What is our primary use case?
My primary use case for Automation Anywhere was accounts receivable automation, where bank statements arrive by email in different formats and the process requires collecting attachments and normalizing transaction data, checking dates and amounts and removing duplicates, and after this we have to prepare valid records for SAP and the bot should also capture posting outcomes and prepare a reconciliation report so that the business end users can get a wide view and a report on what the bot has done and what the outcome is.
Handling different email formats and attachments in Automation Anywhere is straightforward; we just need to add the Outlook configuration tool and use its activities, and as soon as we get an email from a respective user, we use regex and download all attachments and place them in a shared folder where the bot will have access to it and can start processing the workflow.
I utilize document automation in my current processes, where data comes in semi-structured or unstructured documents such as invoices, and at each stage, there are multiple activities that we need to perform, crucial for the document processing workflow.
We have not implemented agentic blended execution, but at the POC level, we have implemented the agentic blended feature, where we would actually need agents for the brain to think and respond when small parts of human intelligence are required.
How has it helped my organization?
Automating back-office processes and automation workflows has positively impacted my organization, as before automating, the human effort has been significantly reduced, and we can cut off three to four hours of their work per day and reduce it by using this bot, reducing the daily task from four hours to 30 minutes and saving three and a half hours per day or 70 hours over 20 working days.
I have worked on document automation, specifically where the data arrives in semi-structured or unstructured documents such as invoices, and the workflow extracts fields, applies validation rules and routes uncertain results for review, especially in finance, where we need to validate invoice number, supplier, date, currency, amount and any available purchase orders.
Automation Anywhere has helped us achieve significant automation goals, as before automating, two to three humans performed the same task and using Automation Anywhere, we cut down the daily task from four to five hours to 30 minutes.
Document automation has saved around 30 hours a week and around 200 hours per month, helping us significantly in reducing time.
What is most valuable?
Automation Anywhere offers many best features.
A couple of the features that stand out to me the most are the Control Room, which helps organizations control production access and avoid mixing development changes, as separating the roles helps organizations control production access and avoid mixing development changes, and the workload management, which handles independent transactions into work items, and each element is really helpful.
With respect to analytics, Automation Anywhere also provides packages where we can add more analytical features; for example, once we complete performing a reconciliation or automation workflows, we require an analytical report for business end-users so that they can have a better understanding of what the bot has performed.
Governance and security are important for an organization, as when we create an agent and deploy it on a server, we must be very careful because data governance and security are paramount, and Automation Anywhere provides governance and security where one can believe and adhere to it.
Regarding Automation Anywhere's AI capabilities, the accuracy and reliability of output is very high, especially with the healing agents, which is beneficial when certain selectors have been changed.
I used Automation Anywhere's AI Agent Studio when it was in staging phase, in the pre-deployment phase, and I had a good experience working in the AI Agent Studio where we can provide user prompts, system prompts, and knowledge base that acts as context around the agents.
What needs improvement?
Automation Anywhere is best, though it could bring more edge cases where users can interact with conversational agents and coded agents; it is still effective.
With respect to the user interface, everything works well, but the community expects more clear documentation with respect to use cases and end-to-end use cases, so one can understand how to handle these scenarios effectively.
Automation Anywhere has been significantly improving and working on additional cases and improvements they can come up with.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Automation Anywhere for two years, and it has helped very much, proving most valuable when it comes to automation, with relevant capabilities like Control Room and other tools where we can use it and perform exact automations.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Automation Anywhere is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Automation Anywhere's scalability is good, as scaling requires both execution capability and design that allows work to be distributed across multiple bots.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is very good, as they are supportive and resolve issues we face within two to three days.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have been using UiPath as well, and both offer RPA development and application integration, document processing capabilities, where I test the same workflow on both platforms and compare the development effort.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment, as we have been reducing manual effort and a four to six hours task that a human completed, the bot is doing in 30 minutes, showing significant improvement when automating a workflow.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
With respect to pricing, I evaluate it as a full cost of ownership and I believe it is not too high, as a high volume process can justify higher costs if the measurable savings are strong.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Automation Anywhere, we would evaluate it with UiPath and compare costs to determine which platform offers the best value for our needs.
What other advice do I have?
Automation Anywhere is deployed in our organization on a public cloud for internal use, while for client services, we deploy it on-premises, where they would have their own servers and dedicated laptops.
For our public cloud deployments, we predominantly use Azure and AWS.
I would advise starting with stable and repetitive processes and establish a stable version control environment, securing credentials and handling exceptions effectively to ensure success.
I would rate Automation Anywhere a nine out of ten because it has helped us in each and every aspect by improving the ROI and reducing the human headcount, as it has all the relevant capabilities to improve automation outcomes.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner