Splunk Enterprise Platform Reviews

Splunk Enterprise Platform is primarily used for SOAR in my daily work to ensure everything is making its way there and everything is making its way out.

I verify and track that everything is working smoothly with Splunk Enterprise Platform through alerting.

The best features Splunk Enterprise Platform offers include alerting.

What I appreciate most about Splunk Enterprise Platform's alerting features is that it notifies me of something bad that is about to happen before it happens.

Alerting is the main highlight for me regarding features.

Splunk Enterprise Platform has positively impacted my organization, as we are ahead of the curve in terms of when we discover issues.

Being ahead of the curve has helped by saving time.

Splunk Enterprise Platform can be improved by addressing bugs and upgrades, as every time there is an upgrade, there is a bug that needs fixing.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Platform for a year and a half.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is stable.

The scalability of Splunk Enterprise Platform is pretty good.

The customer support is okay.

I have not previously used a different solution.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that licensing is a pain.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Splunk Enterprise Platform.

The advice I would give to others looking into using Splunk Enterprise Platform is to consider the cost. I would rate this product a 7.

Private Cloud

I use Splunk Enterprise Platform to get logs from different devices in our organization, and after getting logs, it creates some alerts. I do further analysis on those alerts to determine if they are true positives or false positives.

I appreciate that Splunk Enterprise Platform creates alerts based on pre-described rules. Splunk Enterprise Platform provides better correlation of logs than IBM QRadar. IBM QRadar is more graphically oriented and has a good user interface, but the backend and technical processes are not as strong as Splunk's.

Splunk Enterprise Platform can improve in defense capabilities by blocking suspicious and malicious activities or preventing attacks.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Platform for almost two years.

I have experienced lagging sometimes with Splunk Enterprise Platform, but this is not the fault of Splunk; it is the fault of deployment and some other team members.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is scalable.

I used IBM QRadar previously. I prefer Splunk Enterprise Platform more.

I appreciate the initial deployment part of Splunk Enterprise Platform because it is very easy. Compared to other products, Splunk deployment is straightforward.

I don't get involved in maintenance, but Splunk Enterprise Platform requires maintenance, and the maintenance team is different in our company.

My company deals with the pricing, so I have no idea about it.

Splunk Enterprise Platform provides better correlation of logs than IBM QRadar. IBM QRadar is more graphically oriented and has a good user interface, but the backend and technical processes are not as strong as Splunk's.

I have experienced lagging sometimes with Splunk Enterprise Platform, but this is not the fault of Splunk; it is the fault of deployment and some other team members. I am not familiar with the feature called Trusted Control Plane. I don't have any information about Federated Search. My company deals with the pricing, so I have no idea about it. Overall, I would give Splunk Enterprise Platform a score of eight point five out of ten. I would rate this product nine out of ten overall.

I focus on threat detection against stock trading systems. I am in charge of five to seven stock trading companies' B2C systems for detecting threat attacks. Our customers include several stock trading companies, banks and and large mobile careers in Japan.

We built a threat detection system for our client company, one of the biggest security company in Japan, using Splunk Enterprise Platform. We started a new business on this platform to provide threat detection systems to stock trading system companies and banks, expanding our customer base.

One valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Platform is citizen programming, which allows users to manage and compute huge stream-based datasets easily using SPL language. The second feature is its ability to perform matrix-like stream calculations concurrently, improving upon traditional SIEM tools. Finally, Splunk's Machine Learning Toolkit is offered without charge, allowing users to incorporate machine learning in their business logic, aiding in procedures like threat hunting.

Splunk could improve by enhancing its graphical view functionality. Compared to other BI tools, Splunk's graphic features are limited; part of customers desire detailed, rich visual effects, like world maps showing threat attacks as animations. Additionally, the deep learning capabilities need enhancing, especially on Splunk Cloud, where customers find it challenging to use deep learning tools without setting up backend computing resources.

I have over 14 years of experience with Splunk Enterprise Platform, beginning my first evaluation in 2011.

I would rate the stability of Splunk Enterprise Platform as a seven. While it requires managing configuration files and processing scale-out operations manually, limiting its auto-scaling capabilities, it still performs adequately.

