Auvik Network Management (ANM) Reviews

I used to work with an organization supporting multiple clients. We implemented Auvik Network Management for some of them, not all of them. 

It was interesting how fast Auvik Network Management could discover the network, how it kept monitoring it and updating us with alerts of any spikes in the traffic, and everything else. It was amazing.

Auvik Network Management reduced the downtime and sped up the recovery.

Auvik Network Management helped our entry-level technicians to solve more tickets on their own because it simplifies the process. It lets you find where the problems are faster. It gives you a clearer view of the situation, where you can see the complete network in front of you graphically. You can see all the devices and where the problem is. When you highlight one of them, you can see all the details.

Auvik Network Management decreased issues because it allowed us to monitor the entire network, all the devices, and check the alerts in a timely manner. We could deal with issues quickly.

The best feature of Auvik Network Management is simplicity. It is friendly to use. 

The dashboard is good. It gives a clear vision for all the aspects of the services that Auvik Network Management provides. We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.

I did not have the chance to go through all the aspects or services that Auvik Network Management provides, but what I dealt with was good, and there was not much to complain about. However, its pricing was a little bit higher. 

I used Auvik Network Management for a couple of months. It was implemented in 2024.

It was stable.

We dealt with different clients, from small to large ones. We used Auvik Network Management on all of them. It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.

We used their customer service directly. We did not rely much on the documentation. Whenever we had any issues, we used to call their support centers and book a meeting with them.

We had a couple of meetings with them. They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it. They had their own support, and we relied on them.

Positive

We used N-able previously. Auvik Network Management was implemented to replace N-able in a certain phase. N-able is similar to Auvik Network Management without the graphics, but it has alerting, monitoring, controlling, updating, and patching capabilities.

N-able is an old product. It is not as modern as Auvik Network Management. Auvik Network Management is easier to deal with and faster to get results from.

It was easy. Auvik Network Management was very easy to set up. It does everything by itself.

It was a matter of minutes to set it up. It did not take a long time to start gathering information. After we installed it on one of our machines, it started gathering information and drawing the network. It is very reliable.

The pricing was a little bit higher. They can work on that as everybody wants to save money.

I would rate Auvik Network Management a nine out of ten.

Our company develops its own software solutions and prioritizes user safety, particularly in Europe, where we focus on compliance and education regarding student protection online. This includes content like radicalization, drug exposure, and self-harm. To ensure our own SaaS-based service, offered in both Europe and the US, functions optimally, we utilize Auvik for infrastructure monitoring.

A major challenge has been keeping our on-call teams engaged. Previously, our lack of automation meant that someone had to wake up in the middle of the night to check tickets and logs, ensuring everything was running smoothly. However, Auvik's automation and reporting features have transformed our process. Now, we only get woken up proactively when something actually goes wrong, thanks to Auvik leveraging other tools in conjunction with its own functionalities. This has significantly improved our on-call experience.

Our network management solution, Auvik, is deployed across a hybrid cloud environment. We utilize a mix of cloud providers, including AWS in the UK and Canada, DigitalOcean in the UK, Amsterdam, Germany, France, India, Singapore, San Francisco, Virginia, and Toronto, and four of our own data centers located in the UK, North America, and Amsterdam.

Real-time network visibility was a key factor in choosing Auvik, made possible by its helpful network mapping. While we previously relied on other, more cumbersome software, Auvik's ease of use is a game-changer. Onboarding new employees takes just 20 minutes thanks to the intuitive interface. In contrast, our prior system required countless documents for even basic tasks like adding or removing a host or checking resource utilization. Thankfully, Auvik's intuitive design streamlines these processes.

Since implementing Auvik in April, we've only had one incident, which Auvik fortunately caught in real-time. We received notification within 40 seconds of the event, allowing us to swiftly address it. As the COO responsible for service delivery, I'm impressed. Previously, such issues might have gone unnoticed until the morning. Thankfully, with Auvik, we were up and running within five minutes, and full resolution followed shortly after. In essence, Auvik helped us reduce a potential outage from several hours to a mere 20 minutes.

We anticipated the benefits of Auvik upon deployment, and these expectations were confirmed two weeks later when we encountered an incident that was swiftly addressed.

Auvik has helped reduce our mean time to resolution from a few hours to a few minutes.

Auvik streamlines our network management by automating tasks like agent deployment and configuration. With SNMP enabled on new servers, Auvik automatically discovers them and adds them to the correct network map, saving us significant time compared to manual setup and troubleshooting.

The time savings are resulting in more time being dedicated to other tasks.

