Auvik Network Management (ANM) Reviews

We used Auvik to monitor the networks of our two separate companies. Each company operates on its large network, with approximately 100 to 150 employees.

We implemented Auvik for better visibility of the network.

The intuitiveness of the interface was good. It was not that hard to use.

The network map offers a real-time view of our entire network. Gaining real-time visibility is simple by using the network map and dashboard. We can start by navigating from the top level of the network down to specific elements we're interested in. Alternatively, we can select a specific network segment from the left-hand column for a more focused view.

While Auvik would have provided us with complete visibility into our network, our reliance on rented switches limited our control and prevented them from functionalities like syslog.

We saw the benefits of Auvik as soon as it was deployed.

Auvik helps us reduce our mean time to resolution for network connectivity issues. When a device is unexpectedly disconnected, Auvik can pinpoint the problem quickly. This is especially helpful for troubleshooting complex issues, like a downed VPN.

The most valuable feature of Auvik is its ability to drill down and identify unusual activity on the network, such as unauthorized devices connecting to our Wi-Fi.

One drawback I found with Auvik was its inability to generate clear network diagrams. The connection lines appeared messy, and devices weren't grouped logically. In contrast, HP OpenView, which I used previously, produced well-organized network maps.

I have been using Auvik for 3 years.

Auvik was stable with no crashes or downtime.

Scaling Auvik was easy because it integrates with Discovery. We were able to collect syslogs from controllable devices like firewalls, but Auvik would likely perform even better in an environment where we have control over the switches as well.

In the past, we used HP OpenView. It consisted of two very different programs. Our current solution, which we've been using for some time now, allows for remote connections to machines and collaboration with users. This functionality was absent in Auvik, which would have been a valuable addition. With our current system, we can simply right-click on a machine and initiate a remote connection through tools like Screen Connect or Splashtop.

Auvik was a very good network mapping tool. However, the lines on the map could sometimes be misaligned, making it difficult to understand the network layout. Additionally, a major limitation of Auvik was the lack of remote control functionality. Ideally, the tool would allow administrators to look up a user and connect to their machine's file controller while on the phone with the user for troubleshooting purposes.

Deploying Auvik as a virtual machine is surprisingly easy. We download the template, import it into VMware, and it configures itself automatically.

I completed the deployment in a couple of days.

The implementation was completed in-house.

While Auvik's pricing was attractive, we ultimately had to make budget cuts. After evaluating our various solutions, Auvik was not the best fit for our current needs.

I would rate Auvik 9 out of 10.

Auvik has the potential to reduce the time spent on setup, maintenance, and troubleshooting. While we didn't fully utilize it for that purpose, it could have offered some benefits. However, we ultimately decided to discontinue using Auvik because it lacked features available in our other tools, creating some redundancy.

No maintenance was required on our end.

Auvik offers a demo program. You simply load and install the provided VM template. I can't recall the exact length of the demo period, but I highly recommend trying it out.

It provides comprehensive visibility into your network infrastructure, automates network mapping, sends timely alerts for potential issues, and facilitates configuration management. With Auvik, you can receive notifications directly, ensuring you stay informed about the health and performance of your network.

When I integrated Auvik, the primary goal was to uncover issues that might be occurring without my awareness. Essentially, I wanted to identify potential problems before they escalated to a point where I became aware of them, often when it was already too late. I sought early warnings for network issues to proactively address and mitigate them.

It provides an intuitive interface, supporting ease of use, and I was pleasantly surprised at how quickly I grasped it. The installation process was swift, and their team proved exceptionally helpful in offering expert guidance on setup and addressing any specific product configurations. Most elements were pre-configured, requiring minimal adjustments. Auvik efficiently scanned and identified network components, generating a comprehensive map crucial for my PCI compliance needs—all accomplished within a day.

The network map and the dashboard provide a near real-time snapshot of my network—about as real-time as I could expect. The system regularly pulls device information, the frequency of which is customizable based on alert settings. This flexibility is advantageous, especially when it comes to specific devices like credit card readers. If immediate notification of issues is crucial, Auvik ensures it is delivered.

The user-friendliness of the network map is contingent on the size of your network. A larger screen is advisable for extensive networks as it encompasses a comprehensive view. Managing a complex network might require some manual manipulation of the map to focus on specific areas. Alternatively, you can utilize the search feature, which proves efficient. Whether you prefer a manual approach or a quick search, both options are available. The search function allows you to easily select a category and device, promptly highlighting the desired item on the map.

