No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Chief Information Security Officer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Dec 8, 2020
A stable and capable anti-phishing, anti-malware, and threat protection solution
Pros and Cons
  • "Its anti-phishing functionality is the most valuable. Certainly, the biggest problem I have is phishing."
  • "Proofpoint Email Protection has reduced the analyst overhead in responding to phishing incidents by several orders of magnitude."
  • "It has too many screens. It is kind of a conglomeration of products. In other words, they built product A, product B, and product C, and they are yet to integrate them into a single administrative console. I would certainly like to see a more seamless administrative interface. I would also like to see them include more bang for the buck, by including features like email fraud protection, rather than making their product so piecemeal, where you are buying little pieces. I agree with the idea of having multiple tiers or layers, but maybe as small, medium, and large, as opposed to an a la carte menu."
  • "Their technical support is mediocre. It could be better."

What is our primary use case?

We use it in front of Office 365 for anti-phishing, anti-malware, and threat protection.

How has it helped my organization?

Proofpoint Email Protection has reduced the analyst overhead in responding to phishing incidents by several orders of magnitude. We did not have the resources to respond directly to all Phishing Reports under the old system  With automated responses, we are able to address all Phishing Reports automatically.

What is most valuable?

Its anti-phishing functionality is very valuable to the organization.  As outlined above, we are able to automatically respond to Phishing Reports as well as stop as much as 80% of most Phishing Attacks at the front end leaving only a small percentage to be handled after the fact.

What needs improvement?

It has too many screens. It is kind of a conglomeration of products. In other words, they built product A, product B, and product C, and they are yet to integrate them into a single administrative console. I would certainly like to see a more seamless administrative interface. 

I would also like to see them include more bang for the buck, by including features like email fraud protection, rather than making their product so piecemeal, where you are buying little pieces. I agree with the idea of having multiple tiers or layers, but maybe as small, medium, and large, as opposed to an a la carte menu.

Buyer's Guide
Proofpoint Email Protection
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Proofpoint Email Protection. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is fairly scalable. When we had a problem with capacity on one of the clusters, we simply added more members. We have probably 32,000 to 34,000 users in a given period.

How are customer service and support?

Their technical support is mediocre. It could be better. They're a little slow to respond at times, and depending on the product, they're not always very knowledgeable. In one case, I had to fix it myself and show their tech how to fix it.

How was the initial setup?

I found it to be fairly straightforward. It had medium complexity. The deployment was very fairly fast. I did it in about three to four hours.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Annually, it costs us about $92,000. This is pretty much what it costs us. There is no additional cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated Microsoft ATP or Microsoft Advanced Threat Protection. I also evaluated Mimecast at least at face value. I also looked at GreatHorn technologies.

What other advice do I have?

They're the best in the breed. I would rate Proofpoint Email Protection a ten out of ten for the capability of doing its job. I am happy with this solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Ronny Nazareno - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Engineer at MAINT
Real User
May 28, 2024
Offers an easy and simple user interaction with easy deployment

What is our primary use case?

When we define keywords, the solution evaluates the keywords, generates reports, and gathers the information

How has it helped my organization?

It offers an easy and simple user interaction. It is powerful in discovering information.

What needs improvement?

The solution needs to integrate with the owner's labeling solution. Without this integration, the solution is not feasible.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for two years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is available through a subscription model. Scalability is not an issue, as you can adjust the number of licenses based on the number of endpoints the solution supports. I already have this information because the support team provided it for the business department.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. The solution is cloud-based, and it's all subscription-based. It's very easy to deploy, configure, and use.

What about the implementation team?

Deployment was done by third party.

What other advice do I have?

Proofpoint Email Protection provides advanced threat detection and data protection. It helps prioritize and safeguard confidential information in documents or other work-related materials. 

The solution is a powerful tool and easy to use. I highly recommend it.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Proofpoint Email Protection
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Proofpoint Email Protection. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Business Development Manager at Skytex Consultant Limited
Reseller
Feb 17, 2023
A stable solution with a valuable archive feature
Pros and Cons
  • "The archive feature is valuable."
  • "The scalability can be improved, and the solution can be optimized."

What is most valuable?

The archive feature is valuable.

What needs improvement?

The solution can be improved by including a real-time block list and giving the user more control over customizations. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used the solution for ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. I rate it a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is not very scalable.

How are customer service and support?

We rate our experience with customer service and support an eight out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Barracuda.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup took half a day to configure, and two people were required for deployment.

What other advice do I have?