The way Auvik allows us to manage our infrastructure provides a top-level view of everything, solving several past issues. This includes streamlining on-call duties and maintaining an accurate asset inventory. Our deployment consists of one main site with 46 smaller sites, each running various cloud and production services. These can be managed individually, or we can leverage the top-level view for overall control, saving us time and money in the long run using Auvik.

While Auvik excels at out-of-the-box SNMP monitoring, a major selling point, maintaining services over time often requires custom development to ensure they function and transmit data properly. Ideally, Auvik could integrate the results from these custom applications and scripts directly, streamlining the monitoring process.

Auvik delivers on its core functionalities as advertised, with a smooth deployment and execution process. While the asset management features are helpful for basic network inventory, increased customization for data presentation would be beneficial. This could include integrating custom application results or incorporating data from our own monitoring scripts. It's important to remember that asset management isn't a core function of Auvik, but rather a bonus feature. While additional customization would be a welcome improvement, it's not a core expectation of the software.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for two months.

Auvik Network Management has been stable with no hiccups.

Auvik is handling our network workload well and shows no signs of scalability issues. Of course, we'll need to monitor performance as we grow and add more hardware, but for now, things are running smoothly.

My experience with their customer success team has been fantastic. They've even included technical support for review purposes during our calls.

Positive

We previously relied on a number of custom monitoring tools, including Nagios for system uptime and network capacity, and MRTG for generating graphs. These have all been replaced by Auvik, which provides these functionalities out of the box. We've also done away with internal alert triggers and manual asset lists, and now rely solely on Auvik in conjunction with PagerDuty for notifications and asset management, respectively. This has eliminated the need for maintaining separate spreadsheets and manual processes.

While Nagios is powerful, it demands significant effort and customization. In contrast, Auvik provides essential, out-of-the-box monitoring tools necessary to maintain network uptime. This ease of use allowed us to deploy it across 46 sites in under two hours.

The Auvik deployment started during the trial phase with a collector installed on a few test networks. After successful evaluation, transitioning to full production involved a simple firewall rule change and a one-page document outlining the rollout process, including a maintenance window and proper site naming. Since launch, the team has been fine-tuning the pre-configured alerts to minimize noise and ensure they only trigger when necessary.

One resource was required for the deployment.

Our team handled the deployment process ourselves, and Auvik's customer success team provided us with direct feedback throughout the process.

While traditional ROI might not apply since I don't resell Auvik, the return we're seeing is in engineer productivity. Auvik automates monitoring tasks, freeing them up for other projects. It's still early – only a month and a half – but so far it's been fantastic. We're tracking how much time is saved, and if this trend continues, Auvik will be a major success for our team.

Among the products considered, Auvik stood out for its competitive pricing. While Datadog was considerably more expensive, Auvik offered features and pricing similar to NetData. The Auvik team's customer success and account management teams impressed us with their ability to secure discounts and other incentives, making the deal even more attractive.

Our monitoring covers a large number of devices, well over 150 in total. While our billing reflects around 40 devices, most of these are Linux servers which are included in our monitoring package. This includes virtual machines where the servers reside, and we receive alerts for any issues like disk space, CPU usage, memory problems, or backup failures.

In our evaluation of several monitoring options, we considered Datadog for application monitoring, the new version of Nagios, and NetData for network monitoring. We also explored a few other possibilities. Ultimately, Datadog, Auvik, and NetData emerged as the frontrunners, undergoing extensive testing and trials to determine if they met our requirements.

While ease of deployment was a key factor in choosing Auvik, it wasn't the only one. As a Canadian company, Auvik did hold a certain patriotic appeal, but ultimately, it came down to features and price. Datadog and NetData were significantly more expensive for a production environment. We ruled out Nagios because migrating our existing setup wasn't feasible, meaning a complete rebuild. Thankfully, Auvik's deployment took less than two hours.

I would rate Auvik Network Management ten out of ten.

Auvik has been a key tool for simplifying our platform monitoring. Its intuitive user interface allows for easy navigation between instances, minimizing training time for junior staff. We've reduced onboarding sessions from multiple sessions to just a half hour, making it significantly easier for our new technicians to get up to speed.

One of the key reasons we chose Auvik was because of its minimal maintenance requirements, which is perfect for our small team. Since it's cloud-hosted, the collectors automatically upgrade themselves, so we don't need to worry about keeping up with updates or ensuring we're on the latest version – that's all handled by Auvik.

In my experience, Auvik stands out for its ease of use, especially during the trial period. Setting up trials in custom environments can be difficult, but Auvik's worked flawlessly. Their support was readily available, and their pricing was competitive with good value. Overall, it's a top choice for managing IT infrastructure.

