects us from direct internet outbreaks.

It makes for good flexibility. The solution is very easy to manage. We found the initial setup, for example, to be quite simple.

Easy to deploy.

Efficient protection on the DNS level and even higher. The sandboxing feature analyse and handle the complicated security risks.

The product can be pretty expensive.

I've been using the solution for two to three years at this point.

We haven't faced any issues. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find Cisco to be reliable.

We have a variety of customers. The number of users on each umbrella varies from one to a few thousand. Most companies may just have a few hundred users. It's basically suitable for companies of all sizes. It scales well, in that sense. 

The Cisco Umbrella IT operation resource needs are equal for a large and small company. (no need to hire more engineers or operators)

Overall, the scalability is excellent. It's quite flexible.

While I have been in touch with Cisco technical support in the past (and they've been quite good), for Umbrella, I find I don't need any support.

I've dealt with other products on a different scale. I'd say that Cisco Umbrella is far and away much better than the other cloud security products on the market.

The initial setup was not complex. It was pretty straightforward. We found it to be rather easy, from beginning to end.

The deployment times vary and depend on which Umbrella you use. However, we've found it should only take about a day to get up and running. An IT team can manage it. They don't necessarily need an integrator.

The solution doesn't really require too much maintenance. You probably wouldn't need a dedicated person to maintain it.

We are integrators ourselves, however, the initial setup is so straightforward, typically an in-house IT team can manage a setup.

The solution is costly. It doesn't come cheap. The licensing also comes with additional costs for extra services (such as sandboxing feature, L3/L4 firewall, etc...).

We are Cisco partners. We have a business relationship with them.

We use various types of Umbrella. 

I'd recommend the solution. It's one of the best on the market and it works well in different environments. It's also extremely easy to deploy.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate it at a nine.

We use this solution to provide Dorel filtering and security for our WiFi environment. I'm the chief enterprise architect and we are customers of Cisco Umbrella. 

The security and access control features are the most valuable for us.

Improvements could be made with the user interface, it could be a little smoother and more intuitive.

I've been using this solution for two years. 

The solution is very stable.

I have scaled it in other companies and it scales very well. It's got a UV, it's got a decent user interface so once you go to Cisco training, they offer it when you buy the product so that if you are a small business looking for something like Umbrella, you can set it and forget it and it works. You can also tie it into your WiFi solution.

Tech support at Cisco is great. Not just for this project. I've been working with Cisco equipment and Cisco tech for 25 years now and I've never had a problem with them.

The initial setup was relatively straightforward. We had an implementation strategy and it wasn't particularly difficult.

In general, Umbrella is a competitive solution for small or large enterprise. It's never the cheapest, but it's always in the competition, at least in my experience. I would recommend the solution, there's no reason not to go there, depending on your specific situation, of course. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.