It significantly reduced my meantime to resolution. Initially, I was unaware of certain issues within the network, and upon discovering them, I felt a sense of urgency to address multiple problems. However, once these issues were resolved, I gained confidence in the system's ability to alert me promptly to any future issues, providing a proactive approach to network management.

The most valuable aspect, primarily for a solo IT practitioner like myself, is its simplicity in setup. This was a significant factor that led me to choose it. The appeal lies in the unified dashboard, providing a single view encompassing all aspects of my network. The decision was driven by the ease of use—setting up reporting and alerts was straightforward without the need for complex coding or intricate configurations. It served its purpose precisely as designed, meeting my requirements effortlessly.

A notable feature is the ability to filter out static elements, allowing me to focus solely on what matters. Initially, I appreciated the panoramic view as my network unfolded on the map. From there, I could selectively identify areas of interest and importance. Auvik facilitated this process by enabling me to set up alerts for specific aspects, promptly notifying me of any relevant occurrences.

One enhancement I'd appreciate is the ability to configure the network map based on specific criteria. It would be valuable if Auvik allowed users to customize their view, defining what elements they want to see consistently. For example, configuring the map to display only printers in a retail store upon launching Auvik would streamline the process, eliminating the need to filter down the entire network map each time. Implementing a configurable dashboard for the network map would enhance user experience in this regard.

I have been using it for approximately two years.

When it comes to stability, there was an initial issue where one of my servers, set up to handle scanning and reporting, experienced a service interruption. The service would stop, requiring manual restarts. However, upon investigation, it was identified as a configuration problem, which was promptly addressed and resolved. Since then, the system has been stable without any further disruptions.

In terms of scalability, Auvik conducts a network scan. If you expand your network size, the system automatically identifies new devices and seamlessly integrates them into its operations.

Accessing tech support and raising an issue through the ticketing system was a seamless process. The challenges I encountered were device-specific, particularly with some Cisco devices that weren't configured correctly for Auvik utilization. Their tech support team was well-versed in addressing such issues. Initiating a ticket involved a simple phone call, and the response time, although not immediately critical, was reasonable. The overall process was straightforward and relatively easy to navigate. I would rate it ten out of ten.

Positive

We utilized a different solution before transitioning to Auvik. However, this shift occurred concurrently with a network upgrade. In my initial role, I developed an access application to generate a map and reports based on raw data, which was suitable for a simpler network. As our network evolved and became more intricate, the initial application became impractical, leading me to experiment with less robust solutions. While these alternatives provided some features, they fell short of the comprehensive functionality Auvik offers. Throughout this exploration, it became evident that Auvik encompassed all the essential aspects I was seeking, consolidating them into a unified platform.

Regarding issue resolution, it heavily relies on the specific device, but the crucial aspect of becoming aware of the issue is indeed present. The setup process was straightforward, and maintaining the system was equally uncomplicated. The programming is well-executed.

The deployment process was completed within a day, and I utilized the assistance provided. Although I believe I could have easily handled it on my own, their proactive help was voluntary—I hadn't requested it. Throughout the process, they were readily available and seemed invested in seeing it come together smoothly within the day. The primary task in setting it up involved opening a port and sharing the necessary network information for them to initiate network scanning.

I recognized its value on the very same day when I witnessed the network map coming to life, devices being detected, and a wealth of information being captured by the system.

While having an all-encompassing network monitoring solution may come at a cost, my initial approach was to seek cost-effective modules and integrate them seamlessly. While it was feasible to assemble and make various modules work together, the maintenance and usage of multiple modules would have been more cumbersome compared to the convenience of accessing a unified dashboard for all monitoring needs.

The pricing is reasonable, neither exceptionally cheap nor excessively expensive—it aligns well with what I anticipated.

Auvik's pricing structure is primarily based on servers, and the monitoring of actual endpoint devices is either included in the server license price or provided at no extra cost. While I'm not certain of the specific details, I have observed that the billing is influenced by new network nodes.

As a product, it is robust, and it's easy to generate comprehensive information. The key learning curve involves understanding how to refine and customize the data it provides, essentially eliminating unnecessary static. For me, the primary task was configuring it to align with my environment and specific use case, tailoring the information to my needs. The ongoing training they offer, with the flexibility to attend sessions at any time, is invaluable. Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.