Our corporation, headquartered in Ohio, operates across 36 locations in the United States and Canada under various brand names. These locations fall under different business segments: Roto Molding (Washington, Colorado, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio), Injection Molding and Plastics (Ohio, Missouri), Blow Molding (Oklahoma, Toronto), and Distribution (California, Utah, Texas, Central America, Massachusetts).

To manage this geographically dispersed network, we leverage Auvik. With a central data center in Atlanta and a backup in Houston, all locations are connected via SD-WAN. Auvik scans and tracks assets across all sites, notifying us of critical device outages, new device detections, configuration changes on network equipment (switches, routers, firewalls), and bandwidth or internet disruptions. Our main location acts as the master site, with individual locations as sub-sites. User access varies, with some having read-only privileges for specific segments and others having broader visibility. Importantly, during acquisitions, we deploy a new collector at the acquired site to scan their network before integration, allowing us to map their infrastructure before moving forward. With an active acquisition strategy of at least one per year, this process is crucial for seamless integration.

A standout feature of Auvik is its real-time network mapping. It provides a comprehensive overview but also allows for granular filtering. We can easily focus on specific elements, like only switches, their wireless access points, or even all wireless devices, making it an invaluable tool for network management.

The network map can get cluttered with information, but fortunately, it offers pre-filtered views and allows custom filtering as well. Many users might not be aware of this and might be struggling with the initial complexity. However, the ability to filter the view down to the most relevant details makes the overall functionality quite useful. I appreciate that the map provides a comprehensive view initially, while also empowering users to customize it for their needs.

The benefits of Auvik were clear from the start. Adding sites was a breeze, and the excellent training courses quickly got me up to speed. Since then, I've been using Auvik regularly, particularly to locate printers and conveniently connect to their web interfaces directly within the platform. It's a valuable tool for these tasks and more.

Auvik has significantly improved our mean time to resolution. Alerts ensure we're notified immediately of any downtime, and Auvik's centralized view of the network allows us to quickly diagnose issues. Furthermore, Auvik streamlines troubleshooting by enabling remote configuration of devices, saving valuable time in resolving problems.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on setup, maintenance, and issue resolution.

Auvik stands out for its user-friendly interface and its comprehensive configuration management features. I particularly appreciate the automated backup of configurations, centralized Syslog collection, and configuration comparison tool. This last feature allows us to easily see highlighted changes between previous and current configurations on switches, firewalls, and routers, which is invaluable for change management and understanding who made what modifications.

While Auvik excels in network management with a user-friendly interface, its customization and reporting features could benefit from improvement. Specifically, allowing more control over SNMP scans, like setting custom drive space alert thresholds instead of pre-defined values, would enhance flexibility. Similarly, the ability to tailor reports would be valuable. In contrast, PRTG shines in endpoint monitoring and alerting for servers due to its high level of customization. Lansweeper offers a wider range of reports, including custom and pre-configured options, making it a strong choice for detailed reporting needs. Overall, if Auvik could address these areas, it would solidify its position as a comprehensive network management solution.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for one year.

Auvik Network Management has been mostly reliable for us. While there have been a few outages, they haven't caused any major disruptions. My biggest concern was with occasional false positives, where devices were incorrectly identified as offline, then deleted and rediscovered. This caused some issues, but I recall receiving Auvik notifications about the problem, and it seems to be resolved now. Overall, things have been much smoother since then.

One of the key benefits of Auvik Network Management is its scalability. When we acquire a new site, setting up a collector and integrating it into the system is a breeze. Scanning and adding new sites is a smooth process. Currently, with two main collectors handling most of our locations, adding a third one seems unnecessary. However, as we continue to grow, strategically placing a third collector, potentially within the data center, might become beneficial.

The technical support team was both responsive and knowledgeable. While their answers on some of our tickets regarding server alert customization weren't always what we'd hoped for, it's understandable since this product isn't designed for server monitoring. After all, our billing isn't for network equipment. Overall, I was impressed with their support aside from these customization limitations.

Positive

Our IT toolset currently includes PRTG, Lansweeper, Wazuh, and Auvik. While consolidating everything into a single, unified solution might be ideal, we've discovered valuable functionalities within each of these existing tools. Therefore, we haven't replaced any and now manage four tools in total. Perhaps a single, all-encompassing tool will emerge in the future, but for now, this multi-tool approach is working effectively.

We realized the advantages of Auvik much quicker than with PRTG, Lansweeper, and Wazuh. This is due to Auvik's user-friendly interface, which is significantly easier to navigate than those of its competitors. While competing products offer greater customization, they are often more complex to set up and use. Auvik excels at guiding users, but this can come at the cost of some customization options. Once familiar with the software, customization in Auvik becomes slightly more challenging compared to some competitors, however, it remains the most user-friendly option.