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. The solution is good, but the scalability can be improved and the solution can be optimized.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
PeerSpot user
Product Consultant at M.Tech
Reseller
Jan 22, 2023
Powerful dashboard, reliable, and helpful support
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is the TAP Dashboard. It provides more detailed information that can be used for forensic analysis. This is an advantage that other email security providers, such as Cisco, IronPort, or Microsoft do not offer in their dashboards."
  • "Proofpoint Email Protection has a new approach to email security with its API feature. Currently, it only works with Office 365. In the future, it would be beneficial if it also works with Gmail, as Check Point is currently the only brand that has API email security for Gmail. It would be beneficial if Proofpoint Email Protection could add this integration, they would be more competitive with other vendors."

What is our primary use case?

Many customers in Thailand have issues with phishing. Most email security systems can detect spam and viruses, but not many can detect phishing as well as Proofpoint Email Protection does. Therefore, the main use case is to prevent phishing.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is the TAP Dashboard. It provides more detailed information that can be used for forensic analysis. This is an advantage that other email security providers, such as Cisco, IronPort, or Microsoft do not offer in their dashboards.

What needs improvement?

Proofpoint Email Protection has a new approach to email security with its API feature. Currently, it only works with Office 365. In the future, it would be beneficial if it also works with Gmail, as Check Point is currently the only brand that has API email security for Gmail. It would be beneficial if Proofpoint Email Protection could add this integration, they would be more competitive with other vendors.

One customer mentioned that the user interface for custom configuration could be improved. They stated that while the dashboard looks visually pleasing, they would like the configuration page to have a similar aesthetic appeal.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for approximately one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the stability of Proofpoint Email Protection a seven out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the scalability of Proofpoint Email Protection a seven out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The overall customer feedback on Proofpoint Email Protection's support has been positive. 

How was the initial setup?

The installation process of Proofpoint Email Protection is not particularly difficult and is similar to other major email security vendors unless they are cloud-based solutions. Proofpoint Email Protection could improve is the configuration page of the Proofpoint Protection Server, as it is not as user-friendly as the Proofpoint Essentials.

The length of time it takes to deploy Proofpoint Email Protection depends on the specific requirement. If filters are the only thing needed to set up for inbound and outbound email, it would take approximately a week. The amount of time it takes to customize the categories depends on the customer's specific needs.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We sell annual licenses for this solution.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
PeerSpot user
reviewer1319712 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
Jan 7, 2023
Very strong detection for phishing or malicious emails but post-sales training is lacking
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has very strong detection for most of the phishing and malicious emails received from the outside."
  • "The solution should add post-sales training."

What is our primary use case?

Our company uses the solution for a customer's email security. 

Three years ago, the solution opened offices in Saudia Arabia. Previously, you could only deal with distributors. 

We were introduced to the solution and conducted proof of value and concept for one customer. We implemented one year ago and the customer is happy with the solution. 

Our customer has 5,000 users across a big company with many branches. 

What is most valuable?

The solution is dedicated to email security and that is its core business. It is a leader in comparison to other vendors. 

The solution has very strong detection for most phishing and malicious emails received from the outside. It is stronger in this area than competitors. 

The TRAP is great for analytics and correlations related to the mailbox. 

What needs improvement?

The solution should add post-sales training. There is no issue with the product itself but education could be improved because no information related to implementations is available. We can find sales and pre-sales training but are in need of post-sales training similarly to what is offered by other vendors. 

If we know how the product works, we can implement it. Sometimes, customers ask the solution to handle implementations and that is costly. We would like the training to fully handle implementations and save our customers money. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. We had a problems during implementation but none after that was completed. We haven't received complaints or emails related to issues with the solution. 

Stability is rated a nine out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is very nice and flexible, particularly for virtual machines. 

Our customer did not have the particular requirement to scale.  

Scalability is rated a nine out of ten. 

How are customer service and support?

Our customer has direct contact with the solution's technical support. They can escalate a case directly so sometimes do this instead of contacting our company. 

Our customer has only opened one case with technical support. There were no problems with the process and the support team was both helpful and flexible. 

The Saudi and UAE teams are especially flexible and help with small favors. Other vendors do not provide this level of support.

Technical support is rated a nine out of ten. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our customer had an obsolete email security gateway from Trend Micro. This product had good endpoint protection in general, but was not strong when it came to email security so the customer did not renew the contract.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is straightforward and easy so I rate setup a nine out of ten. 

What about the implementation team?

Three of our technicians implemented the solution for our customer. Implementations depend on use case and customer preparedness.