We're a managed services provider using Auvik for network management of firewalls and switches. We use several tools alongside Auvik, which we primarily utilize for network mapping and managing communication between switches and firewalls. Our clients are set up on tenants within the solution.

Auvik enables us to make comprehensive network diagrams of the various companies that we manage. It gives us complete visibility into the network infrastructure, but we use an RMM for some of our other items. It doesn't replace the RMM or stuff like antivirus.

Our tier 1 support techs generally do not use Auvik because they're handling basic tasks. Auvik's interface is intuitive, but you need to know what you're seeing. Tier 2 and tier 3 engineers have the understanding needed to delve into the information Auvik provides. 

Auvik has lowered our mean time to resolution. When there are network issues, we can hop on Auvik and quickly see what's happening. It enables us to resolve problems much faster than before. Previously, we were hunting through all the switches, trying to understand the problem on a switch-by-switch basis, but Auvik lets us see precisely what's happening on the entire network.

For example, we were ripping apart an entire server rack yesterday. In the past, we had to manually map each individual port on a switch to where it connected on the other side. Now, we can go into Auvik to grab that information right instead of going to each switch individually or physically mapping this port over to this port on this switch. That can get hard, especially when you're dealing with switches that may or may not be on the same switch rack. Auvik definitely helps out with stuff like that.

We started realizing Auvik's benefits within the first month or so. Some of our more experienced network guys could start taking advantage of Auvik as soon as the network maps started populating. 

I like the information Auvik provides you about switches that helps you troubleshoot connectivity issues between clients and switches. It's much easier to locate where the problem is on the network. We were using N-central for our RMM. Unfortunately, that doesn't map out the switches. It tells us what is up or down but doesn't do a good job of network troubleshooting like Auvik does. 

Auvik's intuitive interface enables us to troubleshoot networks much faster than before. In the past, we were going into a connectivity issue blindly. With Auvik, we can pinpoint exactly where things might be breaking down on the network.

When you remove an item from the network, Auvik puts it off to the side so it stays on the map for a long time. I'd like the ability to completely delete unnecessary items. For example, when you replace a switch, the old one still displays on the map as a disconnected item. It would be nice if you could go in there and remove it from the map. 

Network setups take time regardless of the tool you use. It will always take time to build. I wish you could order Auvik to rescan the network on demand when I make changes. Sometimes, I want the network to scan immediately instead of waiting for it to detect the changes.

I have used Auvik for around six months.

I haven't had issues with stability, but there's a little lag when you make a network change. Sometimes it can take a little while. 

Auvik is highly scalable.

I rate Auvik's support eight out of 10. We've contacted support a couple of times. Once, it would not install the collector properly. It took a little back and forth, but they resolved the issue pretty quickly. 

Positive

We were using Microsoft Visio to create our network maps by hand. When something changed, we had to remember to update the map. Auvik updates the map in real-time when something changes, so you can see it update within minutes. We used that and N-able N-central RMM, which we continue to use, but we've limited our N-central license and started to use Auvik for some of the functions related to switches and firewalls because Auvik gives us a clearer understanding of the network. 

Auvik is a cloud-based solution. It's fairly easy to set up. I handled most of the deployment, but two other people were involved. The setup involves adding all the passwords, SMPs, etc. for the network. 

It takes a little time to fine-tune it. It probably takes around two hours for the average network. It's a little less for the smaller sights, but we had a couple of massive ones that took a while to do. I'm also meticulous, so I want to ensure all the workstations pull correctly and show the right names. After deployment, Auvik doesn't require much maintenance.  Sometimes, we have to update the credentials when we add something new. 

We can identify issues a lot faster and make the cluster work a lot quicker. Previously, a technician could spend hours trying to find the issue. Now, it takes minutes. 

Auvik's pricing is fair overall, but some advanced stuff is a little expensive. I like that the licensing model is based on switches instead of endpoints. We don't use some of the more advanced features because they're a little beyond our price range.  We're using the tool internally, but the expense is passed on to the customer, and the advanced features aren't something that most customers are willing to pay for. 

We had researched Auvik before, and so we already had a prior understanding of what Avid does. It was a matter of convincing the people who pay the bills that this is something they should invest in. There weren't many other solutions that did the same thing, and they were expensive. Auvik has a better price point than some solutions like SolarWinds. Also, SolarWinds is too basic for what we're trying to do. 