The initial setup was straightforward and took a couple of months to complete. Five people from our end were involved with the deployment.

We worked with Auvik directly in the engagement team. And then our infrastructure team was primarily involved with getting it deployed.

Auvik's pricing structure is a perk. You only pay for the network devices you manage, like firewalls, routers, and switches. Computers, access points, and other devices Auvik scans are not billed. While their pricing aligns with competitors, the benefit of having these additional devices monitored for free makes Auvik a compelling option.

I would rate Auvik Network Management eight out of ten.

In addition to our participation in the beta program for endpoint monitoring which hasn't been a major focus yet, we're constantly on the lookout for a unified solution. Ideally, this unicorn product would offer everything we need – reporting, scanning detection, and alerting. Currently, we rely on a patchwork of tools like Auvik, PRTG, Lansweeper, and Wazuh. While consolidating everything into one solution might be wishful thinking, Auvik's feature set is particularly impressive, and we hope it might eventually encompass all our needs.

While our infrastructure division within IT restricts access to Auvik for entry-level technicians, we do provision read-only access to some other tools. For example, the information security department can view network maps and devices within these tools, which likely aids their visualization of our network connectivity. Overall, Auvik access is limited for most first-level technicians.

I use Auvik in a couple of ways. It is very good at keeping configuration files organized for us. We can review the changes to configuration files in our networking infrastructure equipment. It is also very good at creating maps and helping me visualize the troubleshooting of any infrastructure problems we have. 

By implementing Auvik Network Management, we were trying to get better visuals on our network and more transparency in our equipment because Auvik could talk to all of it. It was sort of agnostic. It did not require using a certain brand or anything. As long as you can SSH to it or terminal to it somehow, Auvik can read it.

At first, it was definitely just a new toy to play with, but I saw its benefits the first time we were trying to sort through an infrastructure problem with a Wi-Fi network that was older and having issues. We saw several warnings on several of our older switches. We would not have seen this stuff unless we had gone into these switches and read through these logs on our own, but Auvik was holding this data and giving us these warnings so that we could go in and sort out what was wrong.

It gives me all of my infrastructure points very well because I have programmed it to do so. In terms of individual endpoints or workstations for users, the visibility is not as excellent, but it is still good enough. We do not use the tool for that. For our purposes, it is a very clean interface.

Auvik has 100% helped to decrease our mean time to resolution. If I was not using Auvik to troubleshoot infrastructure problems, I would easily be adding another hour of work per problem or using another tool that was doing this. Everything is in one place, so I do not have to jump to different places to see the information. I can very easily filter through warnings and information.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on issue resolution but not on the setup and maintenance of the solution. Any time that we save allows us to do more research into something else that we are doing. There is always a value-add in shrinking troubleshooting time.

The interface is very good. I generally do not have any complaints about it. It takes me where I want to go and is easy to learn.

The dashboard is very easy to use if you set it up correctly at the beginning. We have it all labeled the way we want it to be labeled, and everything is quickly navigable. We can see all of our different locations. We can see any locations that have errors on our map so that we know exactly what to poke at and what to take a look at today. I have no complaints. With big networks, it does become cramped, but there are filters built into the map. I filter out the points I do not want displayed on the map, and then it is very readable.

There are a couple of items here and there that float around disconnected from the network map. That is annoying because they are defined as something that they are not. For example, I have a couple of workstations that it thinks are Wi-Fi access points, and it is a hard and tricky item to clean up. The cleanup or more granular functionality of the network map would be an interesting feature.

If there was a way to do some sort of remote desktop control for endpoints from Auvik, that would be an interesting feature because we have another product that we use for endpoint control to remote into somebody's computer. If Auvik had that, we might move from the other tool into the product that Auvik would offer. We already have that from Auvik to infrastructure devices, which is awesome, but if I could go one step further or one step down right to the workstation that has an issue, that would be a very interesting thing.

I have used it for at least three or four years.

It is better than it ever was. I feel like it was laggier when we first jumped on with Auvik, but over the last year, I have not even thought about any lag or stuttering.

It can be as big as it needs to be for us, but I am only familiar with how it is for us. It met our scale, and ours is medium.

The quality of support is very good. Everybody I have ever talked to in tech support over there or in training is very familiar with Auvik and very comfortable navigating people around it. They have a lot of confidence and capability. I am never disappointed in support.

Positive

For me, Auvik is pretty unique. I have not used many tools that:

• Create a map the way that Auvik does
• Have the configuration review that Auvik has
• Have SSH or terminal access to the tools that Auvik has

Auvik is all in one. I have used SNMP collectors and things but never had another tool like this.

It is deployed in the cloud. Its deployment was easy.

It was not very long to get it fully deployed. The training was longer than the deployment.

