Amazon AWS Reviews

I do research and I am using Amazon AWS for storage in the cloud.

Amazon AWS is very user-friendly.

I have been using Amazon AWS for approximately one year.

Amazon AWS is stable.

I have found Amazon AWS to be scalable.

I have used Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS together.

The implementation is straightforward.

I did the implementation of the solution myself.

The license for Amazon AWS is expensive. I am currently using the free version.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

As the solution is cloud-based, we always use the latest version. 

We use the solution for our web platform business needs. 

We like everything about the solution except for the general price. Most of Amazon's products are quite expensive. 

We have been using Amazon AWS for five years. 

The installation is quite straightforward.

We only need a single administrator for the implementation. 

We are not happy with the general price and find most of Amazon's products to be quite expensive. 

There are 50 users making use of the solution in our organization. 

I would recommend the solution to others. 

I rate Amazon AWS as an eight out of ten. 

The solution is basically infrastructure to service the cloud.

It can be used for everything. It can be for anything. It's an intelligently designed system that can run any workload, on any data for backup, for production, for anything you imagine.

The solution is very easy to install. In a few clicks, you get what you need.

The solution is stable.

The scalability is very good.

Technical support is helpful and responsive.

The initial setup is easy.

The solution would be better if it was more secure. That's an aspect they need to work on.

I've been dealing with the solution for five years. 

The stability and reliability are great. The performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze and there are no bugs or glitches. 

The scalability is good. A company can expand it as needed. It's not a problem.

We have about 100 people on the solution currently. 

We've used technical support in the past, and they are fine. We've been satisfied with the level of service provided to us.

As a cloud-based solution, there isn't really an installation required. Everything sits in the cloud. You don't need to download or install anything. The setup might take a few months.

I handled the initial setup myself. I did not need any help from integrators or consultants. 

While you may have to pay for some of the product kits, it's a monthly fee for everything.

As a cloud-based solution, we're always using the latest version. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I'm pretty happy with the stuff you can do with it, however, I would like it to be more secure. 

I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations.

It is intuitive, easy to deploy, and rather quick to deploy and set up. There are a number of native services in the ecosystem. These services are built into the cloud and are mature enough to support you in many ways.

It is relatively secure and definitely reliable for uptime.

Amazon still has room for improvement in terms of being more mature on the monitoring side and in terms of the native capabilities. Amazon should get their services portfolio stronger on OEM-based workloads such as Microsoft and Oracle. There are a lot of areas that still do not have offerings, so there is room to grow. I would be happy if they bring more maturity to the monitoring capabilities and SaaS offerings. They are strong on Infrastructure as a Service, but they are not mature on SaaS.

Amazon is not at all a partner-friendly company. Support from Amazon is not at all good as a partner.

We are a technology consulting and managed services company. For our customers, we've been designing solutions on Amazon Cloud for almost seven years.

It has been stable so far.

It is scalable.

Support from Amazon is not at all good as a partner. We wouldn't lose sleep by not working with them as a partner, but we would continue to work on that technology. It is not at all a partner-friendly company.

It is easy to deploy. You can quickly deploy and set it up.

Considering the product, support, service, and maturity, I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of 10.

We use Amazon AWS because it has really advanced parameters and suits our business.

I like that it helps us do everything really fast, and its advanced services.

The price could be better.

I've been using Amazon AWS for about four months.

Amazon AWS is stable, and there aren't any issues that I know about.

Amazon AWS is scalable.

I didn't notice any problems or issues related to this area, and everything was fine.

The initial setup wasn't easy because we implemented this process over two months, and it was a complex process.

It's an expensive product.

My company considered not only one provider, and it was really a complicated process to review all the providers. We had our checklist of all necessary requirements, and it was quite complicated. We chose AWS because of its advanced features that let us do everything quickly.

I would recommend this solution to new users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a nine.

We use Amazon AWS for storage, networking, and remote computing.

I like S3, load balancers, and Route 53.

The price could be better.

I have been using Amazon AWS for six years.

Amazon AWS is quite stable.

There are so many references that I can refer to, and their technical support is great.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The price, in general, could be better.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS an eight.

I like the storage, all the codes like Lambda and Amazon EMR.

The price could be better. 

I have been working with Amazon AWS for seven to eight years.

Amazon AWS is a stable solution.

Amazon AWS is scalable. Scalability has been good for us.

I didn't take part in the initial setup on a very hands-on level. However, I hear from my architects and the development team that it's straightforward.

It could be cheaper, and Amazon could also be more transparent with its pricing. I would first expect any product vendor to give me the utmost transparency on pricing information. There shouldn't be any hidden costs.

Their service offerings have a bit of segmentation, and they focus more on SMBs. They brought them onto the cloud and encouraged them to use solutions on the cloud. But strategically, they should probably improve that and offer some credits.

I would advise potential users to use Azure if they want more stability, but I always warn about the costs. That's why I don't bring infrastructure to the business, and I find the customers with their own environment. There are multiple portions, and it's not straightforward for anybody to do. That's the bad side of it, but anybody can prepare.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a seven.

We use the solution for managed hosting of the connection servers of some of our clients. 

The solution has a vast array of features and services. It offers many upgrades. 

The price of the solution is comparatively quite high in comparison with that of Azure. 

We have been using Amazon AWS for around two or three years.

The solution has good stability.

The solution has good scalability. 

I like the technical support.

The initial setup was quite easy. 

The solution could be more cost-effective. 

When it comes to cloud management, I have no complaints at present. 

I am a customer of Amazon. 

As we are, basically, only hosting cloud services, this is geared towards the end user. We manage two or three people.  

I would recommend the solution to others.

Owing to the pricing, I rate Amazon AWS as a nine out of ten.