I rate Auvik nine out of 10. I'm happy with it and how it works. New users should get training from Auvik and play with it. The best way to learn the solution is to use it and try things. Also, I recommend not turning on all the alerts immediately because you'll get overwhelmed. 

We use it for everything from alerting and monitoring. We have had some use cases where we had to do some forensic type of work and track down devices at locations that were breaking policy and things like that. It was pretty handy because we were able to grab some identifying information from the device, and it took about 15 minutes to figure out where the device had been every day for the last seven days.

Auvik provides an intuitive interface that supports ease of use. We got all of our locations clearly defined. Everything is laid out well and labeled well. Several people know how to use it. It is something that I picked up on pretty quickly.

Auvik's network map along with its dashboard gives a real-time picture of our network. By using the filters, we can filter down to see what we want to see. We can see just the Layer 1 devices. It is very handy. With a couple of clicks, we are done. If we want to monitor WAN interfaces, we add them to the dashboard. If we want to monitor VPN interfaces, we can add them to the dashboard. It is fantastic.

Auvik's network map dashboard gives full network visibility. Whatever you give the collector access to, it takes that apart and dissects every bit of that.

Auvik has empowered our entry-level technicians to solve more tickets on their own. I do not want to give them access to it because it makes things too easy for them and they do not get challenged, but it has definitely helped in closing more tickets faster.

Auvik has absolutely decreased our mean time to resolution. Instead of days of hopping around on switches and hoping that the logs still include some information about something that is pertinent, it now takes minutes.

We can monitor our VMware environment with Auvik at no charge. This is absolutely important for us. It makes the product more important for people outside of my department. I am just worried about the infrastructure. Whatever happens on a server, I do not care, but it makes the product valuable to people outside of my department and the infrastructure team, and they get to reap the reward of having this product in our environment.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on the setup and maintenance of the solution and less time on issue resolution. It very much takes you away from a break/fix to make you more proactive. You do not do as much of a break/fix because you are seeing the warnings and the alerts. You are able to see that you have got a physical issue out there that you need to correct, or you find that you do not have redundancy, whereas you thought you had redundancy. This free time is still focused on security.

The biggest draw for me is the flexibility of being alerted. If something happens with my critical infrastructure, I get real-time alerts on it in Teams. 

For pulling up the devices, the dashboard is a little bit sluggish. I know there is a lot of data, and I am starting to get nitpicky here, but this is the only thing. The dashboard is a little sluggish, and you have to keep the filter on sometimes.

In terms of the things or features that I wish it had or has is the Wi-Fi visibility. They are pulling that into it from their newly acquired product. I am excited about that, and that is the only thing that is missing from the suite. That is a big piece to me. I would like to see that sooner rather than later.

I have been using Auvik for two years.

Any stability-related issues are very infrequent. They have a pretty rigorous maintenance schedule, and they notify you when maintenance is happening. The maintenance windows are pretty short and infrequent as well.

It is enormously scalable.

I never had to contact their support.

We had N-central. I tried to use it, and it was not great. There have been half a dozen that I have tried. They are all okay, but after using Auvik, everything else seems not so good.

We could see Auvik's benefits during the trial. The product that I was using at the time was pretty outdated. I had updated it recently, and I was pretty unhappy with the performance and the feature set that it had even after I updated it. I had inherited the product, but I started looking around immediately. We popped in an OVA for the collector into our VMware environment and had it going. In less than 10 minutes, we were already scanning our network and had more information built out than the product that we had been using for years. 

It is on-premises. I was not involved in its deployment. I handed it off to one of the guys on the infrastructure team. He had the setup instructions, and he added it up in ten minutes. It was pretty straightforward.

In terms of maintenance, it does require maintenance for major release versions. About once a year, we have to deploy a new OVA, but for the most part, it stays up-to-date on its own.

It was all done in-house, and there was just one person. It did not take any time.

It is a little more on the expensive side, but I feel that it is a premium product. It is good.

To those evaluating Auvik, I would advise making sure that they have all the credentials they need before they start the trial for your equipment. Make sure you have SNMP set up, and you are good to go.

I would rate Auvik a nine out of ten.

We manually use Auvik for network monitoring, configuration backups, and syslogs.

We implemented Auvik because we wanted to have a redundant monitoring solution that has a cloud component.