We had no consultant. It was Auvik and us.

You can set up Auvik with one person. As long as there is somebody from Auvik with you to do the training, you can set up the collectors yourself, for sure. 

In terms of maintenance, Auvik requires some review for the number of devices it is counting. We had an issue last year where we saw that Auvik was double-counting some of our devices, so we do have to audit the count to make sure that we are not being overcharged.

Auvik is expensive, but given how much we use it and how many hours it is saving over the year, it is justified.

There are no critical devices in our network that are monitored by Auvik at no charge. They are charging for everything. The first page you get to mentions how many devices you are paying for.

Auvik was our first choice because it fitted the use case that we wanted, which was the network control, and not a lot of things. When we started with Auvik, there were not a lot of solutions that offered that, or they were very expensive. Now we are staying with them because it is still good.

Pay attention during the training and definitely play with it after or during the training. Play with your release so that you can ask the questions that are relevant to your network.

We did a demo of SaaS Management with Auvik, and it was very interesting, but the price point was too high for us to justify the capabilities.

I would rate Auvik Network Management a nine out of ten because of the billing thing from last year where we were being double charged. That was disappointing to find out, but we have cleared it up now.

We are a managed service provider. We use it for our customers, and we use it internally for our own network as well.

By implementing this solution, like most people who have to manage networks, the first thing we wanted was to monitor and see what is on our network. 

The network map along with its dashboard gives full network visibility.

Auvik Network Management is helpful for our engineers. We are structured a bit differently. We do not, as such, have entry-level engineers on our team. Our engineers already have pretty good knowledge of these things, but it does help them quite a bit. They do use it.

It has helped to decrease our mean time to resolution, but it is hard to compare the numbers. From the time I have been here, we have had Auvik. I do know that we use it quite often when there are issues. It is most likely the first place we check to make sure that the device is offline or to check for any alerts that might have been generated.

Auvik Network Management has helped us quite a bit with the issue resolution. It helps us trace certain things. It tries to map out as best what devices are connected to certain interfaces. In the past, we have used that quite a bit to troubleshoot when certain things were down.

Its user interface is easy when it comes to where things live. Navigating to certain places and things like that is easy. The other part of the user interface is their map, which has not been the greatest. When I had to search for a device using the map, I found that difficult. They have implemented something to address that. It came out a month or two ago, where when I search for a device, it will automatically bring up that device. I can click on it, and then it will zoom into the device, whereas before, I had to go look for it.

Being able to terminal into the devices without going anywhere else is valuable. All of it can be done within Auvik.

The backups of the configuration seem to work for the most part. I have not had any issues with them. I have used a couple of other solutions, such as WhatsUp Gold which had a lot of issues with making backups, and so far, from what I see, Auvik just works.

Auvik's network map along with its dashboard gives a real-time picture of our network. However, if a device is unreachable, there is no indicator for that, at least from what I have seen. If it is offline, there is an indicator for that, but if it is unreachable, there is no indicator.

The network map is hard to use to gain real-time visibility into our network. We have some bigger sites, and we have all of it in one Auvik site instead of having multiple. If I am trying to look for devices in a particular building, I have to do a couple of different things. I wish there were views that I could save and say, "This view is for this first floor." They do have views, but there is no easy way for me to go and find those views. When you have too many of them, that becomes an issue because they start getting cut off by the pages.

Alerting can also be better. There are limited options. We cannot create alerts that are not there in the system. There are no custom alerts. That might be something that I would like to see more.

I have been using this solution for a year and a half.

So far, we have not had a whole lot of issues with stability. I know that there were a couple of times when Auvik seemed very sluggish and slow, and we did not get any notifications about it. Later on, when we reached out to support, they said that they were experiencing some issues. Over the year and a half that I have used it, that has probably happened twice.

I find it pretty scalable. Because we are an MSP, we are having to add multiple customers. We do not have a whole lot right now; we only have three, but so far, there are no issues there. I do not see any issues there for adding more customers.

I have interacted with their support. Their support is not that great. Usually, I use the chatbot on Auvik's portal. Most of the time, it is very difficult to get a full answer to what I am looking for. They usually have to take it back and research or discuss it with their team. They will send an email for the follow-up, but sometimes, it takes a really long time to get a follow-up email about the resolution. Usually, by that point, I would have already figured out the issue, or the resolution is no longer needed. It could be because we decided not to do that. I cannot remember exactly what type of resolutions those are, but I know that sometimes, it just takes a long time or it does not point me to the right resolution.

In terms of speed, they are pretty quick in answering, but the resolution can take time. I would rate them a seven out of ten.

Neutral

I am not aware of any other product being used in my current company.