I rate the scalability of Splunk Enterprise Platform as an eight. Some products can automatically scale, but Splunk Enterprise requires manual configuration changes to achieve scale, which is slightly outdated compared to modern technologies.

I rate Splunk Japan's customer service as an eight. Although I generally provide support myself and do not often rely on Splunk support, this rating reflects general consultant feedback.

Positive

I previously used Elastic Search and Kibana, but switched to Splunk for ease of use and to define business entities such as branches, channels, and stock accounts.

Standalone Installation was very easy. Designing and capacity planning for a distributed cluster environment was not easy.

I am a Splunk consultant and implement customer solutions myself.

I rate the pricing of Splunk as nine out of ten. The pricing model is based on ingesting data sizes, not user count, and includes a free tier for up to 500 MB of daily data, differentiating it from user-based pricing BI-tools.

I evaluated ArcSight and Manage Engine and made our selection.

# After using Splunk for several years, I conducted further evaluations, but our selection remained unchanged.

# Datadog was ideal for bug traceback during APM operations.

# Exabeam was ideal for use case-centric threat detection.

Overall, I rate Splunk Enterprise Platform ten out of ten. I am dissatisfied with Splunk’s graphics view and deep learning capabilities; they could be better, especially on Splunk Cloud. While I was able to enhance the platform using technologies like JavaScript, most of my clients struggle.However, it will be sufficient for the next few years with it's strong Machine Learning capability.

 Also, it would be preferable for Splunk SOAR to include sequential Splunk task execution and MCP/A2A support features.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

I was a partner with Splunk for around six years, and later I moved to customer projects. As part of Splunk, I worked as a professional services consultant, and later I began working with multiple customers through a different company as an independent consultant.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is exceptional as a SIEM platform, with the breadth and depth built over the last 20 years. The main benefit is that it serves both core operations and security through Enterprise Security.

My experience maintaining granular control over the trusted control plane within Splunk involves working with numerous log types that can be ingested, whether from custom application events, OS events, access and identity information, or security or EDR events.

Regarding AI usage in RBAC, I have primarily used it for use case management and taking actions once a security notable event is generated.

I have used Splunk Federated Search, which I implemented for one of my customers about a year ago.

In my experience with Federated Search, I will provide some context on why it was introduced. Splunk was pushing more on Splunk Cloud platform, which is one of their SaaS-based offerings.

In terms of scalability, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Platform between nine and ten because all you have to do is add one indexer to the platform. Splunk architects and consultants are involved in that process, but it is quite fast.

One area that has room for improvement is the log onboarding problem with all the AI aspects, which has not yet been solved.

I have been using this solution for around eight years.

My experience with technical support leads me to rate it between six and seven, leaning toward seven, as they have outsourced most of the support, and support in some regions is not excellent.

The deployment model of my clients is a mix, as I have a few customers who ingest between 40 to 50 terabytes a day who are on enterprise, and there are a few clients with around four to five terabytes a day on cloud.

I would say the deployment planning and architecting is medium to hard, but once that is planned, the deployment itself is easy.

In terms of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), I would say it is consistently net-net positive because Splunk Enterprise Platform is one of the platforms where all the logs of the entire organization are ingested.

Regarding pricing, I find that Splunk is quite expensive, and I have seen customers getting migrated since the last two years.

In comparison with major vendors on the market, I see Splunk Enterprise Platform as still being the market leader, at least in terms of SIEM.

I have a team reporting to me, as I work for a company, serving a bunch of Splunk customers and other SIEM customers.

In my organization, there are around four to five specialists who work with Splunk.

My clients are enterprise and medium to large businesses.

Splunk Enterprise Platform requires regular maintenance, and I find it easy to maintain.

My impression of Splunk's approach to managing governance within private network environments is that it is straightforward.

I suggest conducting a POC first and having one real customer who uses Splunk, because it will not work if you are just installing it locally.

I would rate this solution a nine overall.

I normally use Splunk Enterprise Platform for review purposes. It is very easy and convenient. Its GUI is easy for me to review and approve all those things.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is very easy and convenient to use. The graphical user interface is easy for me to review and approve tasks. It saves time by allowing me to perform actions on a single platform instead of managing them separately. Additionally, its real-time processing capability is very good.