Auvik utilizes a cloud component that centralizes all data collection and aggregation. Additionally, we employ multiple on-premises collectors to gather data from individual devices. Therefore, our deployment will have a collector at each site, supplemented by a secondary collector at our main site. This configuration ensures redundancy and seamless data transmission to the Auvik cloud.

Auvik's intuitive interface is easy to use. The intuitive interface helps accelerate our troubleshooting of network issues due to how the information is presented.

Auvik's network map and dashboard provide a real-time picture of our network.

The network map and dashboard provide easy access to real-time visibility, with alerts and other information conveniently displayed. Clicking "Advanced" allows further exploration of specific alerts and other relevant details. While the display can become crowded when monitoring numerous items, the filtering capabilities effectively manage information overload.

The network map provides full visibility into everything we are monitoring with it and that is extremely important for us.

Auvik empowers our low-level techs to solve more tickets on their own. This has saved our senior techs time to focus on other tasks. The overall number of tickets has been reduced.

It has helped reduce our mean time to resolution.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on setup, maintenance, and resolution.

The traffic insights and the configuration management are the most valuable features. 

The traffic insights are presented effectively, and I appreciate that the analysis runs in the cloud, avoiding the need to overload any specific on-premise hardware. Additionally, the configuration backups appear to be straightforward, facilitating the comparison and refresh of new images on existing devices.

One main feature I would like to see in Auvik is the ability to generate alerts based on specific events appearing in syslog messages.

I have been using Auvik for three years.

Auvik is stable.

The scalability of Auvik is excellent and it scales easily.

The technical support is quite fast and accurate. We only encountered one major issue, but they were able to resolve it promptly. While it took a little longer due to the unusual nature of the problem, it was effectively addressed within a week.

Positive

Previously, we used SolarWinds. However, the configuration and maintenance overhead for Auvik is significantly lower, and Auvik itself is much faster.

The initial deployment was straightforward. We had three people for the deployment but it could be done with one person.

The implementation was completed in-house.

Compared to Auvik's competitors, its pricing is largely in line with SolarWinds. However, the exact cost may be slightly lower or higher depending on how the software is used.

Auvik does not charge for server monitoring, which is a significant cost advantage. If we had to pay for each server individually, the cost would become quite high, depending on the size and complexity of our server environment.

I would rate Auvik a nine out of ten.

Minimal maintenance is required to keep the collector devices up to date.

Before implementing Auvik, organizations should confirm that all devices they intend to monitor are compatible with Auvik's capabilities. This is particularly important for web-based devices, as Auvik may have limitations in monitoring such systems.

We use the solution for networking. If a router or a switch is down, we can look that up very quickly in Auvik Network Management, and then diagnose the problem.

Auvik has a lot of conventions or online meetings where we are explained how a new feature works. We don't need to figure it out ourselves, which saves us a lot of time to know what exactly we need to do to find a specific problem or switch.

Auvik Network Management really helps with the overview of every switch or router in a location. We tried other programs, but they just didn't work the same as Auvik.

Auvik provides an intuitive interface that is quite easy to navigate. It helps a lot because I can quickly diagnose the problem, which saves me a lot of time and a lot of money for the client.

It has empowered our entry-level technicians to solve more tickets on their own. Managers only need to explain the solution once, and then everybody understands how it works. Auvik is a time saver and money saver for everybody. The solution is easy to navigate.

Auvik has helped to decrease our mean time to resolution by five to ten minutes per problem.

The time-to-value is a lot better than that of other solutions. It took about a month from the time of deployment of Auvik for us to realize the time-to-value benefits.

Critical devices in our network are monitored by Auvik at no charge. This free monitoring is important to us because it shows that Auvik cares about us. We can know for sure that if we have a month that doesn't go very well, the critical devices will still be okay.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on the solution's setup and maintenance. It saves a lot of time because the solution's setup is easy. It doesn't require a lot of steps, and you can explain it to an apprentice very easily, which saves much time. We used the time saved to ensure that all the smaller problems were also addressed. We could use the time we saved to ask the clients what they think about this new setup.

The solution's loading time could be improved because when you click on a switch, it usually takes some time before it has everything loaded.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for almost one year.

We haven’t faced any issues with the solution’s stability.

Auvik Network Management is a scalable solution. About ten users use the solution in our organization, and it has about 280 endpoints.