I have used alternatives to Auvik in other companies. I have used WhatsUp Gold. I have used Zabbix. I have briefly used SolarWinds.

To me, Auvik has been better in almost everything. Zabbix is a very powerful tool, but at the time I used it, it required a lot of setup. Getting it to work required a lot of setup work. Auvik also requires some setup work, but it is a little bit easier. You just have to get the credentials in. Everything is scanned. The collector does the rest once you have everything in there.

One thing that I do not like about WhatsUp Gold is that you have to install it on a Windows machine. It uses a SQL database to store all of its information, so you have to do upgrades or migrations. I had to do that. It is just more work, whereas, with Auvik, if you need to move something or migrate, you just spin up a new collector and shut down the other one. There is really no impact. WhatsUp Gold also had issues running backups of configuration, whereas, with Auvik, I have not had any issues on that front. The only thing that WhatsUp Gold does better is to allow you to do an SNMP walk on your devices, so you can see the OIDs and all the information that is being pulled, whereas, with Auvik, you do not have any of that on the portal itself.

When I joined the company, Auvik was already in place. 

Its deployment is easy. It is more about making sure that all the devices on your network have everything configured. Auvik just takes in whatever you provide. You need to set up new SSH credentials on every device so that Auvik can read it. So far, I have not had too many issues with the setup.

It takes some time to see its benefits after the deployment. I came into Auvik pretty new. At the initial stage, you have all your devices there. They are all being monitored, but once you start getting all the credentials, traffic insights, and Syslogs and you get all the information configured, you start seeing the full benefit of Auvik.

It does not impact the setup of devices at all. I cannot do anything unless the device is connected to Auvik. We need to use the terminal session on that, but not every device is supported in that way. It is pretty limited, but it helps out a little bit on that. In terms of Auvik setup, if we are putting devices in, as soon as the device is scanned, it automatically gets put into Auvik. Maintenance-wise, there is very little required on the maintenance side. The only thing that we need to do in terms of device maintenance is to put the current firmware. If we are going to be implementing a patch, most likely, we are doing that on the device itself. We can terminal in from Auvik itself without having to VPN into the client network.

The number of people required for deployment depends on the environment. It depends on how many devices are on the site and how much access we have. It generally requires two people.

The time taken for deployment also depends on the size of the site. It can take ten hours if we are just straight working and trying to get it set up.

There is no maintenance as such. The maintenance is mostly in terms of cleaning up devices. There can be devices that need to be removed from Auvik because those devices have been removed from the network.

I do not have a whole lot of information on the pricing, but our pricing seems to be okay. Internally, we have not had any issues with it, so we have not had the need to discuss pricing.

My advice to new users would be that in order to have a smooth setup, they need to put in the time to set up their devices. They have to make sure all the devices have proper login credentials, SNMP credentials, and NetFlow setup if you are using NetFlow. After you have all of these set up, it is very simple. From what I have seen from other deployments, when those things are not set up, people seem to think that it does not work. It all depends on the devices.

We used Auvik's SaaS Management product for a month. To me, it seems like a whole separate module. We only used it for a short period for demoing it internally, but I did not see any benefit from having them together. It almost seems like a separate product. Overall, as a product, we definitely liked it. It provided a lot of information. We were testing it internally for our own company before trying to sell it to our customers, but it came back to pricing in terms of whether it was worth it to have this information on our users based on the price. For us, there was not a use case for it. Also, none of our customers have reached out with any interest in having SaaS management. The Auvik rep that I had talked to had mentioned that this came out because a lot of people were asking about it, but none of our customers asked about it. It just did not seem like a product we could push. I would recommend Auvik's SaaS Management product if someone is looking for this type of information.

Overall, I would rate Auvik Network Management a nine out of ten.

We're using Auvik right now for switch backups and general network monitoring.

The switch backups are great. If a switch goes down or gets fried, we can just plug in a new switch and be good to go. 

Its interface is pretty intuitive.

The network map, on the main dashboard when you log on, offers general topography. While I have in my head where everything is, it's nice to have a visual reminder.

The solution is easy to use. It gives you full net visibility. You can dig pretty deep in, and it'll show everything - from server to switches to access points. 

We realized the value of the solution pretty fast. We already had it and we brought it back. We knew what we needed.

It does help with some use cases and would allow for entry-level technicians to solve more tickets on their own. We are a two-person team, so we don't have too many concerns in that respect.

Overall, it's pretty straightforward.

We spend less time on setup and maintenance. If we have a switch we need replaced, we can just copy the configuration, and that saves a lot of time. 

There are spots in the interface that could use a little more work as it is congested with a lot of information in one spot.