If all prerequisites are prepared by the customer in advance, then implementation is straightforward and takes one or two weeks.

Our implementation took about four months because our customer did not prepare the prerequisites. This caused a delay in the project. Otherwise, this implementation would have been completed in a week to ten days.

We handle ongoing maintenance and our customer also has a direct pipeline to the solution's technical support.

What was our ROI?

Our company has not yet realized an ROI because we recently became partners so have only closed one project. We are doing our best now to propose the solution to other customers. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In general, the pricing is competitive. It is not expensive or inexpensive. Pricing is a bit above average but the solution is a leader in the area. 

I rate pricing a six out of ten. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We conducted a proof of concept and proposed Forcepoint and the solution as possible options. To be honest, the solution is many times better than Forcepoint for email security.

Forcepoint has many issues that are also used for email security in another mode. We were not getting much success with email security so we proposed Proofpoint as a better option. 

The two types of email protection include the gateway and the mailbox from the inside. The solution offers three tools for full protection.

The PPS provides email protection as a gateway. The IMD protects internal emails in general. The TRAP is great for analytics and correlations related to anything happening in the mailbox. 

We replaced Trend Micro and implemented all three of the solution's protection components. 

What other advice do I have?

If you want the solution to be implemented properly, then it is important for customers to have prerequisites ready. Technically, the solution can be implemented but customers need to understand their wants, needs, and requirements to ensure a successful implementation. Implementations are easy and flexible when requirements are known in advance. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
PeerSpot user
Product Consultant at M.Tech
Reseller
Dec 29, 2022
It provides excellent technical support and has a threat response auto-pull feature
Pros and Cons
  • "Proofpoint Email Protection is a good product, and its most beneficial feature is the Threat Response Auto-Pull. I also like that it's an integrated email security solution."
  • "The accessibility of Proofpoint Email Protection, particularly access to product trials, could be improved. It's hard to get a trial for Proofpoint Email Protection, and many customers prefer not just to do the POC or demo but try the product out."

What is our primary use case?

Most customers interested in Proofpoint Email Protection have problems with spam, or their email security solution cannot detect phishing or spam, so they want to replace it with Proofpoint Email Protection.

What is most valuable?

Proofpoint Email Protection is a good product, and its most beneficial feature is the Threat Response Auto-Pull. I also like that it's an integrated email security solution.

What needs improvement?

The accessibility of Proofpoint Email Protection, particularly access to product trials, could be improved. It's hard to get a trial for Proofpoint Email Protection, and many customers prefer not just to do the POC or demo but try the product out, including Proofpoint Email Protection add-ons.

In the product's next release, I want more email servers added, such as Lotus Domino, rather than Proofpoint Email Protection focusing on just Microsoft Office 365 Exchange and Gmail.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with Proofpoint Email Protection for about eight months or a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Proofpoint Email Protection is pretty stable, so it's a nine out of ten for me.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Proofpoint Email Protection is scalable, an eight out of ten, scalability-wise. It has a large capacity, so in most cases, seventy to eighty percent of customers won't have issues with user capacity and email traffic, whether that traffic is coming in or out.

How are customer service and support?

I often contact Proofpoint Email Protection technical support, and it's excellent, so it's a ten out of ten for me.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Proofpoint Email Protection is the first email security solution I've worked with because this is the first company I joined after I graduated.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup for Proofpoint Email Protection wasn't that easy, but it wasn't too complex either. I'd rate it an eight out of ten.

It took one month to less than two months to deploy Proofpoint Email Protection.

My team configures the platform to receive the incoming email from the domain and then send it to the customer's email server. For other configurations, it would depend on what the customer wants. Another team is in charge of Proofpoint Email Protection deployment while I do the presale work and capture feature requirements.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing model for Proofpoint Email Protection is simple. It's based on the number of users and, in some cases, the amount of email traffic for the on-premise deployment, but the licensing isn't complicated.

The number of users depends on the customer. For example, it could range from one hundred to twenty thousand in the banking industry. The total price for Proofpoint Email Protection depends on the number of licenses you have.

You don't have to pay additional fees apart from the standard licensing fees.

Price-wise, Proofpoint Email Protection is a five out of ten because it's a pretty expensive solution.

What other advice do I have?

My company is not using Proofpoint Email Protection, but it's a distributor based in Thailand.

I am trying to remember the exact version of the solution, but it should be the latest one.

Proofpoint Email Protection is mainly deployed on the cloud because many of my customers prefer a cloud solution unless the customer works in a bank or financial institution. Still, I have some customers that deployed it on-premises.