The only problem I have with Splunk Enterprise Platform is that sometimes when I update a review, it takes time to receive confirmation emails. This happens very rarely, maybe once or twice a month. I feel this can be improved in terms of performance.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Platform for three years.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is very stable.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is scalable to some extent, which is acceptable. However, when I connect via VPN, it may take time to launch.

I haven't got any support yet, so I can't comment on this as of now.

Splunk Enterprise Platform saves approximately 20 to 30 percent of my time without having to perform different actions separately.

My overall experience with Splunk Enterprise Platform rates around seven out of ten points. The main issues are regarding updating reviews and scalability, which may take some time when connecting via VPN. I would rate the overall solution 7 out of 10.

On-premises

We are working with AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Platform, and other Splunk products. However, the main use case here is with Splunk Enterprise Platform.

Splunk Enterprise Platform is a good tool to have, but it is expensive. The features that have proven most effective for real-time data analysis include parts of the platform and its automation capabilities. However, I want them to enhance their automation to cover every aspect, particularly the automation of roles creation.

While Splunk Enterprise Platform is a good product, it is expensive. Additionally, it is complex for inexperienced cybersecurity engineers and requires experienced personnel to handle it effectively.

We have been providing Splunk Enterprise Platform for ten months.

Splunk's technical support is at the same level for all products, although we have not opened many tickets.

Neutral

Splunk Enterprise Platform is expensive.

The main competitor of Splunk in our region is Exabeam, which is less expensive. For small and medium companies, Fortinet is a competitor. Stellar Cyber has also recently entered the market.

For smaller companies, I recommend Stellar Cyber as an alternative to Splunk Enterprise Platform. Stellar Cyber is easier to implement and integrate, and it has solid AI capabilities, especially for automation. It is also willing to adapt to customer requirements. I would rate Splunk Enterprise Platform overall somewhere between six and eight, depending on the size of the company.

The main use case is to analyze the data log coming from other systems. We use Splunk to identify anomalies in transaction patterns, which may indicate irregular activity from certain customers. Our goal is to create alerts for stakeholders when such anomalies are detected.

Splunk has made our job easier by streamlining data searching and decision-making processes. By using it for fraud detection, we have potentially saved billions of Indonesian rupiah.

Splunk is very flexible in handling various formats of data as long as basic rules are adhered to. Its integration with other systems is seamless and can be done overnight. This ease of integration is its best advantage. Additionally, Splunk is adequate for real-time data processing.

The Splunk Processing Language (SPL) poses a steep learning curve for new users. The software could benefit from additional processing power, such as GPU support, for handling large volumes of data faster. The language could also be more user-friendly, similar to platforms where actions are easier through button clicks.

I have used the solution for approximately three years.

I rarely encounter bugs or glitches during daily use. However, there was one instance where an issue required solutions from the headquarter's next upgrade session.

Splunk is scalable, provided the supporting infrastructure, such as CPU and GPU processing, is also scalable.

I rarely communicate with the Splunk headquarters, usually interacting with the local implementer.

Positive

We are not using anything else that functions like Splunk. However, for fraud detection, we also use GVD Instinct and FICO, along with Elasticsearch.

I have not been involved in implementing it, except in integration, where I've found it easy.

We have been saving significant amounts through fraud detection. I cannot say precisely how much. Overall, Splunk has simplified our data management and decision-making processes.

The official license operates like a subscription with an annual fee. Our local implementer offers pricing based on reserved quota, such as 80 gigabytes per day, costing under one billion Indonesian rupiah, or around $70,000 USD. It is affordable and flexible.

Elasticsearch, Kibana, Check Point, and other solutions like Microsoft Teams, OneDrive, and SharePoint are used.

Keep my identity anonymous; publishing my title is sufficient. It's important to master the SPL for efficient use. Seek solutions that better support GPU for real-time processing.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Other

The use cases for Splunk Enterprise Platform vary depending on the specific scenario.

Splunk Enterprise Platform has different purposes, including data visualization and other applications.

In Splunk Enterprise Platform, the most impactful features for data analytics allow you to get into the repository.