We had the solution a year or two ago, then ended our subscription, then about three or four months ago, resubscribed. We had a change of staff at the time and didn't see the value, and then ended up regaining it once we saw that it offered features we needed. 

I have never had any issues with the Auvik even being slow. It's always been very responsive for me.

The solution should scale well. If we added another store, it would be pretty straightforward. 

I've never reached out to technical support.

We didn't have a direct competitor to Auvik. We do have Cisco, which has some similar functionalities.

I did the initial setup with the team. I went and installed it on a few switches and enabled DHCP and SSH, et cetera. The implementation was pretty straightforward. The setup took around 30 minutes to an hour. 

We do not have to handle any maintenance. We get the alerts and deal with those directly.

Auvik assisted us and we had an initial setup call during deployment. They ran us through the setup of one switch and showed us a few features.

I wasn't involved with purchasing; I can't speak to licensing costs. 

I'm a customer. 

I'd rate the solution a solid nine out of ten. I'd advise users to be prepared to go into all network devices and make sure they are talking to Auvik and reporting back. Just make sure you're spending a few hours getting it all setup.

As an MSP, we install Auvik on our managed service clients' networks to gain a comprehensive view of their network layout. This allows us to monitor overall network health, receive performance metrics, and identify outages across all SNMP-manageable devices like firewalls and switches. While Auvik excels in network device monitoring, we rely on other tools for managing aspects like Windows systems.

In larger environments, we typically deploy a dedicated agent directly on the network for comprehensive scanning and monitoring. For smaller environments, a cloud-based agent provides a more efficient solution.

Auvik provides a close to real-time picture of our network.

Integrating with a network map might seem straightforward, but the complexity depends on the network size. Larger networks require more effort. Fortunately, most of our clients have relatively small setups, typically one to two sites, two to three firewalls, and five to six switches. This keeps our integration time to a maximum of thirty minutes, making it a quick process to get them up and running.

While entry-level technicians don't heavily rely on Auvik for troubleshooting itself, they do benefit from its automated ticketing system. Auvik alerts them to device outages, allowing them to perform basic troubleshooting. If the issue persists, they can escalate the ticket to an engineer, who can then leverage both the technician's initial efforts and the information provided by Auvik for further diagnosis.

Auvik has significantly improved our ability to resolve issues quickly. It saves me at least 30 minutes per ticket because I no longer need to remote into individual network environments and run diagnostic tools manually. With Auvik, I can pull up an overview of the network, saving valuable time on troubleshooting, updates, and other tasks.

Auvik allows us to spend less time on setup, maintenance, and issue resolution.

I like Auvik's detailed device dashboards that show everything from uptime to configuration revisions. The new Northstar feature is particularly useful for troubleshooting network path issues. When someone reports slowness or connectivity problems, Northstar quickly maps the device's connection path, helping pinpoint or narrow down where the problem might lie.

Auvik's interface can appear cluttered at times, reflecting its feature-rich nature, but despite some occasional messiness, it remains fairly intuitive for new users.

It would be helpful to suppress credential prompts for specific sites in Auvik. Currently, we have to dismiss the "enter credentials" or "new devices found" alerts for each site, which can be repetitive. An ideal solution would be a per-site checkbox to indicate that we've discovered all the devices we expect on that network and don't want to be prompted for credentials again. This would streamline our workflow and eliminate the need to dismiss repetitive messages.

While Auvik offers good integrations with SNMP, WMI, and VMware, there's room for improvement with Hyper-V, a platform we heavily rely on. Additionally, enhanced UPS integration would be valuable, particularly for alerting on critical events like a switch to battery power, which currently seems to be missing. This limitation may be specific to our UPS setup, but improved UPS monitoring within Auvik would be beneficial.

The speed and performance can be improved.

I have been using Auvik Network Management for two years.

Auvik Network Management can be a bit slow at times, causing us to wait for it to fully load information. While it doesn't crash frequently, occasional lags can interrupt the workflow.

Our experience with Auvik's scalability is positive. While very large networks with many sites and devices can experience slow loading times, this isn't a concern for most of our clients, who typically have just a few sites. For the handful of larger clients we do have, sub-dividing their networks into smaller groups has mostly addressed performance issues. Even our largest client, with its complex network of eight core switches, 20 labs, and a main firewall, only experiences minor slowdowns when loading everything at once. Overall, Auvik's scalability seems well-suited for the needs of our client base.

In the past, I reached out to Auvik support a few times regarding general SNMP issues, where I had trouble getting Auvik to communicate properly with some devices.

My communication with Auvik technical support was via email, a back-and-forth process with replies within a few hours, which is fairly typical. While it took a few days to resolve and initially involved directing me to the knowledge base, the support escalated to someone who identified the specific fix needed. Overall, it wasn't exceptional but certainly not substandard either.