The technical support team's response time is great. Problems are solved very fast, with no long waiting time.

Positive

We previously used Domotz but switched to Auvik Network Management because Domotz didn't have many features. Auvik Network Management's strength is its ease of usability. Auvik's disadvantage is that it sometimes takes a lot of time to load. The solution's setup is very easy, making the loading time acceptable most of the time because you can save a lot of time elsewhere.

Auvik's network map and dashboard usually give us a real-time picture of our network. However, it sometimes takes a long time to load. If I want to look up something, it needs some time to process, which can be frustrating at some point. It's not difficult to use the network map and dashboard to gain real-time visibility into our network, but it sometimes has a waiting time.

We use the SaaS version of the solution. The solution requires almost no maintenance, which saves us time. We have the solution deployed across multiple locations. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We're an MSP, and we handle and monitor the network for many different organizations. So, we use Auvik for any client that has on-prem resources such as firewalls, switches, and servers. It's basically for any client that has a physical office.

We used it mostly for alerting and to have visibility over resources on a network. It's centralized oversight over what's going on.

The network map is really good. It gives us a good idea of the topology for new sites as we deploy the software. The ability to remotely connect the network devices is great. If we don't have direct access we can pretty much just do it from anywhere that we have an internet connection to. That's really helpful.

My team does the knowledge training. They have a university, and when we have new staff, they take the Auvik certification course. Otherwise, there is a lot of stuff to do in the solution and a lot of things to see. Without training, people will have to guess their way around it. Maybe they will see some basic features, but to actually leverage it to the fullest, you do need to take the training.

The dashboard and the network map give a real-time picture. It is really good so long as you have the credentials for everything. I don't really have any complaints. I think it's really helpful. It has been a lot of use for us in the past. Regarding things such as suggestions, it tells you where you have devices you do not have credentials for. That's something you can see if you go to the discovery settings. 

The benefits were realized pretty immediately. The benefits are very self-evident. The only thing you have to do to see the proper benefits is make sure you have a good setup. It's important to know how to deploy things, which credentials to add, etc. Otherwise, the topology will not be of much use. You will not get the configurations. However, if you have the proper knowledge of how to set this up, it's great.

We do not give our entry-level technicians access to Auvik most of the time. It's usually for tier-two technicians or our network engineers. However, it does help them with the Epic training. Before we are going to give entry-level permissions, we have them take training, and the training gives them a lot of information on the network on how to use the platform. 

Auvik helps decrease our mean time to resolution. What's good about Auvik is you can define thresholds where you can close alerts. So, if something goes down, you can see the condition. That definitely helps us take time out of the resolution process and lowers our oral ticket numbers.

In terms of the dashboard, maybe seeing on the map, for example, if you have an access point that's connected to switch one, and the access point you do not have credentials for, that could help us make management a bit easier. However, it's not terrible. It's just something to make it easier.

It has a monitoring feature. Besides just monitoring the network, you can tell Auvik to monitor a host name, like a domain name or an IP address on the cloud, and it just pings the IP address and gives you information. I feel like that's something that could potentially be improved a bit. For the service monitoring feature, we can check for port status or cloud ping checks. We can check against domains and against IP addresses in the cloud. That's a feature that has been of a lot of use to us. However, it is a little bit lacking in some features compared to other solutions that we have also used in the past. We used to use another solution, and we wanted to transition this service over to Auvik since Auvik does largely the same thing. However, as we were migrating, we noticed specific features were missing, and we could not add some of the monitoring back into Auvik since there were some technical limitations. For example, if Auvik has an IP address for the domain you want to monitor, and if the domain does not respond, it will take it as the services down, and it's going to trigger the alert at that point. It does not check when giving out a ping request. It checks by just making an HTTP request to the website. However, basically, some websites that we manage do not respond back to ping requests based on safety settings and so on. So, we have to do HTTP checks to check if the service is up. However, Auvik does not support that at the time. 

I've used the solution for two years. 

Mostly, it works well. We do have some sites that seem to stress the platform a bit. We might have been over the edge when it happened, and that's the only time I have seen performance issues. 

It's really easy to scale. Previously, and I'm not sure if this is true any longer, you could not turn a single site over to a multi-site and vice versa. In that case, you may need to delete your current site, or sites, and migrate things over. 

Technical support is really good. They are really quick. I have no complaints. 