There are financial benefits from using Splunk Enterprise Platform, and as a retailer, it provides better profit margins.

Splunk Enterprise enhances data analytics with its AI capabilities.

For future updates of Splunk Enterprise Platform, I would like to see integration by GUI.

The integration should be improved with the UI.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Platform for about two years.

There are no significant challenges in deploying Splunk Enterprise Platform.

The challenges or pain points others should anticipate before implementing Splunk Enterprise Platform are mostly related to the integration part.

The time it takes to deploy Splunk Enterprise Platform depends on the use cases.

It may take anywhere from a couple of hours to a couple of weeks for Splunk Enterprise Platform deployment.

The same three people take part in the deployment of Splunk Enterprise Platform.

I do not take part in the deployment; my team does.

My advice for those looking to implement Splunk Enterprise Platform is to know the product well and have hands-on workshops or create a lab to gain complete knowledge before proceeding.

Regarding maintenance, it does not require much as it is on-premises.

Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Platform an eight.

On-premises

Other

We use the tool to monitor logs from various sources. Multiple users send their logs to the Splunk Enterprise Platform using different methods, including Universal Forwarder and AWS services like S3. Additionally, we utilize tools like AWS Genesys for log transmission.

The product helps monitor and visualize data. It allows you to handle various tasks. You can store, visualize, and analyze data with the Splunk Enterprise Platform. It offers features like virtual folders and heavy folders for filtering data. Additionally, you can create dashboards to showcase data to different teams and stakeholders. The tool also enables the creation of analytics and alerts and sends reports, making it a valuable tool for our system.

The dashboard and visualization features are good for data analysis. With features like the Studio dashboard introduced in versions 8 to 9, users find it much easier to create dashboards without knowledge of languages like XML.

Based on my experience, I've noticed areas for improvement, particularly in support. Developers typically interact with support personnel who may lack technical expertise when raising support tickets. This can result in delays as initial interactions involve sharing documents before escalation to higher support levels.

I have been using the product for four years. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

The tool's scalability is good, and it is based on licensing. My company has more than 10,000 users. 

I used Dynatrace before the Splunk Enterprise Platform. 

The tool's deployment can be complex for the first time. It can become more manageable after that. 

If you exceed your licensed limit, the product will issue a warning, typically a five-license warning. Additionally, they send daily email notifications informing you about the breach. This prompts you to consider options such as minimizing logs or acquiring additional licensing to address the issue.

It can be perceived as expensive, especially for organizations dealing with large volumes of data, such as in the banking sector, where numerous logs are generated every second. While other tools are available at lower costs, some teams may consider open-source or lower-cost alternatives, especially if they have funding constraints.

Regarding security and event management, the tool is handled by a different team. They utilize security enterprise tools, including SIEM, to manage security. Splunk Enterprise Platform's real-time processing capability significantly enhances our data monitoring. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

We use Splunk to create dashboards and do analysis.

Splunk can be used primarily to port log files, allowing for easy and quick management of large amounts of logs. However, this can also be a drawback due to the configuration, parsing, and dashboard creation limitations. Communication is stream-based, which means you need to do a lot of pre-emptive setup to get a nice export. Another issue with Splunk is its streamlined nature; it reruns the query whenever you refresh a dashboard. This becomes problematic if you have a large volume of log files, as it can be slow, resource-intensive, and require significant storage space.

It is designed to process and analyze log files. You feed log files into the platform, automatically extracting different fields. This allows you to filter and manipulate the data in a stream-based manner. Essentially, you pass a log file through various filters sequentially, enhancing or reducing its size by adding or removing information. However, this stream-based approach can make it challenging to create detailed dashboards easily. The platform primarily focuses on log files and is unsuitable for real-time data analysis.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Platform for one or two years.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a six out of ten.

It can be very slow if you have a lot of data, and scaling it up for better performance can be quite expensive.

A thousand users use this solution. We have many systems and a lot of data.
It is centrally deployed and used extensively across various systems. I use it daily, but sometimes I only use it once a month. It depends on the data I need or the issue I'm investigating.

I rate the solution’s scalability a four out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward.

I wouldn't recommend Splunk Enterprise Platform because it's slow and has significant limitations.

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

On-premises