Neutral

The overall setup of Auvik is straightforward. One person is enough to handle the deployments.

I would rate Auvik Network Management nine out of ten.

Having used similar network monitoring tools in the past, I was already somewhat familiar with the core functionality of Auvik when I joined the organization.

I recommend Auvik Network Management. While the training and documentation are helpful, hands-on experience is key. In my case, after reading the manual, I dove right in with a client's network and spent a few hours exploring the software. This practical learning made a big difference during my first rollout, as I had a much better understanding of Auvik's capabilities. Having prior experience with network monitoring tools like Nagios and OpenNMS helped as well, since they share a similar core concept of agent-based monitoring and network mapping. This familiarity made Auvik relatively easy to pick up.

We use Auvik to gain visibility into our network across multiple locations. 

If you only want a better overview of your network, you will see the benefits immediately. And if something happens a few months later, you will have a powerful troubleshooting tool. It's a single pane of glass where you can see all your devices and try to coordinate between them to figure out where you have problems. It allows you to troubleshoot faster. 

Auvik helps entry-level technicians solve more tickets without assistance. Everything is laid out in the interface, and it gives suggestions about how to remedy a problem. For example, Auvik will highlight mistakes in a configuration between different devices and say, "Hey, you missed something." Our junior staff are not necessarily troubleshooting. They're often collecting information for a high-level engineer, and they can gather that information more easily. It will be easier for the senior engineer to troubleshoot faster. The more information you have at your fingertips, the better. 

Auvik enables you to export all your ports on your switch, and when they are connected to the switch, Auvik lets you set up a battery. For example, we are in the middle of a data center migration, and this feature was helpful. 

We have multiple locations, and navigating or switching between them is easy. It was quite straightforward to implement. The automatic network discovery feature makes things simple.  Sometimes, you might find switches that you didn't realize existed. Of course, it depends on how well-organized you are. 

Auvik comes with multiple automatic alerts, which you can tweak to make it more helpful. For example, we had a couple of devices connected to some ports that were showing many dropped packets. We had no idea about this before we implemented Auvik. It allowed us to troubleshoot all the problems and gave us alerts about the misconfigurations. 

You need to have a little technical expertise, but the interface is well-designed. There are still a few things that they can improve, but Auvik listens to the customers. If I tell them I want to see something, they usually put it on the roadmap. 

Auvik's network map gives you close to a real-time picture of the network if you set it up properly. For instance, if I have connectivity issues between two devices, I can see a warning message, and it's flagged on the network map in a different color.  

The alerts can always be improved. I have raised this issue with Auvik, and they are working to fix the event correlation and alerts. There is always room to improve the interface. When you have multiple sites, it would be nice to have a way to see the connectivity between them. I have one extension between my data centers, so I'd like to see if something goes down or if I cannot point to anything on my side.

They have a drop-down on the left to connect to your disconnected location. They call them locations. There is a map on the higher level where you see where your data centers are located, and you see a color code for an error or a warning in a location. However, you can't see if the communication between the two locations is up and running properly.

We have used Auvik for about six to eight months.

I haven't had any problems with Auvik's stability. They give us advanced notice when there will be downtime for maintenance. 

It's hard to say how scalable Auvik is. I only have three data centers. We've had some meetings with them where we've talked about adding more locations. It's scalable enough for our needs. Adding another data center won't be an issue. 

I rate Auvik customer support 10 out of 10. Their support is excellent, and their AI chat is helpful. When I have questions, the chatbot quickly points me in the right direction. It connects me immediately if I need to talk to one of their technical people. You'll get a callback in five minutes. 

Positive

We didn't have a tool like Auvik, but we used a combination of tools that did the same thing but were not within the same pane of glass. Auvik's advantage is that it gives you a unified view of all your different departments. If I wanted to troubleshoot something, I had to manually go to each switch and correlate the event. Now, I have them all in one place.

We have VMware, and we installed the Auvik agent as a virtual machine. The rest is uploaded to the cloud, so you could consider it a hybrid deployment. The implementation was straightforward. We primarily handled the implementation ourselves, but we go through an MSP model for the licenses. The initial deployment was short. It took us a couple of days per site. We spent some additional time fine-tuning and customizing things. We had a two-person team for all three sites. 

Auvik's licensing model is straightforward and easy to understand. You only pay for the network devices, not endpoint machines. For example, if I have 100 machines attached to one network device, I will buy a license for one device instead of 100 machines. I feel like it's a good value. 

I rate Auvik nine out of 10. It helps during implementation to have solid information about your environment's configuration. That will help speed up the implementation because it uses SMP to collect data from your devices. It helps to know your public and private keys and the versions of all your devices.