Two to three people take care of product deployment. My company didn't receive customer Proofpoint Email Protection maintenance requests this year because it just started working with Proofpoint, but maybe next year, it will.

Proofpoint Email Protection is best for medium to large businesses because it's pretty pricey so smaller companies would go for another product, or maybe Proofpoint Essentials. Still, since Proofpoint Essentials cannot customize policies or have the same usability as the enterprise product, smaller companies usually aren't interested in it.

My advice to anyone planning to implement Proofpoint Email Protection is that if you want a complete platform for email security, this product is the answer. There's no better email security solution than Proofpoint Email Protection if you can afford its price.

I'm rating the product as nine out of ten. I took away one point because of its price.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1977531 - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyst at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Real User
Oct 14, 2022
Reliable with a nice interface and good features
Pros and Cons
  • "The stability is very good."
  • "The pricing is great, it has a nice interface, the features are very good, the stability is very good, and the solution is scalable."
  • "The initial setup is complex."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for email protection. 

What is most valuable?

The pricing is great.

It has a nice interface.

The features are very good. 

The stability is very good. 

The solution is scalable. 

What needs improvement?

The price policy needs to be better. We'd still like lower pricing. 

The initial setup is complex. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for the last 12 months at least.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's scalable. You can expand it if you need to. 

How are customer service and support?

While I haven't had contact with the technical support, my understanding is it's not the worst in the world. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

We found the initial setup to be pretty complex. It was not necessarily straightforward or simple. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is very good. However, the price policy needs improvement. While we find it reasonable, we'd always like it to be a bit less. 

I'd rate the affordability two out of five. 

What other advice do I have?

I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We are just end-users, and we are using this solution on a small project. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Anuraj Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales Engineer at SNSIN
Reseller
Jul 12, 2022
Scalable, performs well, but expensive
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are the performance from being on the cloud."
  • "Proofpoint Email Protection could improve by reducing the price."
  • "The licensing cost of Proofpoint Email Protection is a lot higher than other solutions, such as Barracuda."

What is our primary use case?

Proofpoint Email Protection is used for email security.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are the performance from being on the cloud.

What needs improvement?

Proofpoint Email Protection could improve by reducing the price.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Proofpoint Email Protection is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Proofpoint Email Protection is scalable because it is on the cloud.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Proofpoint Email Protection is simple.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing cost of Proofpoint Email Protection is a lot higher than other solutions, such as Barracuda.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator
PeerSpot user
General contador at Dicofra
Real User
Jul 3, 2022
Useful data loss prevention, simple setup, and good support
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are ease of use, data loss prevention, antivirus, and spam protection."
  • "Proofpoint Email Protection's interface is confusing and could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use Proofpoint Email Protection for machine learning and artificial intelligence engine.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are ease of use, data loss prevention, antivirus, and spam protection. 

What needs improvement?

Proofpoint Email Protection's interface is confusing and could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for approximately one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Proofpoint Email Protection is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have apparently 100 people using Proofpoint Email Protection in my organization.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support we receive is very good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Proofpoint Email Protection is easy. The installation model for the moment is very confused. It would be a benefit if the next release was easier.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Proofpoint Email Protection a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
it_user1759677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Security Risk Manager at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 26, 2022
The true positives detection are great
Pros and Cons
  • "It's detection of true positives are great, as it's cloud based it's very scalable and stable."
  • "Proofpoint Email Protection's detection for true positives are great, false negatives or type two errors are very low, type one errors are acceptable and this capability is the one that allows the least amount of spam to enter."
  • "The only downside with Proofpoint Email Protection is the cost."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case of Proofpoint Email Protection is focused around data loss prevention (DLP). To protect against spam, viruses, incoming and outgoing mail.

What is most valuable?

Proofpoint Email Protection's detection for true positives are great. False negatives or type two errors are very low. Type one errors are acceptable and this capability is the one that allows the least amount of spam to enter.

What needs improvement?

The only downside with Proofpoint Email Protection is the cost.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Proofpoint Email Protection for 5 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Proofpoint Email Protection is hosted in the cloud, and the stability is very good. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is cloud based so it's very scalable. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup for Proofpoint Email Protection is pretty straightforward. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There has been a recent pricing increase with Proofpoint Email Protection and we are assessing other companies who provide a similar service for comparison. 

What other advice do I have?

The advice I would provide others who were considering Proofpoint Email Protection, is to test the product to determine if it provides you with the best filter rate. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Proofpoint Email Protection Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Proofpoint Email Protection Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.