Positive

I've also used Datto. However, Datto provides actual infrastructure, whereas Auvik is just monitoring. They aren't quite the same. 

Setting up the solution is not difficult. We just have to make sure we have credentials for everything on the network. However, that's something that comes from our clients. As long as we have the credentials, it's pretty quick to set up. We had everything set up in about two weeks. 

However, if someone is not tech-savvy, they will see many unfamiliar terms. If someone has knowledge of API integrations, they'll have an easier time.

We tend to need two people for each deployment. Someone will take care of provisioning and collecting, and someone will do the technical setup within the platform.

There isn't really any maintenance needed. There may be alert tuning. Auvik does come with a lot of alerts that are already pre-built in. Some we disable, some we modify, and some we just create from scratch. 

I do not handle the licensing aspect of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten with my biggest complaint being the documentation and knowledge base, which is difficult to navigate.

We're an MSP. We're pretty much monitoring our client's network. 

We offer a full suite of outsourced IT management solutions. We use this as an internal tool, not something we sell to clients; it's mostly something we use internally to make life easier.

It's reduced manual workaround troubleshooting network incidents. It also works around alert management. We get alerts, and those alerts create a ticket in our ticketing system. When the power comes back, the ticket closes automatically. We can have zero-touch intervention. Previous to the solution, the process was much more manual and a person would have to go and see what was happening.

When it comes to network visibility, we can see incidents. We found a lot of issues with our billing system, for example, and that's probably the biggest value-add for us. 

The network monitoring is great.

The solution covers a bunch of things. It's designed to be MSP-focused, which is useful. Your clients are tenants, and you can set it up at a global level so that you can drill down at a client level. It makes it very scalable. That's the biggest pro for me. Once you set up things correctly, it can scale very easily. You can just keep adding clients. You don't have to touch anything beyond deploying a connector on-site.

The alerting and network mapping are the most important aspects of our organization.

The interface is intuitive and easy to use. It helps a lot with troubleshooting network issues. It's comprehensive. It gives us a real-time picture of what's happening. It's fairly easy to gain visibility. Once you have things set up correctly, it provides a lot of visibility.

The automation of alerts and ticketing has saved us about 30% to 40% of our time.

We've been able to decrease our mean time to resolution. It's hard to gauge an average, however. For some tickets, it's significant, and for others, it may not be that much. Likely, we've improved mean time to resolution by 15% to 20%.

Auvik has positively influenced our operational costs and productivity. It's saved us a lot of time in terms of manual human effort. Since we're saving time, we're saving costs. It's also allowed us to position ourselves as network management and network monitoring experts and perhaps target a few clients more on the network side of things that are more network-focused than just the MSP and IT support side of things.

Sometimes we run into a new switch, firewall, or router brand that the system doesn't manage or interpret. If they could expand the products they support, that would be ideal.

I've been using the solution for somewhere around two years.

The solution is absolutely stable. We haven't had any problems in two years. I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. I do get the odd email that warns that the service is down. However, it's usually during the night, and it resolves quickly.

Our clients are mostly small businesses. 

The scalability is excellent. I'd rate it ten out of ten. 

Both support and the onboarding process were excellent. They have the best technical support experience across any vendor we deal with. The first person you talk to actually knows what is going on. You don't have to wade through different levels of service. 

Positive

We did not use a different solution previously. We did have some scripts set up to run manually without RMM that would mostly check online/offline status. However, the system was very precarious. 

The initial setup came with a bit of a learning curve. Unless you've used the product before, it's a bit complex. However, they offer the best onboarding experience I've had with any vendor. I had a team of people at my disposal.

I mainly handled the deployment myself. It took a few months to implement. Then, when we onboarded a new employee, they also assisted. We were a bit understaffed at the outset, however, once I had the extra person, the implementation went much faster. 

Once it is set up, there is no maintenance needed. 

The vendor assisted with the setup. They were very helpful and answered all of our questions. It was very personalized. Their service is very good, which explains the price point. 

I was able to negotiate the price. The list price is pretty unaffordable. 

We did evaluate other options before choosing Auvik. Other products seemed a bit buggy. Auvik was also cheaper and had a lot more room for growth.

I'm a customer.

I'd recommend the solution to others. It's not a cheap tool and may not suit all MSPs; however, it works for us. While it can be hard to get clients and end-users to understand the value of network monitoring, they do provide a lot of resources that can help.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.